Women have nearly achieved gender parity across India's higher education system, but remain significantly underrepresented in the country's premier engineering institutions. Illustration/EdPublica
Women in IITs remain significantly underrepresented even as India has nearly closed the gender gap in higher education. Drawing on the latest government data, this analysis examines why elite engineering institutions continue to lag behind national trends, and what the disparity reveals about the country’s STEM education pipeline.
Walk into any Central University classroom in India today and you will find, on average, roughly as many women as men. Walk into an IIT lecture hall and the ratio flips hard: for every woman, there are more than three men. Both classrooms sit under the same ministry, funded from the same budget, governed by the same national policy. Only one of them has moved with the country.
That contrast is the story. India’s higher education system, taken as a whole, has quietly crossed a line few people are talking about: women are no longer under-represented in Indian classrooms. They are, on the official numbers, slightly ahead. The country’s most prestigious technical institutes have not caught up to that shift. Some have barely moved at all.
The national picture: parity, and then some…
The government’s own numbers make the “closing gap” claim hard to argue with. The Gender Parity Index for higher education — the ratio of female to male Gross Enrolment Ratio — stood at 1.08 in 2023-24, per the All India Survey on Higher Education. That means female participation has now outpaced male participation, and has done so for seven straight years. Female GER climbed to 31.2 against 30.0 for men. Women make up 49.5 percent of undergraduate students, 56.2 percent of postgraduate students, and 49.8 percent of those pursuing a PhD.
The shift is sharpest in STEM. Women accounted for 44 percent of STEM enrolment nationally in 2023-24, up from 38.4 percent a decade earlier — a jump of nearly six points at a time when STEM enrolment itself crossed one crore students for the first time. Female enrolment in higher education overall grew 42 percent between 2014-15 and 2023-24, outpacing the growth rate for men.
By any reasonable reading, the story of Indian higher education over the past decade is a story of women closing in on parity, then passing it.
Illustration/S James/EdPublica
Women in IITs: Why India’s Elite STEM Still Lags
Set that 44 percent national STEM figure next to enrolment at the Indian Institutes of Technology, and the number stops looking like part of the same trend. As of 2023-24, women make up 23.7 percent of students enrolled across India’s IITs — 35,534 out of 1,49,839, according to a written reply the Ministry of Education gave in the Lok Sabha on 3 August. Barely half the national STEM average. Roughly one woman for every three men.
This is not a new problem breaking through — it is an old one that never moved while everything around it did. A 2021 government report already flagged that female enrolment was lowest at India’s Institutes of National Importance, the category that includes the IITs, even as the national Gender Parity Index was crossing 1.0 for the first time that year. Four years on, the national figure has kept climbing. The IIT figure has not caught up.
The Pipeline Begins Long Before IIT
The imbalance does not begin with the Joint Entrance Examination. It begins much earlier in the education system. Although girls now enrol in higher education at slightly higher rates than boys, they remain less likely to choose the mathematics and physics combinations that dominate engineering entrance examinations. Researchers studying gender participation in STEM have long argued that educational choices are shaped well before university admissions—by social expectations, access to coaching, family perceptions of engineering careers, and the absence of women role models in technical fields. By the time students sit for JEE Advanced, much of the gender gap has already been built into the pipeline.
The quota is already doing more work than the headline number suggests…
Here is where the story gets sharper, not softer. The 23.7 percent enrolment figure is not what the entrance exam alone would produce — it is propped up by policy.
Since 2018, IITs have reserved 20 percent of seats for women through a supernumerary quota — extra seats added on top of the regular intake, not carved out of it. Data from IIT Kanpur’s Joint Implementation Committee reports, compiled by Careers360 across five admission cycles, shows what that quota is compensating for. In JEE Advanced 2024, only 16.5 percent of qualifying candidates were women — 7,964 out of 48,248. In 2025, that share rose to 17.3 percent, still the highest qualification rate for women in five years at 21.7 percent of female registrants clearing the cut-off, up from 18.7 percent in 2021.
Run the comparison straight: without the quota lifting enrolment above what the merit list alone would produce, IIT campuses would likely look closer to 1 woman in 6, not 1 in 4. The quota is not a symbolic gesture. It is currently responsible for roughly a third of the female presence on IIT campuses.
There is a second detail in the same data worth sitting with. The number of seats reserved for women under the quota grew from 1,534 in 2021 to 3,664 in 2025. But the ratio of qualifying women to reserved seats fell over the same period, from 4.2 women per seat to 2.56. The quota was once heavily oversubscribed. It is becoming less so — not because fewer women are qualifying, but because the seat pool reserved for them has grown faster than the pool of qualifying candidates. What that means for the IITs’ own targets, and whether it changes how the quota is administered, is a question for the institutes and the Joint Admission Board to answer directly.
Policy can widen access. It cannot create applicants.
The supernumerary quota has undoubtedly increased the number of women studying at the IITs, but it also highlights the limits of admission policy. Expanding seats can improve representation inside campuses only if enough women choose the engineering pathway in the first place. The data suggest that the next phase of reform may lie less in admissions policy than in strengthening the school-to-STEM pipeline, encouraging girls to pursue mathematics and physics, and addressing the social barriers that shape career choices long before students apply to an IIT.
If the story were simply “elite science education is hostile to women,” the IISERs would be expected to look like the IITs. They don’t. Women make up 40.9 percent of enrolment across India’s Indian Institutes of Science Education and Research — 4,760 of 11,646 students — a figure that tracks close to the national STEM average of 44 percent rather than falling dramatically short of it, as the IITs do.
The IISERs are smaller institutions, and their admissions route has changed recently: from 2024, entry runs solely through the IISER Aptitude Test rather than the mix of JEE Advanced and KVPY scores used earlier. Gender-wise qualification data for the IAT was not available in the reporting for this piece.
Even without that data, the enrolment figure alone complicates any narrative that treats “elite STEM” as a single, uniformly male-dominated category. It isn’t. The IITs are the outlier within their own peer group, not a representative case of it.
A Different Institute, A Different Kind of Gap
The IIMs offer a third pattern entirely — and it runs in the opposite direction from the IITs.
Women made up 36.2 percent of candidates who registered for CAT 2024, the entrance exam that feeds India’s top management institutes, and 36.5 percent of those who actually appeared for it, according to IIM Calcutta’s official results release: 1.07 lakh female candidates out of 2.93 lakh who sat the exam. That is a healthier starting pool than the IITs manage at the JEE Advanced stage.
But final IIM enrolment in 2023-24 stood at 32.8 percent women — 7,552 of 22,997 students. The share drops by roughly four points somewhere between sitting the exam and being admitted. Unlike the IITs, there is no supernumerary quota at the IIMs to catch that fall. Something in the process between the written test and the final offer — the Written Ability Test and Personal Interview round, work-experience weighting, or something else entirely — appears to filter out women at a higher rate than men, even though they enter that stage in roughly equal proportion to their share of the exam-taking pool.
What exactly causes that drop is not something the enrolment numbers can answer. It would take conversations with admissions faculty at individual IIMs, and ideally interview-stage data broken down by gender, which institutes do not routinely publish.
What The Government Says It’s doing
The same Lok Sabha reply that supplied the enrolment numbers also points to a policy response, still in its early stages. The Union Budget for 2026-27 announced five university townships near major industrial and logistics corridors, and one girls’ hostel in every district, funded partly through viability gap financing, with the explicit stated aim of encouraging enrolment of girls in STEM institutes and courses. The announcement recognises a reality often overlooked in debates on gender and STEM: access is not determined by entrance examinations alone. For many students, especially those from smaller towns and rural districts, the availability of safe accommodation, reliable transport and affordable living arrangements can determine whether an admission offer is accepted at all. Whether these measures translate into higher enrolment will become clearer over the next few admission cycles. Since 2014, the government has also added 16 Indian Institutes of Information Technology, 8 Central Universities, 8 IIMs, 7 IITs, 2 IISERs and 12 new AIIMS — expansion that, on its own, does not address the gender composition within any of them.
Whether the hostel and township announcements move the IIT number in the way the supernumerary quota already has remains to be seen; neither has produced an admission cycle yet. Worth tracking, not yet worth crediting.
A Different Question
Three institutes, three different relationships to the same national trend. IISERs already look like the rest of the country’s STEM classrooms. IITs sit at less than half the national average, and would sit lower still without a policy intervention doing quiet, substantial work behind the headline figure. IIMs start with a reasonably representative applicant pool and lose ground to it before anyone is admitted.
India’s higher education story has entered a new phase. The question is no longer whether women are entering universities—they are. The more difficult challenge is ensuring they are equally represented in the institutions that educate the country’s future engineers, researchers, technology entrepreneurs and scientific leaders.
The national data suggest that India has largely solved one problem while another remains unfinished. Gender parity has become the norm across much of higher education. Elite technical education, however, continues to tell a different story. Closing that gap may require looking beyond admissions policies and examining the educational, social and economic factors that shape aspirations years before students ever fill out an application form.
Dipin Damodharan is an award-winning journalist, editor and media entrepreneur, and Co-founder and Editor-in-Chief of EdPublica, an independent global media platform covering education, science, research, innovation, climate and public policy. With more than a decade of experience in journalism, he has worked across print, digital and multimedia media. His reporting explores science, climate, sustainability and the social impact of research and innovation. His work has been recognised by the Solutions Journalism Network and other journalism organisations.
Standing with Teachers: The People Who Shape India’s Future
Standing with teachers means supporting their professional growth, working conditions and role in shaping India’s future amid rapid technological change.
Standing with teachers means more than celebrating them on World Teachers’ Day. It means giving them the support, professional autonomy and working conditions needed to shape India’s future.
Every year, World Teachers’ Day gives us a chance to speak about teachers. But 5 October 2026 is more than another day of appreciation. This year marks 60 years of the 1966 ILO/UNESCO Recommendation concerning the Status of Teachers, and the theme, set by UNESCO with the ILO, UNICEF and Education International, is “Standing with teachers: 60 years of protecting the profession, advancing its status and shaping our futures.” Respect for teachers cannot remain a ceremonial idea. It must become a continuing social and educational responsibility.
Standing With Teachers in a Changing Education System
India has always given the teacher an important place. From the traditional gurukula system to the modern classroom, the teacher has been more than a person who delivers lessons. A teacher has been a guide, a mentor, a listener and, often, a source of confidence for a young person. The subjects taught in a classroom may be forgotten with time, but the encouragement received from a good teacher can last a lifetime.
The teacher’s role, however, is changing rapidly. Students today live in a world of smartphones, social media, artificial intelligence and unlimited digital information. A student can find an explanation for almost any question within seconds. This does not make the teacher less important. In many ways, it makes the teacher more important.
Information is not the same as knowledge, and knowledge is not the same as wisdom. Students need someone who can help them tell reliable information from misinformation, understand different points of view, ask meaningful questions and develop the confidence to think independently. Technology can provide information, but education also requires human understanding.
This is why the teacher of the future cannot be seen simply as a provider of content. The teacher must increasingly become a mentor and a facilitator of learning. Technology should remain a tool in the teacher’s hands, not a substitute for the teacher. Artificial intelligence can explain a concept, but it cannot fully understand the circumstances, emotions, aspirations and difficulties of every student in a classroom.
The human relationship between teacher and student remains at the heart of education.
India also needs to think seriously about the professional status of teachers. Respect should not be limited to Teachers’ Day speeches, greetings and awards. A profession is respected only when its practitioners receive adequate professional support, opportunities for continuous learning, reasonable working conditions and a meaningful voice in decisions that affect education.
UNESCO’s concept note for this year describes teacher status in three parts: symbolic, meaning how far teaching is valued; professional, meaning autonomy, support and a voice in policy; and material, meaning salaries, workloads and working conditions. It adds that the world needs 50 million more teachers by 2030 to meet the global education goal.
Teachers are expected to do much more than teach. They prepare lessons, assess students, maintain records, attend meetings and activities, communicate with parents and often respond to children’s social and emotional needs. These responsibilities require time, training and institutional support. The quality of education therefore depends not only on curriculum and infrastructure but also on the conditions in which teachers work.
Context matters too. Education in India takes place in very different social and geographical circumstances. A teacher in a major city and a teacher in a remote village face very different challenges, yet both are expected to prepare young people for an increasingly complex future.
Teachers in smaller towns and rural areas often become important links between school and community. They encourage children to continue their studies, guide families, identify students who need extra support and create opportunities where resources are limited. Their contribution deserves greater visibility.
Teachers also have a responsibility to preserve values while preparing students for change. Education should build employability and technological skills, but it should also cultivate honesty, compassion, discipline, respect for others and democratic values. An education system cannot be judged by examination results alone. It must also ask what kind of citizens its classrooms are producing.
World Teachers’ Day should therefore be a day of reflection, not only celebration.
The relationship between education and society is inseparable from the relationship between teachers and society. If we want responsible citizens, we must give teachers the freedom and support to nurture responsibility. If we want innovative young people, teachers must themselves be encouraged to experiment and learn. If we want inclusive classrooms, teachers must be supported in understanding different learning needs.
World Teachers’ Day should therefore be a day of reflection, not only celebration.
India has made significant progress in expanding access to education and embracing digital learning. The next challenge is to ensure that technology, policy and institutional reform strengthen the teacher rather than marginalise them. The teacher should remain at the centre of education even as its tools change.
The world also faces new challenges, including climate change, migration, social inequality and rapid technological transformation. UNESCO’s concept note for this year’s observance points to similar pressures on the profession, among them digital technologies and artificial intelligence, climate change, migration, conflict and displacement. Teachers are among those who must help young people understand and respond to them.
That responsibility cannot rest on teachers alone. Governments, educational institutions, parents, communities and society at large must stand with them.
A teacher may not always see the result of their work. A student may become a scientist, entrepreneur, farmer, civil servant, artist, engineer or teacher many years after leaving the classroom. Somewhere in that journey there may be a lesson, a word of encouragement or a moment of trust that came from a teacher.
That is the quiet power of teaching.
On World Teachers’ Day 2026, the question should not simply be, “How do we thank our teachers?” It should also be, “How do we create an environment in which teachers can do their best work?”
Standing with teachers means respecting their knowledge, listening to their experiences, supporting their professional growth and giving them the conditions they need to teach well.
The future of education will certainly involve new technologies. Classrooms will change and learning methods will evolve. But one thing should remain constant: the importance of a committed teacher who sees a student not merely as a mark or a data point, but as a human being with potential.
If we want to shape a better future, we must invest in those who help shape the people who will live in it.
An Ageing Teacher Workforce Is Becoming a Recruitment Problem
An ageing teacher workforce is creating a recruitment challenge as older teachers approach retirement, young teachers leave and shortages persist in schools.
An older teacher conducts a lesson for students in a classroom, illustrating the ageing workforce in education. Representational image. Image credit: Pexels
A teacher nearing retirement leaves behind more than an empty classroom. Finding someone with the right subject knowledge, qualifications and willingness to work in the same school can be much harder than simply filling a vacant post. That challenge is becoming more common as education systems grow older with less youngsters joining the teacher workforce. In Lithuania, 42% of primary and secondary teachers were aged 55 or older in 2024. The share was 38% in both Latvia and Estonia, 37% in Portugal and 33% in Greece.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), a group of 38 countries that compares data and policies across areas including education, employment and the economy, is tracking this shift as part of a wider teacher recruitment problem.
Across OECD countries and partner economies, teachers aged 55 and above made up 23% of the teaching workforce in 2024, up from 20% in 2015. During the same period, the share of teachers under 35 fell from 23% to 22%. When experienced teachers retire, schools need qualified people ready to take their place. The problem is finding them is becoming difficult.
The Problem Bigger Than Empty Posts
A school can have a teacher shortage even when every classroom has someone standing in front of it. In 2024/25, 9.1% of primary and secondary teachers across OECD countries were not fully qualified. Around 4% of secondary teaching positions were unfilled at the beginning of the school year in both Latvia and Luxembourg.
The shortages are not spread evenly. Rural and remote schools, disadvantaged communities and subjects such as mathematics and natural sciences face particular difficulties in finding teachers. That makes an ageing workforce more complicated.
A teacher who retires from a mathematics classroom cannot simply be replaced by any available teacher. Schools need someone with the required subject knowledge and qualifications, and that person also has to be willing to work in that particular school or area.
Lithuania shows how these pressures can overlap. About 43% of its secondary teachers are already aged 55 or older. At the same time, its population aged 5 to 14 is projected to fall by 22% between 2024 and 2033. Fewer children may eventually mean fewer teachers are needed overall. But that does not guarantee that the teachers who remain will be in the right places or teach the subjects schools need
When Younger Teachers Leave?
There is another problem: bringing young people into teaching is only part of the challenge. Keeping them there matters too. Across countries and economies with available data, 6.4% of fully qualified primary and secondary teachers left the profession during the 2024/25 school year. Teachers with fewer than five years of experience accounted for more than one-third of resignations on average.
In some education systems, the share was much higher. Early-career teachers accounted for 77% of resignations in Israel, 69% in Austria, 66% in the French Community of Belgium and 64% in Luxembourg. The reasons vary. Workload, working conditions and the support available during the first years of teaching can influence whether new teachers remain in the profession.
And leaving a school does not always mean leaving education altogether. In Latvia, 12% of fully qualified teachers left the profession in 2024/25. But 37% of those who left moved into other jobs within the education sector. For schools, that still creates a recruitment problem. Experience may remain within education, but it is no longer necessarily available in the classroom where it is needed.
Fewer Children Do Not Solve the Shortage
There is a simple way to look at ageing populations: fewer children should eventually mean fewer teachers. The numbers show why that is not always enough. The population aged 5 to 14 across OECD countries is projected to decline by 9% between 2024 and 2033. Yet between 2015 and 2024, 17 of 40 countries with available data saw primary enrolment decline or remain broadly stable while their teaching workforce continued to grow.
Greece is a striking example. The number of primary students fell by about 12% between 2015 and 2024, but the number of primary teachers increased by 16%. The change was linked to decisions about class sizes, teachers’ working hours and instruction time. In other words, the number of children alone did not determine how many teachers schools needed.
A teacher leads a classroom session with five students. Across OECD countries, teachers aged 55 and above made up 23% of the teaching workforce in 2024, raising concerns about replacing experienced teachers as they retire. Representational image. Image credit: Pexels
The same issue appears at a local level. A village school may lose students but still need a mathematics teacher. A school serving a remote area cannot necessarily fill a vacancy simply because another school has surplus teachers. Where teachers are needed matters as much as how many are needed.
Teacher Workforce: The Indian Context
India’s teacher workforce is growing, but that does not mean teachers are available where they are needed. UDISE+ recorded 10.12 million teachers in 2024–25, up 6.7% from 2022–23. The national pupil-teacher ratio was 20:1 at primary level, 17:1 at upper primary, 15:1 at secondary and 23:1 at higher secondary.
State-level data tell a different story. NITI Aayog’s 2026 analysis recorded more than 2.08 lakh elementary teacher vacancies in Bihar, 80,341 in Jharkhand and 29,473 in Karnataka. India also had 1,04,125 single-teacher schools in 2024–25. Earlier UNESCO data cited by NITI Aayog showed that 89% of such schools were in rural areas. At secondary level, the national 15:1 ratio rose to 47:1 in Jharkhand and 37:1 in Maharashtra and Odisha.
This makes India’s missing age data significant. UDISE+ does not publish a nationally comparable share of teachers aged 55 and above. Without that information, it is difficult to estimate how many teachers are approaching retirement, which subjects and locations could lose experienced staff, or whether recruitment is keeping pace with potential exits.
The government has begun addressing the planning side of the problem. In July 2026, the Ministry of Education said states were being encouraged to use technology-based teacher requirement forecasting, while NITI Aayog has proposed a digital Human Resource Management Information System to track vacancies, transfers and postings. The four-year Integrated Teacher Education Programme is intended to strengthen the supply of new teachers.
The missing link is workforce forecasting that connects these measures. India needs to know not only how many teachers are in its schools, but their age, subject and location, and how many are likely to retire in the years ahead. That would allow states to anticipate vacancies and recruit for specific schools and subjects before shortages become visible in classrooms.
India to Push Indian Sign Language Into Everyday Life
From an ISL rendition of Vande Mataram to school lessons, books and digital learning, new initiatives are widening the place of Indian Sign Language in everyday life for deaf people.
Hands demonstrate Indian Sign Language, reflecting efforts to make communication and public life more accessible to deaf people. Representational image. Image credit: Rdne/Pexels
When Vande Mataram was presented in Indian Sign Language (ISL) at this year’s Sign Language Day event in New Delhi, it was more than a ceremonial performance. It showed how a familiar part of public life can be made accessible through a visual language. But the larger story lies elsewhere. Alongside the ISL rendition, the event brought out a range of new resources, for young children, school students, readers, teachers, interpreters and people accessing educational content online. Together, they point to an effort to take ISL beyond specialised spaces and into more routine parts of life.
India had about 50.7 lakh people with hearing disability, according to the 2011 Census. The figure includes people who were deaf as well as those with difficulty hearing. The Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities (DEPwD) has called for ISL to become part of “everyday citizenship”, so that deaf people can take part in public life without communication barriers, said Additional Secretary Manmeet Kaur Nanda.
A Child’s First Lessons
Some of the new material begins at the earliest stage of education. “Sanket Vatika” visual books have been introduced for children aged 3–6. There is also new teaching material for courses that prepare ISL interpreters and teachers. For schoolchildren, ISL videos now cover content from 14 textbooks for Classes 1–6. The material includes 100 personalised adaptive learning videos. Concept-based videos have also been prepared for Classes 9–12.
A visual chart showing hand signs for the English alphabet in sign language, illustrating how hand gestures can convey letters through visual communication. Image credit: Pexels
The idea is to build resources across different stages of schooling rather than leave gaps as children move from one level to another.
More Than Classroom Material
The move into ISL is also reaching books. Three hundred National Book Trust titles have been made accessible in ISL. They include stories, biographies and historical accounts.
The ISL Dictionary has also been expanded into 11 more languages. The stated goal is to eventually cover all 22 Scheduled Languages. For a language to be used widely, its vocabulary has to travel with it. The expansion of the dictionary is one part of that process.
Taking ISL to the Screen
ISL content is now being live-streamed through PM e-Vidya Channel 31 using direct encoder-based streaming. That puts educational material in a format that deaf viewers can access through a dedicated ISL channel, rather than having to rely only on spoken content.
Digital resources and translated material cannot cover every interaction. There is still a need for people who can interpret between ISL and spoken languages. At the event, DEPwD Joint Secretary Rajeev Sharma spoke about the growing demand for ISL interpreters across different fields.
The new teaching material for the Diploma in Indian Sign Language Interpretation and Diploma in Teaching Indian Sign Language courses is part of this effort. It points to a practical challenge: making information available in ISL is one part of access. Having enough trained people to support communication is another.
What this Looks Like in Ordinary Life
The ISL version of Vande Mataram may have been one of the more visible moments at the event. But the changes taking place in classrooms, books and digital learning are closer to the everyday experience of deaf people.
For a young child, it could mean learning a new word from a picture book in ISL. For a student, it could mean following a lesson in a language they understand. For a reader, it could mean picking up a story, biography or history book in ISL. And for someone who needs to communicate directly, it could mean having an interpreter to help bridge the conversation.
Taken together, these efforts are about making ISL useful beyond a classroom or a special occasion, as a language through which deaf people can learn, read, find information and take part in public life. That is what this year’s Sign Language Day, themed “Declaring Deaf People’s Human Rights”, sought to put into focus.