Space & Physics
Why does superconductivity matter?
Superconductivity was discovered by H. Kamerlingh Onnes on April 8, 1911, who was studying the resistance of solid Mercury (Hg) at cryogenic temperatures. Liquid helium was recently discovered at that time. At T = 4.2K, the resistance of Hg disappeared abruptly. This marked a transition to a new phase that was never seen before. The state is resistanceless, strongly diamagnetic, and denotes a new state of matter. K. Onnes sent two reports to KNAW (the local journal of the Netherlands), where he preferred calling the zero-resistance state ‘superconductivity’’.
There was another discovery that went unnoticed in the same experiment, which was the transition of superfluid Helium (He) at 2.2K, the so-called λ transition, below which He becomes a superfluid. However, we shall skip that discussion for now. A couple of years later, superconductivity was found in lead (Pb) at 7K. Much later, in 1941, Niobium Nitride was found to superconduct below 16 K. The burning question in those days was: what would the conductivity or resistivity of metals be at a very low temperature?
The reason behind such a question is Lord Kelvin’s suggestion that for metals, initially the resistivity decreases with falling temperature and finally climbs to infinity at zero Kelvin because electrons’ mobility becomes zero at 0 K, yielding zero conductivity and hence infinite resistivity. Kamerlingh Onnes and his assistant Jacob Clay studied the resistance of gold (Au) and platinum (Pt) down to T = 14K. There was a linear decrease in resistance until 14 K; however, lower temperatures cannot be accessed owing to the unavailability of liquid He, which eventually happened in 1908.

In fact, the experiment with Au and Pt was repeated after 1908. For Pt, the resistivity became constant after 4.2K, while Au is found to superconduct at very low temperatures. Thus, Lord Kelvin’s notion about infinite resistivity at very low temperatures was incorrect. Onnes had found that at 3 K (below the transition), the normalised resistance is about 10−7. Above 4.2 K, the resistivity starts appearing again. The transition is too sharp and falls abruptly to zero within a temperature window of 10−4 K.
All superconductors are normal metals above the transition temperature. If we ask in the periodic table where most of the superconductors are located, the answer throws some surprises. The good metals are rarely superconducting
Perfect conductors, superconductors, and magnets
All superconductors are normal metals above the transition temperature. If we ask in the periodic table where most of the superconductors are located, the answer throws some surprises. The good metals are rarely superconducting. The examples are Ag, Au, Cu, Cs, etc., which have transition temperatures of the order of ∼ 0.1K, while the bad metals, such as niobium alloys, copper oxides, and 1 MgB2, have relatively larger transition temperatures. Thus, bad metals are, in general, good superconductors. An important quantity in this regard is the mean free path of the electrons. The mean free path is of the order of a few A0 for metals (above Tc), while for good metals (or the bad superconductors), it is usually a few hundred of A0. Whereas for the bad metals (good superconductors), it is still small as the electrons are strongly coupled to phonons. The orbital overlap is large in a superconductor. In good metals, the orbital overlap is small, and often they become good magnets. In the periodic table, transition elements such as the 3D series elements, namely Al, Bi, Cd, Ga, etc., become good superconductors, while Cr, Mn, and Fe are bad superconductors and in fact form good magnets. For all of them, that is, whether they are superconductors or magnets, there is a large density of states at the Fermi level. So, a lot of electronic states are necessary for the electrons in these systems to be able to condense into a superconducting state (or even a magnetic state). The nature of the electronic wave function determines whether they develop superconducting order or magnetic order. For example, electronic wavefunctions have a large spatial extent for superconductors, while they are short-range for magnets.
Meissner effect
The near-complete expulsion of the magnetic field from a superconducting specimen is called the Meissner effect. In the presence of a magnetic field, the current loops at the periphery will be generated so as to block the entry of the external field inside the specimen. If a magnetic field is allowed within a superconductor, then, by Ampere’s law, there will be normal current within the sample. However, there is no normal current inside the specimen. Thus, there can’t be any magnetic field. For this reason, superconductors are known as perfect diamagnets with very large diamagnetic susceptibility. Even the best-known diamagnets (which are non-superconductors) have magnetic susceptibilities of the order of 10−5. Thus, the diamagnetic property can be considered a distinct property of superconductors compared to zero electrical resistance.
The near-complete expulsion of the magnetic field from a superconducting specimen is called the Meissner effect
A typical experiment demonstrating the Meissner effect can be thought of as follows: Take a superconducting sample (T < Tc), sprinkle iron filings around the sample, and switch on the magnetic field. The iron filings are going to line up in concentric circles around the specimen. This implies the expulsion of the flux lines outside the sample, which makes the filings line up.
Distinction between perfect conductors and superconductors
The distinction between a perfect conductor and a superconductor is brought about by magnetic field-cooled (FC) and zero-field-cooled (ZFc) cases, as shown below in Fig. 1.

In the absence of an external magnetic field, temperature is lowered for both the metal and the superconductor in their metallic states from T > Tc to T < Tc (see left panel for both in Fig. 1). Hence, a magnetic field is applied, which eventually gets expelled owing to the Meissner effect. The field has finally been withdrawn. However, if cooling is done in the presence of an external field, after the field is withdrawn, the flux lines get trapped for a perfect conductor; however, the superconductor is left with no memory of an applied field, a situation similar to what happens in the zero-field cooling case. So, superconductors have no memory, while perfect conductors have memory.
Microscopic considerations: BCS theory
The first microscopic theory of superconductivity was proposed by Berdeen, Cooper, and Schrieffer (BCS) in 1957, which earned them a Nobel Prize in 1972. The underlying assumption was that an attractive interaction between the electrons is possible, which is mediated via phonons. Thus, electrons form bound pairs under certain conditions, such as (i) two electrons in the vicinity of the filled Fermi Sea within an energy range ¯hωD (set by the phonons or lattice). (ii) The presence of phonons or the underlying lattice is confirmed by the isotope effect experiment, which confirms that the transition temperature is proportional to the mass of ions. Since the Debye frequency depends on the ionic mass, it implies that the lattice must be involved. 3 A small calculation yields that an attractive interaction is possible in a narrow range of energy. This attractive interaction causes the system to be unstable, and a long-range order develops via symmetry breaking. In a book by one of the discoverers, namely, Schrieffer, he described an analogy between a dancing floor comprising couples, dancing one with any other couple, and being completely oblivious to any other couple present in the room. The couples, while dancing, drift from one end of the room to another but do not collide with each other. This implies less dissipation in the transport of a superconductor. The BCS theory explained most of the features of the superconductors known at that time, such as (i) the discontinuity of the specific heat at the transition temperature, Tc. (ii) Involvement of the lattice via the isotope effect. (iii) Estimation of Tc and the energy gap. The value of Tc and the gap are confirmed by tunnelling experiments across metal-superconductor (M-S) or metal-insulator-superconductor (MIS) types of junctions. Giaever was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1973 for his work on these experiments. (iv) The Meissner effect can be explained within a linear response regime. (v) Temperature dependence of the energy gap, confirming gradual vanishing, which confirms a second-order phase transition. Most of the features of conventional superconductors can be explained using BCS theory. Another salient feature of the theory is that it is non-perturbative. There is no small parameter in the problem. The calculations were done with a variational theory where the energy is minimised with respect to some free parameters of the variational wavefunction, known as the BCS wavefunction.
Unconventional Superconductors: High-Tc Cuprates
This is a class of superconductors where the two-dimensional copper oxide planes play the main role, and superconductivity occurs in these planes. Doping these planes with mobile carriers makes the system unstable towards superconducting correlations. At zero doping, the system is an antiferromagnetic insulator (see Fig. 2). With about 15% to 20% doping with foreign elements, such as strontium (Sr), etc. (for example, in La2−xSrxCuO4), the system turns superconductivity. There are two things that are surprising in this regard. (i) The proximity of the insulating state to the superconducting state; (ii) For the system initially in the superconducting state, as the temperature is raised, instead of going into a metallic state, it shows several unfamiliar features that are very unlike the known Fermi liquid characteristics. It is called a strange metal.

In fact, there are some signatures of pre-formed pairs in the ‘so-called’ metallic state, known as the pseudo gap phase. Since the starting point from which one should build a theory is missing, a complete understanding of the mechanism leading to the phenomenon cannot be understood. It remained a theoretical riddle.
Space & Physics
Meteorite Dust Reveals Evidence of Magnetic Field in the Young Solar System
A magnetic field in the early solar system has been detected in ancient meteorite grains, offering evidence that magnetism helped shape the young sun.
Ancient grains in an Antarctic meteorite reveal evidence of a magnetic field in early solar system, suggesting magnetism helped shape the young sun
Tiny mineral grains preserved inside an ancient meteorite have recorded evidence of a magnetic field that existed during the earliest stages of the solar system, suggesting that magnetism, alongside gravity, helped shape the young sun and its surrounding disk of gas and dust.
Ancient Meteorite Records Reveal a Magnetic Field in the Early Solar System
Scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) examined microscopic grains in a meteorite recovered from Antarctica and found traces of ancient magnetism dating to the first 200,000 years of solar system history. The findings provide what researchers describe as the earliest known evidence of a magnetic field in the infant solar system.
The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, challenges the view that gravity alone drove the transformation of the early solar system from a cloud of gas and dust into a flattened disk that eventually produced the sun and planets.
“This transition, from a spherical cloud to a protoplanetary disk, is one of the most significant events in all of solar system history,” said Benjamin Weiss, professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences at MIT, in a statement issued. Measurements from the study, he said, indicate that magnetism likely played a role.
Magnetic records preserved in meteorite grains
The researchers studied DOM 08006, a primitive meteorite discovered in 2008 in the Dominion Range of Antarctica. The meteorite contains calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions, or CAIs, which formed during the earliest period of solar system development.
CAIs are among the oldest known solid materials from the solar system. Some of the grains contain magnetic minerals that can preserve the imprint of a magnetic field present when they formed.
The team isolated tiny grains from the meteorite and subjected them to a series of tests to determine whether they retained remanent magnetisation — a lasting record of an earlier magnetic field.
The researchers found evidence of a magnetic field with an estimated strength of about 150 to 600 microteslas. That is roughly three to 12 times stronger than Earth’s magnetic field today.
The preservation of these records was possible because DOM 08006 appears to have undergone relatively little alteration during its long history.
“Other meteorites went through many different processes over this 4.5 billion year history,” Weiss said. “But somehow, DOM has experienced less alteration than any other meteorite.”
Magnetism before the planets
Scientists already had evidence of magnetic fields in the solar system several million years after its formation, when the sun had formed and the planets were beginning to take shape.
The new measurements push that evidence much further back — to a period when the solar system was still a collapsing cloud of gas and dust and the sun itself was beginning to form.
In the early solar system, electrically charged particles moving through the developing disk could have generated a magnetic field. That field may then have influenced the movement of gas and material towards the central star.
The researchers argue that magnetism therefore needs to be considered alongside gravity when reconstructing how the early solar system evolved.
“We think these kinds of magnetic fields were helping to move gas from the protoplanetary disk, in toward this central star, the sun,” said Cauê Borlina, the study’s first author and now an assistant professor at Purdue University.
The findings do not replace gravity as the main force shaping the early solar system. Instead, they suggest that magnetic fields were another important part of the physical processes that brought material together and helped the young sun grow.
The study was led by Borlina, with Weiss, Elias Mansbach and Nilanjan Chatterjee of MIT, along with researchers from Tsinghua University, the University of Cambridge, Caltech and the University of California, Los Angeles
Space & Physics
NASA Puts $500,000 Prize on Better Satellite Tracking
NASA is offering up to 500,000 dollars to develop affordable technology that can improve satellite tracking by measuring atmospheric drag in low Earth orbit. The effort aims to help operators predict orbital changes more accurately as solar activity alters the thin upper atmosphere.
A faint layer of air high above Earth is becoming an important concern for satellite tracking operators. NASA is now offering up to USD 500,000 to individual winning teams that can develop a practical way to monitor it. The US space agency opened the Orbital Clarity Challenge on August 19, asking researchers and companies to develop instruments that can determine how much drag spacecraft experience in low Earth orbit. Up to four teams can win the top prize, taking the potential total award to USD 2 million.
The focus is the thermosphere, a region that begins about 80 kilometres above Earth and extends hundreds of kilometres into space. The air here is extremely sparse, but spacecraft moving through it still encounter enough resistance to gradually alter their orbits.

That resistance does not remain constant. When the Sun becomes more active, bursts of energy can heat the upper atmosphere. The thermosphere expands, increasing the amount of gas encountered by satellites. The resulting increase in drag can change their altitude and make their future position harder to calculate. For spacecraft operators, even a small difference can matter when several objects are moving through the same orbital region.
A Gap in the Data
NASA already relies on computer models to estimate atmospheric drag. But those calculations depend on how well scientists understand conditions in the upper atmosphere at a particular time and location. The agency wants new technology that can provide more direct information.
Under the competition, proposed instruments should be inexpensive enough to be deployed widely. NASA says they could potentially be carried aboard commercial spacecraft as hosted payloads, allowing measurements to be collected from several points in orbit rather than from a limited number of dedicated missions.
The competition will run through several stages, with NASA aiming to move successful ideas from an initial concept towards an instrument that can eventually be tested in space. Winning teams are also expected to receive an opportunity for an orbital demonstration. Applications for the first stage close in November 2026.
Satellite Tracking: Why this Matters?
The number of spacecraft operating in low Earth orbit has grown rapidly, with satellites supporting communications, navigation, Earth observation and scientific research.
Their paths are affected by several forces, including the thin atmosphere at orbital altitude. During periods of strong solar activity, atmospheric drag can rise sharply and contribute to changes in orbital altitude. Better information about those changes could help operators plan manoeuvres more accurately and improve forecasts of when satellites will descend from orbit.
NASA’s prize is therefore aimed at a relatively small piece of the space infrastructure puzzle: getting a clearer picture of the air that satellites are still moving through, even hundreds of kilometres above the ground.
Space & Physics
Sophie Adenot Makes History as First Frenchwoman to Walk in Space
French astronaut Sophie Adenot has become the first Frenchwoman to perform a spacewalk, spending 6 hours 23 minutes outside the International Space Station.
French astronaut Sophie Adenot has become the first Frenchwoman to perform a spacewalk, spending 6 hours and 23 minutes outside the International Space Station to begin repairs to its exterior communications system.
French astronaut Sophie Adenot made European space history on Tuesday by becoming the first French woman to perform a spacewalk outside the International Space Station. Adenot, 44, stepped outside the orbiting laboratory alongside American astronaut Anil Menon, floating roughly 400 kilometres above the Earth for 6 hours and 23 minutes to begin a repair of the station’s exterior communications equipment.
“I’m out,” Adenot said as she exited the station. “I feel very good now.”
A Repair Job That Ran Long The astronauts’ task was to replace an aging space-to-ground antenna on the station’s Z1 truss — the primary link carrying high-speed data, voice calls and video between the station and mission control in Houston. The antenna had stopped tracking NASA’s data relay satellites since November and had been out of service since, with a second antenna carrying the station’s communications load in the meantime.
Menon and Adenot successfully removed the failed antenna and secured it to the truss structure, but disconnecting its electrical cables and loosening its mounting bolts took longer than planned, leaving no time to install the replacement unit. NASA has scheduled a second spacewalk for Tuesday, August 25, to complete the installation. The station’s communications were not affected by the delay, as the backup antenna continued operating throughout.
Inside the station, astronauts Jack Hathaway and Jessica Meir coordinated the operation from the control desk, operating the station’s robotic arm and monitoring the spacewalkers’ life support systems throughout.
Days of Preparation Before the Hatch Opened Spacewalks demand days of preparation before the airlock ever opens. In the lead-up, Adenot and Menon spent dozens of hours readying their gear inside the station — inspecting safety tethers, organising tools, servicing backup emergency jetpacks, charging suit batteries, checking for pressure leaks, and testing biomedical sensors and radios.
Spacewalk complete. ✅
After 6 hours and 23 minutes outside the International Space Station, @Soph_astro is safely back inside.
With today’s EVA, Sophie becomes the first French woman to perform a spacewalk. 🇫🇷 pic.twitter.com/i3BghrdaRK— European Space Agency (@esa) August 18, 2026
“A successful [spacewalk] starts long before the hatch opens, and that’s where my focus has been these past few days: rehearsing, preparing and focusing,” Adenot said on social media before the excursion.
Suit fitting was a major focus of the preparation: working inside a heavy, pressurised spacesuit for over six hours puts considerable strain on an astronaut’s hands and shoulders, and engineers on the ground worked closely with Adenot to customise her suit and reduce pressure points.
A Milestone for European Space Exploration Adenot brought extensive technical experience to the mission. A trained engineer and former helicopter test pilot, she was selected for astronaut training by the European Space Agency in 2022 and launched to the space station in February 2026, becoming only the second French woman in history to reach space, after physician-astronaut Claudie Haigneré in 1996. With Tuesday’s spacewalk, she also became the second European woman ever to conduct a spacewalk, after Italian astronaut Samantha Cristoforetti in 2022, and the fifth French citizen overall to do so. The last French citizen to walk in space was Thomas Pesquet.
Despite the milestone, Adenot credited the wider team behind the mission. “My deepest gratitude goes to everyone who made this possible — pioneers who came before us, but also the incredible teams working behind the scenes today,” she said after returning inside the station.
-
Math1 month agoThe 2026 Fields Medals: Four Proofs, Four Decades-Old Problems Solved
-
Climate1 month agoAfter Kerala’s Deadliest Landslide, the Hardest Thing to Rebuild Was Childhood
-
Society2 months agoWest Asia Crisis: Can Kerala’s Returning Gulf Migrants Find a Future in the Green Economy?
-
Space & Physics3 months agoIndia Semiconductor Mission: ‘It’s Not About Fabs. It’s About Building An Entire Ecosystem’
-
Climate3 months agoThe Climate World Cup? How Climate Change Could Affect Player Performance at the 2026 World Cup
-
Society2 months agoWhat Is Civilisational Diplomacy? Understanding India’s Newest Foreign Policy Tool
-
Society3 months agoFrom Bell Labs to the Classroom: A Second Career in Teaching
-
Space & Physics3 months agoEngineers Develop Dual-Mode Propulsion System for Next-Generation Small Satellites


