Connect with us

Space & Physics

Inside India’s Semiconductor Push: ‘This Is a 100-Year Bet’

This is not an industry that rewards speed alone; it demands persistence, coordination, and long-term commitment. In semiconductors, success is not measured in years, but built over generations.

Dipin Damodharan

Published

on

IIT Bombay semiconductor experts Swaroop and Udayan Ganguly discussing India’s semiconductor mission
Swaroop Ganguly and Udayan Ganguly

In a conversation with Education Publica Editor Dipin Damodharan, leading semiconductor researchers Swaroop Ganguly and Udayan Ganguly delve into the science, strategy, and systemic challenges shaping India’s chip ambitions. Both are professors in the Department of Electrical Engineering at the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay. Swaroop Ganguly currently leads SemiX—the institute’s semiconductor initiative that brings together expertise across disciplines to advance India’s capabilities in the sector. Udayan Ganguly previously headed SemiX. India’s semiconductor journey, they argue, is only just beginning. The foundations— policy, infrastructure, talent, and partnerships—are being put in place, but the real challenge lies ahead. This is not an industry that rewards speed alone; it demands persistence, coordination, and long-term commitment. In semiconductors, success is not measured in years, but built over generations. Edited excerpts

India formally launched the semiconductor mission in 2021. Five years on, where does the country stand today?

Swaroop Ganguly:

The India Semiconductor Mission really began taking shape around 2021, but for a couple of years it was largely policy without visible industry participation. The turning point came around 2023 with the approval of the Micron packaging facility. That was important not just as a project, but as a signal—that global companies were willing to invest in India.

Following that, we saw a series of announcements, particularly in packaging and assembly. Now, packaging is not the highest value-add segment in the semiconductor value chain, but it is still a very important step. It generates employment, it helps build supporting capabilities, and it allows the ecosystem to start forming.

why India semiconductor mission matters
Image credit: Athena Sandrini/Pexels

But the real centrepiece—the crown of the semiconductor ecosystem—is the fabrication facility, or fab. That is where silicon wafers are actually processed into chips. We now have at least one major fab announcement, and that is a very significant milestone.

At the same time, we should be careful not to judge progress too quickly. This is not an industry where outcomes can be evaluated in five years. The correct time horizon is at least 10 to 15 years.

BUY THIS SEMICON SPECIAL MAGAZINE
Buy the latest issue of Education Publica. After completing the payment, please share your details at contact@edpublica.com

Why did India take so long to enter this space, especially given its strength in technology?

Swaroop Ganguly:

It’s not entirely accurate to say India never tried. There were attempts in the past. In fact, in the 1980s, India had a silicon fabrication facility in Chandigarh that was not very far behind global standards at that time.

Unfortunately, that facility was destroyed in a fire, and that event set India back significantly—by decades, in fact. But the loss was not just infrastructure. It was also talent. Many of the people who were working there moved abroad and went on to become leaders in global semiconductor companies.

When you lose something like that, you don’t just lose a facility—you lose the continuity of knowledge, mentorship, and ecosystem-building. That has long-term consequences.

After that, the global semiconductor industry moved very fast, and re-entering it became increasingly difficult. It required a level of policy support and industrial coordination that did not exist at the time. That is what has changed with the India Semiconductor Mission.

j4 2

How should we interpret the progress under India Semiconductor Mission 1.0 (ISM 1.0)? Has it delivered what was expected?

Swaroop Ganguly:

I think it would be a mistake to look at ISM 1.0 as something that should have delivered results within five years. This industry demands a long-term, patient approach.

ISM 1.0 has led to the approval of multiple manufacturing-related units, most of them in packaging. That is actually a sensible place to begin. Countries like Taiwan and South Korea also started their semiconductor journeys with packaging before moving up the value chain.

There has also been progress in specialty areas such as compound semiconductors, which are used in applications like power electronics, renewable energy, and communications.

So overall, I would say the direction is correct. But the success of ISM should be evaluated over a much longer period—10 to 15 years at least.

So India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0 is not a reset, but an expansion?

Swaroop Ganguly:

Exactly. ISM 2.0 should be seen as an expansion of scope.

In ISM 1.0, the focus was largely on attracting manufacturing—fabs and packaging units. Now, the thinking is evolving towards building a more complete ecosystem.

That means looking at materials, chemicals, gases, equipment, and all the ancillary industries that support semiconductor manufacturing. At the same time, there is increasing emphasis on research, innovation, education, and training.

This is important because semiconductors are not a one-time investment. As we often say, this is not a bandwagon you jump onto—it’s a treadmill.

ep subscription

What do you mean by that analogy?

Swaroop Ganguly:

The treadmill analogy simply means that once you enter this industry, you have to keep moving. If you stop, you fall off.

Udayan Ganguly:

Yes, and the reason is very simple. The industry evolves continuously. Every couple of years, chips become more powerful, more efficient, more densely packed.

If you don’t keep up with that pace of innovation, your products become uncompetitive. Unlike many other industries, you cannot just build a plant and continue producing the same thing for decades.

j5 2

For a layperson, what does this “semiconductor moment” actually mean for India?

Udayan Ganguly:

Think about everything you do today—medicine, education, transportation, entertainment. All of it runs on semiconductors.

Now imagine that every time you engage in any of these activities, you are effectively paying someone else for that underlying technology.

You go to a doctor—you are paying a semiconductor fee.

You drive a car—you are paying a semiconductor fee.

You watch a movie—you are paying a semiconductor fee.

So the question is: can a country continue to grow while constantly paying for the technological backbone of its economy?

So this is fundamentally about control over technology?

Udayan Ganguly:

Absolutely.

If India does not control semiconductors to some extent, we are basically fighting a losing battle. This is not just about manufacturing chips—it is about controlling the substrate on which modern society operates.

And this is not a short-term project. This is a 100-year bet. Even building meaningful capability will take at least 30 years.

What are the biggest challenges India faces in this journey?

Udayan Ganguly:

There are three core challenges: technology, talent, and governance.

On technology, the reality is that only a handful of companies globally have access to cutting-edge capabilities. These are not technologies that can simply be purchased at cost.

So India will have to start with slightly older technologies, which is perfectly fine. That is how most countries begin.

On talent, it is not just about having engineers—it is about having deep know-how. The ability to solve problems, innovate, and adapt.

And on governance, this is not a free-market industry. It requires sustained policy support and coordination. Without that, it cannot take off.

j8 1

What role do startups and academia play in this ecosystem?

Swaroop Ganguly:

They are central to innovation.

India has had design centres of global semiconductor companies for decades. But what we have not had is a large number of products that are designed, owned, and commercialised by Indian companies.

That is where startups and academia come in.

Innovation typically emerges from these spaces—either from academic research translating into startups, or from experienced professionals building new companies.

Can startups play a role in manufacturing as well?

Swaroop Ganguly:

Manufacturing is much more capital-intensive, so it is difficult for startups to enter that space in the conventional sense.

However, there are opportunities in specialised areas—materials, processes, equipment components—where startups can contribute.

Academia also plays a critical role, particularly in advancing research that can feed into industry.

Is there a missing link in India’s semiconductor ecosystem today?

Udayan Ganguly:

Yes—R&D infrastructure.

Globally, there are dedicated semiconductor research centres where new ideas can be tested at scale without disrupting commercial manufacturing.

These centres act as a bridge between academia and industry.

India needs similar facilities. Without them, it becomes difficult to translate research into real-world applications.

What about talent—are we producing enough skilled people?

Udayan Ganguly:

We have strong core capability, but we need to scale significantly.

To meet the demands of a domestic semiconductor ecosystem, we probably need to increase our talent pool by at least ten times.

And this is no longer just about selecting the best candidates. It is about building a pipeline—training, education, and capacity-building across institutions.

j6 3

Is semiconductor engineering limited to electronics?

Swaroop Ganguly:

Not at all. That is a common misconception.

Semiconductor manufacturing is highly interdisciplinary. It involves physics, chemistry, materials science, and mechanical engineering.

For example, consider a thermal processing step in fabrication. A wafer can be heated from room temperature to over 1000°C in a matter of seconds and then cooled rapidly. That involves complex thermal and mechanical engineering.

So the opportunities extend far beyond traditional electronics.

Who are the key stakeholders in building this ecosystem?

Swaroop Ganguly:

It essentially comes down to three groups: academia, industry, and government.

These three must work together very closely. Without that collaboration, the ecosystem cannot develop.

Government provides policy and support. Industry drives manufacturing and commercialisation. Academia contributes research, talent, and innovation.

j7 2
Image credit: Dipin Damodharan

Does India need to increase its R&D spending?

Swaroop Ganguly:

Spending is already increasing, which is a positive sign.

But equally important is how that money is used. There are global models where competing companies collaborate on early-stage research, pooling resources and working with academia.

Such models can significantly improve the effectiveness of R&D investment.

Finally, are you optimistic about India’s semiconductor journey?

Udayan Ganguly:

Yes, broadly.

The policy direction is strong, and the incentives are competitive. But this is not something that will succeed automatically.

It requires sustained effort over decades.

Swaroop Ganguly:

Exactly. The direction is right, but the time horizon is long. This is not a sprint—it is a marathon.

Dipin Damodharan is the Co-founder and Editor-in-Chief of EdPublica. A journalist and editor with over 15 years of experience leading and co-founding both print and digital media outlets, he has written extensively on education, politics, and culture. His work has appeared in global publications such as The Huffington Post, The Himalayan Times, DailyO, Education Insider, and others.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Space & Physics

MIT develops ultra-low-power chip that could help tiny robots navigate complex environments

MIT researchers have developed an ultra-low-power chip that enables tiny robots to create detailed 3D maps and navigate complex environments while consuming just 6 milliwatts of power. This breakthrough could expand the capabilities of drones, inspection robots, and augmented reality devices.

Joe Jacob

Published

on

MIT robot
Image: Zamani Sahudi/Pexels

Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) have developed a new ultra-efficient chip that enables tiny autonomous robots to generate detailed 3D maps of their surroundings in real time while consuming only a fraction of the power required by existing systems.

The new MIT robot navigation chip, called Gleanmer, could help small drones and robots safely navigate complex environments, from industrial heating and ventilation systems to confined inspection spaces where battery life and computing resources are limited.

According to the researchers, the chip consumes just 6 milliwatts of power—roughly the same amount needed to run a single LED—while constructing detailed 3D maps for navigation.

The findings were recently presented at the IEEE Very Large-Scale Integrated Circuits Symposium.

Designed for battery-powered robots

Autonomous robots rely on 3D maps to understand their surroundings and avoid obstacles. However, generating these maps typically requires significant computing power and memory, making the process difficult for small, battery-powered devices.

The MIT team tackled this challenge by combining a highly efficient mapping algorithm with custom-designed hardware that minimizes memory usage and energy consumption.

“This paper showcases a key example of how you can leverage co-design of the algorithm and hardware to really push energy efficiency,” Vivienne Sze, professor in MIT’s Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and senior author of the study, said in a media statement.

“While there has been a lot of work looking into compact 3D maps, what stands out about this work is that it also ensures that the process to generate those maps is as efficient as possible. Our chip allows you to store very large maps in a very small space, and do it in a very energy efficient manner,” she added.

Replacing cubes with ‘Gaussian blobs’

Traditional mapping systems represent environments using millions of cube-shaped units known as voxels. These structures require substantial memory and processing power.

Instead, the MIT researchers employed a technique that represents objects using flexible ellipsoid-shaped structures known as Gaussians.

Because these Gaussian representations can adapt to the shape of real-world objects more efficiently, the system requires far less memory than conventional approaches while still preserving detailed information about obstacles and free space.

The chip uses a mapping algorithm developed by the researchers called GMMap, which can generate accurate 3D maps from depth images in a single pass, eliminating the need to repeatedly process and store large image datasets.

“At any point in time, we only need to store a few pixels in memory, which significantly reduces the memory footprint our algorithm requires,” co-lead author Peter Zhi Xuan Li said.

Improving efficiency through hardware-software co-design

As robots move through an environment, they often observe the same object from multiple viewpoints, creating overlapping representations that can increase map size.

To address this, the researchers developed a technique that merges overlapping Gaussian representations directly, without revisiting the original image data. This further reduces memory requirements and power consumption.

The chip also keeps frequently used map data in small on-chip memory units located close to the processing hardware, reducing the need to access more energy-intensive external storage.

“By having a dedicated memory that just stores the objects you’ve seen in the previous few frames, you can access the data much more efficiently,” co-lead author Zih-Sing Fu said.

Potential uses beyond robotics

The researchers tested the chip using a range of existing 3D environments and live data streams from an iPhone camera. In these experiments, Gleanmer generated detailed maps in real time while consuming only about 2.5% of the power required by the best existing map-construction chips.

The team believes the technology could be useful not only for autonomous robots and drones but also for lightweight augmented reality headsets, particularly in applications such as medical training, repair work, and industrial assembly.

“We reduce the memory consumption by making sure the algorithm is efficient. Then we accelerate the workload that is performed by that efficient algorithm, so in the end, our chip is as efficient as possible,” Li said.

Researchers now plan to further improve the technology by bringing processing components closer to sensors and exploring additional applications, including AI systems that need to analyse complex engineering schematics.

Continue Reading

Space & Physics

NASA announces crew of Artemis III at live event

Artemis III will be the agency’s next human space exploration mission paving the way for humanity’s planned return to the moon in 2028.

Published

on

The Artemis III crew poses for an official portrait (from left: Andre Douglas, Luca Parmitano, Randy Bresnik, Frank Rubio). Credit: NASA/Bill Stafford

At 20:30 hours IST yesterday, NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas held a live event their engineers, scientists, the astronaut corps and the media attended. The space agency officially announced the crew of Artemis III, the agency’s next human space exploration mission, paving the way for humanity’s planned return to the moon in 2028, over fifty years after the Apollo program.

Half-way through the hour-long presentation, Jared Isacson, the NASA administrator, walked to the dais to announce the all-men crew of Artemis III: NASA mission commander Randy Bresnik, mission specialists Andre Douglas and Frank Rubio, and European Space Agency pilot Luca Parmitano, an Italian national. 

Three of the astronauts excluding Douglas, a US Coast Guard reserve, are both spaceflight and military veterans. Bresnik, a US marine colonel and test pilot clocking 7,000 hours, commanded the International Space Station. So did Parmitano, the first Italian commander of the station, and who survived a 2013 spacewalk when water abruptly filled his helmet and had an asteroid named after him. Rubio, a US army helicopter pilot, holds the record for the longest time spent in space. 

NASAs Artemis III Announcement 38 40 screenshot

Screengrab from the YouTube livestream of the event at NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas. Credit: NASA

Mission timeline

The mission could take off in the second-half of 2027. Originally,  NASA planned Artemis III to be the first soft-landing lunar mission since 1972’s Apollo 17, with a slated launch date in 2028. However, in March, the agency updated mission timelines, with the mission relegated for testing its mission critical docking mechanism, ahead of Artemis IV’s planned soft-landing that year.

The crew will fly aboard a Space X Orion capsule into low-earth orbit. Unlike its predecessor, Artemis III won’t leave earth orbit and conduct a flyby past the moon. Instead, it will test life support systems and docking with Artemis’ era lunar landers, built by private space companies Space X and Blue Origin, the Starship Human Landing System (HLS) and the Blue Moon respectively. In addition, Artemis III will carry on science experiments, including using instrumentation to test effects of atmospheric drag upon the spacecraft, amidst hostile space weather.

lunarlanders

The Apollo and Artemis-era lunar landers drawn to scale. Credit: NASA

Lunar landers 

There has been skepticism whether the Blue Moon lunar lander’s launch schedule would be affected, in the aftermath of last week’s mishap involving New Glenn, the flagship rocket of Jeff Bezos-owned Blue Origin, exploding during a hot-static test ahead of its slated launch of Amazon’s satellites. The explosion destroyed the company’s custom-developed launchpad at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida. However, the company CEO, David Limp, posted on X, they’ll return to full-swing operations latest before the end of this year.

Whereas Starship HLS, the other lunar lander design, will feature a variant of the Starship rocket, with the latter design being still tested over repeated space flights in the past year. 

Either lunar landers designed to ferry astronauts from lunar orbit to the surface, and back. In a future Artemis mission, the astronauts, who will ride aboard Space X’s Orion crew module from earth, will dock with the lander in lunar orbit, before transferring to the lander module. 

It’s unclear which lander design’s slated to make the soft-landing attempt in Artemis IV. 

Continue Reading

Space & Physics

Engineers Develop Dual-Mode Propulsion System for Next-Generation Small Satellites

MIT engineers have developed a dual-mode propulsion system that combines chemical and electric thrusters, giving small satellites greater flexibility in space

Joe Jacob

Published

on

MIT researchers testing a dual-mode propulsion system designed to power next-generation small satellites using a shared propellant tank.
MIT-developed electrospray thrusters prepared for NASA's Green Propulsion Dual Mode mission, a demonstration of next-generation propulsion technology for CubeSats. Photo: Amelia Bruno/MIT News

Dual-mode propulsion system technology developed by MIT engineers could give small satellites the ability to perform both powerful manoeuvres and fuel-efficient long-distance travel using a single propellant source.

Small satellites have transformed space research by making missions cheaper and more accessible. Yet they continue to face a fundamental limitation: propulsion.

Traditional chemical thrusters provide powerful bursts of speed but consume large amounts of fuel. Electric propulsion systems, on the other hand, are highly efficient but generate only gentle thrust over long periods. Spacecraft designers have typically had to choose between the two.

Engineers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) now believe they have found a way to combine both approaches in a single compact system, potentially giving small satellites the agility of much larger spacecraft.

The breakthrough centres on a special propellant capable of powering both chemical and electric thrusters from the same fuel tank.

“If you can have chemical and electrical propulsion in one small package, it’s the best of both worlds,” said Amelia Bruno, lead author of the study and a former postdoctoral researcher in MIT’s Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, in a media statement.

“This opens the door for small satellites to do even more science, more observations, and more interesting missions, all on a smaller and cheaper platform.”

The findings have been published in the Journal of Propulsion and Power.

Dual-Mode Propulsion System Combines Two Technologies

The MIT team tested a propellant known as Advanced SpaceCraft Energetic Non-Toxic propellant, or ASCENT. Originally developed by the U.S. Air Force as a safer alternative to hydrazine, ASCENT was designed for chemical propulsion systems.

Researchers discovered that the same propellant can also power miniature electric propulsion devices known as electrospray thrusters.

These tiny thrusters use electric fields to charge particles within a liquid propellant and eject them into space, creating precise and fuel-efficient thrust. While chemical thrusters are ideal for rapid manoeuvres, electrospray systems are better suited for gradual course corrections and long-duration journeys.

By enabling both systems to share a single fuel source, the technology could significantly reduce the size and complexity of propulsion systems aboard CubeSats and other small spacecraft.

Dual-Mode Propulsion System Could Expand Deep-Space Missions

Dual-mode propulsion system can expand deep-space missions. The implications extend beyond Earth orbit.

CubeSats have become popular for scientific research and technology demonstrations, but their limited propulsion capabilities have restricted their use in deep-space missions.

According to Paulo Lozano, the Miguel Alemán Velasco Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics at MIT, the new system could change that.

“We could send CubeSats to Mars, or the asteroid belt, where they could make the journey slowly, using electrospray thrusters,” he said.

“You could then use your chemical thrusters to quickly move to look at interesting features. You could have a lot more flexibility to do a lot more things.”

Testing the Technology

To evaluate the propellant’s performance, the researchers filled small CubeSat reservoirs with ASCENT and tested them in a vacuum chamber designed to simulate conditions in space.

During the experiments, electrospray thrusters powered by ASCENT successfully generated thrust for extended periods, in some cases operating continuously for up to 100 hours.

NASA Mission Will Put the Technology to the Test

The next major test will come later this year.

MIT researchers are working with NASA on the Green Propulsion Dual Mode mission, a CubeSat that will carry both chemical and electrospray thrusters powered by a single propellant tank. Scheduled for launch in November, the mission will be the first demonstration of such a system in a small spacecraft.

If successful, the mission could help pave the way for a new generation of versatile satellites capable of switching between rapid manoeuvres and highly efficient long-distance travel.

Continue Reading

Trending