How India’s Semiconductor Industry Rose From Ashes to Atoms
How India is rebuilding its semiconductor future—from a lost opportunity in the 1980s to a high-stakes push to master the science, scale, and systems that define the global chip industry.
India’s semiconductor ambition is not merely an industrial policy experiment—it is an attempt to rebuild a technological capability lost decades ago, and to do so in a world where chips have become instruments of economic power and geopolitical leverage. From the ashes of an early setback to a renewed push backed by billions in investment, the country is seeking to construct an ecosystem that spans physics, engineering, and global supply chains. The challenge is not simply to manufacture chips, but to master the science, scale, and systems that define the industry—an effort that will unfold not over years, but over generations.
From early setbacks to a renewed national push, India is attempting to build one of the world’s most complex industrial ecosystems – where physics, policy, and geopolitics converge.
Image credit:Nvidia
In the early months of 1989, India’s most ambitious experiment in semiconductor manufacturing came to an abrupt halt. A fire tore through the country’s primary chip fabrication facility in Mohali, Punjab, crippling an ecosystem that had taken years to build and, more importantly, interrupting a trajectory that might have placed India far closer to the global frontier.
The Semiconductor Complex Limited (SCL), established in 1976, had begun producing chips in 1984—at 5000 nanometers, just one generation behind global standards. India was not leading the semiconductor race, but it was not far behind either—especially in an industry where catching up later becomes exponentially harder.
This was only 13 years after Intel introduced the world’s first microprocessor—and three years before Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) began production. The fire changed everything. Its cause was never officially determined. Investigators noted that it appeared to have started at multiple points—fuelling speculation of sabotage. What followed was not just physical damage, but institutional collapse.
India lost infrastructure.
India lost talent.
India lost time.
The disruption was not merely industrial. It was institutional. Engineers dispersed, expertise dissipated, and momentum stalled. By the time operations resumed years later, the global semiconductor landscape had already shifted irreversibly. Today, SCL—now a research-focused facility—produces legacy chips of around 180 nanometers, primarily for defence and space applications. Meanwhile, TSMC is manufacturing 3-nanometer chips and preparing for 2-nanometer production.
The gap is not incremental, it is generational. India imported semiconductor chips worth nearly $20 billion in 2024, with demand growing rapidly as electronics penetrate every aspect of life. And yet, semiconductors remain invisible—embedded in everything, owned by others. TSMC produces chips for global giants like Apple and Nvidia. SCL serves strategic domestic needs
More than three decades on, India is attempting to rebuild that lost trajectory.
But the context has changed. Semiconductors are no longer obscure components buried within devices. They are the foundation of artificial intelligence, telecommunications, defence systems, and economic competitiveness. They shape not just markets, but geopolitics.
India is not simply re-entering an industry it once attempted to build. It is stepping into one of the most complex and strategically contested systems in the modern world.
In March 2026, Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurated a INR 3,300 crore semiconductor facility in Gujarat, declaring India a “reliable global supplier” in an increasingly fragmented chip economy. Around the same time, Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw announced that multiple semiconductor plants are expected to come online over the next few years, with the first fabrication output targeted before the end of the decade. But behind the announcements lies a deeper reality. India is not building a factory. It is attempting to build one of the most complex scientific-industrial ecosystems ever created.
Image: Muffin/Pexels
The Physics Beneath the Industry
To understand the scale of India’s ambition, it is necessary to understand what a semiconductor actually is—not as a product, but as a process. Modern chips are constructed at nanometre scales, where the behaviour of electrons begins to defy classical expectations. Transistors—billions of which are embedded within a single chip—operate by controlling the flow of these electrons through carefully engineered silicon structures. But as these structures shrink, the physics becomes increasingly unstable.
Electrons leak across barriers that were once reliable. Heat accumulates in ways that are difficult to dissipate. Materials behave unpredictably under extreme miniaturisation. What appears as incremental progress in computing power is, in reality, a constant negotiation with the limits of matter.
“A single wafer can take three to four months to manufacture, and there are hundreds of layers that have to be deposited,” notes Neelkanth Mishra, an expert on India’s semiconductor policy and Chief Economist at Axis Bank.
Each of these layers involves a sequence of deposition, etching, doping, and cleaning processes, repeated dozens of times with near-perfect precision. The tolerances are so tight that even microscopic contaminants can render entire batches unusable.
“The chemicals used in wafer cleaning are extraordinarily high purity, and even small impurities can affect yields,” Mishra adds. The process is not only delicate but energy-intensive. As IIT Bombay’s Udayan Ganguly explains, a single thermal step in fabrication can raise the temperature of a silicon wafer from ambient levels to over 1,000 degrees Celsius within seconds, requiring enormous power and precise control.
What emerges from this process is not simply a manufactured object, but a highly controlled physical system—engineered at scales where conventional intuition no longer applies.
A System Defined by Control
If the science of semiconductors is unforgiving, the global ecosystem built around it is equally restrictive.
“From design software to lithography to testing equipment, 90% of the industry is controlled by just two or three companies in each segment,” Mishra observes.
This concentration reflects decades of accumulated expertise, capital investment, and intellectual property. In some areas, such as extreme ultraviolet lithography—the process required to produce the most advanced chips—the dependence is even more pronounced.
“If you want to do extreme ultraviolet lithography, there is only one company in the world that can do it.” Such chokepoints have transformed semiconductors into strategic assets. Access to technology is no longer determined solely by markets, but increasingly by geopolitical alignment and national priorities.
For countries seeking to build domestic capabilities, this creates a paradox: the need to integrate into a global system while simultaneously reducing dependence on it.
India’s renewed push into semiconductors is structured around this tension.
The India Semiconductor Mission, launched in 2022 with a substantial fiscal outlay, represents one of the most ambitious industrial policy initiatives in the country’s recent history. Since then, the government has approved ten semiconductor projects with investments exceeding ₹1.6 lakh crore across six states, covering fabrication, packaging, and specialised semiconductor technologies.
This is not an isolated effort. It is an attempt to build multiple layers of the value chain simultaneously. Early investments have focused on assembly, testing, and packaging facilities—segments that are less capital-intensive and can be scaled relatively quickly. Projects such as the Micron packaging facility in Gujarat, along with other recently approved units, are expected to serve as entry points for building industrial capability.
At the same time, larger and more complex initiatives—such as the proposed fabrication facility in Dholera—are intended to anchor the ecosystem over the longer term.
The second phase of the mission signals a shift in emphasis. Beyond manufacturing, the focus is expanding to include materials, equipment, and intellectual property—areas that are critical for long-term self-reliance.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi has framed semiconductors as central to India’s technological future, calling for the country to become a “reliable global supplier.” Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw has indicated that multiple plants are expected to become operational within this decade.
India’s Semiconductor Industry and The Design Advantage
Despite its limited manufacturing footprint, India occupies a significant position in the global semiconductor landscape through design.
Nearly one-fifth of the world’s semiconductor design engineers are based in the country. Global firms rely on Indian teams to develop chips used in everything from consumer electronics to advanced computing systems. Nearly 20% of the global semiconductor design workforce is based in India. Companies such as Intel, Qualcomm, Nvidia, AMD, and Broadcom rely on Indian engineers for chip design.
“In a ten-dollar chip, five to six dollars of value is captured by the designer,” Mishra points out. This concentration of talent provides India with a strategic advantage, particularly in a world where intellectual property increasingly determines value. India has mastered design. What it has not yet built is manufacturing scale. However, this strength has historically been tied to global companies. The challenge now is to translate it into domestic capability—developing Indian firms that can own and commercialise their designs.
The Ecosystem Question
The central challenge for India lies not in any single segment of the semiconductor value chain, but in the integration of all its components.
“You cannot just build wafer fabs. You need everything—from capital equipment to chemicals—to make the ecosystem viable,” Mishra says.
A semiconductor industry requires:
Reliable energy and water infrastructure
Access to specialised materials and gases
Advanced manufacturing equipment
A continuous pipeline of skilled talent
It also requires coordination across institutions.
“The ecosystem is a triple helix—academia, industry, and government,” says Swaroop Ganguly of IIT Bombay. “Without tight collaboration, it cannot work.”
This interdependence makes semiconductors fundamentally different from most other industries. Progress in one area depends on parallel advances in others.
Nvidia Vera CPU Rack. Image credit: Nvidia
Institutions That Sustained the Science
Even during the decades when India lacked large-scale manufacturing, certain institutions preserved and advanced semiconductor research.
At IIT Bombay, work in microelectronics dates back to the 1970s, when the institute began building capabilities in semiconductor devices and integrated circuits. Over time, this evolved into more sophisticated infrastructure, including cleanroom facilities and collaborative programmes with organisations such as ISRO.
The establishment of the Centre of Excellence in Nanoelectronics (CEN) in the early 2000s further strengthened this foundation, enabling advanced research in semiconductor devices and fabrication techniques. By the late 2010s, India had emerged as a significant contributor to global semiconductor research, with IIT Bombay playing a leading role in experimental nanoelectronics.
In 2023, these efforts were consolidated under SemiX, a dedicated centre aimed at integrating research, talent development, and industry collaboration.
The Economics of Dependence
Semiconductors underpin virtually every modern activity, yet their economic footprint often goes unnoticed. “Every time you go to a doctor, drive a car, or watch a movie—you are effectively paying a semiconductor fee,” says Udayan Ganguly.
The observation is less rhetorical than it appears. As digital systems expand, the cost of semiconductors becomes embedded in everything from healthcare to transportation.
“If India does not control semiconductors to some extent, we are basically fighting a losing battle.”
This framing shifts the conversation from industrial policy to economic sovereignty. Control over semiconductors is not merely about manufacturing capacity; it is about retaining value within the economy.
Innovation as a Continuous Process
One of the defining characteristics of the semiconductor industry is its pace of change. “Semiconductors are not a bandwagon you jump onto—it’s a treadmill,” Ganguly notes. “If you stop running, you fall off.” Technological progress is relentless. Every generation of chips introduces new architectures, materials, and manufacturing techniques. Companies that fail to keep up quickly lose relevance.
“You cannot just build a plant and expect to coast,” Udayan Ganguly adds.
For India, this implies that building initial capacity is only the first step. Sustained investment in research and development will be essential to remain competitive.
Scaling Talent and Capability
India’s talent base is often cited as its greatest advantage, but scaling that advantage presents its own challenges. “We have the core capability,” says Udayan Ganguly. “But to meet demand, we need to scale talent by at least ten times.” This expansion cannot rely solely on elite institutions. It requires a broader transformation of engineering education, incorporating interdisciplinary training across physics, chemistry, materials science, and mechanical engineering. “Semiconductors are not just electronics,” Swaroop Ganguly emphasises. “They require multiple disciplines working together.”
Image:Pexels
The Long Horizon
Semiconductor ecosystems are not built quickly. The experience of other countries underscores this timeline. Taiwan, South Korea, and China invested consistently over decades before achieving their current positions.
“The Chinese started investing in the late 1990s and are still building capabilities—this is at least a 15–20 year journey,” Mishra notes.
For India, the challenge is not only to start, but to sustain momentum across political and economic cycles.
According to government estimates, India is expected to achieve the capability to design and manufacture chips for 70–75% of domestic applications by 2029. Building on this foundation, the next phase under Semicon 2.0 will prioritize advanced manufacturing, with a defined roadmap to reach 3-nm and 2-nm technology nodes. By 2035, India aims to establish itself as one of the world’s leading semiconductor nations.
India’s semiconductor industry ambitions are rooted as much in history as in future aspirations. The loss of early momentum in the late twentieth century delayed its entry into an industry that rewards continuity and scale. Today, the country is attempting to rebuild that trajectory under far more complex conditions. The progress made so far—policy frameworks, investment commitments, institutional capacity—suggests that the foundation is being laid. But the real test lies ahead.
Semiconductors are not merely manufactured. They are engineered—through sustained effort, coordinated systems, and long-term commitment.
From the ashes of past setbacks to the atomic precision of modern chipmaking, India’s semiconductor journey has begun again. Whether it can be sustained will determine not just the future of an industry, but the contours of technological power in the decades to come.
Dipin Damodharan is an award-winning journalist, editor and media entrepreneur, and Co-founder and Editor-in-Chief of EdPublica, an independent global media platform covering education, science, research, innovation, climate and public policy. With more than a decade of experience in journalism, he has worked across print, digital and multimedia media. His reporting explores science, climate, sustainability and the social impact of research and innovation. His work has been recognised by the Solutions Journalism Network and other journalism organisations.
Indian-Belgian Team Develops Portable Detectors to Image Mountains and Monuments Using Cosmic Rays
Portable cosmic-ray detectors could help researchers examine mountains, tunnels and historical monuments without invasive procedures, opening new possibilities for scientific imaging and infrastructure inspection.
A particle detector displays tracks produced by cosmic rays, illustrating how scientists study high-energy particles for non-invasive imaging applications.Image credit:Pexels
An international team of researchers from India and Belgium has developed portable particle detectors that could help scientists examine the interiors of mountains, tunnels and historical monuments without damaging them. The technology uses naturally occurring cosmic-ray particles to map variations in the density of objects, offering a potential approach to non-invasive imaging of large structures.
The detectors, developed using glass-based Resistive Plate Chambers (RPCs), achieved a particle-detection efficiency exceeding 95% during testing, according to a report published by Research Matters on October 24, 2026. The findings demonstrate the potential of compact detector systems to investigate dense materials and support future applications in geology, archaeology and infrastructure assessment.
The collaboration includes researchers from India’s National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER), Bhubaneswar, and the Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), alongside researchers from Belgian institutions, including Université catholique de Louvain and the Inter-University Institute for High Energies.
How cosmic rays reveal hidden structures
The technology uses muons, high-energy particles produced when cosmic rays interact with Earth’s atmosphere. These particles continuously reach the Earth’s surface and can penetrate substantial thicknesses of rock, concrete and other materials.
As muons travel through an object, some are absorbed or deflected depending on its density and thickness. By measuring the number and trajectories of particles passing through a structure, researchers can identify variations in internal density and reconstruct images of otherwise inaccessible areas.
The technique, known as muography, is comparable in principle to X-ray imaging, but uses naturally occurring particles instead of an artificial radiation source. It has previously been used to investigate geological formations, including volcanoes, and to explore archaeological structures.
However, conventional muon detectors can be bulky, difficult to transport and challenging to operate in remote locations. The new glass-based detectors aim to address some of these limitations through a compact design and sealed operation, reducing dependence on continuous gas supplies.
Testing the detector system
The researchers developed three glass RPC prototypes using thin glass electrodes separated by gas-filled gaps. When a muon passes through a chamber, it ionises the gas, generating an electrical signal that can be recorded to determine the particle’s position.
Electronic readout systems capture these signals and help reconstruct the trajectories of incoming particles. During testing, the detectors achieved an efficiency exceeding 95%, with a timing resolution of approximately 1.8 nanoseconds, according to the research report.
To examine the system’s ability to detect dense materials, the team conducted an absorption experiment using one prototype. During an open-sky measurement, researchers recorded nearly 55,000 muon tracks. After placing a lead block in the experimental setup, the recorded count fell to 30,894, demonstrating how dense material reduced the number of particles reaching the detector.
Representational image.Image credit:Pexels
The experiment provided proof of principle that the system could measure muon attenuation and support radiographic imaging. However, imaging complex structures such as mountains or monuments requires measurements from multiple directions and further computational reconstruction.
Applications and challenges ahead
Portable muon detectors could eventually help researchers investigate hidden cavities, examine geological formations, inspect tunnels and study the internal structures of historical monuments. Engineers could also explore their application in assessing infrastructure such as dams and bridges, although these uses would require additional testing and validation.
For cultural heritage conservation, muography could offer a valuable alternative where drilling or other invasive investigations risk damaging fragile structures. A 2025 review published in iScience highlighted the technique’s potential as a complementary, non-destructive method for studying cultural heritage objects, while noting that the relatively low flux of naturally occurring muons can require lengthy data-collection periods.
The technology is not yet a universal replacement for existing inspection methods. Its practical application will depend on factors such as spatial resolution, detector size, measurement duration and the complexity of the structure being examined.
The researchers have proposed further improvements, including lighter structural materials, larger detector areas and enhanced readout systems. These developments could make the detectors easier to deploy and improve the quality of reconstructed images.
How Scientists Traced the Flow of Matter Around a Dead Star Using X-rays
By studying changes in X-ray signals from Centaurus X-3, researchers at Bengaluru’s Raman Research Institute have found evidence of an unusual way in which matter reaches a neutron star. The discovery could change how scientists explain the radiation coming from this distant system.
An artistic impression of the high-mass X-ray binary system Centaurus X-3. Not to scale.
When a massive star dies, its core can collapse into an extremely dense object called a neutron star. Despite being only about the size of a city, it can have a mass comparable to that of the Sun. Its powerful gravity can pull matter away from a nearby companion star, releasing energy in the form of X-rays as the material falls towards it.
Scientists at Bengaluru’s Raman Research Institute (RRI) have studied these X-ray signals from Centaurus X-3, a star system about 24,000 light-years from Earth. By examining changes in the signals, the researchers identified a stream of matter flowing towards the neutron star and found evidence of a rotating disk of material around it. This is an unusual finding because such disks are not commonly expected in this type of star system. The discovery could help scientists better understand how matter moves around neutron stars and how these distant objects produce X-rays.
Star That Pulls in Matter
Centaurus X-3 is in the constellation Centaurus. It belongs to a class of systems known as high-mass X-ray binaries. These systems contain a neutron star and a massive companion star held together by gravity.
A neutron star forms when the core of a massive star collapses at the end of its life. It packs roughly the Sun’s mass into a sphere only about the size of a city. Its gravity is so strong that it can pull in material from a nearby companion star. As this material falls towards the neutron star, it releases enormous amounts of energy, including X-rays. Scientists study this radiation to understand how the material behaves and how the system works.
Centaurus X-3 is also a pulsar. Its neutron star rotates and sends out radiation from regions near its magnetic poles. As the star spins, these beams sweep across space. When a beam passes an observing satellite, the satellite detects a pulse of radiation, much as a lighthouse produces a repeating flash as it turns. These regular pulses provide scientists with a way to study the neutron star and its surroundings.
What the Changing Signals Revealed
The radiation from Centaurus X-3 does not come only from the neutron star itself. Some of it interacts with nearby material, including the surface of the companion star, gas flowing away from it and matter surrounding the neutron star. This material absorbs radiation and emits it again. Scientists call this secondary radiation.
The accretion stream falling onto the neutron star along its magnetic field lines.
Changes in this radiation can help researchers work out what is happening around the neutron star. However, Centaurus X-3 is so far away that telescopes cannot clearly distinguish its surrounding structures. It appears as a single point of light. Scientists must therefore piece together the system’s structure from the signals they receive.
Earlier observations had shown that the intensity of certain secondary X-ray emission lines changed as the neutron star rotated. An emission line is a feature in a spectrum that can reveal information about the material producing or interacting with the radiation. A research team led by Kinjal Roy of RRI examined four such emission lines in detail. The researchers found that the structure producing these changes must be rotating along with the neutron star.
The pattern helped them identify the likely source which is a stream of matter moving towards the neutron star.
Following the stream of matter
This stream is part of a process called accretion, in which a compact object draws in material from its surroundings. In Centaurus X-3, the stream carries matter from an accretion disk towards the neutron star. The disk is a rotating structure of gas and other material that moves around the star before being drawn inwards. The neutron star’s magnetic field then guides the incoming matter towards its magnetic poles.
The stream also changes what an observing satellite sees. As it moves around the neutron star, it can come between the satellite and the star, partially blocking the direct radiation. When this happens, the primary X-ray signal weakens. At the same time, radiation from the stream itself becomes stronger in the observed signal.
The researchers used these changing signals to connect the observed variations to the movement of matter around the neutron star. The evidence for an accretion stream also points to an accretion disk feeding it. This matters because scientists generally expect high-mass X-ray binaries to gather material in a different way.
Why an accretion disk matters
In many high-mass X-ray binaries, a neutron star captures gas directly from the stream of material blown away by its companion star. This is known as stellar-wind accretion. An accretion disk involves a different arrangement: material gathers into a rotating structure before flowing towards the neutron star. The findings from Centaurus X-3 indicate that this disk-based process is taking place in a system where it is not generally expected.
That difference matters when scientists calculate how the system produces and releases radiation. If their models leave out the disk, they may fail to account for some of the radiation coming from the surrounding material.
“Accretion disk is not expected to occur in [HMXBs] So, if an accretion disk is forming in this system, emission models have to be modified,” Roy said in the Department of Science and Technology’s announcement. He added that future models of Centaurus X-3 would need to account for radiation from the disk.
The research does not mean that scientists have directly photographed the disk. Instead, they have used the changing X-ray signals to infer the presence and behaviour of structures that remain too distant to resolve clearly. Published in The Astrophysical Journal, the study adds to the understanding of Centaurus X-3, one of the most widely studied binary pulsars. It also shows how small changes in radiation can reveal the movement of matter around objects that are otherwise beyond the reach of direct observation.
By identifying the flow responsible for the changing signals, the researchers have provided a more detailed picture of how this neutron star draws in material. That picture will help scientists refine their models of Centaurus X-3 and examine whether similar processes occur in other high-mass X-ray binaries.
A rocket launches over the ocean, illustrating the “Rocket Revolution” theme of World Space Week 2026 and the growing role of launch technology in space access. Representational image. Image credit: SpaceX/ Pexels
For most of the space age, rockets were built to fly once. After delivering a satellite to orbit, much of the vehicle was discarded. But that model is transforming as reusable boosters, smaller launch vehicles and shared launches are making space more accessible to companies, universities and countries beyond the traditional space powers.
This has become the focus of World Space Week 2026, observed from October 4 to 10 with the theme “Rocket Revolution.” The mission of World Space Week Association (WSWA) is to strengthen the link between space and society through public education, participation, and dialogue on the future of space activity using World Space Week as a focus.
The dates mark two milestones in space history: the launch of Sputnik 1 on October 4, 1957, and the entry into force of the Outer Space Treaty on October 10, 1967.
Rockets, Reused
SpaceX’s Falcon 9 has shown the potential of reusable rockets. Its first stage returns to Earth after launch and can fly again. The approach can reduce the need to build an entirely new rocket for every mission. Blue Origin’s New Glenn also has a reusable first stage, while Rocket Lab is developing a reusable version of its Electron launcher.
Smaller rockets and rideshare missions are opening another part of the market. A company with a small satellite no longer necessarily needs access to a large launcher or an entire rocket.
Nearly 15,000 Satellites are in Orbit
The OECD estimates that more than 14,000 operational satellites were in orbit at the end of 2025, rising to nearly 15,000 by mid-2026. Satellite observations supply more than 90% of the observations used in numerical weather prediction, according to the OECD. Earth-observation satellites also monitor crops, forests, oceans and cities, while their images can help map areas affected by floods and cyclones.
The global space economy was estimated at 550–600 billion dollars in 2025, with much of its value coming from services based on satellite communications, navigation and Earth-observation data.
India Opening Launch Sector
India is also moving towards a larger private space industry. In July 2026, Skyroot Aerospace’s Vikram-I became the first privately developed Indian rocket to conduct an orbital launch from Indian soil. It lifted off from Sriharikota on July 18 and placed two satellites, SCOPE and Grahaa, into low Earth orbit.
Interestingly, the Department of Space reported around 440 space-technology startups registered on the DPIIT Startup India portal as of August 2026. ISRO is also developing the Small Satellite Launch Vehicle (SSLV) for spacecraft weighing up to about 500 kg. A dedicated SSLV launch complex is being developed at Kulasekarapattinam in Tamil Nadu.
More spacecraft, More Orbital Risks
A busier space environment brings its own problems. About 45,860 pieces of space debris are regularly tracked, according to the OECD. Millions of smaller fragments are too difficult to monitor individually. A collision can create thousands more pieces and threaten other spacecraft.
Satellite operators therefore need to track nearby objects, avoid collisions and plan for spacecraft disposal after missions end. For World Space Week 2026, the “Rocket Revolution” theme points to a space industry that is moving beyond occasional government missions. Rockets are being reused, private companies are entering the launch business and satellites are becoming part of everyday infrastructure. The challenge that has to be tackled is the increasingly busy orbital environment usable for the next generation of missions.