Connect with us

Climate & Environment

When the Himalayas Collapse Without Warning, What Counts as Preparedness?

Nepal flash floods show why Himalayan disaster preparedness must go beyond early warnings to safer infrastructure, land-use planning and climate adaptation.

Published

on

Nepal flash floods show why Himalayan disaster preparedness must go beyond early warnings to safer infrastructure, land-use planning and climate adaptation.
CCTV footage shows a mudslide and floodwaters at Gyirong Port on the China-Nepal border on August 26, 2026. Credit: CCTV footage via Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain.

The Rasuwa disaster (Nepal flash floods) has killed more than 1,000 people in Nepal and China and left thousands missing. The catastrophe exposes a harder problem than the absence of an alarm: how do you protect communities and infrastructure when mountain hazards can cascade within minutes?

On the morning of August 26, a mass of ice and rock broke loose high in Nepal’s Rasuwa district and plunged roughly 1,200 metres into the valley below. Within minutes, the resulting debris and water surged into the Bhotekoshi River system.

A week later, the scale of the disaster is far clearer and far more devastating than initial reports suggested. Nepal’s National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Authority (NDRRMA) has reported 1,050 deaths and 3,916 people missing. China has reported another 16 deaths and 546 missing in the affected area across the border, taking the combined death toll to 1,066. More than 11,800 people have been rescued in Nepal, but the search continues in remote valleys and at damaged hydropower projects. The numbers continue to shift as rescue teams recover bodies and families search for missing relatives.

Nepal flash floods expose the limits of early warning

Researchers analyzing satellite imagery, seismic signals, and video footage say the flood was likely triggered by an ice-rock avalanche rather than a conventional glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF). The distinction matters: while a glacial lake’s water levels and drainage systems can be monitored for early warnings, an unstable mountain slope can fail suddenly, turning a quiet landscape into a debris corridor within minutes.

A disaster that outran the warning system

ICIMOD’s assessment notes that the collapse occurred around 8:37 am Nepal Standard Time, producing a magnitude 5.2 seismic signal. Hydrological data shows how rapidly the event unfolded: water levels on the Trishuli River at Galchchi rose nine metres in just 30 minutes, while levels at Malekhu rose seven metres in a similar window, washing away several monitoring stations in the process.

This highlights a hard reality in disaster management: a warning system is only useful if there is enough lead time to act.

Dr. Farooq Azam, Senior Cryosphere Specialist at ICIMOD, described the Rasuwa event as a sudden-onset hazard with no detection and no time for warnings. Because deep-seated bedrock or sub-glacial instabilities remain invisible to standard surveillance, identifying a failure point in advance is rarely possible. The take-away isn’t that early-warning systems are useless, but rather that they cannot be the sole pillars of Himalayan safety.

From early warning to early preparedness

When casualties run into the thousands, the scope of the problem extends far beyond simple flood management. Nearly 1.6 million people have been affected across a broad area, with extensive destruction to roads, bridges, markets, communications, and power grids. As of September 1, NDRRMA figures show at least 639 hydropower workers missing, while over 21,000 security personnel remain deployed for search and rescue.

When a sudden mountain hazard strikes, built infrastructure often compounds the catastrophe. Destroyed roads delay emergency crews, collapsed bridges isolate entire villages, damaged power plants force dangerous confined-space rescues, and lost monitoring stations blind teams downstream.

Because of this, Azam advocates shifting focus toward long-term resilience: stricter land-use planning, safer infrastructure siting, and public awareness of high-altitude risks. He emphasizes that environmental impact assessments must evaluate how a shifting mountain landscape will affect a project over its entire operational lifetime—not just during construction. Planners can no longer just ask if a bridge or power plant can survive today’s weather; they have to design for conditions 30, 50, or 70 years down the line.

The Himalayas are not a static landscape

While current scientific evidence does not draw a direct line from climate change to this single avalanche, the event occurred within a mountain ecosystem experiencing rapid physical changes.

Glaciological assessments show accelerating mass loss across the Himalayas, with negative mass balance recorded in 89% of observed years over the last five decades. The Hindu Kush Himalaya region has also seen significant 21st-century warming, rising between 0.15°C and 0.60°C per decade.

These shifts ripple through the whole ecosystem. Snow cover patterns are shifting, permafrost is thawing, and slope stability is deteriorating. Thawing permafrost is particularly concerning high up, where frozen ground acts as a natural glue; as it thaws, erosion, landslides, and slope failure increase, directly threatening down-valley infrastructure. Climate change doesn’t need to directly trigger an avalanche to make the entire region significantly more fragile.

Black carbon is another pressure on the cryosphere

Particulate pollution presents another major stressor. A study by Climate Trends found that black carbon concentrations on the Indian side of the Himalayas rose by roughly 7.74% between 2000–09 and 2010–19. The study recorded a notable jump in average snow-surface temperatures, which rose from -11.27°C (2000–09) to -7.13°C (2020–23).

Black carbon darkens snow, reducing its reflectivity and accelerating surface melting. Because mountain ice acts as a natural water reservoir for downstream populations, this melting threatens long-term water security. While black carbon didn’t explicitly cause the Rasuwa slide, it underscores why regional environmental risks must be tackled holistically rather than in isolated hazard buckets.

The problem begins with where we build

Ultimately, the hardest questions around Rasuwa are geographical: Where are we building towns, laying roads, and placing power plants?

Over recent decades, infrastructure has steadily encroached onto lower riverbanks and active floodplains. While older communities historically built on higher ground to avoid active river channels, modern land-use planning frequently ignores these natural boundaries. Bringing local and indigenous geographical knowledge back into modern engineering decisions is a practical starting point for adaptation.

Anjal Prakash, Professor of Public Policy at FLAME University and an IPCC author, points out that the region does not suffer from a lack of science. Researchers have tracked retreating glaciers, changing permafrost, and rising snowlines for decades. The failure, he argues, lies in policy— translating well-documented risks into smarter zoning and construction choices.

A regional disaster cannot be managed country by country

The Rasuwa crisis also demonstrates why disaster planning cannot stop at national borders. The affected river systems cross international boundaries, the failure originated near the Nepal-China border, and the resulting debris washed through multiple downstream jurisdictions.

The World Meteorological Organization points to this as a clear example of cascading transboundary hazards. Aarti Khosla, Director of Climate Trends, similarly notes that risks across the Hindu Kush Himalaya affect India and neighboring countries equally, requiring joint approaches to monitoring, early warning, and climate adaptation.

Data sharing across borders is essential. A flood warning downstream in one country often relies on sensor data from upstream in another. When development choices or infrastructure failures in one nation can trigger impacts across the border, regional coordination becomes a necessity rather than an option.

The future risk is not just more floods

Disaster risk in the Himalayas is often oversimplified into a single concept: Glacial Lake Outburst Floods (GLOFs).

GLOFs are a major threat, but the vocabulary needs to expand. The mountains face ice falls, rockslides, landslide-dammed rivers, debris flows, and slope failures—often interacting all at once. An avalanche blocks a river; the temporary dam holds back water until it breaches; the resulting torrent sweeps up massive amounts of rock and earth; the debris wipes out bridges and monitoring equipment, leaving downstream teams blind to what is coming next. Preparing for mountain hazards means preparing for these linked multi-stage events, not just isolated floods.

What preparedness should look like now

A practical response requires pairing early-warning technology with long-term climate adaptation:

  • Diversify warning networks: Expand river sensors, satellite tracking, and local alert channels where lead time exists, while planning for events that offer no notice at all.
  • Update zoning and land use: Base building regulations on dynamic river and slope modeling rather than static historical maps.
  • Mandate life-cycle risk assessments: Require infrastructure projects to factor in climate and cryosphere projections over their entire intended lifespan.
  • Build system redundancy: Ensure communications, transit routes, and monitoring stations have backups so a single failure point doesn’t collapse an entire emergency response.
  • Integrate local knowledge: Use community insights on historical floods and terrain stability alongside satellite and scientific data.
  • Formalize transboundary cooperation: Share real-time hydrological, seismic, and weather data across international borders.

The mountains are changing. Policy must catch up.

The long-term outlook for the region is stark. Under high-emissions scenarios, Himalayan glaciers could lose over 60% of their volume by 2100; even moderate scenarios project losses of up to 35%.

These projections outline a fundamental transformation of the mountain environment. Glacial retreat initially leads to periods of higher runoff—”peak water”—followed by declining long-term water availability, directly impacting farming, drinking water, and energy production across South Asia.

As UN Climate Change Executive Secretary Simon Stiell has noted, rising temperatures are making severe mountain disasters more frequent. In the Himalayas, the core issue is that expanding human settlements and multi-million-dollar infrastructure projects are sitting in the path of a rapidly changing landscape designed around historical climate assumptions.

When a mountain moves without warning, safety relies entirely on decisions made years or decades before the collapse happens.

EP Staff is the editorial team at EdPublica, an independent media organisation focused on science, education, environment and public policy. The team produces evidence-based news, features, explainers and analysis on issues that shape society and everyday life.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Earth

Greener Forests, Weaker Carbon Sinks? Study Finds Declining Productivity in Northeast India

A 24-year satellite-based study finds that Northeast India’s forests are experiencing declining carbon productivity despite relatively stable canopy cover, highlighting how rising atmospheric dryness could weaken their capacity to absorb and retain carbon.

Published

on

Dense green forest canopy with sunlight filtering through the leaves of tall trees.
A dense forest canopy illustrating the vegetation cover and ecological richness of tropical forest ecosystems.Image credit:Pexels

Forests in Northeast India are showing signs of a weakening capacity to accumulate carbon despite maintaining relatively stable canopy cover, according to a study published in Ecological Indicators in October 2026. The research suggests that increasing vegetation greenness does not necessarily indicate stronger carbon sinks, highlighting the need to assess forest health beyond satellite measurements of green cover.

Titled Are Greener Forests Stronger Carbon Sinks? Rising Vapour Pressure Deficit Instigates Greening-Productivity Decoupling in a Tropical Biodiversity Hotspot in India, the study examined forest carbon dynamics across Northeast India using 24 years of satellite-derived data from 2001 to 2024.

Researchers analysed three indicators: Leaf Area Index (LAI), Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) and Net Primary Productivity (NPP). These measurements helped assess changes in forest canopy structure, photosynthetic activity and the amount of carbon retained in plant biomass after accounting for plant respiration.

The analysis found that while canopy structure remained relatively stable and gross primary productivity increased modestly by 1.76 grams of carbon per square metre annually, net primary productivity declined by 0.83 grams of carbon per square metre annually across much of the region.

The researchers identified a divergence between canopy greenness and carbon productivity across approximately 40% of forested areas. A separate divergence between photosynthetic activity and net productivity was observed across around 30% of the region.

These findings indicate that forests can maintain their green appearance without achieving corresponding gains in carbon accumulation.

Atmospheric dryness emerges as a major factor

The study identified rising Vapour Pressure Deficit (VPD) as a primary driver of declining forest productivity. VPD measures the difference between the amount of moisture the atmosphere can hold and the moisture it actually contains. Higher VPD indicates greater atmospheric demand for water, increasing stress on vegetation.

Under such conditions, plants may close their stomata, the small pores on their leaves, to reduce water loss. This also restricts the intake of carbon dioxide required for photosynthesis, potentially reducing the amount of carbon absorbed by vegetation.

The researchers also identified a major shift in forest carbon functioning beginning around 2012. Their analysis suggests that the relationship between canopy structure, photosynthesis and net carbon accumulation has weakened over time.

The findings are particularly significant for Northeast India, which the study identifies as a climatically sensitive biodiversity hotspot containing approximately one-third of India’s forest carbon.

Earlier research points to similar concerns

The findings build on earlier research published in Scientific Reports in December 2023, which examined vegetation productivity across India between 2001 and 2019.

That study found that India’s Leaf Area Index increased by 6.75% in consistently forested areas, while Net Primary Productivity declined by 6.19%. Northeast India, the Western Ghats and parts of Peninsular India emerged as important regions experiencing declining productivity.

The 2023 research associated these changes with rising temperatures, which can reduce photosynthesis and increase plant respiration beyond certain temperature thresholds.

Another study examining a semi-deciduous forest in Kaziranga, published in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology in 2022, demonstrated how carbon exchange varies with seasonal and climatic conditions. It found that the forest functioned as a carbon sink during the pre-monsoon season but as a carbon source during winter in the observed study period.

pexels ali soheil 2154370577 38529835 1

Image of a dense forest alongside a flowing river.Image credit:Pexels

Together, these studies highlight the importance of examining forest productivity, atmospheric conditions and seasonal carbon exchange rather than relying solely on changes in green cover.

The latest research does not suggest that Northeast India’s forests are structurally collapsing. Instead, it points to a less visible change in their ecological functioning, with implications for forest carbon accounting and climate-resilient forest management.

The findings underline the need for monitoring systems that combine satellite observations with measurements of atmospheric stress and carbon productivity to better understand how tropical forests respond to a warming climate.

Continue Reading

Health

Climate Change Contributed to 10,600 Excess Preterm Births in Asia During April 2024 Heatwave

A Zero Carbon Analytics briefing estimates that climate change contributed to around 10,600 excess preterm births across three Asian countries during the April 2024 heat event. Its projections indicate a higher burden in India and Bangladesh by mid-century.

Published

on

Healthcare worker measuring a newborn baby during a post-delivery health assessment.
A healthcare worker measures a newborn baby. Extreme heat during pregnancy has been linked to an increased risk of preterm birth, according to a Zero Carbon Analytics analysis. Representational image. Image credit: Vidal Balielo Jr./ Pexels

The extreme heat that swept across South and Southeast Asia in April 2024 may have contributed to more than 16,000 additional preterm births in India, Bangladesh and the Philippines, according to a new analysis by climate research organisation Zero Carbon Analytics. The report estimates that the heat event was associated with approximately 16,150 excess preterm births compared with the number expected during a typical April, based on temperatures recorded between 1991 and 2020. Of these, around 10,600 were attributed to the additional warming caused by human-induced climate change.

The estimates carry considerable uncertainty. The analysis places the range for heat-event-associated excess births between 10,100 and 22,400, while the estimate attributable to human-induced warming ranges from 5,100 to 17,700. The April 2024 event was made at least 45 times more likely by human-caused climate change. The heat persisted for about a month in India and Bangladesh and 15 days in the Philippines.

India: Highest Excess Preterm Births

India accounted for an estimated 10,050 excess preterm births, followed by Bangladesh with 5,515 and the Philippines with 585. The national increase, compared with a typical April, was estimated at 3.6% in India, 11.9% in Bangladesh and 10% in the Philippines.

Bangladesh recorded the highest rate of excess preterm births relative to the number of births, at approximately 19 per 1,000. The Philippines recorded around eight per 1,000. India’s figures varied considerably across states. Four states in the Indo-Gangetic region—Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal and Jharkhand—accounted for 65% of India’s estimated excess preterm births. Their contribution reflects the combination of high population levels and substantial heat exposure during the event.

India’s average temperature in April 2024 was 0.94°C above normal. Several parts of the country experienced much higher anomalies, while nine states recorded temperatures below their respective averages. Tripura and Mizoram were approximately 2.7°C warmer than normal, with an estimated 11% increase in preterm birth risk.

West Bengal recorded a 10% increase in risk, Bihar 7% and Uttar Pradesh around 3%. Karnataka had the highest estimated excess rate, at 12 per 1,000 births. The state experienced a temperature anomaly of around 2°C and had a higher baseline preterm birth rate. The national estimate of 3.6% considers states that experienced warmer-than-normal conditions. Including the nine states that were cooler than average brings the estimated increase down to 3.2%.

Bangladesh had the Highest Excess Rate

Bangladesh recorded approximately 5,515 excess preterm births during the heat event, equivalent to around 19 per 1,000 births. Average temperatures were 2.88°C above normal. Dhaka and Chittagong together accounted for 47% of the country’s estimated excess births. The risk of preterm birth increased by approximately 10–15% across all divisions.

Mymensingh recorded the largest increase. Temperatures there were 3.59°C above normal, and the estimated number of excess preterm births was 24 per 1,000. Sylhet recorded the lowest rate, at 16 per 1,000. In the Philippines, the 15-day heat event was associated with an estimated 585 excess preterm births. Calabarzon accounted for around 100, while Metro Manila and Central Luzon recorded approximately 80 each. Metro Manila contributed 14% of the national estimate.

Average temperatures in the country were 2.44°C above normal. Cagayan Valley recorded a 15% increase in preterm birth risk, equivalent to around 12 excess births per 1,000. In Cagayan province, temperatures were 4.01°C above normal and the estimated risk increase reached 17%.

How Heat Affects Pregnancy

A preterm birth occurs when a baby is born alive before completing 37 weeks of pregnancy. Prematurity is a leading cause of neonatal mortality and can have lasting effects on a child’s physical development, neurological health and learning.

The study has found a relationship between high temperatures and an increased likelihood of premature delivery. A synthesis of studies cited in the Zero Carbon Analytics briefing found that a 1°C increase in heat exposure was associated with 4% higher odds of preterm birth. During heatwaves, the odds were 26% higher. Researchers are still investigating the biological processes behind this association. Heat exposure can cause dehydration and reduce blood flow to the placenta. It may also trigger inflammation and physiological responses that contribute to the onset of labour.

Pregnant women who undertake strenuous physical work or have limited access to drinking water face additional exposure. Poorly ventilated homes, metal and asbestos roofing, unreliable electricity and the cost of cooling can make it difficult to avoid excessive heat.

South Asia already has the world’s highest regional preterm birth rate. In 2020, the regional rate was 13.2%. India recorded 13%, Bangladesh 16.2% and the Philippines 7.7%. India accounted for approximately 20% of all preterm births worldwide that year. The briefing also cites research from Tamil Nadu that found pregnant women undertaking moderate to heavy physical work during heat stress had roughly twice the risk of miscarriage. This study examined miscarriage rather than preterm birth, but it provides further evidence of the reproductive health risks associated with occupational heat exposure.

preterm births: Healthcare professional examining a newborn baby with a stethoscope in a hospital.
A healthcare professional examines a newborn baby after delivery. Research links exposure to extreme heat during pregnancy with an increased risk of preterm birth. Health risks may continue even after the birth in such conditions. Representational image. Image credit: Lemniscate L/ Pexels


How Climate Risks Affect Newborn Health and Survival

The briefing examines research linking high temperatures to other pregnancy complications. One global synthesis found that high heat exposure was associated with 28% higher odds of gestational diabetes and 48% higher odds of congenital anomalies. The evidence for these outcomes remains less extensive than that available on preterm birth. Floods, cyclones and other climate-related hazards also affect newborn health. In flood-prone areas of Bangladesh, infant death rates were estimated to be 8% higher. Research covering 1988–2017 attributed 152,753 excess infant deaths to flood exposure.

Exposure to cyclones during pregnancy or a child’s first year was associated with 10.4 additional infant deaths per 1,000 live births, a 27% increase. In India, studies have found higher rates of low birthweight in flood-affected regions. Poorer households exposed to floods also face a greater likelihood of low birthweight.

Air pollution adds to these health risks. In Bangladesh, exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) was estimated to account for 4.4–4.9% of preterm births between 2015 and 2019. In India, maternal exposure to ambient PM2.5 during pregnancy was associated with 67% higher odds of preterm birth and 37% higher odds of low birthweight, after adjusting for temperature.


India Faces 15,300 More Preterm Births by Mid-Century

The report’s climate projections indicate that heat-related preterm births could increase by the middle of the century. Using climate model data for 2041–2060, it estimates around 15,300 excess preterm births during a typical April in India, compared with the historical baseline. The projected range is 6,800–28,100. For Bangladesh, the corresponding estimate is approximately 1,500, with a range of 630–2,900. The modelling uses two emissions pathways, SSP2-4.5 and SSP3-7.0.

India’s projected estimate is about 50% higher than the 10,050 excess births associated with the April 2024 event. Uttar Pradesh is expected to record the largest burden, followed by Bihar and Rajasthan. In Bangladesh, Dhaka is projected to have the highest number, followed by Chittagong and Rajshahi.

These projections depend on several assumptions. The model keeps the relationship between temperature and preterm birth unchanged and does not account for future physiological, behavioural or healthcare-system adaptation. It also incorporates projected declines in the number of births by mid-century—around 18% in India and 22% in Bangladesh. The figures represent a modelled estimate under specified climate and demographic conditions. They do not predict the exact number of preterm births that will occur.

Maternal Healthcare Plans and Heat Exposure

India has several programmes aimed at improving maternal and newborn health, including the India Newborn Action Plan and the Pradhan Mantri Surakshit Matritva Abhiyan. The programmes were not originally designed to address the specific health risks associated with extreme heat.

The Union Health Ministry has recently issued guidance on heat-related risks during pregnancy for healthcare professionals and community health workers. It covers the identification of high-risk pregnancies, warning signs, hydration, cooling, referrals and family preparedness. The National Programme on Climate Change and Human Health and state climate action plans could help incorporate these measures into maternal healthcare services. Existing state-level plans, however, have substantial gaps.

A review of 19 heat action plans and 16 state climate plans found that 12 of the 35 documents had no recommendations for pregnant or lactating women. The remaining 23 listed 214 strategies, of which only 40 specifically addressed pregnant or lactating women. Most recommendations focused on individual behaviour rather than structural measures such as improved housing, access to cooling and health-system support.

A September 2026 Wellcome Trust survey of 1,000 maternal healthcare professionals across five countries, including India, found that 73% had observed an increase in heat-related cases or complications among pregnant women over the previous five years. Around 92% said they needed more training and resources to manage these risks.

Bangladesh introduced national guidelines in 2024 through its Directorate General of Health Services and UNICEF to address heat-related risks among children and pregnant women. The Zero Carbon Analytics briefing did not identify a comparable heat-specific maternal health guideline or heat action plan in the Philippines.

Preparing for Heat-related Complications

Healthcare services can identify women at higher risk during antenatal visits and advise them on hydration, rest and reducing exposure during the hottest hours. Community health workers can monitor vulnerable pregnancies and help women access medical care when warning signs appear. Hospitals and primary health centres also need procedures to identify and manage heat-related complications.

Access to drinking water, affordable electricity, shaded workplaces and well-ventilated housing will influence how effectively women can protect themselves. Heat warnings need to reach pregnant women and their families in a form they can act on, particularly in communities where outdoor work and limited access to cooling make exposure difficult to avoid.

The April 2024 analysis estimates a substantial number of premature births associated with a single heat event across three countries. The projections for India and Bangladesh suggest that the pressure on maternal and newborn healthcare could increase as temperatures rise. Public health planning will need to account for heat exposure alongside existing risks such as undernutrition, air pollution and inadequate antenatal care.

Continue Reading

Climate & Environment

Overshooting 1.5°C Could Trigger Irreversible Damage to Earth’s Ice Systems, Warns UN-Backed Report

A new ICCI–UNEP report warns that exceeding the 1.5°C warming threshold could trigger irreversible damage to glaciers, polar ice sheets, permafrost and oceans, with lasting consequences for sea levels, freshwater security and ecosystems.

Jishnu P

Published

on

Large blue iceberg floating in dark polar waters, illustrating the effects of global warming on Earth's ice systems.
A large iceberg floats in polar waters, reflecting the growing vulnerability of Earth's ice systems to rising global temperatures.Image credit:Pexels

Exceeding the 1.5°C global warming threshold set by the Paris Agreement could trigger extensive and, in many cases, irreversible damage to Earth’s ice systems. Even if temperatures are subsequently brought down, several consequences of prolonged warming could persist for centuries or thousands of years, according to a new report released on November 2.

Titled Overshoot and the Cryosphere: Averting Global Meltdown, the report was produced by the International Cryosphere Climate Initiative (ICCI) in coordination with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). It brings together research from more than 80 polar and mountain scientists to examine how exceeding the 1.5°C threshold would affect glaciers, polar ice sheets, permafrost, sea ice and polar oceans.

The assessment accompanies UNEP’s Limiting Overshoot Spotlight Report, examining which climate impacts are already unavoidable and how accelerated climate action could prevent further damage. Its findings come ahead of COP31 in Türkiye, highlighting the urgency of limiting the duration and extent of global temperature overshoot.

“There are no good outcomes in exceeding 1.5°C. To contain the global fallout and damage from ice loss in the world’s polar and mountain regions, overshoot needs to be kept to the absolute minimum. Temperatures must be returned to well below 1.5°C again as quickly as possible to reduce the risks,” said Dr James Kirkham, coordinating lead author of the report and Chief Scientist at ICCI.

Ice sheet instability could accelerate sea-level rise

The Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets are among the most critical components of the global climate system. Their continued retreat threatens to accelerate sea-level rise, exposing coastal communities, infrastructure and ecosystems to increasing risks of flooding and erosion.

According to the report, the two major ice sheets are losing ice at approximately six times the rate recorded during the 1990s. Further warming increases the likelihood of crossing critical tipping points, where self-reinforcing processes accelerate ice loss even if temperatures subsequently decline.

Even at 1.5°C of warming, the long-term retreat of polar ice sheets commits the world to substantial sea-level rise. The report estimates a rise of around 0.5–1 metre by 2100, potentially increasing to 2–3 metres over 2,000 years and 6–7 metres over 10,000 years.

The rate of sea-level rise is particularly important for coastal populations. Although some rise is already unavoidable, limiting additional warming could prevent the rate from exceeding the capacity of communities to adapt.

Glacier retreat threatens freshwater security

Mountain glaciers act as natural freshwater reservoirs, supplying water to nearly two billion people directly or indirectly through river systems. However, continued warming is reducing these reserves, threatening drinking water, agriculture and hydropower.

The State of the Cryosphere 2026 report highlights Switzerland’s loss of nearly 20% of its glacier ice over the past five years as evidence of the accelerating changes in mountain regions.

The global assessment also warns that glacier losses will be substantially greater under higher-warming scenarios. Under current policies, which point towards approximately 2.8°C of warming, only around 25% of global glacier ice mass may remain in the long term, compared with approximately 54% under a 1.5°C pathway.

Initially, accelerated melting can increase river flows, creating a temporary surge in water availability. However, as glaciers shrink, this additional supply declines, eventually creating prolonged water shortages.

Glacier retreat also increases the risk of glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs), landslides and other mountain hazards. As glaciers disappear, meltwater can accumulate in lakes held back by unstable natural dams, which can suddenly fail and send destructive floods through downstream valleys.

Declining snowpack adds to the problem. Higher temperatures mean that more precipitation falls as rain rather than snow, while seasonal snow cover disappears earlier, affecting water availability in mountain regions.

Permafrost thaw adds to global warming

Beyond glaciers and ice sheets, rising temperatures are destabilising permafrost, permanently frozen ground found across Arctic and high-altitude regions. Permafrost contains approximately 1,700 billion tonnes of stored carbon.

As the ground thaws, frozen organic matter decomposes and releases carbon dioxide and methane into the atmosphere, further intensifying global warming. The report estimates that accounting for abrupt thaw and wildfire-related emissions could reduce the remaining carbon budget for limiting warming to 1.5°C by approximately 25%.

The process also creates physical hazards, including unstable infrastructure, coastal erosion, landslides and rockfalls. Wildfires can accelerate thawing by destroying the vegetation and organic soil layers that insulate frozen ground.

Unlike emissions from some other sources, carbon released through permafrost thaw cannot readily be recovered by lowering temperatures. This makes the process a particularly concerning climate feedback.

Sea ice loss threatens polar ecosystems and ocean circulation

The Arctic and Antarctic sea ice systems are also experiencing significant changes. Arctic late-summer sea ice extent has declined by more than 40% since 1979, reducing the amount of sunlight reflected into space and exposing darker ocean surfaces that absorb more heat.

The report warns that 1.5°C of warming could bring occasional ice-free Septembers in the Arctic. At 2°C, ice-free September conditions could become frequent, while warming of 3°C could result in several months of ice-free summer conditions annually.

Antarctic sea ice has also entered a period of steep decline. The Southern Ocean’s capacity to store heat means that ice loss could continue for centuries, even after atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations stabilise.

iceloss
irrerversible

Fragments of ice float in polar waters as rising global temperatures threaten glaciers and sea ice.Image credit:Pexels

The consequences extend beyond the disappearance of ice cover. Sea ice protects coastlines from waves and storms and provides essential habitats for polar species. Its loss can accelerate coastal erosion and disrupt marine ecosystems.

Polar oceans face additional risks from warming and acidification. Cold waters absorb significant amounts of atmospheric carbon dioxide, making them particularly vulnerable to changes in ocean chemistry. Freshwater released by melting glaciers and ice sheets can further intensify acidification, threatening organisms such as pteropods that form important components of marine food webs.

Large quantities of freshwater entering the oceans can also alter ocean circulation. This raises concerns about the stability of major systems, including the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) and Antarctic Bottom Water formation, which redistribute heat, nutrients and carbon across the global oceans.

Rapid emissions reductions remain essential

The report argues that the extent of future damage will depend on how quickly global temperatures peak and how long they remain above 1.5°C. While some losses are already unavoidable, limiting the magnitude and duration of overshoot could significantly reduce the risks.

It calls for global greenhouse gas emissions to decline by at least 5% annually, beginning immediately, with the goal of achieving net-zero emissions by mid-century. A rapid phase-out of fossil fuels and substantial reductions in methane emissions are identified as essential steps.

Methane reductions could deliver relatively rapid climate benefits, alongside improvements in air quality, public health and food security. The report also stresses the importance of carbon removal to bring temperatures back below the 1.5°C threshold after overshoot.

“Every extra fraction of a degree and every year spent in overshoot means more devastating impacts,” Kirkham added.

The assessment identifies several potential benefits of limiting overshoot, including slowing sea-level rise, potentially halting and partially reversing glacier and sea ice losses, and reducing permafrost destabilisation.

However, returning to 1.5°C should not be considered the ultimate safety threshold for Earth’s ice systems. The accompanying State of the Cryosphere 2026 assessment suggests that a genuinely safe long-term temperature target could be closer to 1°C or even below over the coming centuries.

“Decisions made in the next few years will lock in the scale of damage, both for youth today and future generations,” said Gunjan Silwal, a young Nepali glacier researcher who will attend COP31. “The tragedy in Nepal is only a foretaste.”

Alongside emissions reductions, the reports emphasise the need for climate finance to meet growing adaptation requirements and strengthen the resilience of vulnerable communities. Investments will be necessary to prepare mountain regions for changing water availability and increasing natural hazards, while coastal populations face the growing costs of adapting to sea-level rise.

The pathway back to 1.5°C will require faster fossil fuel phase-outs, deep methane reductions and expanded carbon removal. Although some damage to the cryosphere may be irreversible, the report stresses that the scale of future losses is not predetermined. Decisions taken now will determine how much of Earth’s remaining ice can be protected.

Continue Reading

Trending