Connect with us

Technology

From Tehran Rooftops To Orbit: How Elon Musk Is Reshaping Who Controls The Internet

How Starlink turned the sky into a battleground for digital power — and why one private network now challenges the sovereignty of states

Dipin Damodharan

Published

on

From Tehran Rooftops To Orbit: How Starlink Is Reshaping Who Controls The Internet
AI-assisted illustration | S James / EdPublica

On a rooftop in northern Tehran, long after midnight, a young engineering student adjusts a flat white dish toward the sky. The city around him is digitally dark—mobile data throttled, social media blocked, foreign websites unreachable. Yet inside his apartment, a laptop screen glows with Telegram messages, BBC livestreams, and uncensored access to the outside world.

Scenes like this have appeared repeatedly in footage from Iran’s unrest broadcast by international news channels.

But there’s a catch. The connection does not travel through Iranian cables or telecom towers. It comes from space.

Above him, hundreds of kilometres overhead, a small cluster of satellites belonging to Elon Musk’s Starlink network relays his data through the vacuum of orbit, bypassing the state entirely.

For governments built on control of information, this is no longer a technical inconvenience. It is a political nightmare. The image is quietly extraordinary. Not because of the technology — that story is already familiar — but because of what it represents: a private satellite network, owned by a US billionaire, now functioning as a parallel communications system inside a sovereign state that has deliberately tried to shut its citizens offline.

The Rise of an Unstoppable Network

Starlink, operated by Musk’s aerospace company SpaceX, has quietly become the most ambitious communications infrastructure ever built by a private individual.

As of late 2025, more than 9,000 Starlink satellites orbit Earth in low Earth orbit (LEO) (SpaceX / industry trackers, 2025). According to a report in Business Insider, the network serves over 9 million active users globally, and Starlink now operates in more than 155 countries and territories (Starlink coverage data, 2025).

It is the largest satellite constellation in human history, dwarfing every government system combined.

This is not merely a technology story. It is a power story.

Unlike traditional internet infrastructure — fibre cables, mobile towers, undersea routes — Starlink’s backbone exists in space. It does not cross borders. It does not require landing rights in the conventional sense. And, increasingly, it does not ask permission.

Iran: When the Sky Replaced the State

During successive waves of anti-government protests in Iran, authorities imposed sweeping internet shutdowns: mobile networks crippled, platforms blocked, bandwidth throttled to near zero. These tactics, used repeatedly since 2019, were designed to isolate protesters from each other and from the outside world.

They did not fully anticipate space-based internet.

By late 2024 and 2025, Starlink terminals had begun appearing clandestinely across Iranian cities, smuggled through borders or carried in by diaspora networks. Possession is illegal. Penalties are severe. Yet the demand has grown.

Because the network operates without local infrastructure, users can communicate with foreign media, upload protest footage in real time, coordinate securely beyond state surveillance, and maintain access even during nationwide blackouts.

The numbers are necessarily imprecise, but multiple independent estimates provide a sense of scale. Analysts at BNE IntelliNews estimated over 30,000 active Starlink users inside Iran by 2025.

Iranian activist networks suggest the number of physical terminals may be between 50,000 and 100,000, many shared across neighbourhoods. Earlier acknowledgements from Elon Musk confirmed that SpaceX had activated service coverage over Iran despite the lack of formal licensing.

This is what alarms governments most: the state no longer controls the kill switch.

www.edpublica.com
Infographics: created using NotebookLM. Concept & Analysis: EdPublica. Sources: International Telecommunication Union (ITU) reports; telecom shutdown analyses; SpaceX technical documentation; industry studies

Ukraine: When One Man Could Switch It Off

The power — and danger — of this new infrastructure became even clearer in Ukraine.

After Russia’s 2022 invasion, Starlink terminals were shipped in by the thousands to keep Ukrainian communications alive. Hospitals, emergency services, journalists, and frontline military units all relied on it. For a time, Starlink was celebrated as a technological shield for democracy.

Then came the uncomfortable reality.

Investigative reporting later revealed that Elon Musk personally intervened in decisions about where Starlink would and would not operate. In at least one documented case, coverage was restricted near Crimea, reportedly to prevent Ukrainian drone operations against Russian naval assets.

The implications were stark: A private individual, accountable to no electorate, had the power to influence the operational battlefield of a sovereign war. Governments noticed.

www.edpublica.com 1
Infographics: created using NotebookLM. Concept & Analysis: EdPublica. Sources: SpaceX disclosures, Business Insider, satellite trackers, Starlink coverage data

Digital Sovereignty in the Age of Orbit

For decades, states have understood sovereignty to include control of national telecom infrastructure, regulation of internet providers, the legal authority to impose shutdowns, the power to filter, censor, and surveil.

Starlink disrupts all of it.

Because, the satellites are in space, outside national jurisdiction. Access can be activated remotely by SpaceX, and the terminals can be smuggled like USB devices. Traffic can bypass domestic data laws entirely.

In effect, Starlink represents a parallel internet — one that states cannot fully regulate, inspect, or disable without extraordinary countermeasures such as satellite jamming or physical raids.

Authoritarian regimes view this as foreign interference. Democratic governments increasingly see it as a strategic vulnerability. Either way, the monopoly problem is the same: A single corporate network, controlled by one individual, increasingly functions as critical global infrastructure.

How the Technology Actually Works

The power of Starlink lies in its architecture. Traditional internet depends on fibre-optic cables across cities and oceans, local internet exchanges, mobile towers and ground stations, and centralised chokepoints.

Starlink bypasses most of this. Instead, it uses thousands of LEO satellites orbiting at ~550 km altitude, user terminals (“dishes”) that automatically track satellites overhead, inter-satellite laser links, allowing data to travel from satellite to satellite in space, and a limited number of ground gateways connecting the system to the wider internet.

This design creates resilience: No single tower to shut down, no local ISP to regulate, and no fibre line to cut.

For protesters, journalists, and dissidents, this is transformative. For governments, it is destabilising.

A Private Citizen vs the Rules of the Internet

The global internet was built around multistakeholder governance: National regulators, international bodies like the ITU, treaties governing spectrum use, and complex norms around cross-border infrastructure.

Starlink bypasses much of this through sheer technical dominance, and it has become a company that: owns the rockets, owns the satellites, owns the terminals, controls activation, controls pricing, controls coverage zones… effectively controls a layer of global communication.

This is why policymakers now speak openly of “digital sovereignty at risk”. It is no longer only China’s Great Firewall or Iran’s censorship model under scrutiny. It is the idea that global connectivity itself might be increasingly privatised, personalised, and politically unpredictable.

www.edpublica.com 2
Infographics: created using NotebookLM. Concept & Analysis: EdPublica. Sources: BNE IntelliNews, Reuters, investigative journalism, activist networks, policy reports

The Unanswered Question

Starlink undeniably delivers real benefits, it offers connectivity in disaster zones, internet access in rural Africa, emergency communications in war, educational access where infrastructure never existed.

But it also raises an uncomfortable, unresolved question: Should any individual — however visionary, however innovative — hold this much power over who gets access to the global flow of information?

Today, a protester in Tehran can speak to the world because Elon Musk chooses to allow it.

Tomorrow, that access could disappear just as easily — with a policy change, a commercial decision, or a geopolitical calculation.The sky has become infrastructure. Infrastructure has become power. And power, increasingly, belongs not to states — but to a handful of corporations.

There is another layer to this power calculus — and it is economic. While Starlink has been quietly enabled over countries such as Iran without formal approval, China remains a conspicuous exception. The reason is less technical than commercial. Elon Musk’s wider business empire, particularly Tesla, is deeply entangled with China’s economy. Shanghai hosts Tesla’s largest manufacturing facility in the world, responsible for more than half of the company’s global vehicle output, and Chinese consumers form one of Tesla’s most critical markets.

Chinese authorities, in turn, have made clear their hostility to uncontrolled foreign satellite internet, viewing it as a threat to state censorship and information control. Beijing has banned Starlink terminals, restricted their military use, and invested heavily in its own rival satellite constellation. For Musk, activating Starlink over China would almost certainly provoke regulatory retaliation that could jeopardise Tesla’s operations, supply chains, and market access. The result is an uncomfortable contradiction: the same technology framed as a tool of freedom in Iran or Ukraine is conspicuously absent over China — a reminder that even a supposedly borderless internet still bends to the gravitational pull of corporate interests and geopolitical power.

Dipin Damodharan is an award-winning journalist, editor and media entrepreneur, and Co-founder and Editor-in-Chief of EdPublica, an independent global media platform covering education, science, research, innovation, climate and public policy. With more than a decade of experience in journalism, he has worked across print, digital and multimedia media. His reporting explores science, climate, sustainability and the social impact of research and innovation. His work has been recognised by the Solutions Journalism Network and other journalism organisations.

Technology

New Semiconductor Could Help Make Solar Cells More Efficient, Oxford Study Finds

Researchers from the University of Oxford and Wuhan University have identified bismuth sulfide as a semiconductor material that could overcome a longstanding trade-off between light absorption and electrical charge retention in solar energy conversion.

Published

on

Close-up view of photovoltaic solar panels arranged in rows, illustrating solar energy generation and renewable energy technology.
Advances in semiconductor materials could help improve the efficiency of solar energy conversion. Image credit:Pexels

Researchers from the University of Oxford and Wuhan University have identified a semiconductor material that could help overcome a longstanding limitation in solar energy conversion. The study, published in Nature on October 28, 2026, demonstrates how bismuth sulfide can absorb light strongly while slowing the loss of electrical charges generated during the process.

The discovery could offer a new direction for developing solar cells that convert sunlight into electricity more efficiently. It challenges the conventional understanding that materials with stronger light absorption necessarily lose their electrical charges more rapidly.

Solar cells use semiconductor materials to absorb sunlight and generate electrical charges. When sunlight strikes a semiconductor, it releases negatively charged electrons, leaving behind positively charged gaps known as holes. These charges must reach the electrodes to generate electricity. However, electrons and holes can recombine before being collected, releasing their energy and reducing the amount available for electricity generation.

This process, known as electron-hole recombination, is a major source of energy loss in solar cells. Materials that absorb sunlight efficiently often experience faster recombination, while those that retain electrical charges for longer periods generally have weaker light absorption. This trade-off has restricted the development of materials that combine both properties.

How bismuth sulfide slows electrical charge loss

The researchers found that bismuth sulfide (Bi₂S₃) combines characteristics of two conventional semiconductor types: direct and indirect semiconductors. Direct semiconductors absorb light strongly but generally allow electrons and holes to recombine quickly. Indirect semiconductors have slower recombination rates but weaker light absorption.

Bismuth sulfide exhibits a combination of these properties. The researchers describe it as a pseudo-direct semiconductor, in which closely spaced electronic energy levels allow the material to absorb light strongly while providing a lower-energy pathway that slows electrical charge recombination.

To investigate this mechanism, the team studied thin films of bismuth sulfide using ultrafast terahertz spectroscopy. By exciting the material with extremely short laser pulses, researchers measured the behaviour of the resulting electrical charges across different temperatures.

The findings, supported by electronic-structure calculations, showed that the material’s unusual electronic arrangement could reduce the rate of electron-hole recombination by approximately 75% at room temperature compared with conventional materials having similar light absorption.

Slower recombination could give electrical charges more time to reach the electrodes, potentially reducing energy losses during electricity generation. The researchers also suggest that the mechanism could be relevant to solar fuel technologies, where sunlight is used to drive chemical reactions.

Building on advances in solar-cell materials

The findings add to ongoing research aimed at improving solar-cell performance by controlling charge-carrier recombination. A study published in Nature Photonics in 2025 demonstrated how surface engineering could reduce recombination losses and improve the stability of perovskite solar cells.

By introducing sodium heptafluorobutyrate to modify the perovskite surface, researchers achieved a certified power-conversion efficiency of 26.96%. The devices retained their initial efficiency after 1,200 hours of continuous illumination and maintained 92% of their initial efficiency after 1,800 hours of ageing at 85°C.

bismuth sulfide
solar cell

Representative image.Image credit:Pexels

While the two studies use different approaches, they highlight the importance of controlling electrical charge losses in developing more efficient and stable solar technologies.

The Oxford researchers suggest that other materials, including tungsten diselenide and indium selenide, could be investigated for similar electronic properties. They also propose that techniques such as stretching layered crystals could help modify the energy levels of certain semiconductors.

However, the discovery does not mean that more efficient commercial solar panels are immediately within reach. The Oxford study establishes the physical mechanism in bismuth sulfide thin films rather than demonstrating a complete solar cell with improved power-conversion efficiency. Further research will be needed to assess its performance, stability and manufacturing potential.

By showing how strong light absorption can coexist with slower electrical charge recombination, the research offers a new direction for identifying semiconductor materials for future solar energy technologies.

Continue Reading

The Sciences

MIT Researchers Develop Origami-Based Method for Lightweight, Load-Bearing Structures

MIT researchers have developed an origami-inspired construction technique that could enable lightweight, rigid structures using less material and simpler assembly methods.

Published

on

Folded aluminium geometric structure displayed in a public library atrium, demonstrating an origami-inspired architectural design.
MIT researchers have developed an origami-inspired construction technique that could enable lightweight, rigid structures using less material and simpler assembly methods.Image credit:MIT

Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) have developed an origami-inspired construction method that could enable the fabrication of lightweight, rigid structures using less material and simpler assembly techniques. The approach could eventually be used for emergency shelters, architectural components and lightweight aerospace parts.

The modular system uses components cut from flat sheets of material, folded into shape and connected to form three-dimensional structural shells. According to MIT, simulations indicate that the structures can be approximately 3.5 times stiffer than those produced using some other structural origami techniques, while requiring only about two-thirds as much material.The research was announced by MIT on October 27 and published in the International Journal of Solids and Structures.

Building structures through folding

The researchers drew inspiration from geometric patterns developed by artist and scientist Ron Resch in the 1960s. Unlike methods that fold a single sheet into a complete structure, the new approach uses individually fabricated components that are folded and connected to create a larger framework.

Alfonso Parra Rubio, a graduate student at MIT’s Center for Bits and Atoms and lead author of the study, developed a method for combining two tripod-shaped units into a rigid building block. These blocks can be interconnected to form a network of beams that creates a lightweight structural shell.

To simplify the design process, the team developed computational software that automatically generates components according to the intended structure. The software checks whether individual units can be folded before combining them into the final design.

The resulting files can be sent to computer-controlled cutting equipment to manufacture components from flat sheets of material, including aluminium. Workers can then fold and assemble the units using basic hand tools, without requiring large-scale welding equipment.

Demonstration at architectural scale

To demonstrate the method’s scalability, the researchers constructed a 23-foot folded-aluminium sculpture that was installed in the atrium of the Boston Public Library. According to MIT, a team without professional construction experience assembled the structure in a matter of days.

The researchers say the modular design simplifies assembly because the components are engineered to fit into their intended positions as the structure takes shape.

Untitled design 39 1

Representational image.Image credit:Pexels

However, the reported stiffness improvements are based on simulations comparing the method with other origami-based systems. Further testing will be necessary to establish its performance across different materials, loading conditions and real-world construction environments.

Potential applications

One potential application is disaster-relief housing. Flat-packed components could be transported efficiently to areas affected by earthquakes or floods and assembled on site, potentially reducing transportation and construction requirements.

The approach could also be explored for lightweight aerospace components, modular robots, sound-dampening panels and building facades. Its ability to create rigid structural shells without interior support columns could offer additional flexibility in architectural design.

The researchers plan to test the technique in larger architectural structures and investigate more complex component geometries that could improve strength and stiffness. They also intend to develop a more accessible interface for designing structures using the system.

While the method has yet to demonstrate widespread use in buildings, the research illustrates how geometric design and digital manufacturing could offer alternatives for constructing complex structures.

Its practical adoption will depend on factors including durability, manufacturing costs, structural safety and performance under real-world conditions. Nevertheless, the approach presents a potential option for applications where reducing material use and simplifying assembly are priorities.

Continue Reading

Technology

India’s Electronics Boom Masks a Deeper Dependence on Semiconductor Imports

India’s semiconductor industry is expanding, but dependence on imported chips remains a major challenge. New investments and manufacturing initiatives aim to strengthen domestic production and build a more resilient electronics supply chain.

Jishnu P

Published

on

Close-up of a microchip mounted on a red printed circuit board with electronic components and conductive traces.
A semiconductor microchip mounted on a printed circuit board. India is expanding domestic semiconductor manufacturing as it seeks to reduce dependence on imported chips.Image credit:Pexels

India’s electronics manufacturing industry is expanding rapidly, but its dependence on imported semiconductors remains a significant challenge. A new industry report highlights the gap between the country’s growing electronics production and its efforts to establish a self-reliant semiconductor ecosystem.

India’s annual semiconductor import bill has reached ₹2.8785 lakh crore, according to the State of India’s Semiconductor Industry 2026 report released by the Data Security Council of India (DSCI) on October 23. The report estimates that India continues to depend on imports for 90–95 per cent of its semiconductor requirements.

The findings underline a central challenge in India’s technology ambitions: expanding the production of electronic devices while reducing dependence on foreign suppliers for the chips and components that power them.

Electronics production rises, but dependence persists

India’s electronics manufacturing industry has grown considerably over the past decade. According to government figures, electronics production increased from approximately ₹1.9 lakh crore in 2014–15 to ₹13.11 lakh crore in 2025–26. Electronics exports rose from around ₹38,000 crore to ₹4.24 lakh crore over the same period.

However, growth in electronics manufacturing does not necessarily mean that the components used in these products are manufactured domestically.

Semiconductors are essential to smartphones, computers, automobiles, telecommunications equipment and data centres. Their production involves complex processes requiring specialised facilities, advanced equipment, materials and highly skilled workers.

India has developed a substantial electronics assembly and manufacturing base, but building a semiconductor ecosystem requires investment across several stages, from chip design and wafer fabrication to assembly, testing and packaging.

The distinction matters because a country can manufacture and export electronic devices while continuing to import many of the high-value components used in them. Reducing semiconductor imports therefore requires strengthening domestic production capabilities rather than simply increasing the number of devices assembled within the country.

Five manufacturing units enter production

India launched the Semicon India Programme in 2021 with an initial outlay of ₹76,000 crore to establish a domestic semiconductor and display manufacturing ecosystem.

According to government figures and the DSCI report, 12 semiconductor manufacturing projects have been approved, involving investments exceeding ₹1.64 lakh crore. Five units have commenced commercial production.

The approved projects include silicon and silicon carbide fabrication facilities, a gallium nitride micro-LED display facility, and nine units focused on assembly, testing and packaging.

These facilities represent an important step towards establishing domestic semiconductor manufacturing capacity. However, the commencement of production does not, by itself, establish how much domestic demand the facilities can meet or how quickly they can reduce import dependence.

The government approved Semicon 2.0 in July 2026 with an outlay of ₹1,27,500 crore. The programme aims to strengthen research and development, chip design, manufacturing equipment, materials, workforce development and advanced packaging.

The broader objective is to develop an ecosystem in which domestic manufacturers can access more of the infrastructure and specialised services required to produce semiconductors.

Strengthening the supply chain

Semiconductor manufacturing depends on more than fabrication plants. It requires specialised materials, sophisticated machinery, reliable infrastructure, research capabilities and trained personnel.

A May 2026 roadmap by NITI Aayog identified India’s dependence on imported semiconductors and components as a vulnerability, particularly given the concentration of global manufacturing capacity in a limited number of countries.

Supply disruptions can affect industries ranging from automobiles and consumer electronics to telecommunications and defence. A shortage of critical chips can interrupt production even when manufacturers have sufficient capacity to assemble the final product.

India’s policy response has consequently extended beyond semiconductor fabrication. The Electronics Component Manufacturing Scheme seeks to develop domestic suppliers and strengthen the production of components used across the electronics industry.

semiconductor
import
manufacturing

Detailed view of organized electronic circuit boards in a production setting.Image credit:Pexels

Government figures published in September indicated that 106 projects had been approved under the scheme by August, with 38 approved plants already producing components.

Developing these supporting industries could help domestic manufacturers access more components locally. Nevertheless, the extent to which this reduces semiconductor dependence will depend on the types of components produced, their quality, cost and ability to meet industrial demand.

The workforce challenge

India’s established strength in semiconductor design offers another opportunity. The country has a large pool of engineers working in chip design and related technology services. Translating this advantage into manufacturing capacity, however, requires additional skills and infrastructure.

Operating semiconductor fabrication facilities involves specialised knowledge of materials, manufacturing processes, equipment maintenance and quality control. Assembly, testing and packaging also require trained technicians and engineers.

The DSCI report identifies workforce development as a priority, including the need to train approximately one lakh factory-floor technicians.

Such training will be essential if new facilities are to operate efficiently and expand production. Collaboration between industry, technical institutions and research organisations could help address the skills gap, although the availability of trained personnel alone cannot guarantee commercially competitive manufacturing.

Beyond factory announcements

India’s semiconductor ambitions reflect a wider effort to strengthen technological security and reduce exposure to international supply disruptions. Yet progress cannot be measured solely by the number of approved projects or the investments announced.

The more significant indicators will be sustained commercial production, manufacturing yields, domestic value addition, the development of local suppliers and the ability to meet demand at competitive prices.

India’s expanding electronics exports demonstrate the strength of its manufacturing growth. Its semiconductor import bill, meanwhile, illustrates the gap between assembling electronic products and producing the critical components within them.

Bridging that gap will require sustained investment in research, infrastructure, skilled labour and the supporting industries that make semiconductor production possible. Whether India’s new manufacturing projects can translate policy ambitions into a resilient domestic supply chain will determine how far the country can move towards semiconductor self-reliance.

Continue Reading

Trending