Sustainable Energy
Can ammonia power a low-carbon future? New MIT study maps global costs and emissions
Under what conditions can ammonia truly become a low-carbon energy solution? MIT researchers attempt to resolve this
Ammonia, long known as the backbone of global fertiliser production, is increasingly being examined as a potential pillar of the clean energy transition. Energy-dense, carbon-free at the point of use, and already traded globally at scale, ammonia is emerging as a candidate fuel and a carrier of hydrogen. But its climate promise comes with a contradiction: today’s dominant method of producing ammonia carries a heavy carbon footprint.
A new study by researchers from the MIT Energy Initiative (MITEI) attempts to resolve this tension by answering a foundational question for policymakers and industry alike: under what conditions can ammonia truly become a low-carbon energy solution?
A global view of ammonia’s future
In a paper published in Energy and Environmental Science, the researchers present the largest harmonised dataset to date on the economic and environmental impacts of global ammonia supply chains. The analysis spans 63 countries and evaluates multiple production pathways, trade routes, and energy inputs, offering a comprehensive view of how ammonia could be produced, shipped, and used in a decarbonising world.
“This is the most comprehensive work on the global ammonia landscape,” says senior author Guiyan Zang, a research scientist at MITEI. “We developed many of these frameworks at MIT to be able to make better cost-benefit analyses. Hydrogen and ammonia are the only two types of fuel with no carbon at scale. If we want to use fuel to generate power and heat, but not release carbon, hydrogen and ammonia are the only options, and ammonia is easier to transport and lower-cost.”
Why data matters
Until now, assessments of ammonia’s climate potential have been fragmented. Individual studies often focused on single regions, isolated technologies, or only cost or emissions, making global comparisons difficult.
“Before this, there were no harmonized datasets quantifying the impacts of this transition,” says lead author Woojae Shin, a postdoctoral researcher at MITEI. “Everyone is talking about ammonia as a super important hydrogen carrier in the future, and also ammonia can be directly used in power generation or fertilizer and other industrial uses. But we needed this dataset. It’s filling a major knowledge gap.”
To build the database, the team synthesised results from dozens of prior studies and applied common frameworks to calculate full lifecycle emissions and costs. These calculations included feedstock extraction, production, storage, shipping, and import processing, alongside country-specific factors such as electricity prices, natural gas costs, financing conditions, and energy mix.
Comparing production pathways
Today, most ammonia is produced using the Haber–Bosch process powered by fossil fuels, commonly referred to as “grey ammonia.” In 2020, this process accounted for about 1.8 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. While economically attractive, it is also the most carbon-intensive option.
The study finds that conventional grey ammonia produced via steam methane reforming (SMR) remains the cheapest option in the U.S. context, at around 48 cents per kilogram. However, it also carries the highest emissions, at 2.46 kilograms of CO₂ equivalent per kilogram of ammonia.
Cleaner alternatives offer substantial emissions reductions at higher cost. Pairing SMR with carbon capture and storage cuts emissions by about 61 percent, with a 29 percent cost increase. A full global shift to ammonia produced with conventional methods plus carbon capture could reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by nearly 71 percent, while raising costs by 23.2 percent.
More advanced “blue ammonia” pathways, such as auto-thermal reforming (ATR) with carbon capture, deliver deeper emissions cuts at relatively modest cost increases. One ATR configuration achieved emissions of 0.75 kilograms of CO₂ equivalent per kilogram of ammonia, at roughly 10 percent higher cost than conventional SMR.
At the far end of the spectrum, “green ammonia” produced using renewable electricity can reduce emissions by as much as 99.7 percent, but at a significantly higher cost—around 46 percent more than today’s baseline. Ammonia produced using nuclear electricity showed near-zero emissions in the analysis.
Geography matters
The study also reveals that the viability of low-carbon ammonia depends heavily on geography. Countries with abundant, low-cost natural gas are better positioned to produce blue ammonia competitively, while regions with cheap renewable electricity are more favourable for green ammonia.
China emerged as a potential future supplier of green ammonia to multiple regions, while parts of the Middle East showed strong competitiveness in low-carbon ammonia production. In contrast, ammonia produced using carbon-intensive grid electricity was often both more expensive and more polluting than conventional methods.
From research to policy
Interest in low-carbon ammonia is no longer theoretical. Countries such as Japan and South Korea have incorporated ammonia into national energy strategies, including pilot projects using ammonia for power generation and financial incentives tied to verified emissions reductions.
“Ammonia researchers, producers, as well as government officials require this data to understand the impact of different technologies and global supply corridors,” Shin says.
Zang adds that the dataset is designed not just as an academic exercise, but as a decision-making tool. “We collaborate with companies, and they need to know the full costs and lifecycle emissions associated with different options. Governments can also use this to compare options and set future policies. Any country producing ammonia needs to know which countries they can deliver to economically.”
As global demand for low-carbon fuels accelerates toward mid-century, the study suggests that ammonia’s role will depend less on ambition alone, and more on informed choices—grounded in data—about how and where it is produced.
Sustainable Energy
Can India Finally Turn Waste Into Fuel? INR 23,731-Crore CBG Push
India invests INR 23,731 crore on compressed biogas (CBG) to reduce fossil-fuel dependence, manage organic waste and strengthen energy security. With 217 plants commissioned and 339 under construction as of August 2026, the new GOBARdhan scheme aims to scale production nearly ten-fold—but can it overcome the infrastructure and feedstock challenges that have slowed the sector so far?
India is putting INR 23,731 crore behind an effort to make compressed biogas (CBG) a larger part of its energy system, with the government targeting nearly ten-fold growth in domestic CBG production by 2035-36. The GOBARdhan scheme will combine assured demand, price support, capital assistance, pipeline connectivity and credit guarantees to expand the industry.
The push comes as India remains heavily dependent on imported gas. The government says nearly 50% of the country’s natural gas requirement is met through imports, while about 55–60% of India’s LNG imports pass through the Strait of Hormuz. This dependence makes domestically produced alternatives more relevant to energy security.
From 5,000 Plants to 217
India’s CBG ambitions are not new. The Sustainable Alternative Towards Affordable Transportation (SATAT) initiative, launched in 2018, envisaged 5,000 CBG plants producing 15 million tonnes annually by 2023-24. The target was missed.
The sector has nevertheless grown. As of August 6, 2026, 1,908 CBG/Bio-CNG plants were registered, of which 217 had been commissioned and another 339 were under construction.
The numbers show both progress and the scale of the challenge: only a fraction of registered projects have reached operation, while hundreds remain under construction.
What is Different This Time?
The new scheme attempts to address one of the industry’s central problems: making CBG projects financially predictable.
City Gas Distribution companies will face a CBG blending obligation of 3% in 2026-27, 4% in 2027-28 and 5% from 2028-29 for CNG transport and domestic PNG. The government will also provide an administered CBG price of INR 2,110 per MMBTU, with a minimum ten-year horizon. Eligible greenfield projects can receive capital assistance of up to INR 2 crore per tonne per day of installed capacity.

The scheme also provides pipeline support and a credit guarantee mechanism, aimed at reducing infrastructure and financing barriers.
In other words, the government is trying to create not just more plants, but a predictable market for the gas those plants produce.
Where is the Industry Growing?
CBG development remains concentrated geographically. Uttar Pradesh is among the leading states, while Gujarat, Haryana, Karnataka and Maharashtra also have significant numbers of projects. The new scheme could allow these existing hubs to expand while opening opportunities in states with large agricultural and municipal-waste streams but limited CBG infrastructure.
Kerala illustrates the latter challenge. The state recently moved into the sector with the Brahmapuram CBG plant in Kochi, commissioned in February 2026 and designed to process 150 tonnes of source-segregated biodegradable municipal waste every day.
This points to one of CBG’s central propositions: waste that would otherwise require disposal can become both fuel and a source of organic manure.
The Waste-to-Energy Opportunity
CBG can be produced from agricultural residue, cattle dung, press mud and biodegradable municipal waste. The process also generates organic fertiliser, potentially creating an additional revenue stream for producers.
But the availability of biomass alone does not guarantee a viable plant. Feedstock must be collected, transported, stored and supplied consistently. This is particularly important for agricultural residues, which are seasonal and geographically dispersed.
The new scheme therefore includes provisions for feedstock mapping and aggregation infrastructure, alongside a district-level challenge fund.
What Does the Government Expect?
The government estimates that the scheme could displace 10 million tonnes of fossil fuel over the next decade and generate around 40,000 crore rupees in foreign-exchange savings. It projects an additional 75,000 crore rupees contribution to GDP, more than 1.5 lakh jobs, over 40 million tonnes of CO₂-equivalent emissions avoided, and production of more than 250 million tonnes of organic fertiliser. These are government projections, not realised outcomes.
The projections underline the government’s broader ambition: CBG is being positioned not simply as an alternative fuel, but as a link between energy security, waste management, agriculture, employment and emissions reduction.
The Implementation Test
India now has a growing pipeline of CBG projects, a policy-backed market and financial incentives. But its earlier experience shows that ambitious targets do not automatically translate into operational plants. The success of GOBARdhan will ultimately depend on whether developers can secure reliable feedstock, obtain financing, connect plants to gas markets and operate them sustainably.
India has no shortage of organic waste. The challenge is turning that resource into a reliable, commercially viable and geographically widespread source of renewable gas.
Sustainable Energy
Can Floating Solar Help India Expand Renewables Without More Land?
India’s new Pradhan Mantri Surya Sarovar Yojana aims to add 5,000 MW of floating solar capacity by 2030–31. By using reservoirs and other water bodies, the scheme could help expand renewable energy while easing pressure on scarce land. Its battery-storage requirement also aims to make solar power more reliable and useful during peak demand.
India is adding solar power rapidly. But as more panels are installed, another question is becoming harder to ignore: where will all of them be installed? Floating solar offers one possible answer. Large ground-mounted solar projects require vast, contiguous parcels of land. This is easier in states such as Rajasthan and Gujarat, which have abundant land and high solar radiation. But the model is harder to replicate in densely populated, land-constrained states such as Kerala.
The Union Cabinet’s approval of the Pradhan Mantri Surya Sarovar Yojana, a ₹5,070-crore scheme, seeks to address this constraint by expanding solar generation to reservoirs and other water bodies. The programme will provide central financial assistance of up to ₹1 crore per MW for floating solar projects and aims to add 5,000 MW by 2030–31. It will be implemented by the Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI). India currently has only around 0.7 GW of installed floating solar capacity, despite an estimated potential of 102 GW.
How Is This Beneficial for Small States?
India’s solar expansion has been concentrated largely in Rajasthan and Gujarat, where large areas of relatively inexpensive land and strong solar radiation have supported utility-scale projects. But land acquisition can involve rehabilitation and resettlement, while large solar parks can compete with agriculture and other land uses.
Floating solar offers another option: generating electricity from suitable water surfaces without occupying large areas of land. This could be particularly relevant for states with limited land availability. Kerala, for example, faces much greater competition for land from settlements, agriculture and infrastructure than states with large open tracts.

But not every reservoir can become a solar park. Water bodies have multiple uses, including drinking water, irrigation, fisheries and power generation. Projects would therefore need careful site selection and environmental assessment.
Addressing The Storage Dilemma
The programme does not stop at adding solar panels. Projects receiving support will have to include battery energy storage equivalent to at least two hours of generation. Across the programme, this is expected to amount to around **10,000 MWh of storage. That addresses another challenge facing India’s renewable-energy transition.
Solar generation peaks during the day, while electricity demand can remain high into the evening. Batteries can store excess solar power and release it when demand rises. Storage could also reduce renewable-energy curtailment, when available electricity is not used because the grid cannot absorb all the generation. The scheme therefore combines two priorities: adding renewable capacity and making that power more useful to the grid.
The 278-MW Omkareshwar floating solar park on the Narmada River in Madhya Pradesh’s Khandwa district is currently the country’s largest floating solar project. Plans are in place to scale it up to 600 MW. However, the project does not have on-site battery storage. The new scheme could encourage a different model, where floating solar and storage are developed together from the beginning.
But Water Is Not Empty Space
Floating solar can ease pressure on land, but it comes with its own environmental and technical questions. Large installations can affect aquatic ecosystems, water quality, fisheries and other uses of reservoirs. The technology can also be more expensive and technically complex than ground-mounted solar. This makes site selection critical. The question is not simply how much floating solar India can install, but where it can be installed without creating new environmental or social costs.
A New Option For India’s Energy Transition
The government’s 5,000-MW target is small compared with India’s estimated 102 GW floating solar potential. But the scheme could help move the technology from a niche application towards a larger role in India’s renewable-energy system. Its significance lies elsewhere.
India’s renewable transition is increasingly about where clean-energy infrastructure can be built and how the electricity can be delivered when it is needed. Floating solar could help address both challenges — using suitable water surfaces to reduce pressure on scarce land while pairing solar generation with storage.
For land-constrained states such as Kerala, that could open another avenue for renewable-energy expansion. Nationally, the scheme could help India find new spaces for clean energy — without assuming that every available piece of land must become a solar park.
Sustainable Energy
India’s Power Grid Gets Greener: Green Energy Break a New Record
India’s solar and wind energy crossed the 100 GW mark for the first time, supplying nearly half of the country’s electricity at one point. The milestone highlights the growing role of renewables in meeting India’s rising power demand—and the storage challenges that could shape the next phase of the energy transition.
As India grappled with another summer of soaring electricity demand, the country’s power grid quietly reached a milestone. For the first time, solar and wind together generated more than 100 gigawatts (GW) of electricity, supplying nearly half of the country’s power at one point.
According to Grid Controller of India Ltd. (GRID-INDIA), utility-scale solar and wind generation reached 103.7 GW at 12.05 pm on July 13, the highest recorded so far. A few minutes later, the two sources supplied 42.79% of the electricity flowing through the national grid. The following day, generation crossed the 100 GW mark again, showing that the achievement was not a one-off event.
The record comes at a time when rainfall has been lower than usual. According to the India Meteorological Department (IMD), the southwest monsoon is expected to bring about 90% of the country’s normal rainfall this year. With lower inflows into reservoirs, hydropower generation can come under pressure, making solar and wind even more important in meeting electricity demand.
The achievement signals a broader shift. Renewable energy is no longer just expanding on paper through new projects—it is increasingly helping power homes, businesses and industries during periods of high demand.
Solar and Wind Energy: India’s Growing Demand for Electricity
India’s appetite for electricity continues to grow.
According to Power Minister Manohar Lal, the country’s peak electricity demand has already reached about 271 GW this year. The government expects it to touch around 300 GW by 2027, driven by rising use of air conditioners, electric vehicles, data centres and industrial activity.
Meeting that demand has traditionally meant relying on coal-fired power plants. This year, however, solar and wind energy has played a larger role. According to GRID-INDIA, solar generation reached a record 81 GW during the April heatwave, helping ease pressure on conventional power plants during the middle of the day.
The International Energy Agency (IEA) expects India to remain one of the world’s fastest-growing renewable energy markets through the rest of the decade. But it also warns that investment in electricity grids and storage must grow alongside renewable energy.

The Challenge Begins After Sunset
The July record was achieved around noon, when solar panels generate their highest output. Electricity demand, however, often remains high long after sunset.
That is why many experts say the next phase of India’s clean energy transition will depend less on building more solar parks and more on storing the electricity they generate.
“The achievement shows the national grid can absorb much larger volumes of renewable electricity than before. The next priority is expanding energy storage so surplus solar power generated during the day can be supplied after sunset,” said Shreya Jai, Energy Lead at Climate Trends.
Solar Energy and Storage Challenges
Research points in the same direction. A recent study by researchers from the University of California, Berkeley, the India Energy and Climate Center and partner institutions found that expanding battery storage and making the grid more flexible would allow India to integrate much larger shares of solar and wind while maintaining a reliable electricity supply.
Disha Aggarwal, Fellow at the Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW), said the milestone shows renewable energy is becoming a larger part of the country’s actual electricity supply, rather than just its installed capacity. She said the next priority should be scaling up energy storage, strengthening reserve capacity and creating electricity markets that can better support evening demand.
Storing renewable energy, however, remains one of India’s biggest challenges. Battery systems are still expensive, while pumped hydro projects require suitable terrain, long construction periods and multiple regulatory clearances. Expanding transmission networks to carry renewable power from generation centres to demand hubs is another hurdle.
Crossing the 100 GW mark shows that India can generate renewable electricity at an unprecedented scale. The bigger challenge now is ensuring that clean power generated during the day can be stored and delivered when homes, hospitals and industries need it most.
-
Math3 weeks agoThe 2026 Fields Medals: Four Proofs, Four Decades-Old Problems Solved
-
Climate2 weeks agoAfter Kerala’s Deadliest Landslide, the Hardest Thing to Rebuild Was Childhood
-
Society1 month agoWest Asia Crisis: Can Kerala’s Returning Gulf Migrants Find a Future in the Green Economy?
-
Space & Physics2 months agoIndia Semiconductor Mission: ‘It’s Not About Fabs. It’s About Building An Entire Ecosystem’
-
Climate2 months agoThe Climate World Cup? How Climate Change Could Affect Player Performance at the 2026 World Cup
-
Society4 weeks agoWhat Is Civilisational Diplomacy? Understanding India’s Newest Foreign Policy Tool
-
Society2 months agoFrom Bell Labs to the Classroom: A Second Career in Teaching
-
Space & Physics2 months agoEngineers Develop Dual-Mode Propulsion System for Next-Generation Small Satellites


