A AI is transforming teaching, research and student life — enabling personalised learning, accelerating discovery and reshaping how campuses work. Yet beneath that convenience lie serious risks: opaque algorithms, rising plagiarism concerns, deepening inequities and an environmental footprint growing faster than most students or educators realise. Did you know? The IEA reports that global investment in data centres is now set to exceed global spending on oil — a stark reminder that “data is the new oil” is no longer a metaphor but an energy reality. EP lays out what true AI literacy must deliver, what institutions should demand from AI vendors, and how universities can build systems that are sustainable, transparent and accountable. The future of learning will be AI-enabled — but it must also be human centred, equitable and environmentally responsible
The rapid ascent of generative artificial intelligence is actively reshaping how we learn, create, and work. It offers a seductive promise of instant knowledge and effortless productivity, a modern-day magic trick available at our fingertips. But like any good magic act, the most important part of the illusion is what the audience doesn’t see. Behind the curtain of flawlessly formed paragraphs and instant data analysis lies a complex and often invisible world of ethical trade-offs and profound physical costs.
Consider the experience of a college student in 2025. When she asked an AI tutor for help with an essay, she watched in amazement as articulate, well-structured text appeared in seconds, complete with what looked like flawless references. The magic, however, quickly faded. As she began to engage critically with the output—tracing sources and questioning claims—she discovered some references were entirely fictitious, the reasoning was hollow, and the fluent prose was merely a sophisticated imitation of insight.
This student’s discovery is a microcosm of a much larger challenge. Her story moves us beyond the simple wonder of a new technology to the central question of our time: Are we truly prepared for the full consequences of the AI revolution? And in this new age, what does it mean to be genuinely “AI literate”?
Education Publica explores the good, the bad, and the hidden “ugly” of artificial intelligence. Our future depends not on whether if we use this transformative tool, but how we choose to use it—effectively, ethically, and with full awareness of its staggering environmental footprint. The path forward requires moving past the illusion and understanding the true cost of the bargain we are making.
The Promise and The Peril: AI’s Double-Edged Sword
To navigate the new AI landscape responsibly, we must first appreciate its dual nature. AI is neither a pure panacea nor an unmitigated threat; it is a powerful tool with the capacity for both transformative good and significant harm. Understanding this duality is the first step toward harnessing its potential while mitigating its inherent risks.
The Promise: A Revolution in Access and Efficiency
Proponents rightly point to a suite of transformative capabilities, particularly in making education more efficient and accessible. The key benefits are already becoming clear:
• Personalized Learning and Access: AI-powered tutors can provide students with 24/7 support, offering rapid feedback and accessible explanations. In a 2025 survey of undergraduates at a large US public university, students confirmed they value this immediate assistance. This technology holds particular promise for bringing personalized learning to underserved regions, such as India.
• Administrative Efficiency: For educators, AI can streamline time-consuming tasks like drafting lesson plans, summarizing readings, and assisting with grading. This frees up valuable time for them to focus on mentoring students and engaging in higher-order teaching.
• Research Acceleration: In academic and scientific fields, AI is a powerful catalyst. It can dramatically speed up literature reviews, process vast datasets, and even help generate new hypotheses, significantly boosting research productivity.
The Peril: The Costs to Integrity, Privacy, and Equity
Alongside its immense promise, AI introduces tangible risks that threaten the core tenets of academic inquiry and social equity. These perils require careful management and proactive policy.
1. Academic Integrity and Critical Thinking: The ease of generating text with AI presents a significant threat to academic integrity. A 2023 educational study warned that this makes it easier than ever for students to submit work they did not write. A more subtle danger is the phenomenon of AI “hallucinations”—false but convincingly presented information—which many students are ill-equipped to identify. Over-reliance on these tools risks weakening the essential skills of critical reasoning and research.
2. Privacy and Surveillance: The use of AI tools in education often involves storing vast amounts of student data on remote servers. Without robust policies and oversight, this sensitive information can be misused or profiled, creating significant privacy and surveillance risks.
3. The Widening Digital Divide: The benefits of AI are not universally accessible. Effective use requires stable internet, modern devices, and reliable electricity. Students from disadvantaged backgrounds who lack these resources risk falling even further behind, deepening existing educational and social inequities.
But these visible debates are a distraction from a far larger, physical cost that is being silently added to a global environmental ledger.
The Ugly: AI’s Invisible Environmental Footprint
While academia and industry wring their hands over plagiarism and bias, they remain wilfully blind to a far more inconvenient truth: the AI revolution is built on a foundation of staggering energy and water consumption. This isn’t an abstract cost; it’s a physical debt being charged to the planet with every query. This is the engine room of the illusion, an immense, energy-hungry global infrastructure that our collective failure to recognize is a critical flaw in our current understanding of the technology.
A Stark Literacy Gap
In a recent survey of over 30 undergraduate and postgraduate students from India, the UK, and Canada, a startling consensus emerged. These students, from diverse fields including engineering and humanities, were either enthusiastic or casual users of AI. Yet, with the exception of a single master’s scholar, not one of them had any meaningful understanding of AI’s physical and environmental footprint.
Their perception of AI was telling, revealing a profound disconnect between the digital tool and its physical reality.
Students frequently described AI as “free,” “virtual,” “weightless,” or “just code.” The notion that AI has a physical footprint—servers, cooling systems, chips, power draw—was almost entirely absent.
This gap represents a fundamental failure of AI literacy. Current education and discourse overwhelmingly focus on what AI does for us, not what it costs the planet. This blind spot is shaping policy and user behaviour at a moment when the stakes could not be higher.
Quantifying the Cost: From a Single Query to Global Demand
The feeling of “weightlessness” is an illusion. In terms of energy, a simple Google search and a generative AI query are worlds apart. The difference is not incremental; it is exponential.
The implication of this data is staggering: One long AI query can consume as much electricity as 30–100 Google searches. When multiplied by hundreds of millions of daily queries worldwide, this individual cost scales into a global crisis.
The scale of this shift is not theoretical; it is being meticulously tracked by global energy watchdogs, and their findings are alarming. The International Energy Agency (IEA) provides a chilling macro-level view of this trend:
• 2024 Consumption: Data centres consumed an estimated 415 TWh of electricity, representing 1.5% of global demand.
• 2030 Projection: Driven primarily by the explosive growth of AI, this demand is projected to more than double to 945 TWh.
• A Shocking Equivalence: This projected demand is equal to the entire annual electricity consumption of Japan.
IEA’s recent analysis signals that AI is no longer just a technological tool but an energy-intensive industrial sector. Its electricity demands are now large enough to reshape consumption patterns in advanced economies and rival global investment in oil — a striking sign of the world’s transition into the “Age of Electricity.”
“Analysis in the World Energy Outlook has been highlighting for many years the growing role of electricity in economies around the world. Last year, we said the world was moving quickly into the Age of Electricity – and it’s clear today that it has already arrived,” said IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol. “In a break from the trend of the past decade, the increase in electricity consumption is no longer limited to emerging and developing economies. Breakneck demand growth from data centres and AI is helping drive up electricity use in advanced economies, too. Global investment in data centres is expected to reach $580 billion in 2025. Those who say that ‘data is the new oil’ will note that this surpasses the $540 billion being spent on global oil supply – a striking example of the changing nature of modern economies.”
This global problem is coming to a head in nations where the balance between progress and sustainability is most delicate, nowhere more so than in India.
India at the AI Crossroads
India stands as the global epicenter of AI’s collision between digital ambition and physical limits. Its unique combination of immense economic opportunity, significant digital disparity, and acute environmental stress makes its approach to AI adoption a high-stakes paradox—and a bellwether for the entire developing world.
The Multi-Billion Dollar Promise
The economic incentives for embracing generative AI are enormous. An EY report estimates that by 2029-30, the adoption of GenAI could add US359 billion to US438 billion to India’s GDP, promising to accelerate growth and enhance productivity across the nation.
A Collision Course with Reality
Yet, this multi-billion-dollar vision, articulated by consultancies like EY, is on a direct collision course with the stark physical limitations outlined by energy and environmental analysts. For India, the promise of virtual wealth is tethered to the reality of stressed power grids and scarce water. Unregulated AI adoption threatens to exacerbate several pre-existing, systemic challenges:
• Digital Disparity: Large segments of the population still lack reliable access to the stable internet and modern devices required for AI-driven learning and work.
• Stressed Infrastructure: The nation’s electricity grids are already under significant strain, and the massive energy demands of AI data centres could push them to their limits.
• Environmental Scarcity: Many regions across India face severe water scarcity, a problem that would be intensified by the vast water requirements for cooling data centres.
• Budgetary Constraints: Public educational institutions operate on tight budgets, making it difficult to fund the necessary technological infrastructure and training for students and educators.
For India, blindly pursuing AI adoption is not a viable path. A deliberate, responsible, and human-centered framework is not just an option; it is an absolute necessity.
Redefining AI Literacy for a Sustainable Future
The challenges posed by AI, while significant, are not insurmountable. Addressing them requires a new, more comprehensive definition of AI literacy—one that is human-centered, ethically grounded, and environmentally accountable. The goal is not to restrict AI, but to build a foundation of trust and sustainability for its responsible integration into society. This requires a coordinated effort from educational institutions, organizations, and policymakers. According to UNESCO, AI literacy involves equipping learners and educators with a human-centred mindset, ethical awareness, conceptual understanding, and practical skills to use AI responsibly, understand its implications, and adapt as AI technologies evolve.
Building on UNESCO’s foundation, Education Publica proposes a broader, more future-ready definition: AI literacy is the integrated set of knowledge, skills, attitudes, and ethical principles that enable individuals to understand what AI is and how it works; use AI tools effectively and safely; critically interpret and question AI outputs; recognise the societal, ethical, economic, and environmental impacts of AI systems; and make informed, responsible choices about when, why, and how to engage with AI.
For Educational Institutions and Organizations:
A proactive, principles-based approach is essential for navigating the complexities of AI integration. The following strategies provide a roadmap for responsible adoption:
1. Demand Vendor Transparency: Insist that AI providers not only disclose per-query energy data, carbon metrics, and water consumption but also provide “explainable AI” algorithms, helping users understand the “why” behind an output, not just the “what.”
2. Mandate Comprehensive AI Literacy: Implement formal courses covering not just AI use, but also its limitations, including inherent bias, hallucination risks, data privacy ethics, and its full environmental impact.
3. Establish Clear Ethical Guidelines: Develop and enforce robust academic integrity policies that explicitly define where AI is allowed (e.g., for brainstorming), allowed with declaration (e.g., for drafting assistance), or prohibited (e.g., in exams).
4. Protect Equity: Ensure students without reliable access to technology are not disadvantaged by maintaining viable offline alternatives for key academic activities and assessments.
5. Foster a Culture of Innovation and Inquiry: Beyond just mandating courses, institutions must build a culture that encourages experimentation and critical feedback loops, as recommended by industry leaders at EY. This involves creating cross-functional teams to continually assess AI’s impact on learning and well-being.
6. Invest in Sustainable Infrastructure: Prioritize renewable-powered cloud providers and perform continuous audits of energy and water consumption related to AI workloads.
For Policymakers:
The role of government is crucial in shaping a healthy AI ecosystem. Policymakers must work to create a global consensus on AI regulation, learning from successful international models while crafting domestic policies that support both innovation and responsible, human-centered use.
These steps are not about stifling innovation. They are about building the necessary foundation of trust and sustainability for AI’s successful and long-term integration into our society.
The EP View: Embracing AI with Eyes Wide Open
Artificial intelligence is neither the utopian solution some have promised nor the existential threat others have feared. It is a powerful tool—and like any tool, its ultimate value will be determined by the wisdom and foresight of those who wield it. The magic is compelling, but we can no longer afford to be mystified by the illusion. True literacy means looking behind the curtain and understanding the machinery and the costs.
The future of learning and work will undoubtedly be AI-enabled. It is our collective responsibility to ensure that this future is also human-centered, equitable, and environmentally conscious. To do so, we must move forward with our eyes wide open, ready to ask the hard questions and build a world where technological progress serves human values and planetary health.
Dipin Damodharan is an award-winning journalist, editor and media entrepreneur, and Co-founder and Editor-in-Chief of EdPublica, an independent global media platform covering education, science, research, innovation, climate and public policy. With more than a decade of experience in journalism, he has worked across print, digital and multimedia media. His reporting explores science, climate, sustainability and the social impact of research and innovation. His work has been recognised by the Solutions Journalism Network and other journalism organisations.
OpenAI Promises Greater Transparency as Data Centre Backlash Grows in the US
OpenAI’s new National Community Compact promises greater transparency in data centre development, including public disclosure of energy and water use and safeguards against higher electricity costs.
OpenAI has announced new transparency commitments for its AI infrastructure projects amid growing scrutiny of data centre expansion. Representational image. Image credit: Solen Feyissa/ Pexels
The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence is increasing demand for the data centres that power it. Across the United States, however, plans to build these energy-intensive facilities are encountering resistance from communities concerned about electricity bills, water consumption, noise and environmental impacts. Against this backdrop, OpenAI announced a National Community Compact outlining commitments to improve transparency and strengthen community participation in the development of its computing infrastructure.
The company has also released a Compute Campus Policy Blueprint, proposing measures for governments and regulators to consider when overseeing data centre development. The announcement comes amid growing public and political scrutiny of the technology industry’s infrastructure expansion.
Ending Secrecy Around Data Centre Negotiations
One of the most significant commitments concerns non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). OpenAI says it will stop requiring public officials to sign NDAs during negotiations over future facilities, except where legitimate security concerns, trade secrets or commercially sensitive information require protection.
Such agreements have attracted criticism because they can restrict the information elected representatives share with residents about proposed developments. Greater disclosure could allow communities to understand the scale and potential consequences of projects before construction begins.
OpenAI has also committed to engaging residents early in the planning process, appointing a local point of contact for each facility and publishing annual reports detailing its progress against the compact’s commitments. The agreement applies to future computing facilities owned and operated by OpenAI, rather than every data centre used by the company.
Who Pays for the Electricity?
Electricity demand is among the most contentious aspects of data centre expansion. These facilities require continuous power to operate servers and cooling systems, potentially placing additional pressure on electricity grids and increasing costs for other consumers.
Electrical control panels inside an industrial power facility, illustrating the electrical infrastructure required to support energy-intensive AI data centres and their growing demand on power grids. Representational image. Image credit: Brett Sayles/ Pexels
OpenAI has pledged to pay the full cost of the electricity its facilities consume, along with the infrastructure upgrades required to supply them. It also proposes financial safeguards to prevent households and businesses from bearing costs if a planned project is delayed, scaled down or cancelled.
The company has proposed reducing electricity consumption during periods of peak demand and making power available to the grid when necessary. Its planned facility in Effingham County, Georgia, illustrates this approach. Under an agreement with Georgia Power, the utility can reduce electricity supplied to the facility by up to 1,000 megawatts during periods of peak demand.
Water Consumption and Environmental Disclosure
Cooling systems are another environmental concern. Data centres generate considerable heat, and some cooling technologies require substantial quantities of water to maintain operating temperatures. OpenAI says it will prioritise closed-loop and low-water cooling systems and develop water-management plans for individual facilities. It has also committed to publishing site-level information on electricity and water consumption.
The company plans to disclose construction details and commission independent noise studies before facilities begin operations. Annual reporting on relevant environmental impacts is also part of the compact. These disclosures could help communities assess the pressures associated with hosting large computing facilities. Their usefulness, however, will depend on the completeness of the information and the scope for independent scrutiny.
Growing resistance to data centre expansion
The announcement comes as opposition to data centre development gains momentum in the United States. Residents have questioned whether the economic benefits of hosting these facilities justify their demands on local electricity, water and infrastructure. According to Data Center Watch, at least 45 data centre projects worth 68 billion dollars faced disruption from local opposition during the second quarter of 2026.
OpenAI has also promised to publish local hiring goals and provide information about employment opportunities. Its commitments include helping local suppliers compete for contracts and encouraging partnerships with community colleges and trade organisations to prepare workers for construction and technical jobs.
However, voluntary corporate commitments do not carry the same force as legally enforceable regulations. OpenAI’s policy blueprint therefore calls on governments to establish stronger oversight of electricity costs, environmental disclosures and community benefits.
As AI computing demand continues to grow, the pressure on electricity networks, water resources and local infrastructure is likely to intensify. Whether OpenAI’s compact delivers meaningful accountability will depend on how consistently its commitments are implemented and independently scrutinised.
How an Indian-made Silicon Chip Could Help Terahertz Signals Overcome Obstacles in Future 6G Networks
An Indian research team at JNCASR has demonstrated a silicon photonic chip that allows terahertz signals to cross engineered barriers with minimal loss, a development that could advance high-speed circuits for future 6G networks.
6G technology is expected to use higher-frequency terahertz waves to support faster data transmission and greater network capacity. Representational image. Image credit: geralt/ Pexels
A sharp bend, a junction or a sudden change in a circuit’s structure can weaken an electromagnetic signal. When communication systems operate at increasingly high frequencies, even these seemingly small disruptions become significant engineering obstacles. For researchers working towards sixth-generation (6G) wireless technology, finding ways to guide signals through compact circuits without losing their strength is a growing challenge.
A research team in India has demonstrated an approach that could help address this problem. Using a specially engineered silicon chip, scientists at the Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research (JNCASR), Bengaluru, have shown that terahertz waves can cross artificial barriers with very little signal loss, even while carrying high-speed data.
The work draws on a phenomenon called photonic Klein tunnelling, which describes how waves can pass through certain barriers without undergoing the substantial reflection or attenuation commonly associated with such obstacles.
Artistic illustration of photonic Klein tunnelling in a silicon valley photonic crystal chip. A terahertz signal carrying high-speed data crosses the engineered barrier (blue) without significant loss, supporting 100 Gbit/s data transmission for 6G communication. Source: PIB
In one of the three devices developed by the researchers, data transmission reached 100 gigabits per second (Gbps). The findings, published in Advanced Materials, offer a potential design approach for the compact terahertz circuits that future communication technologies may require.
Borrowing a Principle From Quantum Physics
The idea behind the research has its origins in a phenomenon associated with quantum mechanics. In quantum physics, Klein tunnelling describes the unusual ability of certain particles to pass through a potential barrier even when classical physics would predict that they should be reflected. Researchers have explored analogous behaviour in photonic systems, where electromagnetic waves can exhibit similar transmission characteristics.
The JNCASR team applied this principle through topological photonics, a field concerned with controlling the movement of electromagnetic waves using specially designed structures. They created a silicon photonic crystal resembling the honeycomb lattice of graphene, with triangular holes arranged in a precise pattern across a silicon slab. This arrangement produces boundary channels along which terahertz waves can propagate. These channels are resistant to certain forms of backscattering, helping signals retain their direction of travel.
The researchers then introduced artificial obstacles into these pathways by changing the dimensions of the triangular holes over a short section of the crystal. The experiment tested whether the waves could retain their transmission characteristics even when their pathways were deliberately disrupted.
When a Barrier Barely Interrupts the Signal
The results showed that the engineered structures could transmit terahertz waves across the barriers with remarkably little loss, provided the strength of the barrier remained below a characteristic coupling threshold of the crystal. A single barrier produced only about 1–2% signal loss. Even with two barriers placed consecutively, the loss remained around 2–3%. For comparison, a similar barrier in a conventional, non-topological waveguide caused a considerably greater reduction in transmission.
This is significant for circuit design because communication signals must often navigate multiple pathways and changes in geometry within a limited physical space. Reducing the losses associated with these obstacles could give researchers greater flexibility when designing compact terahertz components.
The team demonstrated the principle in three silicon devices. One incorporated two barriers in sequence. Another used an omega-shaped pathway containing four sharp bends and a central barrier. The third was a power splitter, which divided an incoming signal into two branches, with one branch containing an engineered barrier.
The devices were fabricated using high-resistivity silicon, a material compatible with established semiconductor manufacturing processes. Measurements across frequencies of 310–360 GHz closely matched the researchers’ computer simulations. In the power splitter, the two output signals remained nearly identical, indicating that the barrier had little effect on signal transmission.
What does 100 Gbps Mean in Practice?
The researchers also examined whether the structures could carry high-speed data, rather than simply transmit terahertz waves. The double-barrier device achieved a data rate of 48 Gbps, while the omega-shaped configuration supported 60 Gbps. The power splitter recorded the highest rate, reaching 100 Gbps using QAM-32 modulation. This technique encodes information through variations in the amplitude and phase of a signal.
At 100 Gbps, a five-gigabyte high-definition film could theoretically be transferred in less than half a second. The different transmission rates are important because they show how the approach performed across three distinct circuit configurations. The 100 Gbps result was achieved by the power splitter, rather than all three devices. The demonstration suggests that engineered barriers need not substantially compromise data transmission, even in circuits incorporating multiple pathways and sharp bends.
From a Laboratory Demonstration to Future 6G Hardware
Terahertz frequencies, which lie between microwaves and infrared light in the electromagnetic spectrum, are attracting interest for their capacity to support high-bandwidth communication. Their potential lies in accommodating large volumes of data at speeds that conventional wireless technologies may struggle to sustain. However, generating and transmitting terahertz signals is only part of the challenge. Researchers must also develop components capable of directing, dividing and processing these signals within compact devices.
The JNCASR study addresses this less visible aspect of future communication infrastructure. Its findings could help in developing integrated terahertz circuits that route and split signals on a single chip without substantial transmission losses. The next step for the research team is to explore whether the engineered barriers can be adjusted electrically, thermally or mechanically. This could eventually allow a device to redirect signals between different pathways on demand, potentially enabling more adaptable terahertz circuits.
The work remains an experimental demonstration of signal transmission at the chip level; it does not establish a commercially deployable 6G system. Further research will be needed to integrate these components into larger communication architectures.
Led by Abhishek Kumar, Assistant Professor at JNCASR and head of its Meta Optics Laboratory (MetoLab), the study involved joint first authors Samina Mulla and Sangram Kumar Sadhu. Researchers from JNCASR, IISER Kolkata, IIT Bombay, the Institute of Microelectronics at A*STAR, Singapore, and the University of Lille and CNRS, France, also contributed. The research offers a new way of thinking about how high-frequency signals can be guided through increasingly intricate circuits. As work on 6G progresses, such advances in the underlying hardware will help determine how much of the promised speed and bandwidth can eventually be translated into practical communication systems.
India Unveils Three Homegrown AI Models, Covering 22 Indian Languages
India has released three indigenous AI models under the IndiaAI Mission. EKA-1 supports all 22 scheduled Indian languages, while Dhīr 2B and Dhīr 5B offer multilingual AI assistance with offline deployment capabilities.
India's indigenous AI development gains momentum with the release of three foundation models under the IndiaAI Mission. Representational image. Image credit: Markus Spiske/ Pexels
India has released three indigenous artificial intelligence models under the IndiaAI Mission, with applications ranging from multilingual reasoning and coding to offline AI assistance in sensitive sectors such as defence, government and education. The models — EKA-1, developed by Soket Labs Technology and Research Private Limited, and Dhīr 2B and Dhīr 5B, developed by ZenteiQ AiTech Innovations, were unveiled in New Delhi under the IndiaAI Innovation Centre (Foundation Models) pillar.
The three models have different technical capabilities and deployment priorities. EKA-1 is designed as a large multilingual foundation model supporting all 22 scheduled Indian languages and English. The Dhīr models, meanwhile, focus on lightweight, locally deployable AI assistance, allowing organisations to process information without depending on continuous cloud connectivity.
Officials from the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology and representatives of Soket Labs and ZenteiQ at the launch of indigenous AI models EKA-1, Dhīr 2B and Dhīr 5B under the IndiaAI Mission in New Delhi.
EKA-1 Trained on 7.5 Trillion Tokens
Developed by Soket Labs, EKA-1 is a 26.3-billion-parameter foundation model trained on approximately 7.5 trillion tokens. It supports all 22 scheduled Indian languages alongside English and is designed for mathematical tasks, coding, reasoning and agentic applications.
The model uses an open, sparse hybrid architecture. Its intended applications include banking, financial services and cybersecurity, where understanding India’s digital ecosystem and sector-specific requirements is important. According to Abhishek Upperwal, CEO of Soket Labs, the model was developed with support from the IndiaAI Mission to address requirements within India’s banking, financial services and cybersecurity sectors.
Dhīr Models Target Offline and Secure AI Applications
ZenteiQ has introduced two open-source models, Dhīr 2B and Dhīr 5B, supporting English and 10 Indian languages. Their primary focus is secure deployment within organisations. The models can operate on-premise, enabling institutions to use AI systems within their own computing infrastructure rather than relying entirely on external cloud services.
They support document-grounded automation, knowledge retrieval and citizen-facing or enterprise services. The press release identifies defence, government, industrial and educational institutions as potential application areas, particularly in environments with limited internet connectivity or sensitive information.
Their lightweight architecture also allows deployment on mobile devices, according to ZenteiQ. The company says the models can run across different computing platforms, including graphics processing units (GPUs) and tensor processing units (TPUs). Prof. Sashikumar, CEO of ZenteiQ AiTech Innovations, said local deployment would allow users to retain data on their devices, improving privacy and security while reducing dependence on cloud connectivity.
Public Computing Infrastructure Supports Model Development
Both development teams were selected under the IndiaAI Innovation Centre pillar, which aims to build indigenous foundation models and large language models. The IndiaAI Mission provided access to subsidised national AI computing infrastructure and support for associated research expenses. These resources helped the selected teams develop their models.
Speaking at the launch, S. Krishnan, Secretary of the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, said indigenous AI models could strengthen India’s technological and strategic autonomy while creating opportunities to improve productivity across government, industry, research and education. He also pointed to AIKosh, the IndiaAI datasets platform, as a channel through which researchers, students, innovators and the wider public could access these resources and experiment with AI applications.
India’s Wider AI Development Programme
Approved by the Union Cabinet on March 7, 2024, the IndiaAI Mission operates through seven pillars: computing capacity, the Innovation Centre, the AIKosh datasets platform, application development, future skills, startup financing, and safe and trusted AI. The development of EKA-1 and the Dhīr models falls under the Innovation Centre pillar, which supports the creation of foundation models tailored to India’s requirements.
The models represent two different approaches to expanding domestic AI capabilities: large-scale multilingual processing and lightweight AI systems designed for secure local deployment. Their practical impact will depend on how effectively they perform across real-world applications and how widely organisations adopt them.