Connect with us

Climate

Weather, Not Just Emissions, Driving PM2.5 Pollution in Indian Cities: Study

A new Climate Trends report finds weather conditions can alter PM2.5 levels in Indian cities by up to 40%, calling for season-specific reforms in India’s National Clean Air Programme (NCAP).

Published

on

interview 15
Image credit: Saikat Ghosh/Pexels

A new analysis of India’s urban air quality has revealed that weather conditions can significantly influence pollution levels, sometimes masking the real health burden faced by residents. The report, released by Climate Trends, argues that India’s clean air policies must account for seasonal and meteorological factors to effectively tackle particulate pollution across major cities.

The study analysed Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) monitoring data from 2024–2025 across six major cities — Delhi, Patna, Kolkata, Mumbai, Chennai, and Bengaluru — and found that meteorological conditions alone can shift pollution levels by up to 40 percent even without changes in emissions.

Researchers say the findings highlight a major gap in India’s National Clean Air Programme (NCAP) and recommend that the upcoming Phase-III reforms include season-specific targets, weather-adjusted evaluation metrics, and dynamic action plans triggered by atmospheric conditions.

Delhi’s extreme winter pollution

The report highlights Delhi as continuing to experience the most severe pollution crisis in the country. The capital recorded the highest annual average PM2.5 levels among the cities analysed and experienced prolonged periods of “Severe” and “Emergency” air quality days.

A particularly alarming finding is that Delhi recorded zero clean air days during winter, despite apparent annual improvements in pollution metrics.

According to the researchers, this discrepancy arises because annual averages can hide seasonal pollution spikes that occur during unfavourable weather conditions such as low wind speeds and high humidity.

“This study shows that a 20–30% reduction in annual PM2.5 does not translate into winter air-quality compliance in stagnation-prone cities like Delhi and Patna, where over 70% of days fall under low-wind, high-humidity meteorological regimes. NCAP Phase-III must therefore adopt season-specific targets, meteorology-triggered interventions, and airshed-level management frameworks to achieve meaningful public-health gains,” Aarti Khosla, Founder and Director of Climate Trends, said in a statement.

Weather plays a decisive role

The report emphasises that air pollution is not simply an “emissions-only” problem. Instead, it is strongly shaped by how emissions interact with atmospheric conditions.

Periods of atmospheric stagnation — characterised by low wind speeds and high humidity — prevent pollutants from dispersing, allowing them to accumulate near the ground and intensify exposure levels for urban populations.

Sagnik Dey, Head of the Centre for Atmospheric Sciences at IIT Delhi, explained the scientific basis for this pattern.

“The persistence of PM2.5 exceedances is strongly associated with sub-1 m/s wind regimes and elevated relative humidity across northern cities, where stagnation episodes sustain disproportionately high exposure levels. Ventilation efficiency emerges as the dominant determinant of inter-city variability. However, current NCAP evaluation frameworks primarily assess observed concentration changes without explicitly accounting for meteorological modulation, potentially leading to distorted interpretations of policy effectiveness. Integrating meteorological regime analytics is therefore essential to ensure a scientifically robust and equitable Phase-III evaluation.”

The study also estimates that simply shifting from stagnant atmospheric conditions to well-ventilated ones could reduce PM2.5 levels by 35–40 percent, demonstrating the powerful role of weather in shaping urban air quality.

Emerging patterns across Indian cities

Beyond Delhi, the report identifies several emerging trends across India’s major urban centres.

Southern cities such as Bengaluru and Chennai, historically considered less polluted, are beginning to show signs of winter-time air quality deterioration, signalling a new vulnerability. Meanwhile, Mumbai and Chennai recorded increases in annual pollution levels in 2025, suggesting that pollution challenges are expanding beyond seasonal spikes into year-round concerns.

Patna continues to face an intensifying crisis, emerging as the second-most polluted city after Delhi, driven in part by persistent atmospheric stagnation across the eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain.

In contrast, Bengaluru stands out for maintaining relatively stable and lower pollution levels, reflecting what researchers describe as “structural air-quality resilience.”

Kolkata’s complex pollution dynamics

Kolkata presents a unique case where meteorology interacts strongly with local pollution sources.

Dr. Abhinandan Ghosh of IISER Kolkata said meteorological conditions play a key role in winter pollution episodes in the city. “As a community of atmospheric scientists, we have long cautioned against a simplistic rat race to replicate Western PM₂.₅ benchmarks, for the Indian subcontinent is endowed with its own meteorological idiosyncrasies, complex topography, and friable alluvial soils that elevate baseline particulate concentrations. The report vindicates this standpoint: in Kolkata, it is not emissions alone but the capricious tyranny of winter boundary-layer dynamics – attenuated mixing heights and enfeebled dispersion – that engenders the most deleterious pollution episodes.”

Professor Abhijit Chatterjee of the Bose Institute pointed to biomass and waste burning as major contributors to winter pollution in the city.

“Amongst several sources, at the current scenario, biomass and waste burning are the major concern in Kolkata especially in winter. The high load of PM2.5 exceeding national standards in winter, primarily due to these two sources which accumulate near the surface because of low dispersion and ventilation coefficients.”

Need for season-specific policies

The study concludes that India’s clean air strategy must move beyond a uniform annual target system and instead adopt seasonally calibrated and meteorology-aware policies.

Experts argue that incorporating weather dynamics into pollution management would help policymakers better assess the effectiveness of interventions and design more realistic mitigation strategies.

Without such reforms, the report warns, improvements in annual averages may continue to mask severe seasonal pollution episodes that pose serious health risks to millions of urban residents.

Climate

The Climate World Cup? How Climate Change Could Affect Player Performance at the 2026 World Cup

Climate change and the 2026 FIFA World Cup could affect 97 matches, increasing heat risks for players, altering performance and raising safety concerns.

Dipin Damodharan

Published

on

Climate change and the 2026 FIFA World Cup could expose players and fans to higher temperatures during matches across North America.
Climate change and the 2026 FIFA World Cup could expose players and fans to higher temperatures during matches across North America. Image credit: Jason Charters /Unsplash

Climate change and the 2026 FIFA World Cup are on a collision course, with new research suggesting that rising temperatures could affect player performance, match intensity and fan safety in nearly every game of football’s biggest tournament.

When football fans tune in to the 2026 FIFA World Cup on June 11, they will be watching more than a battle between the world’s best teams. They may also be witnessing a new reality for global sport: a tournament increasingly shaped by climate change.

A new analysis by Climate Central suggests that rising global temperatures are making it more likely that players will compete in conditions known to affect performance during much of the tournament. The findings raise questions not only about athlete safety but also about how the game itself may evolve in a warming world.

The 2026 FIFA World Cup, scheduled from June 11 to July 19, 2026, will be the largest in the tournament’s history, featuring 48 teams and 104 matches across venues in the United States, Canada and Mexico. But according to Climate Central’s analysis, 97 of those 104 matches now face a higher likelihood of experiencing temperatures above 28°C, a threshold associated with reduced football performance.

Researchers found that nearly half the matches have at least a 50 per cent chance of being played in conditions that can impair performance. In several cases, climate change has increased those odds substantially. One of the most affected fixtures is the June 26 match between Uruguay and Spain in Guadalajara, where the probability of performance-affecting heat has increased by 37 percentage points because of climate change.

Climate Change and the 2026 FIFA World Cup Could Alter the Game

For decades, discussions about climate change and sport focused primarily on scheduling disruptions, extreme weather events or damaged infrastructure. The new analysis points to something more fundamental: the possibility that rising temperatures may influence what happens on the pitch itself.

Research cited by Climate Central shows that temperatures above 28°C can reduce sprint frequency, decrease the total distance players cover and slow recovery times. In a sport where margins are often measured in seconds and centimetres, even small declines in physical performance can influence tactics, intensity and match outcomes.

Professor Mike Tipton of the University of Portsmouth’s Extreme Environments Laboratory said the effects of heat extend beyond discomfort.

“Playing in temperatures above 28°C changes the game – affecting tactics, tempo and overall quality. We see reduced intensity, less sprinting and potentially fewer chances being created. As temperatures climb further, the risks also increase. Prolonged exposure and dehydration can lead to heat exhaustion or even heat stroke, particularly in high-stakes matches where players are more likely to push beyond their natural limits.”

Climate change and the 2026 FIFA World Cup could affect 97 matches, increasing heat risks for players, altering performance and raising safety concerns.
As the 2026 FIFA World Cup gets underway on June 11, concerns are growing that rising temperatures could influence how the tournament is played. Image credit: Franco Monsalvo

The implications are not limited to players. Slower matches, altered tactics and more frequent cooling breaks could affect the experience for millions of spectators in stadiums and billions watching worldwide.

Climate Change and the 2026 FIFA World Cup Raise New Safety Questions

Concerns about heat are becoming increasingly common across international sport.

Athletes competing in marathons, tennis tournaments and Olympic events have already faced extreme temperatures in recent years. Football, despite its global popularity, is not immune.

Norwegian international Morten Thorsby, who is expected to play at the 2026 World Cup, argues that the conversation can no longer focus solely on performance.

“This analysis makes clear that rising temperatures are not only a serious health risk for players and fans, but they are also starting to affect the quality of the game itself. When heat impacts sprinting, recovery, and overall intensity, it changes the way football is played – and not for the better,” he said.

interview 24
Source: Climate Central

“That’s exactly why I signed the players’ letter to FIFA last week. We need to take these risks seriously and ensure that the game we love is protected, both for those on the pitch and everyone watching around the world.”

The analysis arrives as sports governing bodies face increasing pressure to adapt competitions to a changing climate. Possible responses include scheduling more matches during cooler periods of the day, increasing player protection measures and reconsidering host venue requirements.

The Future of Football in a Warming World

Climate scientists argue that what is happening to football mirrors broader changes taking place across society.

Shel Winkley, a meteorologist at Climate Central, said climate change is already reshaping many of the traditions people associate with sport.

“The World Cups of the past won’t happen again — not because the players have changed, but because the planet has. Heatwaves, unpredictable weather, and shifting seasons are rewriting the rules of the games we love,” Winkley said.

“Athletes are forced to play more cautiously, strategize differently, and abandon the risks that once made sport thrilling. Unless we stop burning fossil fuels, the future of competition won’t be about who plays best — it’ll be about who can tolerate the heat.”

For football fans, the warning is striking. Climate change is often discussed through statistics, emissions targets and policy debates. The 2026 World Cup offers a more visible illustration of its impact.

If the analysis proves accurate, the world’s biggest sporting event may become a reminder that climate change is no longer a distant environmental issue. It is increasingly becoming a factor that shapes how people work, travel, compete and even play the games they love.

Continue Reading

Climate

The Next Five Years Could Be Earth’s Hottest Yet, WMO Warns

A new WMO forecast warns that Earth could see new global temperature records before 2030, with Arctic warming continuing to outpace the global average.

Joe Jacob

Published

on

Global temperature record trends highlighted in a climate change analysis showing rising temperatures worldwide.
Image credit: WMO

Global temperature record levels are likely to be challenged again before the end of this decade, according to a new World Meteorological Organization forecast. Scientists say there is a high chance that one of the next five years will become the warmest ever recorded, as rising greenhouse gas emissions and a possible El Niño event continue to push the planet toward new climate extremes.

The world is heading into another stretch of exceptional heat, with a strong chance that a new global temperature record will be set before the end of the decade.

According to a new assessment from the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), global temperatures are expected to remain at or near record levels between 2026 and 2030, extending a warming trend that has already pushed climate indicators into uncharted territory.

The report paints a picture of a planet that continues to warm despite international efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions. While the Paris Agreement aims to limit long-term warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, scientists now estimate there is a 91% chance that at least one of the next five years will temporarily cross that threshold.

Global Temperature Record Could Be Broken Again by 2030

Even more striking, there is a 75% chance that the average temperature across the entire five-year period from 2026 to 2030 will exceed 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.

The findings do not mean the Paris Agreement has officially failed. The agreement’s temperature targets are measured over decades rather than individual years. Still, climate scientists view the growing frequency of these temporary breaches as a sign of how rapidly the planet is approaching those long-term limits.

The report projects annual global temperatures during 2026–2030 to range between 1.3°C and 1.9°C above the 1850–1900 average. There is also an 86% chance that one of those years will surpass 2024, currently the warmest year ever recorded.

One factor behind the forecast is the likely return of El Niño conditions in the tropical Pacific Ocean.

2027 Could Become the Next Global Temperature Record Year

Dr. Leon Hermanson, lead author of the report, said: “There is an El Niño predicted for the end of 2026, which increases the chances of the following year, 2027, being the next record-breaking year.”

El Niño events typically raise global temperatures by releasing additional heat from the Pacific Ocean into the atmosphere. When combined with the long-term warming caused by greenhouse gas emissions, they can push global temperatures to new highs.

Global Temperature Record Highlights Faster Arctic Warming

While rising temperatures affect every region, the Arctic continues to stand out.

The WMO forecasts that Arctic temperatures during the next five northern hemisphere winters will average about 2.8°C above the 1991–2020 baseline. That is more than three times the projected global average anomaly over the same period.

Scientists have long observed that the Arctic is warming faster than the rest of the world, a phenomenon known as Arctic amplification. The consequences include shrinking sea ice, thawing permafrost and disruptions to weather patterns far beyond the polar region.

The report also points to continued declines in sea ice across parts of the Arctic, particularly in the Barents Sea, Bering Sea and the Sea of Okhotsk.

A Wetter North, A Drier South

The warming climate is also reshaping rainfall patterns.

According to the forecast, northern high-latitude regions are likely to experience wetter-than-average winters over the next five years. Increased rainfall is also expected across parts of the tropics.

At the same time, many subtropical regions are projected to become drier. The Amazon is among the areas where below-average rainfall is considered more likely during the coming years.

Seasonal forecasts for 2026–2030 suggest wetter conditions in the Sahel region of Africa, northern Europe, Alaska and Siberia. Such shifts are consistent with what climate scientists have long expected in a warming world, where a warmer atmosphere holds more moisture and alters long-established rainfall patterns.

Beyond Records

The report is not simply about whether another temperature record will be broken.

For governments, businesses and communities, the findings serve as a reminder that climate change is increasingly shaping everyday realities—from agriculture and water supplies to infrastructure, health and disaster preparedness.

The assessment was produced by the UK Met Office on behalf of the WMO and draws on forecasts from 13 international climate centres. Scientists say confidence in the temperature projections is high because similar forecasting systems have performed well when tested against past climate conditions.

If the projections prove accurate, the second half of this decade could become a defining period in the world’s climate story—not because warming suddenly accelerates, but because the consequences of a steadily warming planet become harder to ignore.

Continue Reading

Climate

FIFA Under Fire Over ‘Impossible to Justify’ Heat Rules for 2026 World Cup

Global experts warn FIFA’s heat safety rules for the 2026 World Cup could endanger players amid rising climate-driven temperatures.

Published

on

FIFA heat safety guidelines: Football players competing under extreme heat conditions during an international match as experts warn FIFA over 2026 Football World Cup safety risks.

Experts warn players could face life-threatening conditions as climate change intensifies heat risks across host cities

A coalition of leading global experts in health, climate science and sports performance has issued a sharp warning to FIFA, accusing football’s governing body of maintaining dangerously weak heat safety standards ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Experts criticize FIFA heat safety guidelines and warn players could face life-threatening conditions as climate change intensifies heat risks across host cities

In a strongly worded open letter, seen by EdPublica, the experts argue that FIFA’s current thresholds for allowing matches to continue in extreme heat are “impossible to justify”, even for athletes who are fully acclimatised to hot conditions.

FIFA heat safety guidelines raising alarm

The tournament, set to be hosted across 16 cities in the United States, Mexico and Canada, is already raising alarm among scientists because of the likelihood of soaring temperatures and humidity during summer matches. Experts fear that players could be pushed into dangerous levels of heat stress, especially during afternoon kick-offs.

The warning comes amid growing concern that climate change is making extreme heat events more frequent and more severe worldwide. Scientists say the burning of fossil fuels is directly contributing to these rising temperatures — a point the letter connects to FIFA’s controversial sponsorship relationship with Saudi oil giant Aramco.

FIFA heat safety guidelines and fossil fuels

The authors of the letter describe FIFA’s “active promotion” of fossil fuels as “a conflict of interest with the protection of player welfare.”

Prof Mike Tipton from the University of Portsmouth’s Extreme Environments Lab and President of The Physiological Society warned that the dangers go beyond simple discomfort.

“Competitive exercise in hot environments can lead to a range of problems from impaired performance and enforced alterations in game strategy, to the medical emergency of heat stroke. Amongst the most important ways of minimising the chance of such hazards is to employ effective interventions, including complying with internationally recognised heat-related thresholds for the postponement or relocation of events. As it stands, and due in part to climate-change driven increases in environmental thermal stress, some of the venues for the 2026 World Cup are likely to exceed the recommended heat-related “high risk” threshold, especially during afternoon kick-offs”

At the centre of the criticism is FIFA’s current Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) threshold — a heat stress measure that factors in humidity, solar radiation, wind speed and air temperature. Under FIFA’s existing framework, matches may continue until WBGT levels exceed 32°C.

Experts argue that threshold is dangerously high. The open letter notes that a WBGT of nearly 32°C can correspond to air temperatures around 45°C with moderate humidity — conditions many scientists consider unsafe for intense athletic activity.

Professor Douglas Casa, CEO of the Korey Stringer Institute at the University of Connecticut, said FIFA’s current rules fall well behind accepted scientific standards.

“The science supports the concept that high intensity sport above a 28oC Wet Bulb Globe Temperature can compromise performance and put a player at risk. The fact that under current FIFA Guidelines action will only be taken above 32oC is far from optimal. Additionally, the hydration break in each half absolutely needs to be longer than 3 minutes- at least five minutes for each break and preferably six. We hope this open letter convinces FIFA to update its heat guidelines before the World Cup.”

Although FIFA has introduced cooling breaks and a Heat Illness Mitigation and Management Task Force for the tournament, the experts say current measures remain insufficient. The letter argues that the existing three-minute cooling breaks are “too short to have a meaningful impact on rehydration and body cooling.”

The group is urging FIFA to adopt stricter protections similar to those recommended by FIFPRO, the international footballers’ union. Among the proposed measures are mandatory cooling breaks once WBGT exceeds 26°C and postponement or relocation of matches once temperatures rise above 28°C.

Professor Hugh Montgomery of University College London connected the debate directly to the broader climate crisis.

Climate change threatens human health and survival, now. In this regard, the World Cup shines less bright, tarnished by its core funding coming from a major polluter and by the threat posed to players by the extreme temperatures to which they may now be exposed.”

The controversy also highlights the growing collision between elite sport and climate change. The 2026 FIFA World Cup is expected to become the most carbon-polluting tournament in history due to its expansion to 48 teams and the vast travel demands across three countries.

Recent events across global sport have intensified fears. In 2025, extreme heat at the Shanghai Masters reportedly caused Novak Djokovic to vomit on court, while tennis player Holger Rune publicly asked: “do you want a player to die on court?” after receiving treatment for heat stress.

As the countdown to the 2026 World Cup continues, pressure is now mounting on FIFA to decide whether football’s biggest spectacle can safely coexist with a rapidly warming planet.

Continue Reading

Trending