Connect with us

Climate

When Hillary Clinton Makes a Case for Climate Action from the Global South

At Mumbai Climate Week, Hillary Clinton urges Global South-led climate action, resilience finance innovation and stronger AI governance.

Dipin Damodharan

Published

on

Hillary Clinton speaking at Mumbai Climate Week on Global South climate action and resilience finance. Image credit: DD/EdPublica
Hillary Clinton speaking at Mumbai Climate Week on Global South climate action and resilience finance. Image credit: DD/EdPublica

The Jio World Convention Centre in Mumbai, India’s financial capital, was buzzing with climate ambition this week. Start-ups showcased climate-centred products, philanthropic foundations exchanged notes with impact investors, young founders pitched adaptation tools for heat-stressed cities at the Mumbai Climate Week.

Amid the climate-tech demonstrations and policy exchanges, Hillary Clinton’s address stood out for its strategic clarity — positioning the Global South not merely as a beneficiary of climate action, but as its architect.

Her message was less about symbolism and more about systems — about resilience funds, insurance products, clean cooking, AI governance, and the moral responsibility of both North and South in confronting a warming world.

India as a Climate Laboratory

Clinton placed India squarely at the centre of her remarks — not as a victim of climate change, but as an innovator.

“One of our projects which I wanted to mention to you is creating a climate resilience fund to create a place where philanthropic dollars and corporate dollars and the individual dollars could be aggregated to come up with ideas to assist people who are out there working,” she said at the Mumbai Climate Week.

Through the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), that idea has already taken shape in India.

Working with Humanity Insured — a not-for-profit backed by major insurance firms — and in partnership with SEWA(Self-Employed Women’s Association), CGI launched a parametric insurance product designed for informal women workers vulnerable to extreme heat. The concept is simple but transformative: when temperatures cross 39°C, women who cannot work a full day can claim compensation for lost income.

“As I speak right now, we’ve got this product up and going. India is the example. It’s the model,” Hillary Clinton said. “We now have 500,000 insurance holders here in India. And India will be the model for the rest of the global south because of this CGI commitment.”

The insurance scheme reflects a larger shift in climate discourse — from abstract mitigation targets to hyper-local resilience. For informal workers, climate change is not a policy debate; it is lost wages when heat makes construction sites unworkable.

Hillary Clinton calls for Global South Climate Action at Mumbai Climate Week. Image credit: DD/EdPublica
Hillary Clinton calls for Global South Climate Action at Mumbai Climate Week. Image credit: DD/EdPublica

Clinton framed the model not merely as philanthropy but as smart economics. “This is not only a good thing to do. It is smart. It is a new market.”

The Global South as Agenda Setter

Repeatedly, she argued that climate solutions must emerge from the regions most affected.

“We have to focus attention on solutions in the places that are clearly now most affected by climate change… the front lines of the fight against global climate change is right here in the Global South.”

While acknowledging the historical responsibility of industrialised nations, she did not shy away from noting that emerging economies must also accelerate their transition to clean energy. Pollution, she stressed, is not an abstract carbon statistic — it is a health crisis.

“When I talk about fossil fuels, I’m not just talking about climate change. I’m talking about the pollution that goes in the air in Delhi or Beijing. I’m talking about clear evidence that pollution is impacting our health… particularly the health of our children.”

Climate, she insisted, is inseparable from public health.

Philanthropy Beyond Charity

One of the sharper threads in her address was directed at philanthropy. Charity alone, she argued, cannot solve structural crises.

“If you want to feed a hungry person, give them a fish. If you want to end hunger, teach them to fish,” she said, invoking the familiar metaphor to argue for systemic reform.

The climate resilience fund is intended as catalytic capital — seed funding that aggregates philanthropic, corporate and public resources to unlock scalable models. Adaptation, in her framework, must sit alongside mitigation.

Hillary Clinton also pointed to the massive intergenerational transfer of wealth underway globally, urging that it be channelled into long-term climate solutions rather than short-term relief.

AI, Energy and the Next Disruption

Though the week’s focus was climate, Clinton ventured into another domain shaping the future: artificial intelligence.

AI, she acknowledged, could optimise renewable grids and enable hyper-local climate projections. But she warned against uncritical adoption.

“This technology is also consuming vast amounts of power, water, infrastructure… We would be naive not to recognize the potential threats that AI and its development is causing.”

She raised pointed questions about data centres’ energy and water demands, labour market disruptions, and the political influence of tech giants.

“The people running these companies are the richest people in the world… They want to shape the future… Governments need to be ready to demand answers.”

Drawing lessons from social media’s regulatory lag, she cautioned against waiting a decade to understand AI’s harms. “Let’s figure out how we can deal with that ahead of time and try to shape it rather than shape the life.”

“We inherited it. And with that inheritance… should come a sense of responsibility”

In a country rapidly expanding both its renewable capacity and digital infrastructure, the intersection of AI and climate carries particular urgency.

A Personal Case for the Planet

Beyond policy and programmes, Hillary Clinton’s speech carried a deeply personal note. She spoke of hiking the day after the 2016 US election — an act of reconnecting with nature in a moment of political upheaval.

“I find it so reinvigorating… now we know that spending time in nature… actually does help reset your brain,” she said.

Her environmentalism, she explained, stems from reverence. “We inherited it. And with that inheritance… should come a sense of responsibility.”

Hillary Clinton during her Global South climate action address at Mumbai Climate Week. Image credit: DD/EdPublica
Hillary Clinton during her Global South climate action address at Mumbai Climate Week. Image credit: DD/EdPublica

Climate change, she warned, will not only intensify heatwaves and wildfires but amplify migration, conflict and political instability. Ignoring it is neither economically nor strategically rational.

“If we don’t take care of our world today, it will cost us more money. It will cost us more death and destruction. It will cost us more political conflict.”

A Message to Young Innovators

Among the audience were young founders and activists — many from India’s growing climate-tech ecosystem. Clinton’s closing words were directed at them.

“Do not give in to the naysayers and the cynics. Do not doubt that you are engaged in historic, important work.”

Hillary Clinton acknowledged that global climate finance often bypasses grassroots innovators, particularly women in the Global South. That imbalance, she implied, must change.

“Keep knocking on doors, making your arguments, showing up… ideas are going to come from everywhere and they’re going to be good ideas.”

Mumbai Climate Week, positioned as a first-of-its-kind platform in India, was organised by Project Mumbai with support from organisations including IDFC First Bank and Monitor Deloitte.

Dipin is the Co-founder and Editor-in-Chief of EdPublica. A journalist and editor with over 15 years of experience leading and co-founding both print and digital media outlets, he has written extensively on education, politics, and culture. His work has appeared in global publications such as The Huffington Post, The Himalayan Times, DailyO, Education Insider, and others.

Climate

Climate Change Could Turn Ocean Food into ‘Fast Food’, MIT Study Warns

MIT study finds climate change could shift phytoplankton to low-nutrient “fast-food” forms, impacting marine food webs and global nutrition.

Published

on

interview 18 1
A warming ocean could shift phytoplankton from nutrient-rich to carbohydrate-heavy forms, reshaping marine food webs and global nutrition.

From nutrient-rich to energy-dense but less nourishing—climate change is transforming the composition of ocean food at its source.

Climate change could fundamentally alter the nutritional foundation of the ocean, with new research suggesting that warming waters may turn phytoplankton—the base of the marine food web—into a form of “fast food” with reduced nutritional value.

A study by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), published in Nature Climate Change, finds that rising ocean temperatures could shift phytoplankton composition from protein-rich to carbohydrate-heavy, particularly in polar regions. This transformation could have cascading effects across marine ecosystems and ultimately impact human food systems.

A Shift at the Base of the Food Chain

Phytoplankton are microscopic, plant-like organisms that form the primary food source for a wide range of marine life, including krill, small fish, and jellyfish. These organisms, in turn, sustain larger species and top predators, including humans.

The study suggests that under continued greenhouse gas emissions through 2100, ocean warming will significantly alter the nutritional profile of these organisms. According to the researchers’ model, phytoplankton in polar regions could shift their balance of proteins to carbohydrates and lipids by approximately 20 percent.

“We’re moving in the poles toward a sort of fast-food ocean,” said lead author Shlomit Sharoni, an MIT postdoctoral researcher, in a media statement. “Based on this prediction, the nutritional composition of the surface ocean will look very different by the end of the century.”

Why Nutritional Composition Matters

While previous research has largely focused on how climate change affects phytoplankton populations, this study highlights a less explored dimension: their internal composition.

“There’s been an awareness that the nutritional value of phytoplankton can shift with climate change,” Sharoni said in a media statement, “But there has been very little work in directly addressing that question.”

Phytoplankton are composed of essential macromolecules such as proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids. These components determine their nutritional value for the organisms that consume them. Any imbalance at this foundational level can ripple through the entire food chain.

“Nearly all the material in a living organism is in these broad molecular forms, each having a particular physiological function, depending on the circumstances that the organism finds itself in,” said Mick Follows, professor at MIT.

Warming Oceans, Changing Chemistry

Using a combination of laboratory data and advanced ocean models, the researchers simulated how phytoplankton respond to changing environmental conditions such as temperature, light, and nutrient availability.

Under current conditions, phytoplankton cells are composed of slightly more than 50 percent protein. However, in future climate scenarios where global temperatures rise by around 3°C, this balance shifts significantly.

In polar regions, reduced sea ice allows more sunlight to penetrate the ocean surface, decreasing the need for light-harvesting proteins. At the same time, warmer temperatures and reduced ocean circulation limit the availability of nutrients such as nitrogen and iron.

As a result, protein levels in phytoplankton could decline by up to 30 percent, while carbohydrates and lipids increase.

Uneven Global Impacts

The effects of this shift are not uniform across the globe.

While phytoplankton populations in polar regions may increase, their nutritional quality is expected to decline. In contrast, subtropical regions could see a reduction in phytoplankton populations by up to 50 percent due to reduced nutrient availability.

In these regions, phytoplankton may adapt by moving to deeper waters, where they can access both light and nutrients, potentially increasing their protein content slightly.

Overall, however, the global trend points toward a more carbohydrate-heavy and less nutrient-dense ocean ecosystem.

Early Signs Already Visible

The researchers compared their model with real-world observations from Arctic and Antarctic regions. The findings indicate that this shift is already underway.

“In these regions, you can already see climate change, because sea ice is already melting,” Sharoni said in a statement. “And our model shows that proteins in polar plankton have been declining, while carbs and lipids are increasing.”

Follows added that the implications extend beyond marine ecosystems.

“It turns out that climate change is accelerated in the Arctic, and we have data showing that the composition of phytoplankton has already responded,” he said in a media statement. “The main message is: The caloric content at the base of the marine food web is already changing. And it’s not a clear story as to how this change will transmit through the food web.”

Implications for Marine Life and Humans

The long-term consequences of this shift remain uncertain. Some species may struggle with reduced protein availability, while others that rely on lipid storage could adapt more easily.

However, scientists warn that any disruption at the base of the marine food chain could have far-reaching impacts on biodiversity, fisheries, and global food security.

As the study highlights, climate change is not only altering how much food the ocean produces—but also how nutritious that food is.

Continue Reading

Climate

Study Finds Warming Could Slightly Boost Atmosphere’s Methane-Cleaning Capacity

New research suggests climate warming may modestly enhance the atmosphere’s ability to break down methane, though competing chemical processes add uncertainty.

Published

on

New research suggests climate warming may modestly enhance the atmosphere’s ability to break down methane, though competing chemical processes add uncertainty.
Image credit: MIT News; iStock

New research suggests climate warming may modestly enhance the atmosphere’s ability to break down methane, though competing chemical processes add uncertainty.

A new study by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) finds that rising global temperatures could slightly increase the atmosphere’s ability to break down methane, one of the most potent greenhouse gases.

Methane is a major driver of global warming, second only to carbon dioxide. However, it does not persist as long in the atmosphere due to the presence of hydroxyl radicals—highly reactive molecules often described as the “atmosphere’s detergent” for their role in breaking down pollutants.

Balancing Effects of Water Vapour and Natural Emissions

The MIT team developed a new atmospheric model to understand how hydroxyl radical (OH) levels may respond to warming temperatures. Their findings reveal a complex balance of competing effects.

As global temperatures rise, atmospheric water vapour is expected to increase, boosting OH levels by about 9%. However, higher temperatures will also lead to increased emissions of natural gases from plants—known as biogenic volatile organic compounds—which can reduce OH levels by approximately 6%.

The net effect, according to the study, is a modest increase of around 3% in the atmosphere’s capacity to break down methane under a 2°C warming scenario.

Why Hydroxyl Radicals Matter

Hydroxyl radicals play a critical role in regulating atmospheric chemistry. They react with methane and other gases, breaking them down into less harmful compounds.

“About 90 percent of the methane that’s removed from the atmosphere is due to the reaction with OH,” said study author Qindan Zhu in a statement.

Beyond methane, OH also helps remove air pollutants and gases that affect public health, including ozone.

“There’s a whole range of environmental reasons why we want to understand what’s going on with this molecule,” said Arlene Fiore, a professor at MIT.

New Model Offers Deeper Insights

To conduct the study, researchers developed a model called “AquaChem,” which simulates atmospheric chemistry under different climate scenarios. The model builds on simplified “aquaplanet” systems, allowing scientists to isolate atmospheric processes without the complexity of land and ice interactions.

Using this model, the team compared current climate conditions with a scenario in which global temperatures rise by 2°C—widely considered a likely outcome without significant emissions reductions.

Uncertainty Around Natural Emissions

Despite the findings, researchers caution that there is still significant uncertainty—particularly regarding how plant emissions will respond to climate change.

Biogenic emissions, such as isoprene released by trees, appear to play a major role in influencing OH levels but remain difficult to predict accurately.

Future research will aim to refine these estimates and better understand how different climate scenarios could affect atmospheric chemistry.

Implications for Climate Projections

Even small changes in hydroxyl radical levels can have significant implications for how methane accumulates in the atmosphere.

“Understanding future trends of OH will allow us to determine future trends of methane,” Zhu said.

As methane continues to rise alongside carbon dioxide, insights into these chemical processes will be critical for improving climate models and informing mitigation strategies.

Continue Reading

Climate

Climate change heat impact affected over 2.5 billion people

New analysis shows 2.5 billion people experienced climate-driven heat between Dec 2025 and Feb 2026.

Dipin Damodharan

Published

on

Rising temperatures and climate change heat impact worldwide
Image credit: Centre for Ageing Better/Pexels

Climate change heat impact: A new global analysis has found that climate change significantly influenced daily temperatures for billions of people worldwide between December 2025 and February 2026, underscoring the immediacy of the climate crisis

Climate change is no longer a distant abstraction—it is now embedded in the daily weather experienced by billions of people across the planet.

A new global analysis from Climate Central has found that between December 2025 and February 2026, more than one in six people worldwide lived through temperatures strongly influenced by climate change every single day.

The scale of exposure is striking. Over the three-month period, 2.5 billion people across 124 countries experienced at least 30 days of climate change-driven heat, pointing to a persistent and widespread shift in how global temperatures are being shaped.

Using the Climate Shift Index, a tool designed to measure the role of human-caused warming in daily temperatures, researchers were able to isolate the extent to which fossil fuel emissions are now influencing everyday weather patterns.

Climate change heat impact: Dangerous extremes

What emerges most starkly from the analysis is not just rising temperatures, but the growing prevalence of heat that directly threatens human health.

In 47 countries, every single day of what scientists classify as “risky heat” was attributable to climate change.

>> 47 countries experienced every single day of risky heat due to climate change

>> Nearly 225 million people faced 30 or more days of such heat

>> 81% of those affected were in Africa

For nearly 225 million people, this translated into a month or more of exposure to dangerous heat conditions—an overwhelming majority of them in Africa, where vulnerability to climate extremes remains high.

These findings suggest a shift from climate change as a contributing factor to climate change as a dominant driver of extreme heat events. In several regions, the report notes, warming did not merely intensify heatwaves—it fully accounted for the most dangerous days.

Dr. Kristina Dahl, Vice President for Science at Climate Central, framed the findings in unequivocal terms: “This analysis makes clear that climate change is not a future problem — it is a present-day driver of extreme heat around the world.”

She added: “Millions of people experienced a month or more of dangerous levels of heat that were made significantly more likely by climate change.”

Climate change heat impact: A world of cascading climate shocks

The same three-month period also revealed how rising temperatures are interacting with other climate systems, producing a cascade of extreme events across continents.

An unusually early heatwave in Australia—made five times more likely by climate change—persisted into the new year before giving way to intense rainfall and flooding. In Argentina, extreme heat strained infrastructure to the point of collapse, contributing to a power outage that left more than a million people without electricity.

Elsewhere, the combination of heat, low humidity and strong winds created conditions for destructive wildfires. In Patagonia, fires claimed lives and forced emergency responses, while similar patterns unfolded in parts of Africa, Australia and the United States.

Drought tightened its grip in parts of East Africa, with Kenya enduring its driest season in more than four decades, placing millions at risk of hunger. At the same time, other regions experienced the opposite extreme. Torrential rains and intensified storms killed more than 1,750 people across South and Southeast Asia, while floods displaced hundreds of thousands in North Africa.

Even cold extremes bore the imprint of a changing climate. Severe winter conditions across North America and parts of Europe caused dozens of deaths, widespread disruption and billions in economic losses, highlighting how warming can destabilise weather patterns in multiple directions.

Climate change heat impact reflects a deeper systemic shift

Taken together, the data points to a broader transformation. Climate change is no longer simply raising average temperatures—it is reshaping the entire spectrum of weather, from heatwaves and droughts to storms and snowfall.

Climate change heat impact affecting global populations
Image credit: Vladyslav Dukhin/Pexels

The underlying driver remains consistent: the accumulation of heat-trapping emissions from coal, oil and gas.

As oceans warm and atmospheric systems shift, the result is a more volatile climate, where extremes are not isolated events but interconnected outcomes of the same underlying process.

Dr. Dahl underscored this interconnectedness: “Taken all together, these extremes are the latest signals of how fossil fuel emissions are disrupting livelihoods globally.”

A present reality, not a future projection

What makes the findings particularly significant is their immediacy. The analysis does not project future risks—it documents a present reality in which climate change is already shaping daily life for billions.

For policymakers, scientists and communities alike, the implication is clear: the climate crisis has moved beyond forecasts and into lived experience.

Continue Reading

Trending