Connect with us

Climate

When Hillary Clinton Makes a Case for Climate Action from the Global South

At Mumbai Climate Week, Hillary Clinton urges Global South-led climate action, resilience finance innovation and stronger AI governance.

Dipin Damodharan

Published

on

Hillary Clinton speaking at Mumbai Climate Week on Global South climate action and resilience finance. Image credit: DD/EdPublica
Hillary Clinton speaking at Mumbai Climate Week on Global South climate action and resilience finance. Image credit: DD/EdPublica

The Jio World Convention Centre in Mumbai, India’s financial capital, was buzzing with climate ambition this week. Start-ups showcased climate-centred products, philanthropic foundations exchanged notes with impact investors, young founders pitched adaptation tools for heat-stressed cities at the Mumbai Climate Week.

Amid the climate-tech demonstrations and policy exchanges, Hillary Clinton’s address stood out for its strategic clarity — positioning the Global South not merely as a beneficiary of climate action, but as its architect.

Her message was less about symbolism and more about systems — about resilience funds, insurance products, clean cooking, AI governance, and the moral responsibility of both North and South in confronting a warming world.

India as a Climate Laboratory

Clinton placed India squarely at the centre of her remarks — not as a victim of climate change, but as an innovator.

“One of our projects which I wanted to mention to you is creating a climate resilience fund to create a place where philanthropic dollars and corporate dollars and the individual dollars could be aggregated to come up with ideas to assist people who are out there working,” she said at the Mumbai Climate Week.

Through the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), that idea has already taken shape in India.

Working with Humanity Insured — a not-for-profit backed by major insurance firms — and in partnership with SEWA(Self-Employed Women’s Association), CGI launched a parametric insurance product designed for informal women workers vulnerable to extreme heat. The concept is simple but transformative: when temperatures cross 39°C, women who cannot work a full day can claim compensation for lost income.

“As I speak right now, we’ve got this product up and going. India is the example. It’s the model,” Hillary Clinton said. “We now have 500,000 insurance holders here in India. And India will be the model for the rest of the global south because of this CGI commitment.”

The insurance scheme reflects a larger shift in climate discourse — from abstract mitigation targets to hyper-local resilience. For informal workers, climate change is not a policy debate; it is lost wages when heat makes construction sites unworkable.

Hillary Clinton calls for Global South Climate Action at Mumbai Climate Week. Image credit: DD/EdPublica
Hillary Clinton calls for Global South Climate Action at Mumbai Climate Week. Image credit: DD/EdPublica

Clinton framed the model not merely as philanthropy but as smart economics. “This is not only a good thing to do. It is smart. It is a new market.”

The Global South as Agenda Setter

Repeatedly, she argued that climate solutions must emerge from the regions most affected.

“We have to focus attention on solutions in the places that are clearly now most affected by climate change… the front lines of the fight against global climate change is right here in the Global South.”

While acknowledging the historical responsibility of industrialised nations, she did not shy away from noting that emerging economies must also accelerate their transition to clean energy. Pollution, she stressed, is not an abstract carbon statistic — it is a health crisis.

“When I talk about fossil fuels, I’m not just talking about climate change. I’m talking about the pollution that goes in the air in Delhi or Beijing. I’m talking about clear evidence that pollution is impacting our health… particularly the health of our children.”

Climate, she insisted, is inseparable from public health.

Philanthropy Beyond Charity

One of the sharper threads in her address was directed at philanthropy. Charity alone, she argued, cannot solve structural crises.

“If you want to feed a hungry person, give them a fish. If you want to end hunger, teach them to fish,” she said, invoking the familiar metaphor to argue for systemic reform.

The climate resilience fund is intended as catalytic capital — seed funding that aggregates philanthropic, corporate and public resources to unlock scalable models. Adaptation, in her framework, must sit alongside mitigation.

Hillary Clinton also pointed to the massive intergenerational transfer of wealth underway globally, urging that it be channelled into long-term climate solutions rather than short-term relief.

AI, Energy and the Next Disruption

Though the week’s focus was climate, Clinton ventured into another domain shaping the future: artificial intelligence.

AI, she acknowledged, could optimise renewable grids and enable hyper-local climate projections. But she warned against uncritical adoption.

“This technology is also consuming vast amounts of power, water, infrastructure… We would be naive not to recognize the potential threats that AI and its development is causing.”

She raised pointed questions about data centres’ energy and water demands, labour market disruptions, and the political influence of tech giants.

“The people running these companies are the richest people in the world… They want to shape the future… Governments need to be ready to demand answers.”

Drawing lessons from social media’s regulatory lag, she cautioned against waiting a decade to understand AI’s harms. “Let’s figure out how we can deal with that ahead of time and try to shape it rather than shape the life.”

“We inherited it. And with that inheritance… should come a sense of responsibility”

In a country rapidly expanding both its renewable capacity and digital infrastructure, the intersection of AI and climate carries particular urgency.

A Personal Case for the Planet

Beyond policy and programmes, Hillary Clinton’s speech carried a deeply personal note. She spoke of hiking the day after the 2016 US election — an act of reconnecting with nature in a moment of political upheaval.

“I find it so reinvigorating… now we know that spending time in nature… actually does help reset your brain,” she said.

Her environmentalism, she explained, stems from reverence. “We inherited it. And with that inheritance… should come a sense of responsibility.”

Hillary Clinton during her Global South climate action address at Mumbai Climate Week. Image credit: DD/EdPublica
Hillary Clinton during her Global South climate action address at Mumbai Climate Week. Image credit: DD/EdPublica

Climate change, she warned, will not only intensify heatwaves and wildfires but amplify migration, conflict and political instability. Ignoring it is neither economically nor strategically rational.

“If we don’t take care of our world today, it will cost us more money. It will cost us more death and destruction. It will cost us more political conflict.”

A Message to Young Innovators

Among the audience were young founders and activists — many from India’s growing climate-tech ecosystem. Clinton’s closing words were directed at them.

“Do not give in to the naysayers and the cynics. Do not doubt that you are engaged in historic, important work.”

Hillary Clinton acknowledged that global climate finance often bypasses grassroots innovators, particularly women in the Global South. That imbalance, she implied, must change.

“Keep knocking on doors, making your arguments, showing up… ideas are going to come from everywhere and they’re going to be good ideas.”

Mumbai Climate Week, positioned as a first-of-its-kind platform in India, was organised by Project Mumbai with support from organisations including IDFC First Bank and Monitor Deloitte.

Dipin Damodharan is the Co-founder and Editor-in-Chief of EdPublica. A journalist and editor with over 15 years of experience leading and co-founding both print and digital media outlets, he has written extensively on education, politics, and culture. His work has appeared in global publications such as The Huffington Post, The Himalayan Times, DailyO, Education Insider, and others.

Climate

The Climate World Cup? How Climate Change Could Affect Player Performance at the 2026 World Cup

Climate change and the 2026 FIFA World Cup could affect 97 matches, increasing heat risks for players, altering performance and raising safety concerns.

Dipin Damodharan

Published

on

Climate change and the 2026 FIFA World Cup could expose players and fans to higher temperatures during matches across North America.
Climate change and the 2026 FIFA World Cup could expose players and fans to higher temperatures during matches across North America. Image credit: Jason Charters /Unsplash

Climate change and the 2026 FIFA World Cup are on a collision course, with new research suggesting that rising temperatures could affect player performance, match intensity and fan safety in nearly every game of football’s biggest tournament.

When football fans tune in to the 2026 FIFA World Cup on June 11, they will be watching more than a battle between the world’s best teams. They may also be witnessing a new reality for global sport: a tournament increasingly shaped by climate change.

A new analysis by Climate Central suggests that rising global temperatures are making it more likely that players will compete in conditions known to affect performance during much of the tournament. The findings raise questions not only about athlete safety but also about how the game itself may evolve in a warming world.

The 2026 FIFA World Cup, scheduled from June 11 to July 19, 2026, will be the largest in the tournament’s history, featuring 48 teams and 104 matches across venues in the United States, Canada and Mexico. But according to Climate Central’s analysis, 97 of those 104 matches now face a higher likelihood of experiencing temperatures above 28°C, a threshold associated with reduced football performance.

Researchers found that nearly half the matches have at least a 50 per cent chance of being played in conditions that can impair performance. In several cases, climate change has increased those odds substantially. One of the most affected fixtures is the June 26 match between Uruguay and Spain in Guadalajara, where the probability of performance-affecting heat has increased by 37 percentage points because of climate change.

Climate Change and the 2026 FIFA World Cup Could Alter the Game

For decades, discussions about climate change and sport focused primarily on scheduling disruptions, extreme weather events or damaged infrastructure. The new analysis points to something more fundamental: the possibility that rising temperatures may influence what happens on the pitch itself.

Research cited by Climate Central shows that temperatures above 28°C can reduce sprint frequency, decrease the total distance players cover and slow recovery times. In a sport where margins are often measured in seconds and centimetres, even small declines in physical performance can influence tactics, intensity and match outcomes.

Professor Mike Tipton of the University of Portsmouth’s Extreme Environments Laboratory said the effects of heat extend beyond discomfort.

“Playing in temperatures above 28°C changes the game – affecting tactics, tempo and overall quality. We see reduced intensity, less sprinting and potentially fewer chances being created. As temperatures climb further, the risks also increase. Prolonged exposure and dehydration can lead to heat exhaustion or even heat stroke, particularly in high-stakes matches where players are more likely to push beyond their natural limits.”

Climate change and the 2026 FIFA World Cup could affect 97 matches, increasing heat risks for players, altering performance and raising safety concerns.
As the 2026 FIFA World Cup gets underway on June 11, concerns are growing that rising temperatures could influence how the tournament is played. Image credit: Franco Monsalvo

The implications are not limited to players. Slower matches, altered tactics and more frequent cooling breaks could affect the experience for millions of spectators in stadiums and billions watching worldwide.

Climate Change and the 2026 FIFA World Cup Raise New Safety Questions

Concerns about heat are becoming increasingly common across international sport.

Athletes competing in marathons, tennis tournaments and Olympic events have already faced extreme temperatures in recent years. Football, despite its global popularity, is not immune.

Norwegian international Morten Thorsby, who is expected to play at the 2026 World Cup, argues that the conversation can no longer focus solely on performance.

“This analysis makes clear that rising temperatures are not only a serious health risk for players and fans, but they are also starting to affect the quality of the game itself. When heat impacts sprinting, recovery, and overall intensity, it changes the way football is played – and not for the better,” he said.

interview 24
Source: Climate Central

“That’s exactly why I signed the players’ letter to FIFA last week. We need to take these risks seriously and ensure that the game we love is protected, both for those on the pitch and everyone watching around the world.”

The analysis arrives as sports governing bodies face increasing pressure to adapt competitions to a changing climate. Possible responses include scheduling more matches during cooler periods of the day, increasing player protection measures and reconsidering host venue requirements.

The Future of Football in a Warming World

Climate scientists argue that what is happening to football mirrors broader changes taking place across society.

Shel Winkley, a meteorologist at Climate Central, said climate change is already reshaping many of the traditions people associate with sport.

“The World Cups of the past won’t happen again — not because the players have changed, but because the planet has. Heatwaves, unpredictable weather, and shifting seasons are rewriting the rules of the games we love,” Winkley said.

“Athletes are forced to play more cautiously, strategize differently, and abandon the risks that once made sport thrilling. Unless we stop burning fossil fuels, the future of competition won’t be about who plays best — it’ll be about who can tolerate the heat.”

For football fans, the warning is striking. Climate change is often discussed through statistics, emissions targets and policy debates. The 2026 World Cup offers a more visible illustration of its impact.

If the analysis proves accurate, the world’s biggest sporting event may become a reminder that climate change is no longer a distant environmental issue. It is increasingly becoming a factor that shapes how people work, travel, compete and even play the games they love.

Continue Reading

Climate

The Next Five Years Could Be Earth’s Hottest Yet, WMO Warns

A new WMO forecast warns that Earth could see new global temperature records before 2030, with Arctic warming continuing to outpace the global average.

Joe Jacob

Published

on

Global temperature record trends highlighted in a climate change analysis showing rising temperatures worldwide.
Image credit: WMO

Global temperature record levels are likely to be challenged again before the end of this decade, according to a new World Meteorological Organization forecast. Scientists say there is a high chance that one of the next five years will become the warmest ever recorded, as rising greenhouse gas emissions and a possible El Niño event continue to push the planet toward new climate extremes.

The world is heading into another stretch of exceptional heat, with a strong chance that a new global temperature record will be set before the end of the decade.

According to a new assessment from the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), global temperatures are expected to remain at or near record levels between 2026 and 2030, extending a warming trend that has already pushed climate indicators into uncharted territory.

The report paints a picture of a planet that continues to warm despite international efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions. While the Paris Agreement aims to limit long-term warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, scientists now estimate there is a 91% chance that at least one of the next five years will temporarily cross that threshold.

Global Temperature Record Could Be Broken Again by 2030

Even more striking, there is a 75% chance that the average temperature across the entire five-year period from 2026 to 2030 will exceed 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.

The findings do not mean the Paris Agreement has officially failed. The agreement’s temperature targets are measured over decades rather than individual years. Still, climate scientists view the growing frequency of these temporary breaches as a sign of how rapidly the planet is approaching those long-term limits.

The report projects annual global temperatures during 2026–2030 to range between 1.3°C and 1.9°C above the 1850–1900 average. There is also an 86% chance that one of those years will surpass 2024, currently the warmest year ever recorded.

One factor behind the forecast is the likely return of El Niño conditions in the tropical Pacific Ocean.

2027 Could Become the Next Global Temperature Record Year

Dr. Leon Hermanson, lead author of the report, said: “There is an El Niño predicted for the end of 2026, which increases the chances of the following year, 2027, being the next record-breaking year.”

El Niño events typically raise global temperatures by releasing additional heat from the Pacific Ocean into the atmosphere. When combined with the long-term warming caused by greenhouse gas emissions, they can push global temperatures to new highs.

Global Temperature Record Highlights Faster Arctic Warming

While rising temperatures affect every region, the Arctic continues to stand out.

The WMO forecasts that Arctic temperatures during the next five northern hemisphere winters will average about 2.8°C above the 1991–2020 baseline. That is more than three times the projected global average anomaly over the same period.

Scientists have long observed that the Arctic is warming faster than the rest of the world, a phenomenon known as Arctic amplification. The consequences include shrinking sea ice, thawing permafrost and disruptions to weather patterns far beyond the polar region.

The report also points to continued declines in sea ice across parts of the Arctic, particularly in the Barents Sea, Bering Sea and the Sea of Okhotsk.

A Wetter North, A Drier South

The warming climate is also reshaping rainfall patterns.

According to the forecast, northern high-latitude regions are likely to experience wetter-than-average winters over the next five years. Increased rainfall is also expected across parts of the tropics.

At the same time, many subtropical regions are projected to become drier. The Amazon is among the areas where below-average rainfall is considered more likely during the coming years.

Seasonal forecasts for 2026–2030 suggest wetter conditions in the Sahel region of Africa, northern Europe, Alaska and Siberia. Such shifts are consistent with what climate scientists have long expected in a warming world, where a warmer atmosphere holds more moisture and alters long-established rainfall patterns.

Beyond Records

The report is not simply about whether another temperature record will be broken.

For governments, businesses and communities, the findings serve as a reminder that climate change is increasingly shaping everyday realities—from agriculture and water supplies to infrastructure, health and disaster preparedness.

The assessment was produced by the UK Met Office on behalf of the WMO and draws on forecasts from 13 international climate centres. Scientists say confidence in the temperature projections is high because similar forecasting systems have performed well when tested against past climate conditions.

If the projections prove accurate, the second half of this decade could become a defining period in the world’s climate story—not because warming suddenly accelerates, but because the consequences of a steadily warming planet become harder to ignore.

Continue Reading

Climate

FIFA Under Fire Over ‘Impossible to Justify’ Heat Rules for 2026 World Cup

Global experts warn FIFA’s heat safety rules for the 2026 World Cup could endanger players amid rising climate-driven temperatures.

Published

on

FIFA heat safety guidelines: Football players competing under extreme heat conditions during an international match as experts warn FIFA over 2026 Football World Cup safety risks.

Experts warn players could face life-threatening conditions as climate change intensifies heat risks across host cities

A coalition of leading global experts in health, climate science and sports performance has issued a sharp warning to FIFA, accusing football’s governing body of maintaining dangerously weak heat safety standards ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Experts criticize FIFA heat safety guidelines and warn players could face life-threatening conditions as climate change intensifies heat risks across host cities

In a strongly worded open letter, seen by EdPublica, the experts argue that FIFA’s current thresholds for allowing matches to continue in extreme heat are “impossible to justify”, even for athletes who are fully acclimatised to hot conditions.

FIFA heat safety guidelines raising alarm

The tournament, set to be hosted across 16 cities in the United States, Mexico and Canada, is already raising alarm among scientists because of the likelihood of soaring temperatures and humidity during summer matches. Experts fear that players could be pushed into dangerous levels of heat stress, especially during afternoon kick-offs.

The warning comes amid growing concern that climate change is making extreme heat events more frequent and more severe worldwide. Scientists say the burning of fossil fuels is directly contributing to these rising temperatures — a point the letter connects to FIFA’s controversial sponsorship relationship with Saudi oil giant Aramco.

FIFA heat safety guidelines and fossil fuels

The authors of the letter describe FIFA’s “active promotion” of fossil fuels as “a conflict of interest with the protection of player welfare.”

Prof Mike Tipton from the University of Portsmouth’s Extreme Environments Lab and President of The Physiological Society warned that the dangers go beyond simple discomfort.

“Competitive exercise in hot environments can lead to a range of problems from impaired performance and enforced alterations in game strategy, to the medical emergency of heat stroke. Amongst the most important ways of minimising the chance of such hazards is to employ effective interventions, including complying with internationally recognised heat-related thresholds for the postponement or relocation of events. As it stands, and due in part to climate-change driven increases in environmental thermal stress, some of the venues for the 2026 World Cup are likely to exceed the recommended heat-related “high risk” threshold, especially during afternoon kick-offs”

At the centre of the criticism is FIFA’s current Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) threshold — a heat stress measure that factors in humidity, solar radiation, wind speed and air temperature. Under FIFA’s existing framework, matches may continue until WBGT levels exceed 32°C.

Experts argue that threshold is dangerously high. The open letter notes that a WBGT of nearly 32°C can correspond to air temperatures around 45°C with moderate humidity — conditions many scientists consider unsafe for intense athletic activity.

Professor Douglas Casa, CEO of the Korey Stringer Institute at the University of Connecticut, said FIFA’s current rules fall well behind accepted scientific standards.

“The science supports the concept that high intensity sport above a 28oC Wet Bulb Globe Temperature can compromise performance and put a player at risk. The fact that under current FIFA Guidelines action will only be taken above 32oC is far from optimal. Additionally, the hydration break in each half absolutely needs to be longer than 3 minutes- at least five minutes for each break and preferably six. We hope this open letter convinces FIFA to update its heat guidelines before the World Cup.”

Although FIFA has introduced cooling breaks and a Heat Illness Mitigation and Management Task Force for the tournament, the experts say current measures remain insufficient. The letter argues that the existing three-minute cooling breaks are “too short to have a meaningful impact on rehydration and body cooling.”

The group is urging FIFA to adopt stricter protections similar to those recommended by FIFPRO, the international footballers’ union. Among the proposed measures are mandatory cooling breaks once WBGT exceeds 26°C and postponement or relocation of matches once temperatures rise above 28°C.

Professor Hugh Montgomery of University College London connected the debate directly to the broader climate crisis.

Climate change threatens human health and survival, now. In this regard, the World Cup shines less bright, tarnished by its core funding coming from a major polluter and by the threat posed to players by the extreme temperatures to which they may now be exposed.”

The controversy also highlights the growing collision between elite sport and climate change. The 2026 FIFA World Cup is expected to become the most carbon-polluting tournament in history due to its expansion to 48 teams and the vast travel demands across three countries.

Recent events across global sport have intensified fears. In 2025, extreme heat at the Shanghai Masters reportedly caused Novak Djokovic to vomit on court, while tennis player Holger Rune publicly asked: “do you want a player to die on court?” after receiving treatment for heat stress.

As the countdown to the 2026 World Cup continues, pressure is now mounting on FIFA to decide whether football’s biggest spectacle can safely coexist with a rapidly warming planet.

Continue Reading

Trending