Society
Will Canada remain a hub for Indian students amidst new restrictions?
New restrictions on student visas and work permits have sparked debate about the future of Canada as a preferred educational hub
As Canada continues to position itself as a leading destination for international students, recent policy changes are raising concerns about its appeal, particularly among Indian students. New restrictions on student visas and work permits have sparked debate about the future of Canada as a preferred educational hub.
In the past decade, Canada has seen a surge in international students, with Indian nationals being a significant contributor to this growth. According to recent statistics, Indian students constitute one of the largest groups of international students in Canada. India sent 225,000 students to Canada, a number that rose to 278,000 in 2023. For the first half of 2024, the count has reached 100,000 students. However, new regulations imposed by Canadian authorities aim to address issues of overstaying and unauthorized work, potentially impacting this vibrant demographic.
Policy Changes and Immediate Implications
The Canadian government’s recent policy changes include stricter requirements for student visas and modifications to work permit conditions. Under the new regulations, international students will face more rigorous checks before their applications are approved. Additionally, there are enhanced restrictions on the type and amount of work international students can undertake while studying.
The new rules mandate that students must now provide more detailed evidence of financial stability and academic intentions. Moreover, there will be an increase in the frequency of status reviews and a more stringent enforcement of existing work permit regulations. These measures are designed to curb the misuse of student visas and ensure that students adhere to their intended study programs.
For many Indian students, these changes represent a significant shift in their academic and professional plans. “The new restrictions have created a wave of uncertainty among students planning to study in Canada,” says Arjun Patel, a recent high school graduate who was preparing to enroll in a Canadian university. “We’re concerned about how these policies will affect our ability to work part-time and support ourselves while studying.”
Impact on Current and Prospective Students
For current international students in Canada, the immediate impact of these policy changes includes increased stress over visa renewals and job security. Many students who rely on part-time work to support their education and living expenses might find themselves restricted by the new regulations. This could lead to financial strain and affect their academic performance.
Jose Jacob, a Canadian immigrant, attributes the recent restrictions on international students in Canada to a combination of political and economic factors. “Education is a billion-dollar industry for Canada,” Jacob notes. “When I arrived here, and for many years since, community colleges have been major promoters of study abroad programs. Many of these institutions are private community colleges operating like businesses. More foreign students mean higher fees, which significantly boosts the industry.”

Jacob also points out that the Trudeau government has traditionally been supportive of immigration. Under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Canada has welcomed international students, offered residency, and invited refugees. “Trudeau’s policies are driven by the immigrant vote bank,” Jacob explains.
Prospective students face the challenge of navigating a more complex visa application process. The enhanced scrutiny may lead to longer processing times and additional paperwork, potentially causing delays in starting their studies. “The increased documentation requirements and the possibility of visa rejections have made the application process more daunting,” notes Rina Sharma, a prospective student from Delhi. “We’re concerned about how these changes will affect our plans and whether it will be worth the investment.”
Canada’s Commitment to International Education
Despite the new restrictions, Canadian officials have reiterated their commitment to international education. They emphasize that the changes are intended to preserve the integrity of the student visa system and ensure that students are genuinely pursuing their educational goals. The recent decision to impose restrictions on foreign students came amid significant domestic protests. “The decision was announced during a period of considerable political pressure,” Jose Jacob adds. He also highlights that the rising cost of living and housing shortages in places such as Ontario have contributed to the government’s decision. “The surge in housing prices and the increase in the cost of goods led to saturation,” he says.
| Canada: Key changes |
|---|
| Increased Cost-of-Living Fund Requirement: International students must now demonstrate a minimum of CAD 20,635 in addition to their first-year tuition and travel costs to qualify for a Canadian study permit. |
| Off-Campus Working Hours: The temporary policy allowing international students to work more than 20 hours per week while classes were in session ended on April 30. The new limit is set at 24 hours per week, which is an increase from the pre-pandemic limit but lower than the anticipated 30 hours. |
| Cap on International Student Admissions: Canada has introduced a cap on international student admissions. For 2024, the number of approved study permits is expected to decrease by 35% to 360,000. Each province and territory will receive a portion of this cap and must issue an attestation letter for each study permit application starting January 22, 2024. |
| Restriction on Post-Graduate Work Permits (PGWP): Effective September 1, 2024, international students completing programs under curriculum licensing agreements will not be eligible for post-graduation work permits. This change targets programs that have less oversight and previously exploited loopholes. |
| Restricted Open Work Permits for Spouses: As of January 2024, open work permits are only available to the spouses of international students enrolled in master’s and doctoral programs. Spouses of students in undergraduate and other programs are no longer eligible. |
| Temporary Foreign Worker Program Changes: Canada has implemented restrictive changes to its temporary foreign worker program, potentially affecting job opportunities for international students |
“Canada remains dedicated to attracting top talent from around the world,” says, a spokesperson of a global education consulting group. “These policy adjustments are necessary to prevent abuse of the system and to ensure that our programs continue to benefit students who are committed to their studies.”
Moreover, educational institutions in Canada are working to support international students through these transitions. Many universities are enhancing their advisory services to help students navigate the new regulations and adjust their plans accordingly.
The Future of Canada as an Educational Destination
As Canada navigates these new policy changes, it faces the challenge of maintaining its status as a leading destination for international students. While the regulations are designed to address specific issues, they must balance the need for oversight with the desire to remain an attractive option for students worldwide.
For Indian students, the changing landscape presents both challenges and opportunities. While the new restrictions may complicate the immediate future, Canada’s robust educational infrastructure and diverse academic offerings continue to make it a compelling choice for many. The key will be how well the country can adapt to these changes while continuing to offer a supportive and enriching environment for international learners.

Jacob suggests that these new regulations are also aimed at curbing fraudulent courses. “Previously, the U.S. was marketed to Europeans as the ‘Land of Opportunities,’ attracting early settlers. Similarly, Canada has been marketed as a land of opportunity for Indian students. Community colleges have collaborated with local educational consulting agencies to promote this image. However, the situation has become too saturated. Technical jobs are in higher demand now, and Canada remains a good option for students in those fields.”
Jacob also warns prospective students about the financial realities of living in Canada. “For those coming here to make money, it’s important to understand that it’s not like the Gulf countries. Taxes are very high—13 percent on everything,” he advises. “It’s crucial to be aware of these factors before making the move.”
To sum up, as Canada adjusts its policies regarding international students, it will be crucial for both the government and educational institutions to address the concerns of students and ensure that the country remains a welcoming and viable destination for those seeking higher education. The coming months will reveal whether Canada can sustain its reputation as a global education hub amidst these evolving regulations.
Society
EVs avoided oil equal to 70% of Iran’s exports in 2025
Electric vehicles avoided oil equal to 70% of Iran’s exports in 2025, reshaping global energy security amid Middle East tensions.
When tensions rise around Iran, the world braces for oil shocks. Markets react, governments worry, and the Strait of Hormuz once again becomes the centre of global attention.
But in 2025, something quietly shifted beneath this familiar cycle of crisis.
Electric vehicles avoided oil consumption equivalent to nearly 70% of Iran’s exports.
According to analysis by Ember, the global EV fleet reduced oil demand by 1.7 million barrels per day, approaching the 2.4 million barrels per day exported by Iran through the Strait of Hormuz.
This is not just a milestone for clean energy. It marks the beginning of a structural change in how the world responds to geopolitical risk.
The world’s oil vulnerability is still profound
Despite rapid technological progress, the global economy remains deeply exposed to oil shocks.
Nearly 79% of the world’s population lives in oil-importing countries, making them vulnerable to disruptions in supply and price volatility.
The costs are enormous. For every $10 increase in oil prices, global import bills rise by around $160 billion annually.
At the heart of this vulnerability lies the Middle East—and specifically the Strait of Hormuz. This narrow passage carries around one-fifth of global oil exports, while the wider Gulf region accounts for 29% of global oil supply.
The concentration of supply through such a fragile corridor makes the global economy acutely sensitive to regional instability.
“This is Asia’s Ukraine moment,” said Daan Walter, principal at Ember. “Oil is the Achilles’ heel of the global economy… Asia’s oil vulnerability has been exposed by the current crisis.”
Even oil producers cannot escape the shock
One of the most counterintuitive realities of today’s energy system is that producing oil domestically does not shield economies from global price spikes.
Oil is traded in global markets. When supply is disrupted, prices rise everywhere.
In Texas, one of the world’s largest oil-producing regions, gasoline prices increased by more than 25% following recent geopolitical tensions—in some cases exceeding rises seen in oil-importing countries.
This reflects a fundamental truth: oil dependency is a global vulnerability, not a local one.
The true cost of fossil fuel dependence
The financial burden of this dependency is immense.
Net importing countries spent approximately $1.7 trillion on fossil fuel imports in 2024, with many economies losing significant portions of GDP to energy imports.
For developing economies, the impact is even more severe. Rising prices can strain public finances, disrupt industries, and increase the cost of living.
The report highlights a stark dynamic: when supply tightens, wealthier countries can outbid poorer ones, effectively pushing them out of the market.
Energy insecurity, in this sense, is not just an economic issue—it is a question of global inequality.
EVs are emerging as a geopolitical force
Against this backdrop, the rise of electric vehicles is beginning to alter the equation.
The fact that EVs avoided oil demand equivalent to 70% of Iran’s exports is not just symbolic—it is strategic.
It shows that demand-side transformation can counterbalance supply-side risk.
“Electric vehicles are increasingly cost-competitive with gasoline cars,” Walter said. “Oil volatility means EVs are a common-sense choice for countries wishing to insulate themselves from future shocks.”
The economic benefits are already visible:
- China saves over $28 billion annually in avoided oil imports
- Europe saves around $8 billion
- India saves about $0.6 billion
These savings highlight a critical shift: energy security is moving from controlling supply to reducing dependence.
A broader shift: the rise of “electrotech”
Electric vehicles are only one part of a wider transformation described in the report as “electrotech”—a combination of EVs, solar, wind, batteries, and heat pumps.
Together, these technologies can electrify more than three-quarters of global energy demand and significantly reduce fossil fuel imports.
If deployed at scale, they could cut import dependence by up to 70%, fundamentally reshaping global energy systems.
Unlike fossil fuels, which require continuous imports, these technologies provide long-term stability. Once installed, they operate without fuel costs, price volatility, or geopolitical exposure.
As the report puts it, this is the difference between “renting energy” and “owning it.”
The Strait of Hormuz: from chokepoint to turning point
The current crisis highlights the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz—but it may also accelerate its decline as a central pillar of global energy security.
Asia, which imports around 40% of its oil through the strait, is particularly exposed.
But unlike previous crises, countries now have viable alternatives.
Renewable energy costs have fallen sharply. EV adoption is accelerating across both developed and emerging markets. And electrification technologies are scaling faster than expected.
The report suggests this could become a defining moment—similar to how Europe’s response to the Ukraine crisis reshaped its energy strategy.
Peak oil may arrive sooner than expected
The implications extend beyond immediate crisis management.
The International Energy Agency had projected global oil demand would peak around 2029. But recent developments suggest that peak may arrive sooner.
Electrification is not only reducing demand—it is changing expectations about the future of energy.
The report notes that demand growth forecasts have already been revised downward, with the possibility that global oil demand could plateau—or even decline—earlier than anticipated.
Crises, historically, have accelerated structural transitions. This may be another such moment.
A structural shift beneath the headlines
Geopolitical tensions may dominate headlines, but the deeper story lies beneath.
The fossil fuel system—dependent on continuous trade through vulnerable chokepoints—is becoming increasingly fragile. At the same time, the technologies needed to replace it are becoming cheaper, faster, and more accessible.
The fact that EVs alone have already offset oil demand equivalent to most of Iran’s exports signals a profound shift.
It suggests that the balance of power in global energy is beginning to move—from regions that supply oil to technologies that reduce the need for it.
The Strait of Hormuz may remain a critical artery for now. But its grip on the global economy is loosening.
And for the first time in decades, the world has a credible path to reduce its dependence on it.
Society
Hormuz Crisis Exposes Global Fertiliser Dependency Risks
Hormuz disruption highlights risks of fertiliser dependency as experts warn of food security threats and call for agroecology shift.
Fertiliser dependency has come under sharp global scrutiny as tensions around the Strait of Hormuz highlight how geopolitical disruptions can ripple through food systems, raising concerns over food security and farm resilience.
The Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for global energy supplies, plays a central role in fertiliser production due to its link to fossil fuel exports. Any disruption threatens to push up fertiliser costs—directly impacting agricultural production worldwide, according to an analysis by Zero Carbon Analytics (ZCA).
How Fertiliser Dependency Shapes Global Food Systems
Experts warn that modern agriculture’s heavy reliance on fossil fuel-based fertilisers has created a fragile system vulnerable to geopolitical shocks.
“This vulnerability is a choice, and one that we all pay for,” says Raj Patel, economist and food systems expert at the University of Texas. “Nearly 90 percent of the $540 billion in annual agricultural support goes to the same chemical-intensive production that depends on them. We didn’t stumble into this dependency. We funded it.”
The reliance is deeply embedded in global subsidies and production models, making rapid transitions difficult but increasingly necessary.
Farmers Face Rising Costs Amid Hormuz Tensions
Farmers across Asia are already feeling the pressure of rising fertiliser prices as geopolitical tensions escalate.
“With fertiliser prices rising—and the planting season soon to begin—Asia’s farmers are once again being forced to choose between rising costs and falling yields,” says Shamika Mone, President of the Inter-Continental Network of Organic Farmer Organisations.
She adds that consumers are also likely to face further food price hikes, underlining the broader socio-economic impact.
A Fragile System Under Stress
The current crisis is being described as more than just a supply issue—it is a structural problem in global agriculture.
“What we are seeing is not just a fertiliser and commodity crisis, it is a stress test to a fragile food system that is not designed to be resilient,” says Belén Citoler of the World Rural Forum.
The disruption has exposed how interconnected energy markets and food systems have become, with shocks in one quickly cascading into the other.
Agroecology and Organic Farming as Alternatives
Across continents, experts and farmers are calling for a shift toward more resilient agricultural practices that reduce fertiliser dependency.
“The conflict in Iran highlights the vulnerability of an agriculture system that is overly reliant on fossil fuel fertilisers,” says Oliver Oliveros of the Agroecology Coalition.
He points to growing efforts by countries such as Brazil, Kenya, and Vietnam to support agroecological practices that use natural fertilisers and nitrogen-fixing plants.
Farmers themselves are also adapting.
“Geopolitical conflicts… show how vulnerable our agricultural system has become,” says German farmer Olivier Jung, who has been experimenting with crop diversity and reduced external inputs to build resilience.
Similarly, Brazilian farmer Thales Bevilacqua Mendonça warns that global supply chains are increasingly unstable, urging a shift toward ecological farming practices.
Policy Shift Seen as Key to Reducing Fertiliser Dependency
Experts argue that reducing fertiliser dependency will require systemic policy changes, particularly in how agricultural subsidies are allocated.
“To speed up the transition, we need to redirect billions in agriculture subsidies… and invest in approaches that safeguard farmers and consumers from energy price volatility and climate shocks,” Oliveros adds.
Organic farming advocates also stress that proven alternatives already exist.
“If we really want to take food security seriously, policymakers must support the most resilient models… organic farming must become a pillar,” says French farmer Olivier Chaloche.
A Turning Point for Global Food Security?
The Strait of Hormuz disruption may prove to be a wake-up call for governments worldwide.
As fertiliser dependency becomes increasingly tied to geopolitical instability, the push toward agroecology, organic farming, and resilient food systems is gaining urgency.
The question now is whether policymakers will act fast enough to transform a system many experts say is no longer sustainable.
Society
South Asia’s $107 Billion LNG Expansion Faces Risk Amid Middle East War: Report
A new report warns South Asia’s LNG infrastructure expansion could face economic and energy risks as Middle East tensions disrupt global gas markets.
South Asia’s ambitious expansion of liquefied natural gas (LNG) infrastructure could expose the region to significant economic and energy security risks as geopolitical tensions disrupt global energy markets, according to a new report by Global Energy Monitor.
The report warns that escalating conflict in the Middle East, particularly attacks on Iran and disruptions to shipping routes in the Strait of Hormuz, could sharply affect LNG prices and supply chains, putting pressure on energy-importing economies such as India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan.
Data from the Asia Gas Tracker, compiled by Global Energy Monitor, shows that the three South Asian countries have about $107 billion worth of LNG terminals and gas pipelines either announced or currently under construction.
Together, these projects represent a major share of global gas infrastructure expansion. Southern Asia accounts for 17% of global LNG import capacity under development—about 110.7 million tonnes per year—and 17% of global gas pipelines by length, totalling 34,146 kilometres, according to the report.
India’s expanding gas infrastructure
India is pursuing one of the largest gas infrastructure expansions in the world. The report notes that the country is developing the second-largest LNG terminal expansion globally and the third-largest gas pipeline buildout.
A chart in the report indicates that India ranks among the top countries worldwide for pipeline construction, with nearly three-quarters of its planned gas pipeline network already under construction.
Meanwhile, Bangladesh and Pakistan each have enough LNG import capacity in development to roughly double their existing capacity, highlighting the scale of the region’s dependence on imported gas.
Price volatility and project risks
Despite projections that global LNG supply could increase later in the decade, the report warns that the market remains highly sensitive to geopolitical disruptions. Even relatively balanced markets can experience price spikes if shipping routes or production are affected.
The ongoing conflict in the Middle East demonstrates how quickly a promising growth market can shift into an affordability crisis, potentially delaying or cancelling major infrastructure projects.
“We’ve seen this story before, and South Asian economies that import LNG will struggle with these price shocks. It’s a reminder of the risks of building new gas infrastructure, and that domestic alternatives like renewable power are more affordable and reliable in the long run..” said Robert Rozansky, global LNG analyst for Global Energy Monitor.
History of cancelled LNG projects
The report also highlights a pattern of stalled or cancelled gas infrastructure projects across the region.
Over the past decade, India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan have shelved or cancelled two to three times more LNG import capacity than they have successfully brought online, reflecting the financial and market risks associated with LNG development.
According to the report, India cancelled or shelved 49 million tonnes per annum of LNG capacity, compared with 23 million tonnes that entered operation between 2016 and 2025. Bangladesh and Pakistan show similar trends.
Renewables gaining ground
At the same time, renewable energy is increasingly competing with natural gas in the region’s power sectors.
Solar generation in Pakistan has more than tripled over the past three years, while India is projected to meet over 40% of its electricity demand with renewable energy by 2030.
The report also notes that improvements in energy storage technologies are enhancing grid flexibility, potentially reducing the role of gas as a backup power source.
Emerging alternatives such as green hydrogen could also help reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels for industrial use in the future.
The Asia Gas Tracker, developed by Global Energy Monitor, is an online database that maps and categorises gas infrastructure across the continent, including pipelines, LNG terminals, gas-fired power plants, and gas fields. The tracker is updated annually and documents projects through detailed data pages.
-
Society2 months agoThe Ten-Rupee Doctor Who Sparked a Health Revolution in Kerala’s Tribal Highlands
-
COP305 months agoBrazil Cuts Emissions by 17% in 2024—Biggest Drop in 16 Years, Yet Paris Target Out of Reach
-
Society3 months agoFrom Qubits to Folk Puppetry: India’s Biggest Quantum Science Communication Conclave Wraps Up in Ahmedabad
-
Earth4 months agoData Becomes the New Oil: IEA Says AI Boom Driving Global Power Demand
-
Women In Science5 months agoThe Data Don’t Lie: Women Are Still Missing from Science — But Why?
-
COP304 months agoCorporate Capture: Fossil Fuel Lobbyists at COP30 Hit Record High, Outnumbering Delegates from Climate-Vulnerable Nations
-
Space & Physics3 months agoIndian Physicists Win 2025 ICTP Prize for Breakthroughs in Quantum Many-Body Physics
-
Health5 months agoAir Pollution Claimed 1.7 Million Indian Lives and 9.5% of GDP, Finds The Lancet


