Society
DeepSeek: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
While being hailed as a new disruption in the tech world, DeepSeek also has its share of the good, the bad, and the ugly. Let’s take a closer look
On January 27, a black Monday, $593 billion of NVIDIA’s value was wiped out. The culprit? A little-known Chinese startup, DeepSeek. It has now outpaced even ChatGPT, a US-based popular generative artificial intelligence chatbot, in terms of downloads from the App Store. While being hailed as a new disruption in the tech world, DeepSeek also has its share of the good, the bad, and the ugly. Let’s take a closer look.
Consider this: Every year, 1,000 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of energy is used by an average household in India for electricity. By 2026, America is expected to use the equivalent energy of 2.5 million Indian households just for artificial intelligence (AI) activities. This will total around 270 terawatt-hours of energy. These numbers come from the World Economic Forum. However, the energy used by AI technologies, or rather the costs involved, often go unnoticed.
It is against this backdrop that DeepSeek, a Chinese AI chatbot, emerged as a disruptive product. While it may be called a Chinese startup, it is, in fact, a politically-driven product launched with careful planning and state backing. Compared to ChatGPT, the revolutionary AI tool launched by US-based OpenAI, DeepSeek’s energy consumption and costs are significantly lower. This is the most important (the good) aspect of DeepSeek. Let’s explore why.
The Rise of ChatGPT
ChatGPT, launched in 2022, reached 100 million users within two months. That’s, indeed, a significant achievement. Later, it even challenged Google, the search engine giant, in its dominance.
But have you ever thought about what happens to nature when you ask ChatGPT a question? ChatGPT’s energy consumption has a substantial environmental impact. Each time you ask ChatGPT a question, it consumes 0.0029 kWh of electricity. This is ten times more than a Google search, which consumes just 0.0003 kWh of electricity, according to the Electric Power Research Institute.
To put it simply, while DeepSeek may offer a more energy-efficient AI solution with impressive results, it also carries with it concerns about transparency, ethical usage, and political censorship
Annually, ChatGPT uses 226.82 million kWh of electricity just to answer user queries. With this much energy, you could fully charge 313 million electric vehicles or charge 47.87 million iPhones for a year.
And the cost? A whopping $29.71 million per year. OpenAI spends this amount every year just to answer users’ questions on ChatGPT.
Training and High Costs
ChatGPT works based on large language models that are trained on vast amounts of data. This training requires massive energy consumption. During the training period of ChatGPT-3, a total of 1,287,000 kWh of electricity was used over 34 days. When it came to training GPT-4, the consumption skyrocketed to 62,318,800 kWh over 100 days—48 times more than GPT-3.
ChatGPT, which was introduced to the public in November 2022, became an instant sensation. It’s a chatbot based on a technology called Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT), designed to generate a variety of content, including dialogues.
| Energy consumption |
|---|
| >> OpenAI spends $29.71 million every year just to answer users’ questions on ChatGPT. |
| >> During the training period of ChatGPT-3, a total of 1,287,000 kWh of electricity was used over 34 days |
| >> When it came to training GPT-4, the consumption skyrocketed to 62,318,800 kWh over 100 days—48 times more than GPT-3 |
The success of ChatGPT significantly boosted OpenAI’s market value. OpenAI was founded in 2015 by prominent figures like Sam Altman and Elon Musk, aiming to explore the potential of artificial intelligence. Musk eventually left the company, and Sam Altman is the current CEO.
Meanwhile, DeepSeek V-3 required only 836,400 kWh of energy. As reported by tech entrepreneur Joy Sebastian on Facebook, leading companies use tens of thousands of NVIDIA H100 GPUs for AI training and model operation. This heavy investment helped NVIDIA reach the top of the market value charts. AI development, which demands such immense resources, seemed out of reach even for multi-billion-dollar companies.
It was here that DeepSeek amazed the world by entering the AI space with a relatively modest investment of $5 million, offering a model that competes with the best. DeepSeek is said to deliver better results than GPT-4 in several areas.
Top global companies typically use supercomputers with over 16,000 chips for their chatbot training. However, DeepSeek engineers stated that they only needed about 2,000 NVIDIA chips, according to a report in The New York Times.
Given this, it’s clear that AI technologies need to be studied carefully in terms of their energy sources. According to a report from the World Economic Forum, tech giant Microsoft has seen a 30% increase in carbon emissions since 2020, largely due to the growth of AI-powered data centers. This makes DeepSeek’s low energy usage a significant advantage.
The Bad Thing
China is notorious for copying innovations, from electronics to cars and social media platforms. OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, has confirmed that DeepSeek trained its AI model using ChatGPT’s framework. This has led to some controversy, with OpenAI stating that they have evidence of this. Microsoft, a major investor in OpenAI, has initiated an investigation into the issue. Despite the US imposing restrictions on product exports to China, DeepSeek continued its operations using NVIDIA chips. It’s been reported that DeepSeek had stockpiled around 50,000 NVIDIA A100 chips before the ban took effect. However, some reports suggest that DeepSeek only used 2,000 chips for training its AI model. This is in stark contrast to major companies that use 16,000 specialized chips. Yet, there’s still a lack of clarity regarding which chips were actually used in DeepSeek’s operations, as commented by figures like Elon Musk.
The Ugly
While both Google and AI-powered ChatGPT became popular due to their openness and transparency, the same cannot be said for DeepSeek. A major issue is its refusal to answer sensitive political questions, especially those that are inconvenient for the Chinese government. Ask about the Tiananmen Square massacre or Chinese authoritarianism, and DeepSeek will respond with, “Let’s talk about something else.” Regardless of its other advantages, this undemocratic and regressive approach is a major flaw that could affect its global acceptance.

To put it simply, while DeepSeek may offer a more energy-efficient AI solution with impressive results, it also raises concerns about transparency, ethical usage, and political censorship. It’s a reminder that in the world of AI, the good, the bad, and the ugly are often intertwined.
Society
EVs avoided oil equal to 70% of Iran’s exports in 2025
Electric vehicles avoided oil equal to 70% of Iran’s exports in 2025, reshaping global energy security amid Middle East tensions.
When tensions rise around Iran, the world braces for oil shocks. Markets react, governments worry, and the Strait of Hormuz once again becomes the centre of global attention.
But in 2025, something quietly shifted beneath this familiar cycle of crisis.
Electric vehicles avoided oil consumption equivalent to nearly 70% of Iran’s exports.
According to analysis by Ember, the global EV fleet reduced oil demand by 1.7 million barrels per day, approaching the 2.4 million barrels per day exported by Iran through the Strait of Hormuz.
This is not just a milestone for clean energy. It marks the beginning of a structural change in how the world responds to geopolitical risk.
The world’s oil vulnerability is still profound
Despite rapid technological progress, the global economy remains deeply exposed to oil shocks.
Nearly 79% of the world’s population lives in oil-importing countries, making them vulnerable to disruptions in supply and price volatility.
The costs are enormous. For every $10 increase in oil prices, global import bills rise by around $160 billion annually.
At the heart of this vulnerability lies the Middle East—and specifically the Strait of Hormuz. This narrow passage carries around one-fifth of global oil exports, while the wider Gulf region accounts for 29% of global oil supply.
The concentration of supply through such a fragile corridor makes the global economy acutely sensitive to regional instability.
“This is Asia’s Ukraine moment,” said Daan Walter, principal at Ember. “Oil is the Achilles’ heel of the global economy… Asia’s oil vulnerability has been exposed by the current crisis.”
Even oil producers cannot escape the shock
One of the most counterintuitive realities of today’s energy system is that producing oil domestically does not shield economies from global price spikes.
Oil is traded in global markets. When supply is disrupted, prices rise everywhere.
In Texas, one of the world’s largest oil-producing regions, gasoline prices increased by more than 25% following recent geopolitical tensions—in some cases exceeding rises seen in oil-importing countries.
This reflects a fundamental truth: oil dependency is a global vulnerability, not a local one.
The true cost of fossil fuel dependence
The financial burden of this dependency is immense.
Net importing countries spent approximately $1.7 trillion on fossil fuel imports in 2024, with many economies losing significant portions of GDP to energy imports.
For developing economies, the impact is even more severe. Rising prices can strain public finances, disrupt industries, and increase the cost of living.
The report highlights a stark dynamic: when supply tightens, wealthier countries can outbid poorer ones, effectively pushing them out of the market.
Energy insecurity, in this sense, is not just an economic issue—it is a question of global inequality.
EVs are emerging as a geopolitical force
Against this backdrop, the rise of electric vehicles is beginning to alter the equation.
The fact that EVs avoided oil demand equivalent to 70% of Iran’s exports is not just symbolic—it is strategic.
It shows that demand-side transformation can counterbalance supply-side risk.
“Electric vehicles are increasingly cost-competitive with gasoline cars,” Walter said. “Oil volatility means EVs are a common-sense choice for countries wishing to insulate themselves from future shocks.”
The economic benefits are already visible:
- China saves over $28 billion annually in avoided oil imports
- Europe saves around $8 billion
- India saves about $0.6 billion
These savings highlight a critical shift: energy security is moving from controlling supply to reducing dependence.
A broader shift: the rise of “electrotech”
Electric vehicles are only one part of a wider transformation described in the report as “electrotech”—a combination of EVs, solar, wind, batteries, and heat pumps.
Together, these technologies can electrify more than three-quarters of global energy demand and significantly reduce fossil fuel imports.
If deployed at scale, they could cut import dependence by up to 70%, fundamentally reshaping global energy systems.
Unlike fossil fuels, which require continuous imports, these technologies provide long-term stability. Once installed, they operate without fuel costs, price volatility, or geopolitical exposure.
As the report puts it, this is the difference between “renting energy” and “owning it.”
The Strait of Hormuz: from chokepoint to turning point
The current crisis highlights the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz—but it may also accelerate its decline as a central pillar of global energy security.
Asia, which imports around 40% of its oil through the strait, is particularly exposed.
But unlike previous crises, countries now have viable alternatives.
Renewable energy costs have fallen sharply. EV adoption is accelerating across both developed and emerging markets. And electrification technologies are scaling faster than expected.
The report suggests this could become a defining moment—similar to how Europe’s response to the Ukraine crisis reshaped its energy strategy.
Peak oil may arrive sooner than expected
The implications extend beyond immediate crisis management.
The International Energy Agency had projected global oil demand would peak around 2029. But recent developments suggest that peak may arrive sooner.
Electrification is not only reducing demand—it is changing expectations about the future of energy.
The report notes that demand growth forecasts have already been revised downward, with the possibility that global oil demand could plateau—or even decline—earlier than anticipated.
Crises, historically, have accelerated structural transitions. This may be another such moment.
A structural shift beneath the headlines
Geopolitical tensions may dominate headlines, but the deeper story lies beneath.
The fossil fuel system—dependent on continuous trade through vulnerable chokepoints—is becoming increasingly fragile. At the same time, the technologies needed to replace it are becoming cheaper, faster, and more accessible.
The fact that EVs alone have already offset oil demand equivalent to most of Iran’s exports signals a profound shift.
It suggests that the balance of power in global energy is beginning to move—from regions that supply oil to technologies that reduce the need for it.
The Strait of Hormuz may remain a critical artery for now. But its grip on the global economy is loosening.
And for the first time in decades, the world has a credible path to reduce its dependence on it.
Society
Hormuz Crisis Exposes Global Fertiliser Dependency Risks
Hormuz disruption highlights risks of fertiliser dependency as experts warn of food security threats and call for agroecology shift.
Fertiliser dependency has come under sharp global scrutiny as tensions around the Strait of Hormuz highlight how geopolitical disruptions can ripple through food systems, raising concerns over food security and farm resilience.
The Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for global energy supplies, plays a central role in fertiliser production due to its link to fossil fuel exports. Any disruption threatens to push up fertiliser costs—directly impacting agricultural production worldwide, according to an analysis by Zero Carbon Analytics (ZCA).
How Fertiliser Dependency Shapes Global Food Systems
Experts warn that modern agriculture’s heavy reliance on fossil fuel-based fertilisers has created a fragile system vulnerable to geopolitical shocks.
“This vulnerability is a choice, and one that we all pay for,” says Raj Patel, economist and food systems expert at the University of Texas. “Nearly 90 percent of the $540 billion in annual agricultural support goes to the same chemical-intensive production that depends on them. We didn’t stumble into this dependency. We funded it.”
The reliance is deeply embedded in global subsidies and production models, making rapid transitions difficult but increasingly necessary.
Farmers Face Rising Costs Amid Hormuz Tensions
Farmers across Asia are already feeling the pressure of rising fertiliser prices as geopolitical tensions escalate.
“With fertiliser prices rising—and the planting season soon to begin—Asia’s farmers are once again being forced to choose between rising costs and falling yields,” says Shamika Mone, President of the Inter-Continental Network of Organic Farmer Organisations.
She adds that consumers are also likely to face further food price hikes, underlining the broader socio-economic impact.
A Fragile System Under Stress
The current crisis is being described as more than just a supply issue—it is a structural problem in global agriculture.
“What we are seeing is not just a fertiliser and commodity crisis, it is a stress test to a fragile food system that is not designed to be resilient,” says Belén Citoler of the World Rural Forum.
The disruption has exposed how interconnected energy markets and food systems have become, with shocks in one quickly cascading into the other.
Agroecology and Organic Farming as Alternatives
Across continents, experts and farmers are calling for a shift toward more resilient agricultural practices that reduce fertiliser dependency.
“The conflict in Iran highlights the vulnerability of an agriculture system that is overly reliant on fossil fuel fertilisers,” says Oliver Oliveros of the Agroecology Coalition.
He points to growing efforts by countries such as Brazil, Kenya, and Vietnam to support agroecological practices that use natural fertilisers and nitrogen-fixing plants.
Farmers themselves are also adapting.
“Geopolitical conflicts… show how vulnerable our agricultural system has become,” says German farmer Olivier Jung, who has been experimenting with crop diversity and reduced external inputs to build resilience.
Similarly, Brazilian farmer Thales Bevilacqua Mendonça warns that global supply chains are increasingly unstable, urging a shift toward ecological farming practices.
Policy Shift Seen as Key to Reducing Fertiliser Dependency
Experts argue that reducing fertiliser dependency will require systemic policy changes, particularly in how agricultural subsidies are allocated.
“To speed up the transition, we need to redirect billions in agriculture subsidies… and invest in approaches that safeguard farmers and consumers from energy price volatility and climate shocks,” Oliveros adds.
Organic farming advocates also stress that proven alternatives already exist.
“If we really want to take food security seriously, policymakers must support the most resilient models… organic farming must become a pillar,” says French farmer Olivier Chaloche.
A Turning Point for Global Food Security?
The Strait of Hormuz disruption may prove to be a wake-up call for governments worldwide.
As fertiliser dependency becomes increasingly tied to geopolitical instability, the push toward agroecology, organic farming, and resilient food systems is gaining urgency.
The question now is whether policymakers will act fast enough to transform a system many experts say is no longer sustainable.
Society
South Asia’s $107 Billion LNG Expansion Faces Risk Amid Middle East War: Report
A new report warns South Asia’s LNG infrastructure expansion could face economic and energy risks as Middle East tensions disrupt global gas markets.
South Asia’s ambitious expansion of liquefied natural gas (LNG) infrastructure could expose the region to significant economic and energy security risks as geopolitical tensions disrupt global energy markets, according to a new report by Global Energy Monitor.
The report warns that escalating conflict in the Middle East, particularly attacks on Iran and disruptions to shipping routes in the Strait of Hormuz, could sharply affect LNG prices and supply chains, putting pressure on energy-importing economies such as India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan.
Data from the Asia Gas Tracker, compiled by Global Energy Monitor, shows that the three South Asian countries have about $107 billion worth of LNG terminals and gas pipelines either announced or currently under construction.
Together, these projects represent a major share of global gas infrastructure expansion. Southern Asia accounts for 17% of global LNG import capacity under development—about 110.7 million tonnes per year—and 17% of global gas pipelines by length, totalling 34,146 kilometres, according to the report.
India’s expanding gas infrastructure
India is pursuing one of the largest gas infrastructure expansions in the world. The report notes that the country is developing the second-largest LNG terminal expansion globally and the third-largest gas pipeline buildout.
A chart in the report indicates that India ranks among the top countries worldwide for pipeline construction, with nearly three-quarters of its planned gas pipeline network already under construction.
Meanwhile, Bangladesh and Pakistan each have enough LNG import capacity in development to roughly double their existing capacity, highlighting the scale of the region’s dependence on imported gas.
Price volatility and project risks
Despite projections that global LNG supply could increase later in the decade, the report warns that the market remains highly sensitive to geopolitical disruptions. Even relatively balanced markets can experience price spikes if shipping routes or production are affected.
The ongoing conflict in the Middle East demonstrates how quickly a promising growth market can shift into an affordability crisis, potentially delaying or cancelling major infrastructure projects.
“We’ve seen this story before, and South Asian economies that import LNG will struggle with these price shocks. It’s a reminder of the risks of building new gas infrastructure, and that domestic alternatives like renewable power are more affordable and reliable in the long run..” said Robert Rozansky, global LNG analyst for Global Energy Monitor.
History of cancelled LNG projects
The report also highlights a pattern of stalled or cancelled gas infrastructure projects across the region.
Over the past decade, India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan have shelved or cancelled two to three times more LNG import capacity than they have successfully brought online, reflecting the financial and market risks associated with LNG development.
According to the report, India cancelled or shelved 49 million tonnes per annum of LNG capacity, compared with 23 million tonnes that entered operation between 2016 and 2025. Bangladesh and Pakistan show similar trends.
Renewables gaining ground
At the same time, renewable energy is increasingly competing with natural gas in the region’s power sectors.
Solar generation in Pakistan has more than tripled over the past three years, while India is projected to meet over 40% of its electricity demand with renewable energy by 2030.
The report also notes that improvements in energy storage technologies are enhancing grid flexibility, potentially reducing the role of gas as a backup power source.
Emerging alternatives such as green hydrogen could also help reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels for industrial use in the future.
The Asia Gas Tracker, developed by Global Energy Monitor, is an online database that maps and categorises gas infrastructure across the continent, including pipelines, LNG terminals, gas-fired power plants, and gas fields. The tracker is updated annually and documents projects through detailed data pages.
-
Society2 months agoThe Ten-Rupee Doctor Who Sparked a Health Revolution in Kerala’s Tribal Highlands
-
COP305 months agoBrazil Cuts Emissions by 17% in 2024—Biggest Drop in 16 Years, Yet Paris Target Out of Reach
-
Society3 months agoFrom Qubits to Folk Puppetry: India’s Biggest Quantum Science Communication Conclave Wraps Up in Ahmedabad
-
Earth4 months agoData Becomes the New Oil: IEA Says AI Boom Driving Global Power Demand
-
Women In Science5 months agoThe Data Don’t Lie: Women Are Still Missing from Science — But Why?
-
COP304 months agoCorporate Capture: Fossil Fuel Lobbyists at COP30 Hit Record High, Outnumbering Delegates from Climate-Vulnerable Nations
-
Space & Physics3 months agoIndian Physicists Win 2025 ICTP Prize for Breakthroughs in Quantum Many-Body Physics
-
Health5 months agoAir Pollution Claimed 1.7 Million Indian Lives and 9.5% of GDP, Finds The Lancet
