Space & Physics
S N Bose – the world’s most underrated quantum maestro
There are plenty of scientists across the world from history, across the colonial era and beyond – which this ‘Know the Scientist’ page seeks to shed light on. It’s through us retelling these stories time and again do their experiences become immortalized in time for us to understand.
It’s 1924, and Satyendra Nath Bose, going by S.N. Bose was a young physicist teaching in Dhaka, then British India. Grappled by an epiphany, he was desperate to have his solution, fixing a logical inconsistency in Planck’s radiation law, get published. He had his eyes on the British Philosophical Magazine, since word could spread to the leading physicists of the time, most if not all in Europe. But the paper was rejected without any explanations offered.

But he wasn’t going to give up just yet. Unrelenting, he sent another sealed envelope with his draft and this time a cover letter again, to Europe. One can imagine months later, Bose breathing out a sigh of relief when he finally got a positive response – from none other than the great man of physics himself – Albert Einstein.
In some ways, Bose and Einstein were similar. Both had no PhDs when they wrote their treatises that brought them into limelight. And Einstein introduced E=mc2 derived from special relativity with little fanfare, so did Bose who didn’t secure a publisher with his groundbreaking work that invented quantum statistics. He produced a novel derivation of the Planck radiation law, from the first principles of quantum theory.
This was a well-known problem that had plagued physicists since Max Planck, the father of quantum physics himself. Einstein himself had struggled time and again, to only have never resolved the problem. But Bose did, and too nonchalantly with a simple derivation from first principles grounded in quantum theory. For those who know some quantum theory, I’m referring to Bose’s profound recognition that the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution that holds true for ideal gasses, fails for quantum particles. A technical treatment of the problem would reveal that photons, that are particles of light with the same energy and polarization, are indistinguishable from each other, as a result of the Pauli exclusion principle and Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle.
Fascinatingly, this July will mark the 100 years since Einstein submitted Bose’s paper, “Planck’s law and the quantum hypothesis” on his behalf to Zeitschrift fur Physik.
Fascinated and moved by what he read, Einstein was magnanimous enough to have Bose’s paper translated in German and published in the journal, Zeitschrift für Physik in Germany the same year. It would be the beginning of a brief, but productive professional collaboration between the two theoretical physicists, that would just open the doors to the quantum world much wider. Fascinatingly, this July will mark the 100 years since Einstein submitted Bose’s paper, “Planck’s law and the quantum hypothesis” on his behalf to Zeitschrift fur Physik.
With the benefit of hindsight, Bose’s work was really nothing short of revolutionary for its time. However, a Nobel Committee member, the Swedish Oskar Klein – and theoretical physicist of repute – deemed it a mere advance in applied sciences, rather than a major conceptual advance. With hindsight again, it’s a known fact that Nobel Prizes are handed in for quantum jumps in technical advancements more than ever before. In fact, the 2001 Nobel Prize in Physics went to Carl Wieman, Eric Allin Cornell, and Wolfgang Ketterle for synthesizing the Bose-Einstein condensate, a prediction made actually by Einstein based on Bose’s new statistics. These condensates are created when atoms are cooled to near absolute zero temperature, thus attaining the quantum ground state. Atoms at this state possess some residual energy, or zero-point energy, marking a macroscopic phase transition much like a fourth state of matter in its own right.
Such were the changing times that Bose’s work received much attention gradually. To Bose himself, he was fine without a Nobel, saying, “I have got all the recognition I deserve”. A modest character and gentleman, he resonates a lot with the mental image of a scientist who’s a servant to the scientific discipline itself.
He was awarded the Padma Vibhushan, the highest civilian award by the Government of India in 1954. Institutes have been named in his honour, but despite this, his reputation has little if no mention at all in public discourse.
But what’s more upsetting is that, Bose is still a bit of a stranger in India, where he was born and lived. He studied physics at the Presidency College, Calcutta under the tutelage that saw other great Indian physicists, including Jagdish Chandra Bose and Meghnad Saha. He was awarded the Padma Vibhushan, the highest civilian award by the Government of India in 1954. Institutes have been named in his honour, but despite this, his reputation has little if no mention at all in public discourse.
To his physicists’ peers in his generation and beyond, he was recognized in scientific lexicology. Paul Dirac, the British physicist coined the name ‘bosons’ in Bose’s honor (‘bose-on’). These refer to quantum particles including photons and others with integer quantum spins, a formulation that arose only because of Bose’s invention of quantum statistics. In fact, the media popular, ‘god particle’, the Higgs boson, carries a bit of Bose as much as it does of Peter Higgs who shared the 2013 Nobel Prize in Physics with Francois Englert for producing the hypothesis.
There are plenty of scientists across the world from history, across the colonial era and beyond – which this ‘Know the Scientist’ page seeks to shed light on. It’s through us retelling these stories time and again do their experiences become immortalized in time for us to understand.
Space & Physics
Researchers Develop Stretchable Material That Can Instantly Switch How It Conducts Heat
MIT engineers have developed a stretchable material heat conduction system that can rapidly switch how heat flows, enabling adaptive cooling applications.
Stretchable material heat conduction has taken a major leap forward as engineers at MIT have developed a polymer that can rapidly and reversibly switch how it conducts heat simply by being stretched. The discovery opens new possibilities for adaptive cooling technologies in clothing, electronics, and building infrastructure.
Engineers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have developed a new polymer material that can rapidly and reversibly switch how it conducts heat—simply by being stretched.
The research shows that a commonly used soft polymer, known as an olefin block copolymer (OBC), can more than double its thermal conductivity when stretched, shifting from heat-handling behaviour similar to plastic to levels closer to marble. When the material relaxes back to its original form, its heat-conducting ability drops again, returning to its plastic-like state.
The transition happens extremely fast—within just 0.22 seconds—making it the fastest thermal switching ever observed in a material, according to the researchers.
The findings open up possibilities for adaptive materials that respond to temperature changes in real time, with potential applications ranging from cooling fabrics and wearable technology to electronics, buildings, and infrastructure.
The research team initially began studying the material while searching for more sustainable alternatives to spandex, a petroleum-based elastic fabric that is difficult to recycle. During mechanical testing, the researchers noticed unexpected changes in how the polymer handled heat as it was stretched and released.
A new direction for adaptive materials
“We need materials that are inexpensive, widely available, and able to adapt quickly to changing environmental temperatures,” said Svetlana Boriskina, principal research scientist in MIT’s Department of Mechanical Engineering, in a media statement. She explained that the discovery of rapid thermal switching in this polymer creates new opportunities to design materials that actively manage heat rather than passively resisting it.
The research team initially began studying the material while searching for more sustainable alternatives to spandex, a petroleum-based elastic fabric that is difficult to recycle. During mechanical testing, the researchers noticed unexpected changes in how the polymer handled heat as it was stretched and released.
“What caught our attention was that the material’s thermal conductivity increased when stretched and decreased again when relaxed, even after thousands of cycles,” said Duo Xu, a co-author of the study, in a media statement. He added that the effect was fully reversible and occurred while the material remained largely amorphous, which contradicted existing assumptions in polymer science.
The discovery demonstrates how stretchable material heat conduction can be actively controlled in real time, allowing materials to respond dynamically to temperature changes.
How stretching unlocks heat flow
At the microscopic level, most polymers consist of tangled chains of carbon atoms that block heat flow. The MIT team found that stretching the olefin block copolymer temporarily straightens these tangled chains and aligns small crystalline regions, creating clearer pathways for heat to travel through the material.
“This gives the material the ability to toggle its heat conduction thousands of times without degrading
Unlike earlier work on polyethylene—where similar alignment permanently increased thermal conductivity—the new material does not crystallise under strain. Instead, its internal structure switches back and forth between straightened and tangled states, allowing repeated and reversible thermal switching.
“This gives the material the ability to toggle its heat conduction thousands of times without degrading,” Xu said.
From smart clothing to cooler electronics
The researchers say the material could be engineered into fibres for clothing that normally retain heat but instantly dissipate excess warmth when stretched. Similar concepts could be applied to electronics, laptops, and buildings, where materials could respond dynamically to overheating without external cooling systems.
“The difference in heat dissipation is similar to the tactile difference between touching plastic and touching marble,” Boriskina said in a media statement, highlighting how noticeable the effect can be.
The team is now working on optimising the polymer’s internal structure and exploring related materials that could produce even larger thermal shifts.
“If we can further enhance this effect, the industrial and societal impact could be substantial,” Boriskina said.
Researchers say advances in stretchable material heat conduction could significantly influence future designs of smart textiles, electronics cooling, and energy-efficient buildings.
The study has been published in the journal Advanced Materials. The authors include researchers from MIT and the Southern University of Science and Technology in China.
Researchers say advances in stretchable material heat conduction could significantly influence future designs of smart textiles, electronics cooling, and energy-efficient buildings.
Space & Physics
Physicists Capture ‘Wakes’ Left by Quarks in the Universe’s First Liquid
Scientists at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider have observed, for the first time, fluid-like wakes created by quarks moving through quark–gluon plasma, offering direct evidence that the universe’s earliest matter behaved like a liquid rather than a cloud of free particles.
Physicists working at the CERN(The European Organization for Nuclear Research) have reported the first direct experimental evidence that quark–gluon plasma—the primordial matter that filled the universe moments after the Big Bang—behaves like a true liquid.
Using heavy-ion collisions at the Large Hadron Collider, researchers recreated the extreme conditions of the early universe and observed that quarks moving through this plasma generate wake-like patterns, similar to ripples trailing a duck across water.
The study, led by physicists from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, shows that the quark–gluon plasma responds collectively, flowing and splashing rather than scattering randomly.
“It has been a long debate in our field, on whether the plasma should respond to a quark,” said Yen-Jie Lee in a media statement. “Now we see the plasma is incredibly dense, such that it is able to slow down a quark, and produces splashes and swirls like a liquid. So quark-gluon plasma really is a primordial soup.”
Quark–gluon plasma is believed to be the first liquid to have existed in the universe and the hottest ever observed, reaching temperatures of several trillion degrees Celsius. It is also considered a near-perfect liquid, flowing with almost no resistance.
To isolate the wake produced by a single quark, the team developed a new experimental technique. Instead of tracking pairs of quarks and antiquarks—whose effects can overlap—they identified rare collision events that produced a single quark traveling in the opposite direction of a Z boson. Because a Z boson interacts weakly with its surroundings, it acts as a clean marker, allowing scientists to attribute any observed plasma ripples solely to the quark.
“We have figured out a new technique that allows us to see the effects of a single quark in the QGP, through a different pair of particles,” Lee said.
Analysing data from around 13 billion heavy-ion collisions, the researchers identified roughly 2,000 Z-boson events. In these cases, they consistently observed fluid-like swirls in the plasma opposite to the Z boson’s direction—clear signatures of quark-induced wakes.
The results align with theoretical predictions made by MIT physicist Krishna Rajagopal, whose hybrid model suggested that quarks should drag plasma along as they move through it.
“This is something that many of us have argued must be there for a good many years, and that many experiments have looked for,” Rajagopal said.
“We’ve gained the first direct evidence that the quark indeed drags more plasma with it as it travels,” Lee added. “This will enable us to study the properties and behavior of this exotic fluid in unprecedented detail.”
The research was carried out by members of the CMS Collaboration using the Compact Muon Solenoid detector at CERN. The open-access study has been published in the journal Physics Letters B.
Space & Physics
Why Jupiter Has Eight Polar Storms — and Saturn Only One: MIT Study Offers New Clues
Two giant planets, made of the same elements, display radically different storms at their poles. New research from MIT now suggests that the key to this cosmic mystery lies not in the skies, but deep inside Jupiter and Saturn themselves.
For decades, spacecraft images of Jupiter and Saturn have puzzled planetary scientists. Despite being similar in size and composition, the two gas giants display dramatically different weather systems at their poles. Jupiter hosts a striking formation: a central polar vortex encircled by eight massive storms, resembling a rotating crown. Saturn, by contrast, is capped by a single enormous cyclone, shaped like a near-perfect hexagon.
Now, researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology believe they have identified a key reason behind this cosmic contrast — and the answer may lie deep beneath the planets’ cloud tops.
In a new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the MIT team suggests that the structure of a planet’s interior — specifically, how “soft” or “hard” the base of a vortex is — determines whether polar storms merge into one giant system or remain as multiple smaller vortices.
“Our study shows that, depending on the interior properties and the softness of the bottom of the vortex, this will influence the kind of fluid pattern you observe at the surface,” says study author Wanying Kang, assistant professor in MIT’s Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences (EAPS) in a media release issued by the institute. “I don’t think anyone’s made this connection between the surface fluid pattern and the interior properties of these planets. One possible scenario could be that Saturn has a harder bottom than Jupiter.”
A long-standing planetary mystery
The contrast has been visible for years thanks to two landmark NASA missions. The Juno spacecraft, which has been orbiting Jupiter since 2016, revealed a dramatic polar arrangement of swirling storms, each roughly 3,000 miles wide — nearly half the diameter of Earth. Cassini, which orbited Saturn for 13 years before its mission ended in 2017, documented the planet’s iconic hexagonal polar vortex, stretching nearly 18,000 miles across.
“People have spent a lot of time deciphering the differences between Jupiter and Saturn,” says Jiaru Shi, the study’s first author and an MIT graduate student. “The planets are about the same size and are both made mostly of hydrogen and helium. It’s unclear why their polar vortices are so different.”
Simulating storms on gas giants
To tackle the question, the researchers turned to computer simulations. They created a two-dimensional model of atmospheric flow designed to mimic how storms might evolve on a rapidly rotating gas giant.
While real planetary vortices are three-dimensional, the team argued that Jupiter’s and Saturn’s fast spin simplifies the physics. “In a fast-rotating system, fluid motion tends to be uniform along the rotating axis,” Kang explains. “So, we were motivated by this idea that we can reduce a 3D dynamical problem to a 2D problem because the fluid pattern does not change in 3D. This makes the problem hundreds of times faster and cheaper to simulate and study.”
The model allowed the scientists to test thousands of possible planetary conditions, varying factors such as rotation rate, internal heating, planet size and — crucially — the density of material beneath the vortices. Each simulation began with random chaotic motion and tracked how storms evolved over time.
The outcomes consistently fell into two categories: either the system developed one dominant polar vortex, like Saturn, or several coexisting vortices, like Jupiter.
The decisive factor turned out to be how much a vortex could grow before being constrained by the properties of the layers beneath it.
When the lower layers were made of softer, lighter material, individual vortices could not expand indefinitely. Instead, they stabilized at smaller sizes, allowing multiple storms to coexist at the pole. This matches what scientists observe on Jupiter.
But when the simulated vortex base was denser and more rigid, vortices were able to grow larger and eventually merge. The end result was a single, planet-scale storm — remarkably similar to Saturn’s massive polar cyclone.
“This equation has been used in many contexts, including to model midlatitude cyclones on Earth,” Kang says. “We adapted the equation to the polar regions of Jupiter and Saturn.”
The findings suggest that Saturn’s interior may contain heavier elements or more condensed material than Jupiter’s, giving its atmospheric vortices a firmer foundation to build upon.
“What we see from the surface, the fluid pattern on Jupiter and Saturn, may tell us something about the interior, like how soft the bottom is,” Shi says. “And that is important because maybe beneath Saturn’s surface, the interior is more metal-enriched and has more condensable material which allows it to provide stronger stratification than Jupiter. This would add to our understanding of these gas giants.”
Reading the interiors from the skies
Planetary scientists have long struggled to infer the internal structures of gas giants, where pressures and temperatures are far beyond what can be reproduced in laboratories. This new work offers a rare bridge between visible atmospheric patterns and hidden planetary composition.
Beyond explaining two of the Solar System’s most visually striking storms, the research could shape how scientists interpret observations of distant exoplanets as well — worlds where atmospheric patterns might be the only clues to what lies within.
For now, Jupiter’s swirling crown of storms and Saturn’s solitary hexagon may be doing more than decorating the poles of two distant giants. They may be quietly revealing the deep, unseen architecture of the planets themselves.
-
Society2 months agoThe Ten-Rupee Doctor Who Sparked a Health Revolution in Kerala’s Tribal Highlands
-
COP304 months agoBrazil Cuts Emissions by 17% in 2024—Biggest Drop in 16 Years, Yet Paris Target Out of Reach
-
Earth4 months agoData Becomes the New Oil: IEA Says AI Boom Driving Global Power Demand
-
COP303 months agoCorporate Capture: Fossil Fuel Lobbyists at COP30 Hit Record High, Outnumbering Delegates from Climate-Vulnerable Nations
-
Society2 months agoFrom Qubits to Folk Puppetry: India’s Biggest Quantum Science Communication Conclave Wraps Up in Ahmedabad
-
Space & Physics2 months agoIndian Physicists Win 2025 ICTP Prize for Breakthroughs in Quantum Many-Body Physics
-
Women In Science5 months agoThe Data Don’t Lie: Women Are Still Missing from Science — But Why?
-
Health4 months agoAir Pollution Claimed 1.7 Million Indian Lives and 9.5% of GDP, Finds The Lancet


