Connect with us

Society

AI goes nuclear, but what are the risks?

As technology companies invest in small modular reactors (SMRs) to meet energy demands for AI data centers in the future, how safe are they?

Karthik Vinod

Published

on

Credit: Joshua Sortino / Unsplash

As AI fever runs high, BBC reported a US-based start-up, Digital Realty that plans to use small nuclear reactors to power their AI data center in Portland, Oregon. But why?

In an interview with BBC, Stephanie Hare, an AI commentator and technology researcher, said that powering data centers in general are very energy-intensive, leaving behind a massive carbon footprint in addition to the usage of water.

Gallons of water, for instance, functions as a coolant to counteract overheating in machines when it busy processes user requests.

Hare noted that computers there can use up to ‘half a liter’ of water to process requests from a single user at a time.  

However, operating an AI data center is going to consume even more power.

“A normal data center needs 32 megawatts of power flowing into the building. For an AI data center it’s 80 megawatts,” said Chris Sharp, Chief Technology Officer (CTO) of Digital Realty, to the BBC. But it’s not just Digital Realty though participating in this enterprise.

Small Modular Reactors can generate one-third the energy of a conventional nuclear power plant and are said to be cheap based on design.

In 2023, The Verge reported Microsoft potentially showing interests in using ‘small modular reactors’ (SMRs) to fuel their AI data centers. These reactors split uranium nuclei with slow-moving neutrons, very much like conventional nuclear power plants.

However, lending a nuclear reactor to commercial establishments comes with its challenges. For one, only skilled workers can be relied upon to operate properly and manage the nuclear reactor.

Whereas for another, is for the nuclear reactor with its safety mechanisms to manage waste. However, scientists at Stanford University and University of British Columbia had worked out some technical flaws in SMRs. They reached the opposite conclusion to what SMR advocates had to say. They said there’s going to be more radioactive leakage owing to the small design that can’t absorb and take away byproduct neutrons from the chain reaction.

However, these generate one-third the energy of a conventional nuclear power plant and are said to be cheaper to design and manufacture. But how soon can they be deployed?

In the US, their Nuclear Regulatory Commission has authorized one such SMR design, by NuScale although it will be demonstrated only in 2029.

Spencer Lamb, Chief Commercial Officer at British data center developed Kao Data, said in the same BBC report, “I’ve heard about SMRs, but it will take a long time to deploy a nuclear-configured data center in the UK, and AI is happening now.”

BBC interviewed Dr Doug Parr, who’s chief scientist of the non-profit environmental activist group, Greenpeace UK, who labeled the unfolding story about SMRs powering AI data centers as mere ‘hype’. He said tech companies will develop cold feet when they realize that SMRs would prove to be much costly when they’re finally demonstrated. “Unrealistic hype lies behind the cost estimates for SMRs,” said Dr Parr. “This hype will fall away as delays and difficulties emerge.”

However, Dr Michael Bluck a nuclear engineer at Imperial College London, UK was more optimistic – at least in a technical standpoint. He said, “There’s no reason why a small fast reactor can’t power a data center, except that you have to get it past the regulator.”

What about public trust though? The BBC doesn’t cover that. Won’t they have the final say in this case, since it involves nuclear energy? At least in history, nuclear energy has been a point of contention in the West, with public suspecting whether authorities were truly capable of ensuring safeguards against radioactive leakages and waste management. In Germany, policy failure to reassure the public actually led to the wide-spread phase out of nuclear reactors. Public trust is hard to achieve, but it takes the government and scientists to trust them back.

In the UK back in 1957, local farmers in Cumbria, England had suspected radioactive leakages from the Sellafield nuclear plant. However, authorities and scientists didn’t pay attention to the farmer’s concerns of a leak, until farmers strenuously lobbied to get the site checked for by scientists – later positively verifying the claims, leading to the shutdown of the plant.

The point isn’t that nuclear energy is somehow more unsafe compared to other forms of energy, say renewable energy. The numbers of countries operating nuclear reactors have actually expanded to 32 countries, including developing countries, with some 436 reactors operational of today.

Yes, catastrophe has occurred in the past – there’s the infamous Chernobyl and Fukushima events. The US alone had witnessed the Three Mile Island nuclear disaster in 1979. But we don’t want that to happen again.

The point is – paradoxically – we’ll never know how safe a technology is, unless we’ve already tested them.

But before that we need to keep the dialogue on as we discuss and discover hidden risks.

Karthik Vinod is a freelance science writer and journalist from Kochi, India. He runs EdPublica as co-founder and science editor.

Books

The Rise of U.S. Retail Giants: A Century of Political and Economic Shaping

Currently, 90% of Americans live within 10 miles of a Walmart, and five of the top 10 U.S. employers—Walmart, Amazon, Home Depot, Kroger, and Target—are retailers

Published

on

MIT political scientist Kathleen Thelen’s new book, “Attention, Shoppers!”Credits:Photo: Gretchen Ertl

The U.S. retail sector, once dominated by small, independent merchants, has transformed over the past century into a landscape controlled by retail giants. In the late 19th century, most U.S. retail was local. However, this shifted with the rise of catalog retailers like Sears and Roebuck, which saw rapid growth, followed by Montgomery Ward’s expansion. By the 1930s, chain stores began to proliferate, with the Atlantic and Pacific (A&P) supermarkets leading the pack with over 15,000 locations.

Fast-forward to today, and the dominance of retailers like Walmart, Amazon, and Target is undeniable. Currently, 90% of Americans live within 10 miles of a Walmart, and five of the top 10 U.S. employers—Walmart, Amazon, Home Depot, Kroger, and Target—are retailers. In addition, logistics giants UPS and FedEx play a crucial role in supporting the retail economy.

This prevalence of massive retail chains is largely unique to the U.S., where domestic consumption is a driving force behind economic growth. Additionally, the U.S. has five times as much retail space per capita as Japan and the U.K., and 10 times as much as Germany. Unlike in Europe, the U.S. has few regulations limiting shopping hours.

How did we arrive at this point? While major chains like Walmart and Amazon are known for their business prowess, the full story involves over a century of political and legal debates that shaped the landscape of U.S. retailing. MIT political scientist Kathleen Thelen, in her new book Attention, Shoppers! American Retail Capitalism and the Origins of the Amazon Economy, dives into the role of political and legal forces in the rise of large, low-cost retailers.

“The markets that we take as given, that we think of as the natural outcome of supply and demand, are heavily shaped by policy and by politics,” Thelen explains.

Thelen’s book offers a unique perspective, drawing comparisons with European economies and taking a historical approach to the growth of chain retailing. For instance, she highlights how alternative commercial arrangements, like cooperatives, were stifled by U.S. antitrust laws, which favored big corporations while suppressing smaller competitors. This legal framework gave a significant advantage to large retailers, including Sears, which relied on the U.S. Postal Service’s money order system to reach customers who lacked bank accounts.

Smaller retailers resisted the expansion of large chains, particularly during the Great Depression, but big retailers found ways around regulatory constraints. “Antitrust laws in the United States were very forbearing toward big multidivisional corporations and very punitive toward alternative types of arrangements like cooperatives, so big retailers got a real boost in that period,” Thelen says. Over time, antitrust law increasingly prioritized consumer prices, further benefiting low-cost retailers.

As Thelen argues, prioritizing price reduction often leads to lower wages for workers, with large retailers driving down wages both directly and through pressure on suppliers. “If you prioritize prices, one of the main ways to reduce prices is to reduce labor costs,” she says, noting that low-cost discounters are often low-wage employers.

In her analysis, Thelen suggests that the American retail system’s focus on low prices, low wages, and high consumer convenience has led to a “deep equilibrium,” where low-wage workers rely on these retail giants to make ends meet. Meanwhile, the speed of modern delivery systems has become a normal part of American shopping culture.

“The triumph of these types of retailers was not inevitable,” Thelen reflects. “It was a function of politics and political choice.” With ongoing debates about labor law reforms and antitrust enforcement, the current retail equilibrium may persist for the foreseeable future, unless significant changes are made to the system.

Through Attention, Shoppers!, Thelen offers readers a comprehensive look at the economic forces that have shaped the retail sector, helping explain the giant retail landscape many Americans take for granted today.

Continue Reading

Society

Jio Joins Forces with SpaceX’s Starlink to Bring High-Speed Internet to India

India’s richest man Mukesh Ambani’s Jio Partners with SpaceX for a Digital Revolution

Published

on

In a groundbreaking move, Jio Platforms Limited (JPL), a subsidiary of India’s Reliance Industries Limited, has announced a strategic partnership with SpaceX to offer Starlink’s high-speed broadband internet services across India. This collaboration comes as part of Jio’s ambition to expand its broadband offerings and transform connectivity in the country, especially in rural and remote areas.

The partnership between Jio, led by India’s richest man, Mukesh Ambani, and SpaceX, led by US billionaire Elon Musk, marks a significant step in bridging the digital divide and accelerating India’s digital ecosystem. By bringing Starlink’s advanced low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite internet into its fold, Jio is positioning itself at the forefront of India’s broadband evolution, promising to provide affordable and high-speed internet to even the most remote corners of the country.

Through this agreement, Jio will integrate Starlink’s services into its vast network, offering them to both consumers and businesses across India. Customers will be able to access Starlink’s solutions through Jio’s retail outlets as well as its online platforms, ensuring a seamless and efficient experience for users nationwide.

“Ensuring that every Indian, no matter where they live, has access to affordable and high-speed broadband remains Jio’s top priority,” said Mathew Oommen, Group CEO of Reliance Jio, in a statement. “Our collaboration with SpaceX to bring Starlink to India strengthens our commitment and marks a transformative step toward seamless broadband connectivity for all. By integrating Starlink into Jio’s broadband ecosystem, we are expanding our reach and enhancing the reliability and accessibility of high-speed broadband in this AI-driven era, empowering communities and businesses across the country.”

Jio’s extensive infrastructure, paired with Starlink’s pioneering satellite technology, will address the connectivity challenges in India’s most underserved areas, ensuring the benefits of the digital age are accessible to all. The collaboration will also allow Jio to complement its existing broadband services, such as JioAirFiber and JioFiber, by providing high-speed internet in hard-to-reach locations more quickly and affordably.

Additionally, Jio and SpaceX are exploring further areas of collaboration, looking for innovative ways to strengthen India’s digital landscape. Gwynne Shotwell, President and Chief Operating Officer of SpaceX, commented, “We applaud Jio’s commitment to advancing India’s connectivity. We are looking forward to working with Jio and receiving authorization from the Government of India to provide more people, organizations, and businesses with access to Starlink’s high-speed internet services.”

In an interesting twist, Jio’s partnership with Starlink comes just one day after India’s second-largest telecom operator, Airtel, also signed a deal with Starlink. This move indicates that India’s telecom sector is witnessing a significant transformation as leading operators race to offer cutting-edge broadband services through satellite technology, further boosting the country’s digital revolution.

As part of its long-term strategy, Jio continues to innovate and diversify its offerings, positioning itself as a leader in the broadband space with cutting-edge solutions. With this collaboration, Jio not only aims to enhance the reach of its broadband services but also solidifies its role in advancing India’s goal of becoming a global leader in the digital economy.

The union of Jio’s expansive infrastructure and SpaceX’s space-based internet promises to accelerate India’s journey toward becoming a digitally connected nation, ensuring that no part of the country is left behind in the fast-evolving digital landscape.

Continue Reading

Society

New Research Could Allow People to Correct Robots’ Actions in Real-Time

Through basic interactions like pointing to the object, tracing a path on a screen, or physically nudging the robot’s arm, you could guide it to complete the task more accurately.

Published

on

Graduate student Felix Yanwei Wang nudges a robotic arm that is manipulating a bowl in a toy kitchen set up in the group’s lab. Using the framework Wang and his collaborators developed, slightly nudging a robot is one way to correct its behavior. Credits:Credit: Melanie Gonick, MIT

A breakthrough framework developed by researchers from MIT and NVIDIA may soon allow people to correct a robot’s actions in real-time using simple, intuitive feedback—similar to how they would guide another person.

Imagine you’re doing the dishes and a robot grabs a soapy bowl from the sink—but its gripper misses the mark. Instead of having to retrain the robot from scratch, a new method could enable you to fix its behaviour in real time. Through basic interactions like pointing to the object, tracing a path on a screen, or physically nudging the robot’s arm, you could guide it to complete the task more accurately.

This new approach eliminates the need for users to collect data and retrain the robot’s machine-learning model, unlike other traditional methods. Instead, it allows the robot to immediately adjust its actions based on user feedback to get as close as possible to fulfilling the user’s intent.

In tests, the framework’s success rate was 21 percent higher than an alternative method that did not leverage human corrections.

“This approach is designed to let robots perform tasks effectively right out of the box,” says Felix Yanwei Wang, an MIT graduate student in electrical engineering and computer science (EECS) and the lead author of a paper on the framework. “We can’t expect laypeople to gather data and fine-tune models. If a robot doesn’t work as expected, users should have an intuitive way to fix it.”

Wang’s co-authors include Lirui Wang PhD ’24, Yilun Du PhD ’24, senior author Julie Shah, MIT professor of aeronautics and astronautics and director of the Interactive Robotics Group at CSAIL, along with Balakumar Sundaralingam, Xuning Yang, Yu-Wei Chao, Claudia Perez-D’Arpino PhD ’19, and Dieter Fox from NVIDIA. The research will be presented at the upcoming International Conference on Robots and Automation.

A New Approach to Robot Correction

Currently, many robots use generative AI models trained on vast amounts of data to perform tasks. These models can solve complex tasks but often struggle to adapt to real-world situations that differ from their training environment. For example, a robot might fail to pick up a box from a shelf if the shelf in the user’s home is arranged differently than in its training environment.

To address this, engineers often collect new data and retrain the model—a time-consuming and costly process. However, the new MIT-NVIDIA framework allows users to interact with the robot during deployment, correcting its behavior in real time without the need for retraining.

“We want users to guide the robot without causing mistakes that could misalign with their intent,” says Wang. “The goal is to provide feedback that adjusts the robot’s behavior in a way that is both valid and aligned with the user’s goals.”

The system offers three ways for users to provide feedback: they can point to the object they want the robot to interact with, trace a desired trajectory on a screen, or physically nudge the robot’s arm. Wang explains, “Physically nudging the robot is the most direct way to specify user intent without losing any of the information.”

Ensuring Valid Actions

To avoid the robot making invalid moves—like colliding with nearby objects—the researchers developed a sampling procedure. This technique ensures that the robot chooses actions that are both feasible and aligned with the user’s request.

“Rather than just imposing the user’s will, we allow the robot to take the user’s intent into account while ensuring the actions remain valid,” Wang says.

The researchers’ framework outperformed other methods during tests with a real robot arm in a toy kitchen. While the robot might not always complete tasks immediately, the system allows users to correct it on the spot, without waiting for it to finish and then provide new instructions.

The framework also has the potential to learn from user corrections. For instance, if a user nudges the robot to pick up the correct bowl, the robot could log this action and incorporate it into its future behavior, gradually improving over time.

“The key to continuous improvement is having a way for users to interact with the robot,” says Wang. “This method makes that possible.”

Looking ahead, the researchers aim to improve the speed of the sampling procedure and test the framework in new, more complex environments, paving the way for robots that are more adaptable to real-world scenarios.

Continue Reading

Trending