Space & Physics
Pioneers of modern Artificial Intelligence
The 2024 Nobel Prize for Physics has been a trend breaker with computer scientists being awarded the prestigious prize.
Geoffrey Hinton, one of this year’s laureates, was previously awarded the 2018 Turing Prize, arguably the most prestigious prize in computer science.
John Hopfield, the other laureate, and Hinton, were amongst the early generation of computer scientists in the 1980s, who’d set the foundations for machine learning, a technique used to train artificial intelligence. These techniques shaped modern AI models, to take up the mantle from us, to discover patterns within reams of data, which otherwise would take humans arguably forever.
Until the last mid-century, computation was a task that required manual labor. Then, Alan Turing, the British inventor and scientist, who’d rose to fame during World War 2, having helped break the Enigma code, would conceive the theoretical basis for modern computers. It was when he tried to push further, he came up with, arguably a thought, that led to publication of “Can machines think?” Seemingly an innocuous question, but with radical consequences if it really took shape, Turing, through his conceptions of algorithms, laid the foundation of artificial intelligence.
Why the physics prize?
Artificial neural networks, particularly, form the basis for today’s much popular OpenAI’s ChatGPT, and numerous other facial, image and language translational software. But these machine learning models have broken the ceiling with regards to their applications in numerous disciplines: from computer science, to finance to physics.
Physics did form the bedrock in AI research, particularly that of condensed matter physics. Particularly of relevance is spin glass – a phenomena in condensed matter physics, that involves quantum spins behaving randomly when it’s not supercooled, when it rather becomes orderly. Their applications to AI is rather foundational.
John Hopfield and Geoff Hinton are pioneers of artificial neural networks. Hopfield, an American, and Hinton, from Britain, came from diverse disciplines. Hopfield trained as a physicist. But Hinton was a cognitive psychologist. The burgeoning field of computer science, needed interdisciplinary talent, to attack a problem that no single physicist, logician, mathematician could solve. To construct a machine that can think, it will have to learn to make sense of reality. Learning is key, and computer scientists took inspiration from across statistical and condensed matter physics, psychology and neuroscience to come up with the neural network.
Inspired by the human brain, it involves artificial neurons, that holds particular values. This takes shape when the network would be initially fed data as part of a training program before it’s trained further on unfamiliar data. These values would update upon subsequent passes with more data; forming the crux of the learning process. The potential for this to work happened though with John Hopfield constructing a simple neural network in 1982.
Hopfield network, with neurons forming a chain of connections. Credit: Wikimedia Commons
Neurons pair up with one another, to form a long chain. Hopfield would then feed an image, training it by having these neurons passing along information, but only one-way at a time. Patterns of neurons that fire together, wire together, responding to particular patterns that it formerly trained with. Known as the Hebbian postulate, it actually forms the basis for learning in the human brain. It was when the Hopefield network was able to identify even the most distorted version of the original image, did AI take its baby steps. But then to train the network to learn robustly across a swathe of more data, required additional layers of neurons, and wasn’t an easy goal to achieve. There was a need for an efficient method of learning.
Artificial neural network, with neurons forming connections. The information can go across in both directions (though not indicated in the representation). Credit: Wikimedia Commons
That’s when Geoff Hinton entered the picture at around the same timeframe, helping conceive backpropagation, a technique that’s now mainstream and is the key to machine learning models that we use today. But in 2000, Hinton conceived the multi-layered version of the “Boltzmann machine”, a neural network founded on the Hopfield network. Geoff Hinton was featured in Ed Publica‘s Know the Scientist column.
Space & Physics
IIT Kanpur Unveils World’s First BCI-Based Robotic Hand Exoskeleton for Stroke Rehabilitation
The BCI-based robotic hand exoskeleton utilizes a unique closed-loop control system to actively engage the patient’s brain during therapy
The Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK) has unveiled the world’s first Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)-based Robotic Hand Exoskeleton, a groundbreaking innovation set to revolutionize stroke rehabilitation. This technology promises to accelerate recovery and improve patient outcomes by redefining post-stroke therapy. Developed over 15 years of rigorous research led by Prof. Ashish Dutta from IIT Kanpur’s Department of Mechanical Engineering, the project was supported by India’s Department of Science and Technology (DST), UK India Education and Research Initiative (UKIERI), and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR).
The BCI-based robotic hand exoskeleton utilizes a unique closed-loop control system to actively engage the patient’s brain during therapy. It integrates three key components: a Brain-Computer Interface that captures EEG signals from the motor cortex to detect the patient’s intent to move, a robotic hand exoskeleton that assists with therapeutic hand movements, and software that synchronizes brain signals with the exoskeleton for real-time feedback. This coordination helps foster continuous brain engagement, leading to faster and more effective recovery.
“Stroke recovery is a long and often uncertain process. Our device bridges the gap between physical therapy, brain engagement, and visual feedback creating a closed-loop control system that activates brain plasticity, which is the brain’s ability to change its structure and function in response to stimuli,” said Prof. Ashish Dutta. “This is especially significant for patients whose recovery has plateaued, as it offers renewed hope for further improvement and regaining mobility. With promising results in both India and the UK, we are optimistic that this device will make a significant impact in the field of neurorehabilitation.”
Traditional stroke recovery often faces challenges, especially when motor impairments stem from damage to the motor cortex. Conventional physiotherapy methods may fall short due to limited brain involvement. The new device addresses this gap by linking brain activity with physical movement. During therapy, patients are guided on-screen to perform hand movements, such as opening or closing their fist, while EEG signals from the brain and EMG signals from the muscles are used to activate the robotic exoskeleton in an assist-as-required mode. This synchronization ensures the brain, muscles, and visual engagement work together, improving recovery outcomes.
Pilot clinical trials, conducted in collaboration with Regency Hospital in India and the University of Ulster in the UK, have yielded impressive results. Remarkably, eight patients—four in India and four in the UK—who had reached a recovery plateau one or two years post-stroke achieved full recovery through the BCI-based robotic therapy. The device’s active engagement of the brain during therapy has proven to lead to faster and more comprehensive recovery compared to traditional physiotherapy.
While stroke recovery is typically most effective within the first six to twelve months, this innovative device has demonstrated its ability to facilitate recovery even beyond this critical period. With large-scale clinical trials underway at Apollo Hospitals in India, the device is expected to be commercially available within three to five years, offering new hope for stroke patients worldwide.
Space & Physics
Obituary: R. Chidambaram, Eminent Physicist and Architect of India’s Nuclear Program
Rajagopala Chidambaram (1936–2025), a man whose work shaped the future of modern India, will always be remembered as the chief architect of India’s nuclear journey.
Rajagopala Chidambaram, a world-class physicist and the chief architect of India’s nuclear program, passed away on January 4, 2025, at the age of 88. Renowned for his unparalleled contributions to India’s nuclear defense and energy security, Chidambaram leaves a profound legacy in both the scientific community and the nation’s strategic defense apparatus.
Born on November 11, 1936, in India, Dr. Chidambaram was an alumnus of Presidency College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, and the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, Karnataka. His academic background, coupled with his innate curiosity and vision, led him to become one of India’s foremost scientific minds. Throughout his illustrious career, Dr. Chidambaram played an instrumental role in shaping India’s nuclear capabilities, overseeing both the Pokhran-I (1974) and Pokhran-II (1998) nuclear tests, which cemented India’s position as a nuclear power on the world stage.
As a physicist, Dr. Chidambaram’s groundbreaking research in high-pressure physics, crystallography, and materials science greatly advanced the understanding of these fields. His pioneering work laid the foundation for modern materials science research in India, contributing to the nation’s scientific progress in multiple areas. His expertise in these complex disciplines not only bolstered India’s nuclear research but also advanced its technological prowess.
In addition to his work in nuclear weapons development, Dr. Chidambaram made significant strides in nuclear energy, ensuring that India remained at the forefront of scientific and technological advancements. As Director of the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) and later as Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission of India, he was integral to India’s peaceful nuclear energy initiatives. As Principal Scientific Adviser to the Government of India, Dr. Chidambaram guided national policies on defense, energy, and nuclear research, shaping the future of India’s scientific endeavors.
He was a vital member of the team that conducted India’s first nuclear test, Smiling Buddha, at Pokhran in 1974. His leadership during the Pokhran-II tests in 1998, which confirmed India’s nuclear deterrent, was a defining moment in the nation’s history. Chidambaram’s steadfast commitment to India’s defense and scientific advancement earned him respect both at home and abroad.
A visionary leader, Dr. Chidambaram believed in the power of science and technology to drive national development. His efforts were instrumental in championing key initiatives in energy, healthcare, and strategic self-reliance. He steered numerous projects that significantly advanced India’s science and technology landscape. Notably, he played a central role in the indigenous development of supercomputers and was the driving force behind the conceptualization of the National Knowledge Network, which connected research and educational institutions across India.
Dr. Chidambaram was also an ardent advocate for the application of science and technology to improve societal conditions. He established the Rural Technology Action Groups and the Society for Electronic Transactions and Security, among other programs. His emphasis on “Coherent Synergy” in India’s scientific efforts helped foster collaboration across various disciplines, accelerating the country’s scientific growth.
On the global stage, Dr. Chidambaram served as the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 1994-1995 and contributed to several high-level international nuclear discussions. His expertise was sought worldwide, and in 2008, he was appointed to the Commission of Eminent Persons by the IAEA to assess the agency’s role in nuclear governance.
He was a vital member of the team that conducted India’s first nuclear test, Smiling Buddha, at Pokhran in 1974
In recognition of his exceptional contributions to science and national development, Dr. Chidambaram received several prestigious accolades, including the Padma Shri in 1975 and the Padma Vibhushan in 1999. He was also awarded honorary doctorates from several universities and was a fellow of several eminent Indian and international scientific academies.
Dr. Chidambaram’s passing marks the end of an era for India’s nuclear program and the global scientific community. His legacy as a scientist, visionary leader, and architect of India’s nuclear journey will continue to inspire future generations. His contributions to national security, energy, and technological innovation have left an indelible mark on India’s scientific and strategic landscape.
Rajagopala Chidambaram’s profound impact on India’s nuclear and scientific trajectory will be remembered for generations to come. His work in advancing both national defense and the peaceful use of nuclear energy stands as a testament to his vision of a self-reliant, scientifically empowered India.
“Deeply saddened by the demise of Dr Rajagopala Chidambaram. He was one of the key architects of India’s nuclear programme and made ground-breaking contributions in strengthening India’s scientific and strategic capabilities. He will be remembered with gratitude by the whole nation and his efforts will inspire generations to come,” Prime Minister Narendra Modi wrote on X.
Dr. Ajit Kumar Mohanty, Secretary, Department of Atomic Energy, in a statement issued, said, “Dr. Chidambaram was a doyen of science and technology whose contributions furthered India’s nuclear prowess and strategic self-reliance. His loss is an irreparable one for the scientific community and the nation.”
Space & Physics
The Story of the World’s Most Underrated Quantum Maestro
As the world celebrates the 131st birth anniversary of S.N. Bose, EdPublica explores the theoretical physicist’s unparalleled contributions to the field of quantum mechanics
It’s 1924, and Satyendra Nath Bose, going by S.N. Bose was a young physicist teaching in Dhaka, then British India. Grappled by an epiphany, he was desperate to have his solution, fixing a logical inconsistency in Planck’s radiation law, get published. He had his eyes on the British Philosophical Magazine, since word could spread to the leading physicists of the time, most if not all in Europe. But the paper was rejected without any explanations offered.
But he wasn’t going to give up just yet. Unrelenting, he sent another sealed envelope with his draft and this time a cover letter again, to Europe. One can imagine months later, Bose breathing out a sigh of relief when he finally got a positive response – from none other than the great man of physics himself – Albert Einstein.
In some ways, Bose and Einstein were similar. Both had no PhDs when they wrote their treatises that brought them into limelight. And Einstein introduced E=mc2 derived from special relativity with little fanfare, so did Bose who didn’t secure a publisher with his groundbreaking work that invented quantum statistics. He produced a novel derivation of the Planck radiation law, from the first principles of quantum theory.
This was a well-known problem that had plagued physicists since Max Planck, the father of quantum physics himself. Einstein himself had struggled time and again, to only have never resolved the problem. But Bose did, and too nonchalantly with a simple derivation from first principles grounded in quantum theory. For those who know some quantum theory, I’m referring to Bose’s profound recognition that the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution that holds true for ideal gasses, fails for quantum particles. A technical treatment of the problem would reveal that photons, that are particles of light with the same energy and polarization, are indistinguishable from each other, as a result of the Pauli exclusion principle and Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle.
Fascinatingly, last July marked the 100 years since Einstein submitted Bose’s paper, “Planck’s law and the quantum hypothesis” on his behalf to Zeitschrift fur Physik.
Fascinated and moved by what he read, Einstein was magnanimous enough to have Bose’s paper translated in German and published in the journal, Zeitschrift für Physik in Germany the same year. It would be the beginning of a brief, but productive professional collaboration between the two theoretical physicists, that would just open the doors to the quantum world much wider. Fascinatingly, last July marked the 100 years since Einstein submitted Bose’s paper, “Planck’s law and the quantum hypothesis” on his behalf to Zeitschrift fur Physik.
With the benefit of hindsight, Bose’s work was really nothing short of revolutionary for its time. However, a Nobel Committee member, the Swedish Oskar Klein – and theoretical physicist of repute – deemed it a mere advance in applied sciences, rather than a major conceptual advance. With hindsight again, it’s a known fact that Nobel Prizes are handed in for quantum jumps in technical advancements more than ever before. In fact, the 2001 Nobel Prize in Physics went to Carl Wieman, Eric Allin Cornell, and Wolfgang Ketterle for synthesizing the Bose-Einstein condensate, a prediction made actually by Einstein based on Bose’s new statistics. These condensates are created when atoms are cooled to near absolute zero temperature, thus attaining the quantum ground state. Atoms at this state possess some residual energy, or zero-point energy, marking a macroscopic phase transition much like a fourth state of matter in its own right.
Such were the changing times that Bose’s work received much attention gradually. To Bose himself, he was fine without a Nobel, saying, “I have got all the recognition I deserve”. A modest character and gentleman, he resonates a lot with the mental image of a scientist who’s a servant to the scientific discipline itself.
He was awarded the Padma Vibhushan, the highest civilian award by the Government of India in 1954. Institutes have been named in his honour, but despite this, his reputation has little if no mention at all in public discourse.
But what’s more upsetting is that, Bose is still a bit of a stranger in India, where he was born and lived. He studied physics at the Presidency College, Calcutta under the tutelage that saw other great Indian physicists, including Jagdish Chandra Bose and Meghnad Saha. He was awarded the Padma Vibhushan, the highest civilian award by the Government of India in 1954. Institutes have been named in his honour, but despite this, his reputation has little if no mention at all in public discourse.
To his physicists’ peers in his generation and beyond, he was recognized in scientific lexicology. Paul Dirac, the British physicist coined the name ‘bosons’ in Bose’s honor (‘bose-on’). These refer to quantum particles including photons and others with integer quantum spins, a formulation that arose only because of Bose’s invention of quantum statistics. In fact, the media popular, ‘god particle’, the Higgs boson, carries a bit of Bose as much as it does of Peter Higgs who shared the 2013 Nobel Prize in Physics with Francois Euglert for producing the hypothesis.
-
Society6 months ago
Death toll 280 & counting: what is the science behind Kerala’s deadly landslides?
-
Interviews6 months ago
‘Significant under-representation of black women in academic and research leadership’
-
Space & Physics4 months ago
Bubbles observed moving on a star for the first time
-
Learning & Teaching6 months ago
How AI is transforming India’s education System
-
Society6 months ago
Rate of heart attacks and strokes was lower after COVID-19 vaccination: Study
-
Learning & Teaching5 months ago
India’s Premier Universities Ranked: Indian Institute of Science tops the list
-
Space & Physics6 months ago
NASA bids farewell to its asteroid-hunting telescope
-
Earth5 months ago
NASA discovers innovative method for measuring river flows