Connect with us

Society

A tale of two divergent nuclear energy policies

Germany phased out nuclear energy after protests and nuclear disasters elsewhere shook public faith. France pushed ahead with centralized planning. Laid bare in this piece is how their contrasting legacies reveal the complex dance between democracy and technology.

Karthik Vinod

Published

on

Public protest against the use of nuclear power in Bonn, West Germany | Photo Credit: Hans Weingartz

In a world reeling from climate change effects, nuclear energy has offered a cleaner and viable alternative to fossil fuels. However, concerns regarding safety and radioactive waste management persists in developed and developing nations alike. In the past century, the backdrop of nuclear anxieties during the Cold War had even major Western powers, such as Germany and France, on the backfoot addressing those fears.

Their choice to engage in dialogue with the public, left their respective nuclear energy policies contrasting legacies. Policy makers would do well to consider the importance of maintaining public trust, crucial to build a future with clean energy.

West German Anxiety

In the 1970s, West Germany had announced plans to produce a quarter of electric power with nuclear energy. But protests broke out in the city of Wyhl, against having a nuclear reactor operate in their vicinity, claiming potential ecological threat. Ecological institutes had lent support to this view. But authorities failed to engage, considering the argument to have lacked merit. However, a blowback ensued, bolstered by lobbyists applying pressure. Authorities buckled under pressure, in what was just the first of many such public protests nuclear power plants.

In Germany, for long it had just been the “green” political parties, which had been uncompromisingly anti-nuclear. But following the meltdown at Fukushima nuclear power plant in 2011, even fence-sitters have joined the bandwagon. The Germans plan to phase out nuclear power plants completely by this decade. Notwithstanding that, they are still able to achieve net zero carbon dioxide emissions by 2045. However, commentators still wonder whether Germany has squandered an opportunity out of irrational political compulsions; now instead pursuing still expensive means of renewable energy. Their next-door neighbour, France meanwhile, has built more power plants in the intervening decades.

Superphenix, Nuclear power plant at Creys-Malville, Isère, France | Photo Credit: Yann Forget

Lending a blind eye

France did witness large-scale protests, such as against the Superphenix spent fuel disposal plant, that led to its shutdown in 2000. But protests in France, mirroring those in Germany are rare. Protests are relatively less effective under a government content with centralized, institutionalized policy making. Despite the lack of public engagement in this case, it helped there was de-facto consensus among political parties, in support of nuclear power.

If public concerns existed, these were mostly addressed through existing environment safety laws. As such, nuclear power plants did not cause a stir amongst voters immediately. But this began to change when the green parties in France came to the foyer in the 1990s. In their 2015 article, scholars Sylvain Brouard and Isabelle Guinadeau said: “The pro-nuclear consensus was broken only after the Green Party became a potential coalition partner for the PS (Socialist Party); the PS manifesto has become less and less pro-nuclear since then in order to preserve the pre-electoral coalition with the Greens.” 

The resultant policy faced little public accountability as a result. Forecasts on electricity demands were vastly overestimated, with there being far more nuclear power plants built than necessary. Also, these plants are particularly vulnerable during winters, thereby relying on heavy electric power imports during the season. Since hitting peaks in the 1970s and 80s, when nuclear energy accounted for some 80% of energy and electricity demand in the country, that figure has dipped sharply, and will so until about 50% soon, considering a renewed push to alternative renewable resources.

Engage in dialogue

It helped that neither France, nor Germany had dealt with a radioactive mishap, unlike the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in erstwhile Soviet Union, or the Three Mile Island disaster in the United States; instances where people were exposed to harmful radioactive exposure. And so, it should be little wonder the public are consulted to address problems that concern their own safety. Often, governments adopt a top-down approach in explaining their position to the public about their policy. But there must be space for dialogue. Science policies are only effective when they are framed democratically; when policy makers fail to consult beforehand with their beneficiaries – the public.

Including members of the public with “lay” expertise often invites criticism for their lack of subject-matter expertise. While this holds true, especially in advocacy for public participation in scientific advisory committees for example, a critical angle – or unique perspective – can prove beneficiary. In a 2012 article examining public engagement practices notes, scholars Alan Irwin, Torben Elgaard Jensen, and Kevin E. Jones, notes: “Criticism, rather than voicing negative prospects and possibilities that must be overcome before meaningful action can occur, has potential value (and relevance) as a meaningful action in its own right.”

For a fact, scientists relying upon scientific evidence themselves, are often beleaguered with the uncertainties and risks involved in handling affairs. There is space for lay persons to take part in risk assessments, that can help identify potential hazards to them, and risk compensation pathways that can compensate them in the event of a disaster. All of this makes policy making more holistic, and in spirit with celebrating participatory democracy in decision-making.

EDUNEWS & VIEWS

Harvard Pledges $250 Million for Research After Federal Funding Slash

The administration has defended the funding freeze as part of a broader campaign to address what it characterizes as pervasive anti-Semitism on campuses and to roll back diversity programs

Published

on

Image credit: Kalhh from Pixabay

Harvard University has announced a $250 million investment to sustain vital research programs in the face of steep federal funding cuts imposed by the Trump administration.
The move follows a sweeping $2.6 billion reduction in government grants to the Ivy League institution, citing alleged discriminatory practices and refusal to comply with federal oversight mandates. The cuts, which Harvard is actively challenging in court, have already suspended or canceled dozens of projects—some of which were considered critical to public health and technological innovation.

University President Alan Garber and Provost John Manning issued a joint statement on Wednesday, emphasizing the urgent need to protect research initiatives. “While we cannot fully offset the financial blow from halted federal support, we are committed to backing essential research during this transitional period,” they said. The university is also working with faculty to secure alternative funding channels.

Harvard has strongly criticized the federal measures, calling the termination of grants “unlawful” and accusing the administration of interfering with academic independence. The university contends that the loss of funding not only halts groundbreaking work but also threatens years of scientific progress.

At the heart of the dispute is a broader political clash over university governance. Harvard, whose endowment reached $53.2 billion in 2024, has become a focal point of the Trump administration’s efforts to reshape higher education policy. The White House has demanded greater control over admissions, hiring, and the political climate on campus—demands Harvard has resisted.

The administration has defended the funding freeze as part of a broader campaign to address what it characterizes as pervasive anti-Semitism on campuses and to roll back diversity programs. Critics argue these moves are part of a larger effort to suppress progressive academic culture and penalize dissent over U.S. foreign policy, especially in light of recent student protests against the war in Gaza.

In recent weeks, federal authorities have also taken steps to revoke visas of international students involved in these demonstrations, accusing them of ties to militant organizations—allegations civil rights groups and university leaders have strongly disputed.

With tensions between the federal government and top academic institutions mounting, Harvard’s legal challenge could set a precedent for how universities navigate political interference while safeguarding research, free speech, and academic autonomy.

Continue Reading

Health

Robot Helps Elderly Sit, Stand, and Stay Safe from Falls

The innovation comes at a time when the United States faces a dramatic demographic shift

Published

on

Image credit: MIT News/ Courtesy of the researchers

As America’s population ages faster than ever before, a team of engineers at MIT is turning to robotics to meet the growing eldercare crisis. Their latest invention, the Elderly Bodily Assistance Robot—or E-BAR—aims to provide critical physical support to seniors navigating life at home, potentially reducing the risk of injury and relieving pressure on a strained care system.

The innovation comes at a time when the United States faces a dramatic demographic shift. The nation’s median age has climbed to 38.9, nearly ten years older than in 1980. By 2050, the number of adults over 65 is projected to surge from 58 million to 82 million. As demand for care rises, the country is simultaneously grappling with shortages in care workers, escalating healthcare costs, and evolving family structures that leave many elderly adults without daily support.

“Eldercare is the next great challenge,” said Roberto Bolli, a graduate student in MIT’s Department of Mechanical Engineering and one of E-BAR’s lead designers, in a media statement. “All the demographic trends point to a shortage of caregivers, a surplus of elderly persons, and a strong desire for elderly persons to age in place.”

E-BAR is designed to address exactly that challenge. The mobile robot acts as a robotic support system, following a user from behind and offering both steadying handlebars and rapid intervention in case of a fall. It can support a person’s full weight and includes side airbags that inflate instantly to catch users if they begin to fall—without requiring them to wear any equipment or harnesses.

“Many older adults underestimate the risk of fall and refuse to use physical aids, which are cumbersome, while others overestimate the risk and may not exercise, leading to declining mobility,” said Harry Asada, the Ford Professor of Engineering at MIT, in a media statement. “Our design concept is to provide older adults having balance impairment with robotic handlebars for stabilizing their body. The handlebars go anywhere and provide support anytime, whenever they need.”

The robot consists of a heavy, 220-pound base equipped with omnidirectional wheels, allowing it to maneuver easily through typical home spaces. From its base, articulated bars extend and adjust to assist users in standing or sitting, and the handlebars provide a natural, unrestrictive grip. In testing, E-BAR successfully helped an older adult complete everyday movements such as bending, reaching, and even stepping over the edge of a bathtub.

“Seeing the technology used in real-life scenarios is really exciting,” said Bolli.

The team’s design, which will be presented later this month at the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), aims to eliminate the physical constraints and stigmas often associated with eldercare devices. Their approach prioritizes both independence and safety—key values for aging Americans seeking to remain in their homes longer.

While E-BAR currently operates via remote control, the team plans to add autonomous capabilities and streamline the device’s design for home and facility use. The researchers are also exploring ways to integrate fall-prediction algorithms, developed in a parallel project in Asada’s lab, to adapt robotic responses based on a user’s real-time risk level.

“Eldercare conditions can change every few weeks or months,” Asada noted. “We’d like to provide continuous and seamless support as a person’s disability or mobility changes with age.”

As the nation prepares for the realities of an aging population, MIT’s work offers a glimpse into a future where robotics play a central role in eldercare—enhancing both quality of life and personal dignity for millions of older adults.

Continue Reading

Society

Young Indian Innovator Wins Global Scholarship for Breakthrough Solar Technology

The Solar Mech Engine is more than a student project—it represents a scalable clean-energy solution that aligns with global sustainability goals

Published

on

Japteg Singh Bamrah and his Mentor, Dr. Nasir Ul Rasheed, demonstrating the Solar Mech Engine project. Image: PIB

In a landmark moment for Indian innovation, 17-year-old Japteg Singh Bamrah, a Class 12 student at Dalhousie Public School, has won the prestigious HonorsGradU 2025 Scholarship, earning global recognition for his sustainable energy innovation—the Solar Mech Engine.

Bamrah is one of just five winners worldwide of the “Build a Better Future” Award, organized by U.S.-based nonprofit Honors Graduation. The scholarship program celebrates student-led projects that aim to solve real-world challenges with innovation and impact. Japteg’s Solar Mech Engine was recognized as the top technology entry among thousands of global submissions.

“This is a proud moment not just for me, but for India and young innovators everywhere,” said Japteg in a press statement.

Under the mentorship of Dr. Nasir Ul Rasheed, Senior Scientist at CSIR-Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine (IIIM), Jammu, Japteg developed his project through the CSIR Jigyasa Hackathon initiative—an effort to nurture grassroots science and innovation in school students. The Solar Mech Engine, which also clinched top honours at the Jigyasa Hackathon 2024, operates as a standalone solar thermal system based on Concentrated Heat and Power (CHP) technology.

The innovation harnesses the principles of air expansion and contraction due to temperature changes to convert solar heat into mechanical energy. It features a low-resistance generator that uses electromagnetic induction for direct mechanical-to-electrical energy conversion. What makes it particularly unique is its reversible heat pump capability, allowing it to both generate and store energy with high efficiency.

Japteg showcased his invention at the National Startup Festival held at CSIR-IIIM Jammu in February 2025, where he presented the Solar Mech Engine to Dr. Jitendra Singh, Union Minister of Science and Technology and Vice President of CSIR. Dr. Singh lauded the project as a shining example of India’s Start-Up India, Stand-Up India mission, stating, “It’s innovations like these that embody the spirit of self-reliance and technological progress envisioned by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.”

“This achievement breaks new ground. Japteg is the first and only student from India to top this global competition since its inception in 2012,” said Dr. Rasheed in a press statement. “It highlights the untapped potential of young minds when given the right support and opportunities.”

As part of his award, Japteg receives a $10,000 scholarship toward his undergraduate studies in the United States and an additional $5,000 to further develop and scale his invention. With offers from more than ten leading universities across the U.S., Australia, and Canada—and additional scholarships totaling $16,000 per year—Japteg is now preparing for the next phase of his academic journey.

The Solar Mech Engine is more than a student project—it represents a scalable clean-energy solution that aligns with global sustainability goals. CSIR-IIIM’s backing underscores the importance of institutional support in converting youthful ideas into transformative technologies.

With a total grant package of $31,000, Japteg Singh Bamrah is poised to take his innovation to the next level while pursuing his education at a top international university. His journey from a school laboratory in Himachal Pradesh to the global stage is a testament to the power of curiosity, mentorship, and vision in building a better, greener future.

Continue Reading

Trending