Connect with us

Space & Physics

In search for red aurorae in ancient Japan

Ryuho Kataoka, a Japanese auroral scientist, played a seminal role in searching for evidence of super-geomagnetic storms in the past using historical methods

Karthik Vinod

Published

on

Professor Ryuho Kataoka in his office at NIPR, with the fan-shaped painting behind him, Picture courtesy: RK Works

Aurorae seen on Earth are the end of a complex process that begins with a violent, dynamic process deep within the sun’s interior.

However, studying the depths of the sun is no easy task, even for scientists. The best they can do is to observe the surface using space-based telescopes. One problem that scientists are attempting to solve is how a super-geomagnetic storm on Earth comes to being. These geomagnetic storms find their roots in sunspots, that are acne-like depressions on the sun’s surface. As the sun approaches the peak of its 11-year solar cycle, these sunspots, numbering in the hundreds, occasionally release all that stored magnetic energy into deep space, in the form of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) (which are hot wisps of gas superheated to thousands of degrees).

If the earth lies in the path of an oncoming CME, the energy release from their resultant magnetic field alignment can cause intense geomagnetic storms and aurorae on Earth.

This phenomenon, which is astrophysical and also electromagnetic in nature, can have serious repercussions for our modern technological society.

Super-geomagnetic storms, a particularly worse form of geomagnetic storm, can induce power surges in our infrastructure, causing power outages that can plunge the world into darkness, and can cause irreversible damages to our infrastructure. The last recorded super-geomagnetic storm event occurred more than 150 years ago. Known as the Carrington event, the storm destroyed telegraph lines across North America and Europe in 1859. The risk for a Carrington-class event to happen again was estimated to be 1 in 500-years, which is quite low, but based on limited data. Ramifications are extremely dangerous if it were to ever happen.

However, in the past decade, it was learnt that such super-geomagnetic storms are much more common than scientists had figured. To top it all, it wasn’t just science, but it was a valuable contribution by art – specifically ancient Japanese and Chinese historical records that shaped our modern understanding of super-geomagnetic storms.

Ryuho Kataoka, a Japanese space physicist, played a seminal role in searching for evidence of super-geomagnetic storms in the past using historical methods. He is presently an associate professor in physics, holding positions at Japan’s National Institute of Polar Research, and The Graduate University for Advanced Studies.

“There is no modern digital dataset to identify extreme space weather events, particularly super-geomagnetic storms,” said Professor Kataoka. “If you have good enough data, we can input them into supercomputers to do physics-based simulation.”

However, sunspot records go until the late 18th century when sunspots were actively being cataloged. In an effort to fill the data gap, Professor Kataoka decided to be at the helm of a very new but promising interdisciplinary field combining the arts with space physics. “The data is limited by at least 50 years,” said Professor Kataoka. “So we decided to search for these red vapor events in Japanese history, and see the occurrence patterns … and if we are lucky enough, we can see detailed features in these lights, pictures or drawings.” Until the summer of 2015, Ryuho Kataoka wasn’t aware of how vast ancient Japanese and Chinese history records really were.

In the past 7 years, he’s researched a very specific red aurora, in documents extending to more than 1400 years. “Usually, auroras are known for their green colors – but during the geomagnetic storm, the situation is very different,” he said. “Red is of course unusual, but we can only see red during a powerful geomagnetic storm, especially in lower latitudes. From a scientific perspective, it’s a very reasonable way to search for red signs in historical documents.”

A vast part of these historical red aurora studies that Professor Kataoka researched came from literature explored in the last decade by the AURORA-4D collaboration. “The project title included “4D”, because we wanted to access records dating back 400 years back during the Edo period,” said Professor Kataoka.

“From the paintings, we can identify the latitude of the aurora, and calculate the magnitude or amplitude of the geomagnetic storm.” Clearly, paintings in the Edo period influenced Professor Kataoka’s line of research, for a copy of the fan-shaped red aurora painting from the manuscript Seikai (which translates to ‘stars’) hangs on the window behind his office desk at the National Institute of Polar Research.

The painting fascinated Professor Kataoka, since it depicted an aurora that originated during a super-geomagnetic storm over Kyoto in 1770. However, the painting did surprise him at first, since he wondered whether the radial patterns in the painting were real, or a mere artistic touch to make it look fierier. “That painting was special because this was the most detailed painting preserved in Japan,” remarked Professor Kataoka. “I took two years to study this, thinking this appearance was silly as an aurorae scientist. But when I calculated the field pattern from Kyoto towards the North, it was actually correct!”

Fan-shaped red aurora painting from the ‘Seikai’, dated 17th September, 1770; Picture Courtesy: Matsusaka City, Mie Prefecture.

The possibility to examine and verify historical accounts using science is also a useful incentive for scholars of Japanese literature and scientists partaking in the research.

“This is important because, if we scientists look at the real National Treasure with our eyes, we really know these sightings recorded were real,” said Professor Kataoka. “The internet is really bad for a survey because it can easily be very fake,” he said laughing. It’s not just the nature in which science was used to examine art – to examine Japanese “national treasures” that is undoubtedly appealing, but historical accounts themselves have contributed to scientific research directly.

“From our studies, we can say that the Carrington class events are more frequent than we previously expected,” said Professor Kataoka. There was a sense of pride in him as he said this. “This Carrington event is not a 1 in 200-year event, but as frequent as 1 in 100 years.” Given how electricity is the lifeblood of the 21st century, these heightened odds do ingrain a rather dystopian society in the future, that is ravaged by a super-geomagnetic storm.

Professor Kataoka’s work has found attention within the space physics community. Jonathon Eastwood, Professor of Physics at Imperial College London said to EdPublica, “The idea to use historical information and art like this is very inventive because these events are so rare and so don’t exist as information in the standard scientific record.”

There’s no physical harm from a geomagnetic storm, but the threat to global power supply and electronics is being increasingly recognized by world governments. The UK, for instance, identified “space weather” as a natural hazard in its 2011 National Risk Register. In the years that followed, the government set up a space weather division in the Met Office, the UK’s foremost weather forecasting authority, to monitor and track occurrences of these coronal mass ejections. However, these forecasts, which often supplement American predictions – namely the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) – have failed to specify previously where a magnetic storm could brew on Earth, or predict whether a coronal mass ejection would ever actually strike the Earth.

The former occurred during the evacuation process for Hurricane Irma in 2017, when amateur radio ham operators experienced the effects of a radio blackout when a magnetic storm affected the communications network across the Caribbean. The latter occurred on another occasion when a rocket launch for SpaceX’s Starlink communication satellites was disrupted by a mild geomagnetic storm, costing SpaceX a loss of over $40 million.

Professor Kataoka said he wishes space physicists from other countries participate in similar interdisciplinary collaborations to explore their native culture’s historical records for red aurora sightings. He said the greatest limitation of the AURORA-4D collaboration was the lack of historical records from other parts of the world. China apparently boasts a history of aurora records longer than Japan, with a history lasting before Christ himself. “Being Japanese, I’m not familiar with British, Finnish or Vietnamese cultures,” said Professor Kataoka. “But every country has literature researchers and scientists who can easily collaborate and perform interdisciplinary research.” And by doing so, it’s not just science which benefits from it, but so is ancient art whose beauty and relevance gains longevity.

Space & Physics

Joint NASA-ISRO radar satellite is the most powerful built to date

NISAR – a portmanteau for the NASA-ISRO synthetic aperture global radar earth observation satellite — will only be their latest collaboration between the two space agencies.

Karthik Vinod

Published

on

A concept art on NISAR | Photo Credit: NASA

On July 30th, NISAR  — the NASA-ISRO joint space mission — launched to space aboard the GSLV Mark II rocket from Sriharikota, Andhra Pradesh. The satellite, now safely tucked into a sun-synchronous orbit around earth, will enter a commissioning phase over the next three months, to deploy all its instruments.

Perched at an altitude of 750 km, the three ton satellite will complete an orbit around the earth every 12 days, while studying the planet’s diverse geology with unprecedented detail.

NISAR, a portmanteau for the NASA-ISRO synthetic aperture radar mission, marks the culmination of a decade-long effort to build the most powerful earth observation satellite to date.

The story began around 2007, when NASA actively began exploring an ambitious undertaking to build a satellite, which could map the earth and the whole ecosystem. On the agenda were investigations into studying climate change and its role in exacerbating extreme weather events. Greenland and Antarctica, whose disappearing ice sheets have been linked to the global average increase in sea-levels over the years, would be among the vulnerable hotspots to come under surveillance. 

Traditional remote sensing satellites are limited in their need for sunlit conditions and clear skies for imaging. Clouds are transparent to radio and microwaves unlike visible light. As such, a synthetic aperture radar can work across any weather, whether sunlit or not alike.

That said, SAR technology isn’t new. They have been around for about seventy years, since the first proof of principle was proven in the 1950s. In 1978, the US launched the first SAR-equipped earth observation satellite, Seasat, to monitor oceans. Neither Seasat or for that matter any SAR-based successors, could bear resolutions as high as 1 cm, or map terrain across a swath area as wide as about 240 km, as NISAR can.

NASA engaged in a cost-effective strategy, opening doors for international partners to pool resources, and co-develop the satellite and the scientific campaigns.

A melt pond in Greenland | Photo Credit: Michael Studinger (2008)

Mutual benefits

NASA found an interested party in ISRO, which at the time was developing the Radar Imaging Satellite (RISAT), which had a smaller scope to study India’s geology. India, being especially vulnerable to floods, landslides and cyclones, couldn’t overlook the incentives an extra eye in the sky could provide.

NISAR can track and relay even the minutest of changes on the surface in near real-time. In principle, the satellite should detect a flooded area hidden from view to rescuers on-ground, or even traditional remote sensing satellites which use passive receivers. The satellite can serve a key role in an integrated multi-hazard early warning system.

In 2014, ISRO inked the NISAR agreement with NASA. The mission would only be their latest collaboration between the two space agencies. Previously, they had collaborated on 2008’s Chandrayaan-1. Back then, NASA’s Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M3) instrument and miniSAR radar onboard the Chandrayaan orbiter, led the famous detection of water ice on the moon. 

NASA and ISRO share expertise

Although NISAR was originally slated for launch in 2020, innumerable delays followed as they sorted technical challenges, and the abrupt global lockdown amid COVID pandemic.

Upon project completion last year, NISAR had become the most expensive satellite built, with NASA and ISRO pouring some $1.5 billion into development. The costs were unevenly split between them; with NASA spending some $1.3 billion, and ISRO bearing a modest amount at $91 million.

Then NASA administrator Charles Bolden (left), and ISRO chairman K. Radhakrishnan (right), signed documents which included a charter on NISAR, in Toronto | Photo Credit: NASA

But a white paper details ISRO had contributed an equal value in engineering various components, re-establishing parity. ISRO engineered the spacecraft body, readied tracking stations on-ground, and developed the short wavelength S-band radar. The S-band (at 12 cm) complements NASA’s longer wavelength L-band (24 cm) radar.

The L-band can track changes under thick foliage or leaves, under forests. It can even measure land deformation rates as tiny as 4 mm/year. While the L-band serves as NISAR’s primary means of acquiring radar data, ISRO’s S-band radar will help provide details that concern Indian earth scientists, monitoring coastal erosion for example. Both radars work in tandem with NASA-designed radar receiver and reflector – a 12-meter wide meshed net, resembling a canopy attached to the spacecraft body via a boom. 

Three months from now, once the commissioning phase is complete, NISAR will begin its observational runs, and beam radar data back to earth continuously. The National Remote Sensing Centre in Hyderabad, and Goddard Space Flight Centre in Maryland, will process the respective L & S-band data independently, and archive them online for the world to see, all in few hours.

Continue Reading

Space & Physics

New double-slit experiment proves Einstein’s predictions were off the mark

Results from an idealized version of the Young double-slit experiment has upheld key predictions from quantum theory.

Published

on

Two individual atoms suspended in a vacuum chamber are illuminated by a laser beam, serving as the two slits. Scattered light interference is captured by a highly sensitive camera shown as a screen. Credit: Courtesy of the researchers/MIT
  • MIT physicists perform the most idealized double-slit experiment to date, using individual atoms as slits.
  • Experiment confirms the quantum duality of light: light behaves as both a particle and a wave, but both behaviors can’t be observed simultaneously.
  • Findings disprove Albert Einstein’s century-old prediction regarding detecting a photon’s path alongside its wave nature.

In a study published in Physical Reviews Letters on July 22, researchers at MIT have realized an idealized version of the famous double-slit experiment in quantum physics yet.

The double-slit experiment—first devised in 1801 by the British physicist Thomas Young—remains a perplexing aspect of reality. Light waves passing through two slits, form interference patterns on a wall placed behind. But this phenomenon is at odds with the fact light also behaves as particles. The contradiction has lent itself to a paradox, which sits at the foundation of quantum mechanics. It has sparked a historic scientific duel nearly a century ago, between physics heavyweights Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr. The study’s findings have now settled the decades-old debate, showing Einstein’s predictions were off the mark.

Einstein had suggested that by detecting the force exerted when a photon passes through a slit—a nudge akin to a bird brushing past a leaf—scientists could witness both light’s wave and particle properties at once. Bohr countered with the argument that observing a photon’s path would inevitably erase its wave-like interference pattern, a tenet since embraced by quantum theory.

The MIT team stripped the experiment to its purest quantum elements. Using arrays of ultracold atoms as their slits and weak light beams to ensure only one photon scattered per atom, they tuned the quantum states of each atom to control the information gained about a photon’s journey. Every increase in “which-path” information reduced the visibility of the light’s interference pattern, flawlessly matching quantum theory and further debunking Einstein’s proposal.

“Einstein and Bohr would have never thought that this is possible, to perform such an experiment with single atoms and single photons,” study senior author and Nobel laureate, Wolfgang Ketterle, stated in a press release. “What we have done is an idealized Gedanken (thought) experiment.”

In a particularly stunning twist, Ketterle’s group also disproved the necessity of a physical “spring”—a fixture in Einstein’s original analogy—by holding their atomic lattice not with springs, but with light. When they briefly released the atoms, effectively making the slits “float” in space, the same quantum results persisted. “In many descriptions, the springs play a major role. But we show, no, the springs do not matter here; what matters is only the fuzziness of the atoms,” commented MIT researcher Vitaly Fedoseev in a media statement. “Therefore, one has to use a more profound description, which uses quantum correlations between photons and atoms.”

The paper arrives as the world prepares for 2025’s International Year of Quantum Science and Technology — marking 100 years since the birth of quantum mechanics. Yoo Kyung Lee, a fellow co-author, noted in a media statement, “It’s a wonderful coincidence that we could help clarify this historic controversy in the same year we celebrate quantum physics.”

Continue Reading

Space & Physics

Researchers Uncover New Way to Measure Hidden Quantum Interactions in Materials

Published

on

Image credit: Pixabay

A team of MIT scientists has developed a theory-guided strategy to directly measure an elusive quantum property in semiconductors — the electron-phonon interaction — using an often-ignored effect in neutron scattering.

Their approach, published this week in Materials Today Physics, reinterprets an interference effect, typically considered a nuisance in experiments, as a valuable signal. This enables researchers to probe electron-phonon interactions — a key factor influencing a material’s thermal, electrical, and optical behaviour — which until now have been extremely difficult to measure directly.

“Rather than discovering new spectroscopy techniques by pure accident, we can use theory to justify and inform the design of our experiments and our physical equipment,” said Mingda Li, senior author and associate professor at MIT, in a media statement.

By engineering the interference between nuclear and magnetic interactions during neutron scattering, the team demonstrated that the resulting signal is directly proportional to the electron-phonon coupling strength.

“Being able to directly measure the electron-phonon interaction opens the door to many new possibilities,” said MIT graduate student Artittaya Boonkird.

While the current setup produced a weak signal, the findings lay the groundwork for next-generation experiments at more powerful facilities like Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s proposed Second Target Station. The team sees this as a shift in materials science — using theoretical insights to unlock previously “invisible” properties for a range of advanced technologies, from quantum computing to medical devices.

Continue Reading

Trending