Society
Starliner crew challenge rhetoric, says they were never “stranded”
Sunita Williams and Barry Wilmore don’t require a “rescue mission.” The veteran astronauts challenged some misconceptions the public has had about their over-extended stay aboard the International Space Station (ISS), following the Boeing Starliner mishap last June.

Last year on June 5th, NASA astronauts Sunita Williams and Barry Wilmore were on a flight testing mission to dock a Boeing Starliner spaceraft to the International Space Station (ISS). Set to return just eight-days later, their mission met with an ill-fated death. A few thrusters failed, in addition to a helium leak onboard, rendered the Boeing Starliner spacecraft too unsafe for NASA’s liking. The agency’s stubborn refusal to let their astronauts be under harm’s way, meant the Starliner returned to earth later in September without its crew.
In the months passing since then, Williams and Wilmore never left the public gaze. Media headlines and TV news anchors have taken to report the event as a major predicament. This is despite the fact, that the astronauts were neither stranded, nor left alone. Williams and Wilmore weigh in on the issue recently during a live interaction with the media.
“Butch (Barry Wilmore) and I knew this was a test flight,” Sunita Williams said to CBS News. “We knew that we would probably find some things (wrong with Starliner) and we found some stuff, and so that was not a surprise.”
Musk made a statement there that sparked controversy. “They were left up there for political reasons.”
This is not to say the situation the duo found themselves in is unprecedented; for it is indeed unprecedented. When NASA had Boeing Starliner‘s software reconfigured and return to earth in one shape. NASA had the benefit of doubt, given their original assessment was made with the best possible evidence available at the time; and not to compromise upon crew safety. As of latest plans, Williams and Wilmore will return to earth by late-March 2025 at the earliest.
But the rhetoric has reinforced calls to put together a “rescue mission.” SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, who advises incumbent US President Donald Trump, claimed at a Fox News interview that his proposal to bring the astronauts back in September was rejected by the previous administration led by President Joe Biden. Musk made a statement there that sparked controversy. “They were left up there for political reasons.”
Narratives draw ire from the space community
Musk’s comments drew ire from other veteran astronauts. Andreas Mogensen, a former ISS commander during Expedition 70, reacted to Musk’s comment on X to say, “What a lie. And from someone who complains about lack of honesty from the mainstream media.” Musk responded in kind soon there after, aggressively standing his ground. However, the astronauts themselves found the claims unsubstantiated.
According to WCVB Boston, Barry Wilmore himself said, “I have not heard that … I’m not sure that could be the case based on what I know. We came up here with a plan to return, and the plan changed.” NASA themselves had issued a clarification in the aftermath of Musk’s own comments, claiming it had never received a direct proposal from SpaceX for any mission. Nor did they warrant such a “rescue mission”, as now President Trump has called on for.
Political considerations are not a factor in changing the timelines in the ISS expeditions. “The White House was very good about letting us make safety decisions and leaving that to the experts at NASA,” Bloomberg reported Pam Melroy, an ex-NASA administrator involved in the mission, as having said.

Long-exposure photograph taken on July 3, 2024, of the Boeing Starliner docked to the ISS, with the earth in the background | Credit: Matthew Dominick/NASA
“Help us change the rhetoric …”
Risks and derailed plans are part and parcel of space travel, and something space agencies draw backup plans for. Much of the public angst and concern for the astronauts is the loneliness arising from prolonged isolation in space, and fears of mishap with the ISS.
“That is what the human space flight program is; it prepares for any and all contingencies that we can conceive of, and we prepare for those,” Newsweek reports Sunita Williams as having said. Health professionals on ground have helped monitor and manage their physical and psychological fitness. Inadvertently, they contribute to research studying the human body’s ability to adapt in the micro-gravity conditions; as well as psychological resilience and the astronauts’ ability to handle stress. But this is nothing astronauts cannot handle. In fact, Williams compared her situation with that of a tourist. “I call it a little vacation from earth.”
“So if you’ll help us change the rhetoric, help us change the narrative…let’s change it to ‘prepared and committed’ rather than what you’ve been hearing,” WCVB Boston reported Williams as having said.
They have had astronauts from the Crew 8 expedition give them company during the arrival in June, assisting them with their microgravity-based scientific experiments. In September, they were joined by a new party of astronauts of the Crew 9 mission – Roscosmos’ Alexander Gubnov, and NASA’s Nick Hague – replacing the astronauts from Crew 8.
In addition to extra clothing and stockpile of food, NASA had left two extra seats were left empty for Williams and Wilmore to return along with Gubnov and Hague on their return later this March or April, when astronauts from upcoming Crew 10 dock later this month. Given there is a spacecraft docked to the ISS at all time, they have all what it takes to evacuate during an emergency.
“So if you’ll help us change the rhetoric, help us change the narrative…let’s change it to ‘prepared and committed’ rather than what you’ve been hearing,” WCVB Boston reported Williams as having said.
Society
How Scientists and Investigators Decode Air Crashes — The Black Box and Beyond
The final report may take months, but it will be critical in issuing safety directives or revising standard procedures.

As rescue and recovery operations continue following the June 12, 2025, plane crash in Ahmedabad, aviation safety experts are now focusing on the technical investigation phase. With 241 lives lost, the search for the cause isn’t just about accountability—it’s about prevention.
The Black Box: Aviation’s Memory Keeper
1. What Is the Black Box?
Despite the name, the black box is actually orange — for visibility. It consists of two components:
- Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR): Captures conversations and audio from the flight deck.
- Flight Data Recorder (FDR): Logs dozens to hundreds of parameters — speed, altitude, engine status, control inputs.
These devices are housed in titanium or steel and can withstand:
- Temperatures above 1,000°C
- Underwater pressures up to 20,000 feet
- Crashes with up to 3,600 G-force
They also emit underwater locator beacons for up to 30 days.
2. Forensic Engineering & Flight Reconstruction
Beyond black boxes, investigators use:
- Radar data and air traffic control logs
- Wreckage analysis for structural failure clues
- Satellite-based tracking systems like ADS-B
- Weather data for turbulence or wind shear insights
Forensic teams often reconstruct the flight path virtually or even physically using recovered debris to determine failure points.
3. Human Factors & AI in Modern Investigation
New tools like machine learning and human factors analysis are used to identify procedural errors or lapses in judgement.
In many modern investigations, AI helps:
- Filter large datasets (e.g., over 1,000 flight parameters per second)
- Detect patterns missed by the human eye
- Predict similar risk scenarios in future flights
What Happens Next in the Ahmedabad Crash?
Authorities, in coordination with the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), are likely:
- Retrieving and analyzing the black box
- Interviewing air traffic controllers
- Reconstructing the aircraft’s final seconds using both data and simulation
The final report may take months, but it will be critical in issuing safety directives or revising standard procedures.
Society
Researchers Unveil Light-Speed AI Chip to Power Next-Gen Wireless and Edge Devices
This could transform the future of wireless communication and edge computing

In a breakthrough that could transform the future of wireless communication and edge computing, engineers at MIT have developed a novel AI hardware accelerator capable of processing wireless signals at the speed of light. The new optical chip, built for signal classification, achieves nanosecond-level performance—up to 100 times faster than conventional digital processors—while consuming dramatically less energy.
With wireless spectrum under growing strain from billions of connected devices, from teleworking laptops to smart sensors, managing bandwidth has become a critical challenge. Artificial intelligence offers a path forward, but most existing AI models are too slow and power-hungry to operate in real time on wireless devices.
The MIT solution, known as MAFT-ONN (Multiplicative Analog Frequency Transform Optical Neural Network), could be a game-changer.
“There are many applications that would be enabled by edge devices that are capable of analyzing wireless signals,” said Prof. Dirk Englund, senior author of the study, in a media statement. “What we’ve presented in our paper could open up many possibilities for real-time and reliable AI inference. This work is the beginning of something that could be quite impactful.”
Published in Science Advances, the research describes how MAFT-ONN classifies signals in just 120 nanoseconds, using a compact optical chip that performs deep-learning tasks using light rather than electricity. Unlike traditional systems that convert signals to images before processing, the MIT design processes raw wireless data directly in the frequency domain—eliminating delays and reducing energy usage.
“We can fit 10,000 neurons onto a single device and compute the necessary multiplications in a single shot,” said Ronald Davis III, lead author and recent MIT PhD graduate.
The device achieved over 85% accuracy in a single shot, and with multiple measurements, it converges to above 99% accuracy, making it both fast and reliable.
Beyond wireless communications, the technology holds promise for edge AI in autonomous vehicles, smart medical devices, and future 6G networks, where real-time response is critical. By embedding ultra-fast AI directly into devices, this innovation could help cars react to hazards instantly or allow pacemakers to adapt to a patient’s heart rhythm in real-time.
Future work will focus on scaling the chip with multiplexing schemes and expanding its ability to handle more complex AI tasks, including transformer models and large language models (LLMs).
Society
Ahmedabad Plane Crash: The Science Behind Aircraft Take-Off -Understanding the Physics of Flight
Take-off is one of the most critical phases of flight, relying on the precise orchestration of aerodynamics, propulsion, and control systems. Here’s how it works:

On June 12, 2025, a tragic aviation accident struck Ahmedabad, India when a regional passenger aircraft, Air India flight A1-171, crashed during take-off at Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport. According to preliminary reports, the incident resulted in over 200 confirmed casualties, including both passengers and crew members, and several others are critically injured. The aviation community and scientific world now turn their eyes not just toward the cause but also toward understanding the complex science behind what should have been a routine take-off.
How Do Aircraft Take Off?
Take-off is one of the most critical phases of flight, relying on the precise orchestration of aerodynamics, propulsion, and control systems. Here’s how it works:
1. Lift and Thrust
To leave the ground, an aircraft must generate lift, a force that counters gravity. This is achieved through the unique shape of the wing, called an airfoil, which creates a pressure difference — higher pressure under the wing and lower pressure above — according to Bernoulli’s Principle and Newton’s Third Law.
Simultaneously, engines provide thrust, propelling the aircraft forward. Most commercial jets use turbofan engines, which accelerate air through turbines to generate power.
2. Critical Speeds
Before takeoff, pilots calculate critical speeds:
- V1 (Decision Speed): The last moment a takeoff can be safely aborted.
- Vr (Rotation Speed): The speed at which the pilot begins to lift the nose.
- V2 (Takeoff Safety Speed): The speed needed to climb safely even if one engine fails.
If anything disrupts this process — like bird strikes, engine failure, or runway obstructions — the results can be catastrophic.

Environmental and Mechanical Challenges
Factors like wind shear, runway surface condition, mechanical integrity, or pilot error can interfere with safe take-off. Investigators will be analyzing these very aspects in the Ahmedabad case.
The Bigger Picture
Take-off accounts for a small fraction of total flight time but is disproportionately associated with accidents — approximately 14% of all aviation accidents occur during take-off or initial climb.
-
Earth3 months ago
How IIT Kanpur is Paving the Way for a Solar-Powered Future in India’s Energy Transition
-
Space & Physics2 months ago
Could dark energy be a trick played by time?
-
Space & Physics2 months ago
Sunita Williams aged less in space due to time dilation
-
Society4 months ago
DeepSeek: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
-
Earth2 months ago
122 Forests, 3.2 Million Trees: How One Man Built the World’s Largest Miyawaki Forest
-
Space & Physics5 months ago
Obituary: R. Chidambaram, Eminent Physicist and Architect of India’s Nuclear Program
-
Society4 months ago
Sustainable Farming: The Microgreens Model from Kerala, South India
-
Earth4 months ago
Kerala Elephant in Critical Condition After Head Injury: Urgent Medical Attention Needed