EDUNEWS & VIEWS
“One Nation, One Subscription” is a welcome step, in light of publishers’ apathy
Some top journals can be incredibly difficult to access, without paying for subscriptions, that are exorbitant to say the least. Indian scientists know this better than anybody.

On 25th November, the Indian government announced a central scheme to enable public research and education institutions to access scholarly work free of charge. The “One Nation, One Subscription” was earmarked with an initial sum of Rs. 6,000 crores, to cover subscription costs for the next three years. The PIB press release states that over 6,300 government education and research institutions in India will gain access, to the over 13,000 e-journals owned by some 30 international publishers.
Reactions have been positive so far, with many welcoming the move. On X, Dibyendu Nandi, a space physicist at IISER Kolkata, termed the scheme “a step forward in the right direction.” Some top journals can be incredibly difficult to access, without paying for subscriptions, that are exorbitant to say the least. Google Scholar could often the go-to, though rarely do most relevant content be accessible for free. In these cases, research institutions pay for open access to publishing journals.
But this isn’t the norm. Academicians – in the sciences, social sciences and humanities – are kept out of reach, thanks to paywalls that keep scholarships wanting for more liberty. Nonetheless, there are other challenges still remaining, which awaits state intervention to scientists’ call for a more inclusive budget.
Publishing industry’s murky underbelly
India’s arguably the only country with such a relaxed subscription service in place. Usually, departments at universities across the world are hard-pressed to offer students and scholars subscriptions (if at all they do in other places) to journals of a relevant discipline. This means having to pay to view research that occurs in other disciplines, preventing open access to work in interdisciplinary fields. Research ends up in silos by design, which inhibits any substantial progress.
For-profit journals like Springer Nature, and their likes, have excessive fees in place to access their content. Admittedly, not everybody demands for this, definitely not subscription journals. But then subscription journals aren’t lucrative. Nature charges $200 for a single annual subscription, which amounts to nearly Rs. 17,000 in Indian currency (in today’s rate). Meanwhile, open access journals don’t demand authors to pay for publication, but require institutions to pay for them.
But this includes the cream of journals. Scientists in developing countries like India has to pay a lot more to simply have access to the same piece of research. In this light, the government’s decision to waver this fee could ease burden scientists have from participating in research that’s unpopularly symbolic of corporate interference. It’s not like scientists aren’t plagued by other problems that the government isn’t answerable to. Research institutions, even the prominent ones are underfunded for their research programs, have their woes go unheeded for. However, there’s an elephant in the room that’s gone unmentioned in any government communiques.

Credit: Wikimedia
Publishing costs, databases and research in the developing world
There’s a cost accrued to publish papers that institutions have to pay for. Journals don’t publish for free, of course, and there’s cost incurred from conducting peer-reviews, proof-reading work, making illustrations and even doing a press release. It may be worth mentioning to state that an unpaid reviewer could add as much quality and dedication as any other. But scientific publishing has been under close scrutiny over the years, especially with the rise of predatory journals being caught for publishing content without any editorial review.
This isn’t the condition in every journal, but it’s as though the price tag on the journal, say Nature, which is a hybrid journal, makes them more immune from having peer-reviewers or even corporate higher-ups who’d incentivize an exclusive culture that still doesn’t have every quality paper in reach.
Academics have different ways to reach out to their peers, but then institutions pay for this too. In fact, The Hindu, says that some Rs. 30 – 50 crore rupees so far, to access online databases such as SCORPUS and Web of Science, to receive analytics and insights to track citations – building a corpus of related research work. Basically, simply mining papers costs money.
These exorbitant costs cut both ways aside from wanting to simply read papers, in that it diminishes incentives for researchers who’d be doing high-quality research but not have it published in a journal with a higher reach. Corporatization has added to this list of endless concerns on why science in developing countries don’t fare as well compared to their wealthier counterparts. The prices are seen exorbitant for most of the world – conducting research that bears unfair public bias as that being unimportant, and having researchers put away from carrying out ambitious efforts – for which they find no funders, or those who have the zeal to fund any ambitious projects in the first place.
Suffice it to say, scientists in the West do acknowledge this has been a problem, both in terms of having to access themselves personally, since research institutions only provide access for a few select journals, at the cost of viewing research done elsewhere across the globe. So far, dissent has been ineffective, and without options, scientists everywhere choose to publish in other less-known journals, to avoid having to pay off one’s pocket. In this light, the government’s incentives are the right step against limitless greed.
Wanting to be heard
By all means, the government’s action shouldn’t merely come as a savior complex. Indian science needs state support. There are woes in Indian research, that aren’t necessarily contributed purely from talent deficit, as much as it’s from a lack of public finances being used to justify research. The Anusadhan National Research Foundation, which would receive Rs. 50,000 crores in funds, maybe a viable answer, but the elephant in the room is where and how these funds will be distributed and utilized. but there’s a lot more to be addressed.
Scientists, are people, and they’re vulnerable in light of conditions that are too stressful to handle otherwise, and seems a majority of stakeholders in India’s academia has been left out from enter as decision makers in discussions on matters that will affect them, and shape the ecosystem going forward.
Today, academia’s known to suffer from a “publishes or perish” crisis that isn’t making life easy for quality scholarship to thrive for long. And scientists need to be heard, not passively, but as active decision makers. If there’s a message to take away from recent discourse on scientific research in India, it’s that scientists and their institutions are desperate to be heard.
EDUNEWS & VIEWS
India is not in competition with any other nation: ISRO Chief
ISRO Chief V. Narayanan urges youth to lead India’s technological revolution

In a powerful address at the 8th edition of the Chhatra Sansad India Conclave (CSI), ISRO (Indian Space Research Organisation) Chairman V. Narayanan inspired over 20,000 young minds to push boundaries and take India to new heights in space exploration and scientific innovation. His message was clear: the nation’s future in technology will be shaped by the youth, and they are crucial in propelling India to the forefront of global advancements.
In his keynote, V. Narayanan, Chairman of ISRO, spoke about India’s ongoing strides in space exploration. He emphasized that India is not in competition with any other nation but is focused solely on advancing its own technological progress. “India’s future is in the hands of its youth. You are the driving force behind the country’s technological and scientific transformation,” Narayanan said, calling for continued innovation in space research.
The conclave, held at Lovely Professional University, gathered influential leaders, policymakers, and thinkers under the theme “Vision India 2047: Bharat @ 100.” The event was a platform for dynamic conversations about India’s growth and the role youth will play in shaping the nation’s future as it approaches its centenary of independence.
Dr. Ashok Kumar Mittal, Member of Indian Parliament and Founder Chancellor of LPU, set the tone for the event, urging the youth to embrace their power to reshape India’s trajectory. He highlighted LPU’s commitment to nurturing future leaders who will lead the country in global arenas.

Other prominent speakers at the conclave included Smriti Irani, former Union Minister, who encouraged the youth to leverage their talents to build businesses and enterprises that would drive India’s economic future. Motivational speaker Jaya Kishori inspired attendees to embody discipline, values, and purpose-driven action, while Temjen Imna Along, Minister of Tourism & Higher Education for Nagaland, spoke of an inclusive India where progress benefits all regions and communities.
The event also saw insightful video messages from several distinguished figures, including Nitin Gadkari, India’s Union Minister for Road Transport and Highways, and Vikrant Massey, Indian actor, emphasizing the role of youth in the ongoing digital revolution and India’s rise on the global stage.
A key feature of the conclave was a thought-provoking debate on “One Nation, One Election,” which sparked discussions on the potential impact of a unified electoral system on India’s future governance. The debate, chaired by Maulana Kalbe Rushaid Rizvi, allowed students to actively contribute their views on shaping India’s democratic structure.
EDUNEWS & VIEWS
‘Blue Ghost’ soft-lands on the moon in one shape
With Blue Ghost’s successful soft-landing, Firefly Aerospace has become only the first private company ever to have a lunar probe intact on the lunar surface.

On March 2, NASA confirmed the first ever successful soft-landing attempt by a private company. Firefly Aerospace’s lunar lander, the Blue Ghost Mission 1 (named after a rare species of fireflies thought native to the United States), touched down at precisely 2.04 p.m. IST, near Mons Latrielle at Mare Crisium on the moon’s near side. Firefly Aerospace issued a press release shortly thereafter.
The soft-landing comes after another US-based private company, Intuitive Machines, attempted one a year ago. On that occasion however, the lander, known as Odyssey, bounced off hard on the lunar surface at touchdown, following a steep descent. It rested titled with a stray lunar rock to offer a shoulder. In contrast, Blue Ghost which stuck both an upright landing, and its payloads intact.
The landing was the culmination of a 45 day trip that began early this year. On January 15, Blue Ghost blasted to space aboard a SpaceX’s Falcon 9 Block 5 from NASA’s Kennedy Space Centre, Florida. Sharing space during the launch was yet another commercial lunar lander, the Hakuto-R Mission 2 – built and operated by the Japanese space technology company, ispace. However, Hakuto-R has a projected landing date on the moon sometime in April, owing to a different arrival approach.
Firefly had released pictures of the lunar terrain, the Blue Ghost‘s photographed from its landing site. One of them shows a rugged gray dusty terrain, with a portion of the lander’s chassis in view in the foreground. Whereas a second one showed a desolate terrain with the earth reflecting sunlight above the horizon. Blue Ghost‘s shadow looms in the foreground in the image.
This site located close to Mons Latrielle, is what scientists think is an ancient basin formed upon a rogue asteroid impact eons ago. More than 500 km wide, Mare Crisium, as the basin is known by, is believed to have been flooded by lava in volcanic eruptions dating to some 4 billion years ago.

The SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket that carried Firefly Aerospace’s lunar lander, Blue Ghost Mission 1, is seen stationed here at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center, Florida | Credit: NASA
Laying groundwork for NASA’s Artemis
“Firefly is literally and figuratively over the Moon,” Jason Kim, CEO of Firefly Aerospace, said shortly after the landing, in a press release. “Our Blue Ghost lunar lander now has a permanent home on the lunar surface with 10 NASA payloads and a plaque with every Firefly employee’s name. This bold, unstoppable team has proven we’re well equipped to deliver reliable, affordable access to the Moon, and we won’t stop there. With annual lunar missions, Firefly is paving the way for a lasting lunar presence that will help unlock access to the rest of the solar system for our nations, our partners, and the world.”
In 2023, Firefly Aerospace ferried the instruments as part of a $93.3 million contract signed with NASA as part of the Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program. The CLPS program is Nasa’s attempt at driving private participation on future lunar missions. But the payloads help set stage for NASA’s Artemis program, which would mark their first attempt since the Apollo program, to land astronauts on the lunar surface.
Some of the payloads reflect the new engineering demands for such long-term lunar missions. To streamline tracking lander and rovers on the moon, NASA supplied the Lunar GNSS Receiver Experiment (LuGRE). It is a GNSS receiver to help earth-orbiting satellite constellations, including GPS and the Galileo, track the lunar lander with high accuracy in real-time. Another one is the Regolith Adherence Characterization (RAC) that investigates possible soil degradation left behind in the wake of a typical lunar mission soft-landing.
Other payloads were designed to explore various science objectives. Research institutes and universities across the United States contributed to a variety of instruments. They included laser retro reflectors to measure distances, an x-ray imaging device to study how the solar wind affects space weather on earth; a probe which can inject itself into the moon’s sub-surface to measure heat dissipation.
In a press release applauding Blue Ghost’s successful soft-landing attempt, NASA’s acting administrator, Janet Petro, said, “This incredible achievement demonstrates how Nasa and American companies are leading the way in space exploration for the benefit of all … We have already learned many lessons – and the technological and science demonstrations onboard Firefly’s Blue Ghost Mission 1 will improve our ability to not only discover more science, but to ensure the safety of our spacecraft instruments for future human exploration – both in the short term and long term.”
EDUNEWS & VIEWS
Indian kids use different math skills at work vs. school
The research, which involved over 200 children, compared the performances of children engaged in market work with those focused solely on their studies

A recent study conducted in Delhi sheds light on the contrasting mathematical abilities of children who work in markets versus those who attend school, raising questions about how educational systems can better address these disparities. The research, which involved over 200 children, compared the performances of children engaged in market work with those focused solely on their studies.
In the study, children were tasked with solving math problems under various conditions. Remarkably, 85 percent of children with market jobs were able to answer a complex market transaction problem correctly, while only 10 percent of their school-going counterparts succeeded in solving a similar question. However, when the same group was given simple division and subtraction problems, with pencil and paper for assistance, the results shifted. Fifty-nine percent of school kids solved the problems correctly, while only 45 percent of market-working children did.
The researchers also introduced a word problem involving a boy buying vegetables at the market. One-third of market-working children successfully solved the problem without any aid, whereas fewer than 1 percent of schoolchildren were able to do the same. This stark difference in performance highlights the potential benefits that practical, real-world experience in the marketplace can offer.
Why, then, do nonworking students seem to struggle more under market conditions?
“They learned an algorithm but didn’t understand it,” said researcher Abhijit Banerjee, explaining the phenomenon. On the other hand, market-working children appeared to have developed useful strategies for managing transactions. One notable example was their use of rounding to simplify calculations. For instance, when faced with multiplying 43 by 11, many market kids would round 43 to 40, multiply by 10, and then add 43 to get the correct result of 473—an intuitive trick that seemed to help them tackle problems more efficiently.
“The market kids are able to exploit base 10, so they do better on base 10 problems,” said Esther Duflo, co-author of the study. “The school kids have no idea. It makes no difference to them.” Conversely, the schoolchildren demonstrated a better understanding of formal written methods for division and subtraction.
The findings raise an important issue: while market-working children excel in solving real-world problems quickly, they may be missing out on the formal education necessary for long-term academic success. “It would likely be better for the long-term futures if they also did well in school and wound up with a high school degree or better,” Banerjee said.
The divide between the intuitive problem-solving skills of market kids and the formal methods taught in school suggests that a new approach could be beneficial in the classroom. Banerjee suspects that traditional teaching methods, which often prioritize a single, formal approach to solving problems, may be limiting. He advocates for encouraging students to reason their way toward an approximation of the correct answer, a method that aligns more closely with the informal strategies used by market-working children.
Despite these concerns, Duflo emphasized, “We don’t want to blame the teachers. It’s not their fault. They are given a strict curriculum to follow, and strict methods to follow.”
The question remains: how can schools adjust their teaching methods to better support students’ diverse problem-solving strategies? The research team is actively exploring new experiments to address this issue, with the goal of creating a more inclusive and effective educational system.
“These findings highlight the importance of educational curricula that bridge the gap between intuitive and formal mathematics,” the authors concluded.
The study was supported by the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab’s Post-Primary Education Initiative, the Foundation Blaise Pascal, and the AXA Research Fund.
-
EDUNEWS & VIEWS5 months ago
India: Big Science in the 20th century and beyond
-
Interviews5 months ago
Memory Formation Unveiled: An Interview with Sajikumar Sreedharan
-
Space & Physics6 months ago
Nobel laureates in Physics recognized for contributions to Machine Learning
-
Society5 months ago
Global tech alliance: Nvidia partners with Reliance to transform AI landscape in India
-
Space & Physics6 months ago
Pioneers of modern Artificial Intelligence
-
The Sciences5 months ago
Prof Saleem Badat awarded ASSAf Science-for-Society Gold Medal
-
Earth5 months ago
The wildfires, floods, and heatwaves: Understanding the science behind climate change
-
Space & Physics6 months ago
India’s quantum leap: The future of computing and research