Space & Physics
Superconducting Saga: What happened to LK-99?
The community of condensed matter physicists was put under spotlight in the wake of a paper, triggering a frenzy like none other in recent times.

In July 2023, two South Korean experimental physicists, Lee Sukbae and Kim Ji-Hoon published a pre-print in arXiv, claiming discovery of superconductivity in a sample, occurring at room temperature.
The condensed matter physics community was put under spotlight in the wake of this paper, triggering a frenzy like none other in recent times.
The material dubbed, LK-99, after the initials of the South Korean physicists, promised nothing short of a revolution to the electronics industry.
But before I go further, let’s go through some superconductivity basics.
What are superconductors?
Basically, superconductivity is a macroscopic quantum phenomenon. Our story begins with two ground-breaking experiments.
In 1911, the Dutch physicist, Heike Onnes observed that a mercury wire dipped in liquid helium, offered zero resistance to the passage of electricity, when the temperature of the mercury was lowered to-269◦ C.
In 1937, Pyotr Kapitsa, John F. Allen and Don Misener discovered that at an even lower temperature close to -273◦ C, liquid helium-4 transformed into a superfluid. A superfluid’s an exotic fluid exhibiting zero viscosity.
Both these exotic phenomena of superfluidity and superconductivity are closely linked, though they’re not the same.

However, this effect would go for years without a solid theory, until the physicists’ trio, John Bardeen, Leon Cooper and John Schrieffer, put together a ‘complete’ microscopic theory, known as the ‘BCS theory’. The theory makes a number of quantitative predictions about the behavior of superconductors. Most importantly, it shows how pairs of electrons would couple to form Cooper pairs, overcoming mutual repulsion below a set critical temperature. Bardeen, Cooper and Schrieffer would go on to win the 1972’s Nobel Prize in Physics for this work.
As much as superconductors revolutionized the electronics industry in the 20th century, the temperatures at which this effect is commonly seen is in the same regime as outer space. It takes resources for laboratories to reach these temperatures. But imagine if nature showed us a material that can become a superconductor at room temperature …
The case for ‘room temperature’ superconductors
But you may be wondering what’s the big deal with room temperature superconductors anyway? For one, they’re promising an overnight revolution of sorts in the electronics industry. The approximately 7% loss of energy there is to pass currents through wires during transportation, can be brought down to near zero with room temperature superconductors. Another important use of these superconductors would be in the development of strong magnetic fields. Strong stable magnetic fields are used in MRI imaging and maglev trains.

Source: Ramon Salinero / Unsplash
This could make such technologies more accessible and cheaper to the public. Renewable energy generation from solar and wind power could see their efficiency rise with the help of room-temperature superconductors. The use of room-temperature superconductors could grow exponentially more after its discovery, even in applications we do not know yet. Think of the world today without any semiconductors, it would be tough to live without our LED lamps or solar panels. Similarly, room temperature superconductors could inexorably revolutionize our way of living for the better. I mean, who knows? Nobody knows! It’s yet to be invented.
Sukbae and Kim claimed that LK-99 displayed superconductivity when the temperature dropped below 127◦ C. They claimed to have observed zero resistance currents.
And that was all it took for social media savvy tech entrepreneurs to embark on a hype train, and spread the word on room temperature superconductors potentially being real at last. Except it’s not technically room temperature – for 127◦ C is way past the boiling point of water. But it’s much easier for laboratories to set up an experiment, investigate and replicate 127◦ C.
The dream fever isn’t abating away, but the proof really is in the pudding.
There’s nothing to say room temperature superconductors can’t exist. In fact, scientists who worked in producing these results have also shared this opinion in their work.
Conventional superconductivity – with extreme cold critical temperatures – was challenged back in 1986, when certain cuprate compounds such as yttirium barium copper oxide (or YBCO) were discovered. They have a higher critical temperature of -183◦ C, which is still very cold, but still warmer compared to helium-4. Such critical temperatures are outside the realm of the standard BCS theory, with the main mechanisms underpinning them being a topic of research.
The race for verification
After their paper was submitted in arXiv, Sukbae and Kim released a video of the levitating LK-99 sample on a magnet – a hallmark signature of the Meissner effect. The Meissner effect is a prediction of the standard BCS theory – when magnetic field lines are ousted from within the material itself.
They provided a detailed description of how LK-99 can be synthesised. This led materials labs from across the world to descend into a frenzy to try and replicate their results.
Some of the earliest research were done at the National Physics Laboratory (NPL) in New Delhi and Beihang University in Beijing (BU).
A team from the Southeast University in Nanjing, observed a near-zero resistance in LK-99 at -163 ◦ C. The team from Nanjing used an X-ray diffraction technique consistent with the work that the Korean scientists had published.
And then the theorists entered the fray. Sinead Griffin from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, US, performed calculations to suggest there really were telltale signs of room temperature super conductance in LK-99. Specifically, possible mechanisms for forming Cooper pairs were identified.
While these results were tantalising, they did not give conclusive evidence of superconductivity.
The Meissner effect – or what the South Koreans claimed was the Meissner effect- couldn’t be replicated in any other studies.
Griffin attained social media popularity after her tweets with over 14K followers on X. However, truth be told – Griffith wasn’t explicitly backing anybody – but was merely giving the South Koreans’ work a fair shot.
The last twist in the saga came when she said, “My paper did *not* prove nor give evidence of superconductivity”.
Realization dawns
And suddenly, it wasn’t going in LK-99’s favour at all. It turned out the research team at Southeast University in Nanjing, had made incorrect measurements using faulty instrumentation, meaning they were unreliable.
Whereas, the studies from India’s National Physical Laboratory (NPL) and Beihang University didn’t find report any superconductivity effect. In fact, it just seemed like dull, grey metal.
But the final series of nails in the coffin were the conclusive results by Yuan Li at Peking Institute, and Yi Jiang at the Donostia International Physics Centre, Spain. They proved beyond doubt that LK-99, as synthesised by the South Korean team, was a ferromagnet. Yuan Li also explained the levitating video of LK-99 pellets over a magnet was a result of ferromagnetism. He also showed the absence of superconducting current at low temperatures.

A ferrofluid exhibiting ferromagnetic properties; Source: Etienne Desclides / Unsplash
Science is often rife with controversies and debatable results. Many physicists have published unconfirmed, and published plagiarized work. Some notable examples include the alleged groundbreaking work of Jan Schön, who claimed discovery of organic transistors. Only to be charged with fraud after he made up his results, thus bringing him disrepute that brought an end to his scientific career pretty early on.
Then there was the work by Anshu Pandey and Dev Thapa on similar claims of room temperature superconductors that weren’t replicated.
Although it’s unfortunate that this saga ended so disappointingly with LK-99, I am not, in any manner suggestive of the fact that room-temperature superconductivity cannot exist.
Scientists who worked in producing these results have also shared this opinion in their work. Many scientists have however also shared the need to understand the results and related nitty gritty, before jumping the gun.
However, the collaboration amongst scientists at universities across the world, was focused on uncovering LK-99’s true properties.
It wasn’t just mere claims, backed by data, but also the peer-review process that helped redefine public discourse, and set the facts straight. And that had made all the difference.
Space & Physics
This Sodium-Fuelled Clean Energy Breakthrough Could Electrify Aviation and Shipping
The innovation offers more than triple the energy density of today’s lithium-ion batteries — potentially clearing a major hurdle for electric-powered aviation, rail, and maritime travel

A new type of fuel cell developed by MIT researchers could represent a pivotal breakthrough in the race to decarbonize heavy transportation. Designed around liquid sodium metal, the innovation offers more than triple the energy density of today’s lithium-ion batteries — potentially clearing a major hurdle for electric-powered aviation, rail, and maritime travel.
Unlike traditional batteries that require time-consuming recharging, this system operates like a fuel cell that can be refueled quickly using liquid sodium — a cheap, abundant substance derived from salt. The technology, which uses air as a reactant and a solid ceramic electrolyte to facilitate the reaction, was tested in lab prototypes and demonstrated energy densities exceeding 1,500 watt-hours per kilogram — a level that could enable regional electric flight and clean shipping.
“We expect people to think that this is a totally crazy idea,” said Professor Yet-Ming Chiang, lead author and Kyocera Professor of Ceramics, in a media statement. “If they didn’t, I’d be a bit disappointed because if people don’t think something is totally crazy at first, it probably isn’t going to be that revolutionary.”
Chiang explained that current lithium-ion batteries top out at around 300 watt-hours per kilogram — far short of the 1,000 watt-hours needed for electric aircraft to become viable at scale. The new sodium-based cell meets that benchmark, which could enable 80% of domestic flights and drastically reduce aviation’s carbon footprint.
Moreover, the sodium-fueled system offers environmental benefits beyond zero emissions. Its chemical byproduct, sodium oxide, reacts spontaneously in the atmosphere to capture carbon dioxide and convert it into sodium bicarbonate — better known as baking soda — which may help counteract ocean acidification if it ends up in marine environments.
“There’s this natural cascade of reactions that happens when you start with sodium metal,” Chiang said. “It’s all spontaneous. We don’t have to do anything to make it happen, we just have to fly the airplane.”
The team has already created two functioning lab-scale prototypes: one vertical and one horizontal model. In both, sodium gradually reacts with oxygen from air to generate electricity, and a moist air stream improves the process by allowing liquid byproducts to be expelled more easily.
Karen Sugano, one of the MIT doctoral students on the project, noted, “The key was that we can form this liquid discharge product and remove it easily, as opposed to the solid discharge that would form in dry conditions,” she said in a media statement.
The researchers have founded a startup, Propel Aero, housed in MIT’s startup incubator The Engine, to scale the technology. Their first commercial goal: a brick-sized fuel cell capable of powering a large agricultural drone — expected to be ready within a year.
Chiang emphasized the economic and safety benefits of using sodium, which melts just below 100°C and was once mass-produced in the U.S. for leaded gasoline production. “It reminds us that sodium metal was once produced at large scale and safely handled and distributed around the U.S.,” he said.
Critically, the fuel cell design also avoids many safety concerns of high-energy batteries by physically separating the fuel and oxidizer. “If you’re pushing for really, really high energy density, you’d rather have a fuel cell than a battery for safety reasons,” Chiang said.
By reviving and reimagining sodium-metal chemistry in a practical, scalable form, the MIT team may have lit the path toward clean, electrified transportation systems — from the skies above to the oceans below.
Space & Physics
Is Time Travel Possible? Exploring the Science Behind the Concept
Subtle forms of time travel — such as time dilation — do occur and have practical implications in science and technology.

Everyone is, in a way, a time traveller. Whether we like it or not, we are constantly moving through time — one second per second. From one birthday to the next, we travel through time at a steady pace, just like walking one foot per footstep. However, when we talk about “time travel,” we often imagine something much more dramatic — traveling faster (or even backward) through time, as seen in science fiction movies and novels. But is such a thing truly possible?
From Fiction to Science
The concept of time travel first gained widespread attention through literature, particularly with H.G. Wells’ 1895 novel The Time Machine. In it, time is described as the fourth dimension, akin to space, and the protagonist travels forward and backward in time using a specially built machine. Interestingly, this idea predates Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which would later reshape how we understand space and time.

Einstein’s Contribution: Relativity and Time Dilation
In the early 20th century, Albert Einstein introduced a revolutionary idea through his theory of relativity. He proposed that space and time are interconnected, forming a four-dimensional continuum called space-time. According to his theory, the speed of light (186,000 miles per second) is the ultimate speed limit in the universe. But how does this relate to time travel?
Einstein’s theory states that as you move faster — especially at speeds approaching the speed of light — time slows down relative to someone who is stationary. This phenomenon, known as time dilation, has been proven through various experiments. One famous example involved two synchronized atomic clocks — one placed on Earth and the other onboard a high-speed jet. When the plane returned, the onboard clock showed slightly less time had passed compared to the one on the ground. This demonstrates that, at very high speeds, time passes more slowly.
Astronaut Twins and Time
A notable example of time dilation involved twin astronauts Scott and Mark Kelly. Scott spent 520 days aboard the International Space Station, while Mark spent only 54 days in space. Due to the effects of time dilation, Scott aged slightly less than Mark — by about 5 milliseconds. Though this difference is minuscule, it is real and measurable, showing that time can indeed “bend” under certain conditions.
The GPS Example
Surprisingly, even GPS satellites experience time differently than we do on Earth. These satellites orbit at altitudes of about 20,200 kilometers and travel at speeds of roughly 14,000 km/h. Due to both their speed (special relativity) and weaker gravitational pull at high altitudes (general relativity), time ticks slightly faster for the satellites than for devices on Earth. This discrepancy is corrected using Einstein’s equations to ensure precise positioning. Without these adjustments, GPS systems could be off by several miles each day.
Science Fiction vs. Scientific Reality
Science fiction has long explored imaginative time travel — characters jumping into machines and traveling decades into the future or past. Stories often depict them altering historical events or witnessing the far future. However, there is no scientific evidence that anyone has travelled backward or forward in time in such a dramatic way.
Renowned physicist Stephen Hawking addressed this idea humorously in 2009. He hosted a party for time travellers — but only announced it afterward, reasoning that if time travel were possible, people from the future would show up. No one came. Hawking took this as a tongue-in-cheek sign that backward time travel may not be feasible.
Could Wormholes Be the Key?
Theoretical physics does suggest possibilities like wormholes — shortcuts through space-time. According to Einstein’s equations, these could, in theory, connect distant places and times. A wormhole might allow someone to enter at one point in space and exit at another, potentially in a different time. However, this remains purely speculative. The extreme gravitational forces within black holes or wormholes could destroy anything attempting to pass through.
Moreover, the idea of backward time travel introduces major paradoxes — such as the classic “grandfather paradox,” where someone goes back in time and prevents their own existence. Such contradictions challenge our understanding of causality and logic.
The Limitations of Current Science
At present, building a time machine capable of transporting people backward or forward in time by centuries remains outside the realm of scientific possibility. It’s a concept best enjoyed in novels and films for now. However, subtle forms of time travel — such as time dilation — do occur and have practical implications in science and technology.
While we may not have DeLoreans or TARDISes at our disposal, time travel — at least in small, measurable ways — is a part of our reality. The interplay of speed, gravity, and time demonstrates that our universe is far more flexible than it appears. And who knows? In some distant corner of the cosmos, nature might already be bending time in ways we are only beginning to imagine.
Until then, we’ll keep moving forward — one second per second.
Space & Physics
MIT Physicists Capture First-Ever Images of Freely Interacting Atoms in Space
The new technique allows scientists to visualize real-time quantum behavior by momentarily freezing atoms in motion and illuminating them with precisely tuned lasers

In an intriguing advancement for quantum physics, MIT researchers have captured the first images of individual atoms freely interacting in space — a feat that until now was only predicted theoretically.
The new imaging technique, developed by a team led by Professor Martin Zwierlein, allows scientists to visualize real-time quantum behavior by momentarily freezing atoms in motion and illuminating them with precisely tuned lasers. Their results, published in Physical Review Letters, reveal how bosons bunch together and fermions pair up in free space — phenomena crucial to understanding superconductivity and other quantum states of matter.
“We are able to see single atoms in these interesting clouds of atoms and what they are doing in relation to each other, which is beautiful,” said Zwierlein in a press statement.
Using their method — called “atom-resolved microscopy” — the team was able to trap atom clouds with a loose laser, briefly immobilize them with a lattice of light, and then image their positions via fluorescence. This approach allowed the researchers to observe quantum behaviors at the level of individual atoms for the first time.
The MIT group directly visualized sodium atoms (bosons) bunching together in a shared quantum wave — a vivid confirmation of the de Broglie wave theory — and lithium atoms (fermions) pairing up despite their natural repulsion, a key mechanism underlying superconductivity.
“This kind of pairing is the basis of a mathematical construction people came up with to explain experiments. But when you see pictures like these, it’s showing in a photograph, an object that was discovered in the mathematical world,” said co-author Richard Fletcher in a press statement.
Two other research teams — one led by Nobel laureate Wolfgang Ketterle at MIT, and another by Tarik Yefsah at École Normale Supérieure — also reported similar quantum imaging breakthroughs in the same journal issue, marking a significant moment in the experimental visualization of quantum mechanics.
The MIT team plans to expand the technique to probe more exotic quantum behaviors, including quantum Hall states. “Now we can verify whether these cartoons of quantum Hall states are actually real,” Zwierlein added. “Because they are pretty bizarre states.”
-
Earth3 months ago
How IIT Kanpur is Paving the Way for a Solar-Powered Future in India’s Energy Transition
-
Space & Physics2 months ago
Could dark energy be a trick played by time?
-
Society3 months ago
Starliner crew challenge rhetoric, says they were never “stranded”
-
Society4 months ago
DeepSeek: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
-
Space & Physics5 months ago
Obituary: R. Chidambaram, Eminent Physicist and Architect of India’s Nuclear Program
-
Space & Physics2 months ago
Sunita Williams aged less in space due to time dilation
-
Society4 months ago
Sustainable Farming: The Microgreens Model from Kerala, South India
-
EDUNEWS & VIEWS4 months ago
Indian kids use different math skills at work vs. school