Connect with us

Society

DeepSeek: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly

While being hailed as a new disruption in the tech world, DeepSeek also has its share of the good, the bad, and the ugly. Let’s take a closer look

Dipin Damodharan

Published

on

AI-created illustration

On January 27, a black Monday, $593 billion of NVIDIA’s value was wiped out. The culprit? A little-known Chinese startup, DeepSeek. It has now outpaced even ChatGPT, a US-based popular generative artificial intelligence chatbot, in terms of downloads from the App Store. While being hailed as a new disruption in the tech world, DeepSeek also has its share of the good, the bad, and the ugly. Let’s take a closer look.

Consider this: Every year, 1,000 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of energy is used by an average household in India for electricity. By 2026, America is expected to use the equivalent energy of 2.5 million Indian households just for artificial intelligence (AI) activities. This will total around 270 terawatt-hours of energy. These numbers come from the World Economic Forum. However, the energy used by AI technologies, or rather the costs involved, often go unnoticed.

It is against this backdrop that DeepSeek, a Chinese AI chatbot, emerged as a disruptive product. While it may be called a Chinese startup, it is, in fact, a politically-driven product launched with careful planning and state backing. Compared to ChatGPT, the revolutionary AI tool launched by US-based OpenAI, DeepSeek’s energy consumption and costs are significantly lower. This is the most important (the good) aspect of DeepSeek. Let’s explore why.

The Rise of ChatGPT

ChatGPT, launched in 2022, reached 100 million users within two months. That’s, indeed, a significant achievement. Later, it even challenged Google, the search engine giant, in its dominance.

But have you ever thought about what happens to nature when you ask ChatGPT a question? ChatGPT’s energy consumption has a substantial environmental impact. Each time you ask ChatGPT a question, it consumes 0.0029 kWh of electricity. This is ten times more than a Google search, which consumes just 0.0003 kWh of electricity, according to the Electric Power Research Institute.

To put it simply, while DeepSeek may offer a more energy-efficient AI solution with impressive results, it also carries with it concerns about transparency, ethical usage, and political censorship

Annually, ChatGPT uses 226.82 million kWh of electricity just to answer user queries. With this much energy, you could fully charge 313 million electric vehicles or charge 47.87 million iPhones for a year.

And the cost? A whopping $29.71 million per year. OpenAI spends this amount every year just to answer users’ questions on ChatGPT.

Training and High Costs

ChatGPT works based on large language models that are trained on vast amounts of data. This training requires massive energy consumption. During the training period of ChatGPT-3, a total of 1,287,000 kWh of electricity was used over 34 days. When it came to training GPT-4, the consumption skyrocketed to 62,318,800 kWh over 100 days—48 times more than GPT-3.

ChatGPT, which was introduced to the public in November 2022, became an instant sensation. It’s a chatbot based on a technology called Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT), designed to generate a variety of content, including dialogues.

Energy consumption
>> OpenAI spends $29.71 million every year just to answer users’ questions on ChatGPT.
>> During the training period of ChatGPT-3, a total of 1,287,000 kWh of electricity was used over 34 days
>> When it came to training GPT-4, the consumption skyrocketed to 62,318,800 kWh over 100 days—48 times more than GPT-3

The success of ChatGPT significantly boosted OpenAI’s market value. OpenAI was founded in 2015 by prominent figures like Sam Altman and Elon Musk, aiming to explore the potential of artificial intelligence. Musk eventually left the company, and Sam Altman is the current CEO.

Meanwhile, DeepSeek V-3 required only 836,400 kWh of energy. As reported by tech entrepreneur Joy Sebastian on Facebook, leading companies use tens of thousands of NVIDIA H100 GPUs for AI training and model operation. This heavy investment helped NVIDIA reach the top of the market value charts. AI development, which demands such immense resources, seemed out of reach even for multi-billion-dollar companies.

It was here that DeepSeek amazed the world by entering the AI space with a relatively modest investment of $5 million, offering a model that competes with the best. DeepSeek is said to deliver better results than GPT-4 in several areas.

Top global companies typically use supercomputers with over 16,000 chips for their chatbot training. However, DeepSeek engineers stated that they only needed about 2,000 NVIDIA chips, according to a report in The New York Times.

Given this, it’s clear that AI technologies need to be studied carefully in terms of their energy sources. According to a report from the World Economic Forum, tech giant Microsoft has seen a 30% increase in carbon emissions since 2020, largely due to the growth of AI-powered data centers. This makes DeepSeek’s low energy usage a significant advantage.

The Bad Thing

China is notorious for copying innovations, from electronics to cars and social media platforms. OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, has confirmed that DeepSeek trained its AI model using ChatGPT’s framework. This has led to some controversy, with OpenAI stating that they have evidence of this. Microsoft, a major investor in OpenAI, has initiated an investigation into the issue. Despite the US imposing restrictions on product exports to China, DeepSeek continued its operations using NVIDIA chips. It’s been reported that DeepSeek had stockpiled around 50,000 NVIDIA A100 chips before the ban took effect. However, some reports suggest that DeepSeek only used 2,000 chips for training its AI model. This is in stark contrast to major companies that use 16,000 specialized chips. Yet, there’s still a lack of clarity regarding which chips were actually used in DeepSeek’s operations, as commented by figures like Elon Musk.

The Ugly

While both Google and AI-powered ChatGPT became popular due to their openness and transparency, the same cannot be said for DeepSeek. A major issue is its refusal to answer sensitive political questions, especially those that are inconvenient for the Chinese government. Ask about the Tiananmen Square massacre or Chinese authoritarianism, and DeepSeek will respond with, “Let’s talk about something else.” Regardless of its other advantages, this undemocratic and regressive approach is a major flaw that could affect its global acceptance.

This was the response from Deepseek when we asked about the Tiananmen Square protests

To put it simply, while DeepSeek may offer a more energy-efficient AI solution with impressive results, it also raises concerns about transparency, ethical usage, and political censorship. It’s a reminder that in the world of AI, the good, the bad, and the ugly are often intertwined.

Dipin is the Co-founder and Editor-in-Chief of EdPublica. A journalist and editor with over 15 years of experience leading and co-founding both print and digital media outlets, he has written extensively on education, politics, and culture. His work has appeared in global publications such as The Huffington Post, The Himalayan Times, DailyO, Education Insider, and others.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

EDUNEWS & VIEWS

Harvard Pledges $250 Million for Research After Federal Funding Slash

The administration has defended the funding freeze as part of a broader campaign to address what it characterizes as pervasive anti-Semitism on campuses and to roll back diversity programs

Published

on

Image credit: Kalhh from Pixabay

Harvard University has announced a $250 million investment to sustain vital research programs in the face of steep federal funding cuts imposed by the Trump administration.
The move follows a sweeping $2.6 billion reduction in government grants to the Ivy League institution, citing alleged discriminatory practices and refusal to comply with federal oversight mandates. The cuts, which Harvard is actively challenging in court, have already suspended or canceled dozens of projects—some of which were considered critical to public health and technological innovation.

University President Alan Garber and Provost John Manning issued a joint statement on Wednesday, emphasizing the urgent need to protect research initiatives. “While we cannot fully offset the financial blow from halted federal support, we are committed to backing essential research during this transitional period,” they said. The university is also working with faculty to secure alternative funding channels.

Harvard has strongly criticized the federal measures, calling the termination of grants “unlawful” and accusing the administration of interfering with academic independence. The university contends that the loss of funding not only halts groundbreaking work but also threatens years of scientific progress.

At the heart of the dispute is a broader political clash over university governance. Harvard, whose endowment reached $53.2 billion in 2024, has become a focal point of the Trump administration’s efforts to reshape higher education policy. The White House has demanded greater control over admissions, hiring, and the political climate on campus—demands Harvard has resisted.

The administration has defended the funding freeze as part of a broader campaign to address what it characterizes as pervasive anti-Semitism on campuses and to roll back diversity programs. Critics argue these moves are part of a larger effort to suppress progressive academic culture and penalize dissent over U.S. foreign policy, especially in light of recent student protests against the war in Gaza.

In recent weeks, federal authorities have also taken steps to revoke visas of international students involved in these demonstrations, accusing them of ties to militant organizations—allegations civil rights groups and university leaders have strongly disputed.

With tensions between the federal government and top academic institutions mounting, Harvard’s legal challenge could set a precedent for how universities navigate political interference while safeguarding research, free speech, and academic autonomy.

Continue Reading

Health

Robot Helps Elderly Sit, Stand, and Stay Safe from Falls

The innovation comes at a time when the United States faces a dramatic demographic shift

Published

on

Image credit: MIT News/ Courtesy of the researchers

As America’s population ages faster than ever before, a team of engineers at MIT is turning to robotics to meet the growing eldercare crisis. Their latest invention, the Elderly Bodily Assistance Robot—or E-BAR—aims to provide critical physical support to seniors navigating life at home, potentially reducing the risk of injury and relieving pressure on a strained care system.

The innovation comes at a time when the United States faces a dramatic demographic shift. The nation’s median age has climbed to 38.9, nearly ten years older than in 1980. By 2050, the number of adults over 65 is projected to surge from 58 million to 82 million. As demand for care rises, the country is simultaneously grappling with shortages in care workers, escalating healthcare costs, and evolving family structures that leave many elderly adults without daily support.

“Eldercare is the next great challenge,” said Roberto Bolli, a graduate student in MIT’s Department of Mechanical Engineering and one of E-BAR’s lead designers, in a media statement. “All the demographic trends point to a shortage of caregivers, a surplus of elderly persons, and a strong desire for elderly persons to age in place.”

E-BAR is designed to address exactly that challenge. The mobile robot acts as a robotic support system, following a user from behind and offering both steadying handlebars and rapid intervention in case of a fall. It can support a person’s full weight and includes side airbags that inflate instantly to catch users if they begin to fall—without requiring them to wear any equipment or harnesses.

“Many older adults underestimate the risk of fall and refuse to use physical aids, which are cumbersome, while others overestimate the risk and may not exercise, leading to declining mobility,” said Harry Asada, the Ford Professor of Engineering at MIT, in a media statement. “Our design concept is to provide older adults having balance impairment with robotic handlebars for stabilizing their body. The handlebars go anywhere and provide support anytime, whenever they need.”

The robot consists of a heavy, 220-pound base equipped with omnidirectional wheels, allowing it to maneuver easily through typical home spaces. From its base, articulated bars extend and adjust to assist users in standing or sitting, and the handlebars provide a natural, unrestrictive grip. In testing, E-BAR successfully helped an older adult complete everyday movements such as bending, reaching, and even stepping over the edge of a bathtub.

“Seeing the technology used in real-life scenarios is really exciting,” said Bolli.

The team’s design, which will be presented later this month at the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), aims to eliminate the physical constraints and stigmas often associated with eldercare devices. Their approach prioritizes both independence and safety—key values for aging Americans seeking to remain in their homes longer.

While E-BAR currently operates via remote control, the team plans to add autonomous capabilities and streamline the device’s design for home and facility use. The researchers are also exploring ways to integrate fall-prediction algorithms, developed in a parallel project in Asada’s lab, to adapt robotic responses based on a user’s real-time risk level.

“Eldercare conditions can change every few weeks or months,” Asada noted. “We’d like to provide continuous and seamless support as a person’s disability or mobility changes with age.”

As the nation prepares for the realities of an aging population, MIT’s work offers a glimpse into a future where robotics play a central role in eldercare—enhancing both quality of life and personal dignity for millions of older adults.

Continue Reading

Society

Young Indian Innovator Wins Global Scholarship for Breakthrough Solar Technology

The Solar Mech Engine is more than a student project—it represents a scalable clean-energy solution that aligns with global sustainability goals

Published

on

Japteg Singh Bamrah and his Mentor, Dr. Nasir Ul Rasheed, demonstrating the Solar Mech Engine project. Image: PIB

In a landmark moment for Indian innovation, 17-year-old Japteg Singh Bamrah, a Class 12 student at Dalhousie Public School, has won the prestigious HonorsGradU 2025 Scholarship, earning global recognition for his sustainable energy innovation—the Solar Mech Engine.

Bamrah is one of just five winners worldwide of the “Build a Better Future” Award, organized by U.S.-based nonprofit Honors Graduation. The scholarship program celebrates student-led projects that aim to solve real-world challenges with innovation and impact. Japteg’s Solar Mech Engine was recognized as the top technology entry among thousands of global submissions.

“This is a proud moment not just for me, but for India and young innovators everywhere,” said Japteg in a press statement.

Under the mentorship of Dr. Nasir Ul Rasheed, Senior Scientist at CSIR-Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine (IIIM), Jammu, Japteg developed his project through the CSIR Jigyasa Hackathon initiative—an effort to nurture grassroots science and innovation in school students. The Solar Mech Engine, which also clinched top honours at the Jigyasa Hackathon 2024, operates as a standalone solar thermal system based on Concentrated Heat and Power (CHP) technology.

The innovation harnesses the principles of air expansion and contraction due to temperature changes to convert solar heat into mechanical energy. It features a low-resistance generator that uses electromagnetic induction for direct mechanical-to-electrical energy conversion. What makes it particularly unique is its reversible heat pump capability, allowing it to both generate and store energy with high efficiency.

Japteg showcased his invention at the National Startup Festival held at CSIR-IIIM Jammu in February 2025, where he presented the Solar Mech Engine to Dr. Jitendra Singh, Union Minister of Science and Technology and Vice President of CSIR. Dr. Singh lauded the project as a shining example of India’s Start-Up India, Stand-Up India mission, stating, “It’s innovations like these that embody the spirit of self-reliance and technological progress envisioned by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.”

“This achievement breaks new ground. Japteg is the first and only student from India to top this global competition since its inception in 2012,” said Dr. Rasheed in a press statement. “It highlights the untapped potential of young minds when given the right support and opportunities.”

As part of his award, Japteg receives a $10,000 scholarship toward his undergraduate studies in the United States and an additional $5,000 to further develop and scale his invention. With offers from more than ten leading universities across the U.S., Australia, and Canada—and additional scholarships totaling $16,000 per year—Japteg is now preparing for the next phase of his academic journey.

The Solar Mech Engine is more than a student project—it represents a scalable clean-energy solution that aligns with global sustainability goals. CSIR-IIIM’s backing underscores the importance of institutional support in converting youthful ideas into transformative technologies.

With a total grant package of $31,000, Japteg Singh Bamrah is poised to take his innovation to the next level while pursuing his education at a top international university. His journey from a school laboratory in Himachal Pradesh to the global stage is a testament to the power of curiosity, mentorship, and vision in building a better, greener future.

Continue Reading

Trending