The Indian Institute of Science (IISc), today a global leader in scientific research, and India’s top-ranked higher education institution, owes its origin to a confluence of visionary ideas and unwavering dedication to national progress. While the name of eminent industrialist Jamsetji Tata often stands at the forefront of the institute’s establishment, two lesser-known figures played pivotal roles in shaping its foundations: Swami Vivekananda, a revolutionary Indian spiritual leader the world has ever seen, and his most loyal disciple Sister Nivedita. Their influence not only propelled the institution’s creation but also laid the groundwork for India’s self-reliance in science and technology.

The Visionary Dialogue: Swami Vivekananda and Jamsetji Tata

In the summer of 1893, two individuals—both from vastly different walks of life—found themselves sharing a ship journey from Japan to Canada. One was Swami Vivekananda, a 30-year-old monk, unknown to the world but filled with boundless energy and deep wisdom; the other was Jamsetji Tata, a prominent industrialist with a forward-thinking vision for India’s economic future. Their discussions during this journey would have a profound impact on the future of Indian science.

Swami Vivekananda, a leader whose brilliance and eloquence were so exceptional that even a Western leader could not come close to him at that time, passionately spoke of India’s potential to transition from merely trading raw materials to manufacturing its own goods. He emphasized the need for scientific and technological education to fulfill the country’s needs and help it become self-sufficient. He envisioned India not just as a land of spirituality, but as a land of innovation, equipped to face the challenges of a rapidly modernizing world.

Tata, already an influential figure in India’s industrial landscape, was deeply moved by Vivekananda’s ideas. Although the monk’s vision was far-reaching and idealistic, Tata recognized its importance and resolved to act upon it. This was the beginning of Tata’s long-standing commitment to the advancement of science in India.

Tata sought Vivekananda’s guidance to create a place where India’s spiritual ascetics could devote themselves to the advancement of science and technology.

The Seed of an Institution: Tata’s Pledge and Vivekananda’s Guidance

In 1898, five years after their first meeting, Tata wrote to Swami Vivekananda, after the latter’s much-celebrated and adored foreign trips that rocked the West, recalling their conversation on the ship. In his letter, Tata spoke of his vision for a research institute that would combine scientific research with the development of India’s humanistic traditions. Tata committed a substantial sum—200,000 pounds sterling (about INR 30 lakh at the time)—to establish a research institute that would focus on solving problems related to tropical diseases, Indian history, and the nation’s neglected scientific fields. Tata sought Vivekananda’s guidance to create a place where India’s spiritual ascetics could devote themselves to the advancement of science and technology.

“I trust you remember me as a fellow-traveller on your voyage from Japan to Chicago. I very much recall at this moment your views on the growth of the ascetic spirit in India, and the duty, not of destroying, but of diverting it into useful channels.

I recall these ideas in connection with my scheme of a Research Institute of Science for India, of which you have doubtless heard or read. It seems to me that no better use can be made of the ascetic spirit than the establishment of monasteries or residential halls for men dominated by this spirit, where they should live with ordinary decency, and devote their lives to the cultivation of sciences – natural and humanistic. I am of opinion that if such a crusade in favour of an asceticism of this kind were undertaken by a competent leader, it would greatly help asceticism, science, and the good name of our common country; and I know not who would make a more fitting general of such a campaign than Vivekananda,” Tata wrote in the letter.

In his reply letter, Vivekananda said (which was published in the April 1899 issue of Prabuddha Bharata, a monthly magazine started by Vivekananda), “We are not aware if any project at once so opportune and so far-reaching in its beneficent effects was ever mooted in India, as that of the post-graduate research university of Mr. Tata. The scheme grasps the vital point of weakness in our national well-being with a clearness of vision and tightness of grip, the masterliness of which is only equalled by the munificence of the gift with which it is ushered to the public.

It is needless to go into the details of Mr. Tata’s scheme here. Every one of our readers must have read Mr. Padsha’s lucid exposition of them. We shall try to simply state here the underlying principle of it. If India is to live and prosper and if there is to be an Indian nation which will have its place in the ranks of the great nations of the world, the food question must be solved first of all. And in these days of keen competition, it can only be solved by letting the light of modern science penetrate every pore of the two giant feeders of mankind: agriculture and commerce.”

While Swami Vivekananda could not directly lead the initiative due to his responsibilities with his monastic order, he wholeheartedly supported Tata’s vision. He encouraged his disciples to take the project forward, though he could not dedicate his time to its realization.

Sister Nivedita: A Tireless Advocate for Science and Self-Reliance

Swami Vivekananda’s disciple, Sister Nivedita, emerged as a crucial figure in the realization of Tata’s vision. Nivedita, who was deeply committed to India’s intellectual and cultural revival, took it upon herself to champion the cause of the research institute. Her writings in various English-language newspapers were instrumental in rallying public support for the project. In 1899, Nivedita wrote:

“We are not aware if any project is at once so opportune and so far-reaching in its beneficent effects as that of the Post-Graduate Research University of Mr. Tata. The scheme grasps the vital point of weakness in our national well-being with a clearness of vision and tightness of grip.”

Her powerful advocacy helped keep the vision alive despite challenges from the British colonial administration. Nivedita’s activism, coupled with her close relationship with prominent international thinkers, played a significant role in generating support for Tata’s ambitious plan.

Resistance and Struggle: The British Roadblocks

Despite Tata’s substantial pledge and Nivedita’s advocacy, the British establishment was initially unsupportive of the idea. When Tata presented the idea to Lord Curzon, the Viceroy of India, Curzon dismissed it as unfeasible. He doubted that Indians had the capacity for scientific research and questioned whether an institute focused on both science and humanities could succeed. Even after Tata met the Viceroy’s skepticism with steadfast commitment, the project was stalled.

The British colonial officials’ resistance continued when Sir William Ramsay, a well-known scientist, was appointed to inquire into Tata’s proposal. Ramsay, though a Nobel laureate in Chemistry, failed to transcend colonial biases. He rejected the idea, citing the improbability of blending scientific research with humanities. Despite the setbacks, Sister Nivedita refused to let the vision fade. While in London, she lobbied influential figures such as William James, the renowned American philosopher, and Patrick Geddes, a Scottish intellectual. Their advocacy bolstered the project’s credibility, with James even emphasizing that the institution should be managed entirely on national lines, free from government control.

The Final Approval: The Indian Institute of Science

Tragedy struck when Jamsetji Tata passed away in 1904, two years after Swami Vivekananda’s death. However, Tata’s dream was eventually realized after his death, when Lord Minto, the Viceroy who succeeded Lord Curzon, finally approved the proposal in 1909. The institute was originally intended to be located in Bombay, but it was ultimately established in Bangalore, thanks to the generous gift of 370 acres from the Maharaja of Mysore, Krishnaraj Wadiyar, who had been a devoted disciple of Vivekananda. His father H.H. Chamaraja Wadiyar, had been a staunch follower of Vivekananda and was greatly involved in sending him to the West.

The institute went on to become the intellectual backbone for a host of specialized institutions in India, including the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research and the Indian Institutes of Technology.

Unrecognized Contributions: The Role of Swami Vivekananda and Sister Nivedita

While Jamsetji Tata’s name is forever associated with the IISc, the contributions of Swami Vivekananda and Sister Nivedita are often overlooked. Vivekananda’s ideas on channeling India’s spiritual energy towards practical, scientific advancement laid the ideological foundation for the institute. Sister Nivedita’s tireless advocacy ensured that Tata’s vision remained alive, even in the face of intense opposition.

Today, the IISc stands as a testament to the dreams of these extraordinary individuals—visionaries who understood the critical link between scientific progress and national self-reliance. While the world remembers Tata for his industrial foresight, it is important to recognize the role played by Vivekananda and Nivedita in laying the intellectual and spiritual groundwork for what would become India’s premier scientific institution. Their legacy continues to inspire generations of scientists, educators, and thinkers in India and beyond.

The ideas of Swami Vivekananda were clear and unwavering. Freedom and reason were their essence. That was reflected in the case of the IISc. He consistently taught the eternal principles of Dharma, and that was their core. In the verse “Yukthiyuktham vachograhhyam balaadapi shukaadapi, Ayukthamaapi na graahhyam saakshaadapi Brihaspathe”, lies the foundation of Indian epistemology. Rational matters can be accepted from anyone, even from a child or a parrot. However, irrational ideas, no matter how great the person who presents them, must not be accepted. This stands in opposition to all forms of blind belief. Therefore, a philosophy based on authoritarianism cannot claim to be the legacy of Swami Vivekananda. Neither can a dogmatic “Ism” rooted in a singular intellect be aligned with his vision. Swami believed that freedom is the soul of India and indeed, of humans. Its dependence is solely on itself.

India Health Minister J P Nadda on Friday inaugurated the new campus of the School of Advanced Studies, S-VYASA University, an institution dedicated to advancing traditional Indian knowledge systems alongside modern education. The new campus is located in Bengaluru, the capital city of South Indian state Karnataka, and a celebrated technology hub. The Minister also launched two significant initiatives—DIGI-Vyasa and Vyasa TV.

S-VYASA, a deemed to be university, is renowned for its emphasis on integrating holistic wellness with academic excellence. The institution focuses on areas such as Yoga, Naturopathy, and Ayurveda, offering an education model that blends ancient practices with modern scientific approaches. The newly inaugurated campus is designed to offer specialized programs in Engineering, Computer Applications, and Management, all while incorporating Yoga and holistic development into the curriculum.

Speaking at the event, Nadda highlighted the government’s commitment to a more integrated healthcare system. “Our visionary Prime Minister Narendra Modi has brought about a significant policy shift in healthcare to ensure that the health system is both holistic and comprehensive,” Nadda said. He further emphasized that efforts are underway to merge the AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy) system with modern medicine for better healthcare outcomes.

The Minister also pointed to the country’s growing healthcare infrastructure, noting that India now boasts 22 All India Institutes of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), each with an AYUSH block. “A collaborative approach has been adopted, where modern medicine practitioners refer patients to AYUSH treatments when deemed beneficial, and vice versa,” he explained, underscoring the synergy between both systems for enhanced patient care.

Nadda also drew attention to the Ministry of AYUSH’s international collaborations, which now span 103 countries. He further highlighted the establishment of the WHO-recognized Global Traditional Medicine Centre in Jamnagar, Gujarat. This center is set to become the world’s leading hub for traditional medicine studies and innovations, he added.

The launch of the new S-VYASA campus and its initiatives reflects a continued push toward modernizing education while staying rooted in India’s rich cultural heritage. The institution’s tagline, “Education Meets Industry,” emphasizes its mission to bridge the gap between academia and real-world applications, fostering a transformative learning environment for its students.

The new campus is expected to be a hub for cutting-edge education, industry collaboration, and technological innovation, making it a vital part of India’s growing landscape of holistic education and healthcare.

What does the reality of our oceans look like today? Plastic pollution. Do we go to the beach without ever noticing a plastic bottle or plastic waste amidst the beauty of the waves and the vast sea? Or have we lost sight of nature’s true state, consumed by the exploitation we have allowed? It’s time we took a moment to reflect.

Today, one of the biggest challenges facing our oceans is plastic pollution. Since 2018, the world has produced 359 million metric tons of plastic. According to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), approximately 400 million tons of plastic waste are generated annually, with around 36% used for packaging—much of which ends up in landfills. In India alone, around 3.3 million metric tons of plastic waste is generated each year. And a large portion of this, approximately 8 million metric tons, ends up in the oceans annually.

Currently, our oceans are home to about 5.25 trillion plastic items, weighing a staggering 268,940 tons. By 2050, it is projected that there will be more plastic in the oceans than fish, according to a 2016 report presented at the World Economic Forum.

Disaster in the Deep Blue

Why is plastic waste so widespread in our oceans? As we walk along the beach, enjoying the beauty of the waves and the endless blue horizon, have we ever stopped to think about the plastic we might be overlooking? Beneath the surface, our oceans now hold vast quantities of plastic waste that are invisible to the naked eye, often carried by rivers or discarded carelessly by humans.

The plastic waste that litters the oceans consists of both macroplastics (larger objects such as bags and bottles) and microplastics (tiny particles that result from the breakdown of larger plastics). These microplastics, often less than 5 millimeters in size, are created as a result of exposure to sunlight, wave action, and other environmental factors. Even though these particles become so small, they do not disappear completely from the marine ecosystem.

Plastic waste, whether it’s a discarded plastic bottle, fishing gear, or other synthetic materials, poses a major threat to marine life. Marine creatures consume plastic debris, mistaking it for food, and suffer from serious health consequences. The damage is not limited to marine organisms; human beings are also at risk, as the toxic chemicals in plastics enter the food chain.

The Ecological and Economic Impact

The consequences of plastic pollution are far-reaching. For marine ecosystems, plastics lead to habitat destruction, toxic contamination, and loss of biodiversity. For humans, plastic waste affects fisheries, tourism, and coastal economies. Plastic waste also disrupts the functioning of marine ecosystems, which are essential for regulating the climate and providing food and oxygen for life on Earth.

Plastic debris floating on the water’s surface or sinking to the ocean floor threatens marine navigation and ship safety as well. The potential for harm is vast, and addressing the problem is crucial to preserving the future of our oceans.

Why Are We Still Struggling to Tackle Ocean Pollution?

Even as millions of tons of plastic waste flow into the oceans every year, why is there still no effective response to this environmental crisis? One reason is the lack of comprehensive research and detailed studies on the extent of microplastic pollution and its long-term impact on marine ecosystems. To understand the scale of the problem, we need to know how much waste is accumulating in the oceans and where the most significant concentrations are.

While commercial vessels and research ships have gathered some data, using plankton nets to collect ocean samples, this method only covers a small fraction of the vast oceans. The challenge is that the sheer size of the oceans makes it nearly impossible to assess the full scale of plastic pollution using current techniques. Moreover, long-term data on how plastic waste is changing over time is still limited.

The Impact of Plastic on Marine Life and Human Health

The effects of plastic pollution on marine life are devastating. Fish, birds, and other marine creatures often mistake plastic debris for food, leading to ingestion, which can be fatal. Some animals become entangled in fishing nets or plastic packaging, restricting their movement and leading to death. Even more concerning is the potential for toxic chemicals from plastics to enter the food chain, eventually reaching humans.

Moreover, plastic waste that floats on the surface or sinks to the bottom of the ocean poses a threat to navigation and shipping, making it difficult for vessels to safely navigate through affected areas. As plastics degrade over time, they release harmful chemicals into the water, further exacerbating the environmental damage.

Using Satellites to Track Plastic Waste

Understanding the extent and movement of plastic waste in the oceans is key to mitigating its impacts. Researchers at the University of Michigan once proposed an innovative solution by leveraging satellite data to monitor plastic pollution. NASA’s Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System (CYGNSS), launched in 2016, has been used to track microplastics in the ocean, helping scientists better understand their location and movement. The research conducted by the University of Michigan on using NASA’s satellite data to monitor and track plastic waste in the oceans was published in 2020.

This method utilizes radar to measure surface roughness, which can indicate the presence of plastic debris. Since microplastics tend to float on the ocean surface and are influenced by wind patterns, this system can help identify areas with high concentrations of plastics, allowing for more effective cleanup efforts.

Satellites that record wind speed can also detect changes in the distribution of microplastics. Through satellite imagery, researchers have observed that plastic pollution in the northern hemisphere’s oceans peaks during the summer months, while in the southern hemisphere, it rises during January and February. This data offers critical insights into seasonal changes in plastic distribution and can guide future cleanup operations.

Researchers have also used satellite data to monitor pollution flowing from rivers, such as those in China’s Yangtze River, and how it affects nearby ocean regions. This type of research can be crucial in understanding how industrial growth and population density contribute to increasing plastic waste.

Satellite Data for Cleanup Efforts

One of the key benefits of satellite-based research is its potential to aid ocean cleanup organizations. By identifying areas with high concentrations of plastic, cleanup operations can be more focused and efficient. These organizations can deploy specialized vessels equipped to collect and recycle plastic debris, significantly reducing waste in targeted regions.

However, the relationship between ocean surface roughness and microplastic concentrations is still under study. While the researchers have observed a pattern, they caution that the link may not always be direct. Other factors, such as surfactants in the water, could also be influencing surface conditions, so more research is needed.

The use of satellite-based systems like CYGNSS is still a developing area of study, and researchers are continuing to improve the accuracy of detecting microplastics and understanding the seasonal variations of their distribution

As of now, the research has shown promising results, but the methodology is still under refinement. The findings have been used to create maps identifying regions with high levels of microplastics. These maps are helping organizations and cleanup efforts focus their resources more efficiently.The use of satellite-based systems like CYGNSS is still a developing area of study, and researchers are continuing to improve the accuracy of detecting microplastics and understanding the seasonal variations of their distribution. Researchers are also working on refining cleanup technologies based on this satellite data to increase their effectiveness in addressing plastic pollution.

Time to Address Ocean Pollution

Plastic pollution is a growing threat, and the time to act is now. Governments, industries, and individuals all have a role to play in reducing plastic waste and preventing further harm to our oceans. Stronger regulations on plastic production and disposal, increased public awareness, and innovation in biodegradable materials are all part of the solution.

As we continue to confront this crisis, it is essential that we understand the full extent of plastic pollution in our oceans, track its impact on marine ecosystems, and work toward sustainable solutions that protect the environment for future generations. The health of our oceans is directly tied to the health of our planet—and it is up to all of us to make a difference.

It’s easy to overlook the plastic waste scattered on our beaches or floating in the ocean. But the reality is clear: plastic pollution is suffocating our oceans and destroying marine life. As we continue to pollute, we risk not only the health of our oceans but also the survival of countless species, including our own. It is time to take action before the waves of plastic drown the beauty of the seas we cherish.